Quality prescribing in early psychosis: key pharmacotherapy principles

Objective: To present a practical, easy-to-implement clinical framework designed to support evidence-based quality prescribing for people with early psychosis. Method: Identification and explanation of key principles relating to evidence-based pharmacotherapy for people with early psychosis. These were derived from the literature, practice guidelines and clinical experience. Results: Key principles include (1) medication choice informed by adverse effects; (2) metabolic monitoring at baseline and at regular intervals; (3) comprehensive and regular medication risk–benefit assessment and psychoeducation; (4) early consideration of long-acting injectable formulations (preferably driven by informed patient choice); (5) identification and treatment of comorbid mood disorders and (6) early consideration of clozapine when treatment refractory criteria are met. Conclusions: Current prescribing practices do not align with the well-established evidence for quality pharmacotherapy in early psychosis. Adopting evidence-based prescribing practices for people with early psychosis will improve outcomes.

How government health insurance coverage of novel anti-cancer medicines benefited patients in China – a retrospective analysis of hospital clinical data

Background China started to cover novel medicines for the treatment of major cancers, such as trastuzumab for breast cancer by the government health insurance programs since 2016. Limited data have been published on the use of cancer medications and little is known about how government health insurance coverage of novel anti-cancer medicines benefited patients in the real world. This study aimed to generate evidence to inform the health security authorities to optimize the government health insurance coverage of novel anti-cancer medicines as a more inclusive and equal policy, through which each of the needed patient can get access to the novel anti-cancer medicines regardless of the ability to pay. Methods The study targeted one of the government health insurance newly covered novel medicines for breast cancer and the breast cancer patients. The analyses were based on the data collected from one tertiary public hospital in Fujian province of China. We conducted interrupted time series analysis with a segmented regression model and multivariate analyses with a binary logistic regression model to analyze the impact of the government health insurance coverage on medicines utilization and the determinants of patient’s medication choice. Results The average proportion of patients who initiated medication with novel medicines increased from 37.4% before the government health insurance coverage to 69.2% afterwards. Such an increase was observed in all patient sub-groups. The monthly proportion of patients who initiated medication with novel medicines increased sharply by 18.3 % (95 %CI,10.4-34.0 %, p = 0.01) in September 2017, the afterwards trend continuously increased (95 %CI,1.03–3.60, p = 0.02). The critical determinants of patient's medication choice were mostly connected with the patient's health insurance benefits packages. Conclusions The government health insurance coverage of novel anti-breast-cancer medicines benefited the patients generally. The utilization of novel medicines such as trastuzumab continuously increased. The insurance coverage benefited well the patients in the high-risk age groups. However, rural patients, patients enrolled in the “resident program”, and patients from low-income residential areas and non-local patients benefited less from this policy. Improving the benefits package of the low-income patients and the “resident program” beneficiary would be of considerable significance for a more inclusive and equal health insurance coverage of novel anti-cancer medicines.

Patterns of antipsychotic prescribing in first episode psychosis – differences between acute and early intervention services

AimsThis study aimed to evaluate the patterns of antipsychotic prescribing in patients with first episode psychosis (FEP) at the time of their initial treatment and over the first year with the Early Intervention Service (EIS). It was hypothesised that different care teams would have a preference for certain antipsychotic medications and that initial medication choice would be continued through the first year.BackgroundResearch indicates that with the exception of clozapine, all antipsychotics are equally as effective. However, anecdotally it has been observed that inpatient and crisis teams and EIS have differing initial medication choices.MethodAn analysis of the North West Sussex EIS caseload (n = 67) was conducted. The first antipsychotic prescribed and initiating team was recorded. Prescribed medication for those that had completed 12 months (n = 43) with EIS after initial prescription was recorded. An analysis was performed of prescribing choice by initial care team (acute vs EIS vs other community services) with the frequency with which medication was changed during treatment.Result97% (n = 65) of patients were started on an antipsychotic. Initial medication choice was olanzapine (44.8%, n = 30), aripiprazole (22.4%, n = 15), risperidone (20.9%, n = 14), quetiapine (6%, n = 4) and zuclopenthixol were least common (1.5%, n = 2). At the 12 month point 51.2% (n = 22 of 43) had switched and 16.3% (n = 7 of 43) had discontinued.The most common medication started by acute services was olanzapine (56.0%, n = 28 of 50), though of those who completed 12 months this had been switched in 53% of cases (n = 9 of 17). EIS most commonly initiated aripiprazole or risperidone (37.5% each n = 4). At 6 and 12 month follow-up by EIS, the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic was aripiprazole (24 patients 40.7%, and 14 patients 32.6% respectively).ConclusionThere was a clear preference for olanzapine as initial treatment of First Episode of Psychosis in the region. On breakdown it was apparent that there was a split in prescribing choices between more sedating medication in acute services and less sedating medication in EIS. Given that most patients changed to less sedating and less metabolic active medications over their first year it is not clear why alternative options are not used at the start of treatment. Future research will focus on clinician's rationale for initial prescribing choice. This will look for any underlying bias toward specific medications.

