Corrigendum

The Editor-in-Chief has been informed that in the article ?Comparisons of Quantemol and Morgan LXCat cross section sets for electron-neutral scattering and rate-coefficients: helium and water?, FACTA UNIVERSITATIS, Series Physics, Chemistry and Technology Vol. 17, No 2, 2019, pp. 145-159, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/FUPCT1902145M, the cross sections for electron-impact excitation of helium in Figure 1b) are wrongly presented. The values of the cross section in the ordinate axis are marked in the interval from 10-1 to 101 (in units 10-16 cm2), and should be from 10-2 to 100. We apologize for that oversight. After further discussion with the corresponding author, the Editor-in-Chief has decided to publish a corrigendum with corrected Figure 1. Link to the corrected article: https://doi.org/10.2298/FUPCT1902145M <br><br><font color="red"><b> Link to the corrected article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FUPCT1902145M">10.2298/FUPCT1902145M</a></b></u>

Correction to: Detecting social media users based on pedestrian networks and neighborhood attributes: an observational study

Following publication of the original article [1], the author reported that figure 5 numbered correction was not implemented during the production process. The corrected figure can be found below.

Correction to: Real‑world experience with dalbavancin therapy in gram‑positive skin and soft tissue infection, bone and joint infection

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The presentation of Fig. 1 was incorrect. The corrected figure is given below.

Correction to: Contour analysis for interpretable leaf shape category discovery

Unfortunately, the original version of the article [1] contained an error in figure 7. The names of species Umus minor and Acer campestre were interchanged. The corrected figure 7 is given below:

Correction to: FAK-ERK activation in cell/matrix adhesion induced by the loss of apolipoprotein E stimulates the malignant progression of ovarian cancer

In the original publication of this manuscript [1], Fig. 5E lower panel was incorrect due to an error in the preparation of these figures for publication. It was noticed that in the lower panel of Fig. 5E, one mouse image of ApoE−/− + PBS group (upper) was a photograph coming from ApoE−/− + BAPN pre-treatment group (lower). The corrected figure appears below. We apologize for any confusion this may have caused.