323 Immunogenic syngeneic model MC38-OVA for the preclinical evaluation of immune evasion and checkpoint blockade

BackgroundThe development of immuno-oncology (I/O) therapeutics has revolutionized the cancer treatment landscape. Despite this achievement, the mechanism behind limited responses is poorly understood. Tumor immune evasion has been reported to arise through the loss of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling, interferon-γ (IFN-γ) signaling, and antigen presentation pathways, which are crucial to CD8+ T cell-mediated killing. Syngeneic mouse models have been widely used as they have an intact immune system, are easily accessible, and have a vast array of historical data for comparison. However, limited syngeneic models respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors, possibly due to low intrinsic immunogenicity. The expression of ovalbumin (OVA) has previously shown to sufficiently alter the susceptibility of syngeneic tumors to host T cell-mediated responses. In this study, the newly developed OVA-expressing MC38 syngeneic line was characterized for tumor immunity, checkpoint blockade response and response durability.MethodsMurine colon cancer MC38 cells were transduced by lentiviral vector with chicken OVA coding cDNA. A single clone was selected, and OVA expression was confirmed by western blot. The MC38-OVA cells were subcutaneously implanted into immunocompetent mice to evaluate the tumorigenicity and in vivo response to anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. Blood was collected 2 days post final dose of anti-PD-1 treatment for phenotypic analysis by FACS. Spleen and tumor draining lymph nodes were collected at termination for FACS analysis of IFN-γ+ T cells and OVA specific CD8+ T cells. Adoptive transfer was evaluated by challenge studies in both MC38-OVA and MC38 tumor-bearing mice with T cells derived from MC38-OVA mice, anti-PD-1 cured mice and OT-I mice. In vitro killing assays were performed to evaluate the function of adoptive CD3+ T cells transfer.ResultsOVA-expressing MC38 presented complete regression under anti-PD-1 treatment in vivo. T cell expansion was observed after anti-PD-1 treatment in peripheral blood with increased IFN-γ+ T cells in both tumor-draining lymph nodes and spleen. Additionally, anti-PD-1 cured mice generated robust tumor specific memory T cell, which successfully inhibited MC38-OVA and MC38 tumor growth following adoptive transfer. CD3+ T cells from MC38-OVA-bearing mice and OT-I mice showed anti-tumor immunity in vivo. In vitro killing assay demonstrated increased immunity.ConclusionsSyngeneic mouse tumor models are preferred preclinical models for I/O research, despite limited intrinsic immunogenicity. OVA expression in syngeneic tumors largely increased T cell-mediated immunity to enhance antigen-specific T cell responses during tumorigenesis, providing novel immunogenic models for preclinical immunotherapy evaluation.

Amplified antitumor efficacy by a targeted drug retention and chemosensitization strategy-based “combo” nanoagent together with PD-L1 blockade in reversing multidrug resistance

Background Recent studies have demonstrated that multidrug resistance (MDR) is a critical factor in the low efficacy of cancer chemotherapy. The main mechanism of MDR arises from the overexpression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which actively enhances drug efflux and limits the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents. Results In this study, we fabricated a “combo” nanoagent equipping with triple synergistic strategies for enhancing antitumor efficacy against MDR cells. Tumor homing-penetrating peptide endows the nanosystem with targeting and penetrating capabilities in the first stage of tumor internalization. The abundant amine groups of polyethylenimine (PEI)-modified nanoparticles then trigger a proton sponge effect to promote endo/lysosomal escape, which enhances the intracellular accumulation and retention of anticancer drugs. Furthermore, copper tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (CuTCPP) encapsulated in the nanosystem, effectively scavenges endogenous glutathione (GSH) to reduce the detoxification mediated by GSH and sensitize the cancer cells to drugs, while simultaneously serving as a photoacoustic imaging (PAI) contrast agent for image visualization. Moreover, we also verify that these versatile nanoparticles in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy can not only activate immunological responses but also inhibit P-gp expression to obliterate primary and metastatic tumors. Conclusion This work shows a significant enhancement in therapeutic efficacy against MDR cells and syngeneic tumors by using multiple MDR reversing strategies compared to an equivalent dose of free paclitaxel. Graphic Abstract

Amplified Antitumor Efficacy By A Targeted Drugs Retention and Chemosensitization Strategies-Based “Combo” Nanoagent Together With PD-L1 Blockade In Reversing Multidrug Resistance

