Nanomedicine-designed tumor blockade treatment (TVBT) approaches include angiogenesis suppression, vascular disruption, and infarction. VEGF, VEGFR, mTOR, EGFR, bFGF, ROS and other components have become promising candidates for angiogenesis reduction. The system of nanomedicine successfully reduced tumor neovascularization employing silencing, chemotherapy, phototherapy, and other treatments. Nanomaterial-led VDAs were bonded with bonding sites of CA4, COL, PTX, and other microtubular medications to promote rapid disintegration of tumor vascular wall cells. Multiple therapies combined substantially boosted tumor therapeutic outcome. For example, loss of tumor blood arteries caused by nanoparticle-mediated physical methods coupled with chemotherapy was successful in a large-volume tumor model. Several carriers, including nanoparticles, DNA nanorobot, platelet membrane, and so on, are used to carry thrombin, tTF, and other drugs for local thrombosis and safe and efficient tumor treatment.Nanomedicine-involved TVBT still has significant drawbacks. First, basic TVBT has tumor edge residual tumor cells (Tozer, Kanthou, & Baguley, 2005). While customized nanoparticles significantly increase anti-tumor medication efficacy while avoiding resistance and severe side effects, combination treatment is an appropriate treatment strategy. Multiple treatment methods should be extensively examined when establishing a combination therapy approach. For example, nanomedicine chemotherapy has a high tumor peripheral lethality, but the permeability is limited, resulting in insufficient tumor core efficacy. Researchers may build nanoscale drug-loading devices targeting tumor peripheral and tumor blood arteries to deliver multiple medications to different places for more complete tumor treatment. Second, the worry about pharmaceutical safety can not be overlooked, since free agents exhibited detrimental effects in earlier clinical trials. Although delivery of nanoparticles has proven remarkable safety in animal models, complete examination of side effects is still needed, which will need rigorous preclinical and clinical investigations. Furthermore, the toxicity of nanomaterials or leftover compounds from the preparation process should be fully investigated. Third, although VDAs and thrombosis can rapidly eliminate large-scale tumor cells, necrotic cells' released toxic components are a serious potential problem. Using customized nanoparticles to eliminate harmful components and maintain neighboring tissues is therefore crucial. Fourth, certain nanomaterials are complex and difficult to mass-produce. Additionally, raw materials are expensive and well-accessible. In response to these difficulties, structures of nanoparticles must be logically constructed and simple, efficient nanoplatforms built. More shortcomings should be identified and rectified in future investigations.