ENERGY OF ELECTRIC CHARGE RADIATION AND ITS EFFECTS

It is believed that an electric charge moving along a circular path, i.e. with centripetal acceleration, it is necessary to emit electromagnetic waves. This applies, inter alia, to cyclotron radiation. The purpose of the work is to establish the conditions for the radiation of an electric charge, based on the significant differences between its tangential and centripetal accelerations. The relevance of the work is determined by the widespread use of devices that generate electromagnetic radiation due to the acceleration of electric charges, including X-ray units and magnetrons. The starting point is a credible statement. A number of mathematically correct transformations are performed with it. Therefore, the result is necessarily reliable. Sad experience shows that this logic is not available for many specialists. In the event that such a necessary reliable result contradicts the existing paradigm, preference is almost always given to the paradigm, regardless of the persuasiveness of the evidence. This circumstance is an almost insurmountable obstacle to obtaining new knowledge. After all, if it does not contradict the paradigm, then it is not new and does not represent any value. Electromagnetic radiation carries away energy. It follows from this that the energy of the radiating system changes during radiation. Associated with this is the well-known rule: the change in energy is equal to the perfect work. Four theorems are proved. Theorem 1. A tangentially accelerated charge emits electromagnetic waves. Theorem 2. A normally accelerated charge does not emit electromagnetic waves. Theorem 2 formalizes a circumstance well-known in mechanics that the centripetal force does not perform work (since the scalar product of orthogonal vectors must be zero). Theorem 3. Electric charge satisfies Newton's second law. When a hydrogen-like atom passes from one stationary state to another, the orbital angular momentum changes. The difference is attributed to a photon and is called the photon's spin. Theorem 4. The spin of a photon is zero. The defect in the angular momentum of an atom during radiation can easily be attributed to the nucleus of an atom and even to an electron.

Radiation reaction from quantum electrodynamics and its implications for the Unruh effect

The Abraham–Lorentz–Dirac theory predicts vanishing radiation reaction for uniformly accelerated charges. However, since an accelerating observer should detect thermal radiation, the charge should be seen absorbing photons in the accelerated frame which, if nothing else occurs, would influence its motion. This means that either there is radiation reaction seen in an inertial frame or there should be an additional phenomenon seen in the accelerated frame countering the effect of absorption. In this paper I rederive the Abraham–Lorentz–Dirac force from quantum electrodynamics, then I study the case of a uniformly accelerated charge. I show that in the accelerated frame, in addition to the absorption of photons due to the Unruh effect there should also be stimulated emission. The net effect of these phenomena on the motion of the charge is found to be zero.

Directional charge delocalization dynamics in semiconducting 2H-MoS$$_{2}$$ and metallic 1T-Li$$_{\mathrm{x}}$$MoS$$_{2}$$

The layered dichalcogenide MoS$$_{2}$$ 2 is relevant for electrochemical Li adsorption/intercalation, in the course of which the material undergoes a concomitant structural phase transition from semiconducting 2H-MoS$$_{2}$$ 2 to metallic 1T-Li$$_{\mathrm{x}}$$ x MoS$$_{2}$$ 2 . With the core hole clock approach at the S L$$_{1}$$ 1 X-ray absorption edge we quantify the ultrafast directional charge transfer of excited S3p electrons in-plane ($$\parallel$$ ‖ ) and out-of-plane ($$\perp$$ ⊥ ) for 2H-MoS$$_{2}$$ 2 as $$\tau _{2H,\parallel } = 0.38 \pm 0.08$$ τ 2 H , ‖ = 0.38 ± 0.08 fs and $$\tau _{2H,\perp } = 0.33 \pm 0.06$$ τ 2 H , ⊥ = 0.33 ± 0.06 fs and for 1T-Li$$_{\mathrm{x}}$$ x MoS$$_{2}$$ 2 as $$\tau _{1T,\parallel } = 0.32 \pm 0.12$$ τ 1 T , ‖ = 0.32 ± 0.12 fs and $$\tau _{1T,\perp } = 0.09 \pm 0.07$$ τ 1 T , ⊥ = 0.09 ± 0.07 fs. The isotropic charge delocalization of S3p electrons in the semiconducting 2H phase within the S-Mo-S sheets is assigned to the specific symmetry of the Mo-S bonding arrangement. Formation of 1T-Li$$_{\mathrm{x}}$$ x MoS$$_{2}$$ 2 by lithiation accelerates the in-plane charge transfer by a factor of $$\sim 1.2$$ ∼ 1.2 due to electron injection to the Mo-S covalent bonds and concomitant structural repositioning of S atoms within the S-Mo-S sheets. For excitation into out-of-plane orbitals, an accelerated charge transfer by a factor of $$\sim 3.7$$ ∼ 3.7 upon lithiation occurs due to S-Li coupling.