Diabetes prescription patterns in Costa Rica and Panama among patients switching to a second-line medication. Evidence from the DISCOVER real-world diabetes registry.

Aims: to describe the prescriptions patters of second line medications in patients with diabetes in Costa Rica and Panama.Methods: DISCOVER is a registry of patients with type 2 diabetes that are switching from first- to second-line medications. We analyzed medication choice and reasons to switch by country. Results: 219 patients were included, 127 in Costa Rica and 92 in Panama. The most frequently prescribed first-line medication was metformin, followed by sulphonylureas in Panama and a combination of metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (iDPP4) in Costa Rica. DPP4 inhibitors plus metformin was the most commonly prescribed second line medication in both countries, followed by metformin combined with SGLT2 inhibitors in Costa Rica and iDPP4 in monotherapy in Panama. The main reason to switch was efficacy. When choosing the second-line medication, the main reasons were efficacy, weight loss, and hypoglycemia risk in both countries (tolerability was also common in Panama). Conclusions: In these two Latin American countries the main reason to switch to second line medication was efficacy and the most prescribed agent was metformin plus iDPP4.

Status Epilepticus—Work-Up and Management in Children

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies in children and has a mortality of 2 to 4%. Admissions for SE are very resource-consuming, especially in refractory and super-refractory SE. An increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of SE leaves room for improving SE treatment protocols, including medication choice and timing. Selecting the most efficacious medications and giving them in a timely manner may improve outcomes. Benzodiazepines are commonly used as first line and they can be used in the prehospital setting, where most SE episodes begin. The diagnostic work-up should start simultaneously to initial treatment, or as soon as possible, to detect potentially treatable causes of SE. Although most etiologies are recognized after the first evaluation, the detection of more unusual causes may become challenging in selected cases. SE is a life-threatening medical emergency in which prompt and efficacious treatment may improve outcomes. We provide a summary of existing evidence to guide clinical decisions regarding the work-up and treatment of SE in pediatric patients.

Outcomes and Practice Preferences After Endophthalmitis Following Anti-VEGF Intravitreal Injection

Purpose: This study examines treatment-based outcomes of endophthalmitis due to antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injection and its effect on subsequent management of neovascular disease. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted of 157 patients with a diagnosis of endophthalmitis following anti-VEGF intravitreal injection at 10 major ophthalmic centers. Results: The median number of injections before endophthalmitis was 10 (range, 1 to 84 injections). Initial treatment with tap and inject with or without subsequent vitrectomy trended toward smaller visual acuity changes from baseline (4 ETDRS [Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study] letter difference vs 19 ETDRS letter difference) compared with initial vitrectomy, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant change in medication choice among injections after endophthalmitis. There was a statistically significant shift away from regular interval (1- to 2-month) injections and a shift toward treat-and-extend and as-needed injection algorithms. Conclusions: The visual outcomes were not significantly different between patients who initially underwent tap and injection of antibiotics and those who underwent vitrectomy. There was no significant change in medication choice before and after endophthalmitis but there was a shift toward lower-frequency injection algorithms after postintravitreal injection endophthalmitis compared with prior.