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated that multidrug resistance (MDR) plays a critical role in the low efficiency of cancer chemotherapy. The main mechanism of MDR arises from the overexpression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which actively enhances drug efflux and limits the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents. Results: In this study, we fabricated a “combo” nanoagent equipped with triple synergistic strategies for enhancing antitumor efficacy against MDR cells. Tumor homing-penetrating peptide endows the nanosystem with targeting and penetrating capabilities in the first stage of tumor internalization. The abundant amine groups of polyethylenimine (PEI)-modified nanoparticles then trigger a proton sponge effect to promote endo/lysosomal escape that enhances the intracellular accumulation and retention of anticancer drugs. Furthermore, copper tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (CuTCPP) encapsulated in the nanosystem, effectively scavenges endogenous glutathione (GSH) to relieve the detoxification mediated by GSH and sensitize the cancer cells to drugs, while simultaneously serving as a photoacoustic imaging (PAI) contrast agent for image visualization. Moreover, we also verify that the versatile nanoparticles in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy can not only activate immunological responses but also inhibit P-gp expression to obliterate primary and metastatic tumor. Conclusion: This work shows a significant enhancement in therapeutic efficacy against MDR cells and syngeneic tumors compared to an equivalent dose of free paclitaxel by using multiple MDR reversing strategies.

Divergent immune landscapes of primary and syngeneic Kras-driven mouse tumor models

Immune cells play critical functions in cancer, and mice with intact immune systems are vital to understanding tumor immunology. Both genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) and syngeneic cell transplant approaches use immunocompetent mice to define immune-dependent events in tumor development and progression. Due to their rapid and reproducible nature, there is expanded interest in developing new syngeneic tools from established primary tumor models. However, few studies have examined the extent that syngeneic tumors reflect the immune profile of their originating primary models. Here, we describe comprehensive immunophenotyping of two well-established GEMMs and four new syngeneic models derived from these parental primary tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic analysis comparing immune landscapes between primary and orthotopic syngeneic tumors. These models all use the same well-defined human-relevant driver mutations, arise at identical orthotopic locations, and are generated in mice of the same background strain. This allows for a direct and focused comparison of tumor immune landscapes in carefully controlled mouse models. We identify key differences between the immune infiltrate of GEMM models and their corresponding syngeneic tumors. Most notable is the divergence of T cell populations, with different proportions of CD8+ T cells and regulatory T cells across several models. We also observe immune variation across syngeneic tumors derived from the same primary model. These findings highlight the importance of immune variance across mouse modeling approaches, which has strong implications for the design of rigorous and reproducible translational studies.

Heterogeneity of response to immune checkpoint blockade in hypermutated experimental gliomas

Intrinsic malignant brain tumors, such as glioblastomas are frequently resistant to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with few hypermutated glioblastomas showing response. Modeling patient-individual resistance is challenging due to the lack of predictive biomarkers and limited accessibility of tissue for serial biopsies. Here, we investigate resistance mechanisms to anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy in syngeneic hypermutated experimental gliomas and show a clear dichotomy and acquired immune heterogeneity in ICB-responder and non-responder tumors. We made use of this dichotomy to establish a radiomic signature predicting tumor regression after pseudoprogression induced by ICB therapy based on serial magnetic resonance imaging. We provide evidence that macrophage-driven ICB resistance is established by CD4 T cell suppression and Treg expansion in the tumor microenvironment via the PD-L1/PD-1/CD80 axis. These findings uncover an unexpected heterogeneity of response to ICB in strictly syngeneic tumors and provide a rationale for targeting PD-L1-expressing tumor-associated macrophages to overcome resistance to ICB.

Comparison of the molecular and cellular phenotypes of common mouse syngeneic models with human tumors

Background The clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrates that reactivation of the human immune system delivers durable responses for some patients and represents an exciting approach for cancer treatment. An important class of preclinical in vivo models for immuno-oncology is immunocompetent mice bearing mouse syngeneic tumors. To facilitate translation of preclinical studies into human, we characterized the genomic, transcriptomic, and protein expression of a panel of ten commonly used mouse tumor cell lines grown in vitro culture as well as in vivo tumors. Results Our studies identified a number of genetic and cellular phenotypic differences that distinguish commonly used mouse syngeneic models in our study from human cancers. Only a fraction of the somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in these common mouse cell lines directly match SNVs in human actionable cancer genes. Some models derived from epithelial tumors have a more mesenchymal phenotype with relatively low T-lymphocyte infiltration compared to the corresponding human cancers. CT26, a colon tumor model, had the highest immunogenicity and was the model most responsive to CTLA4 inhibitor treatment, by contrast to the relatively low immunogenicity and response rate to checkpoint inhibitor therapies in human colon cancers. Conclusions The relative immunogenicity of these ten syngeneic tumors does not resemble typical human tumors derived from the same tissue of origin. By characterizing the mouse syngeneic models and comparing with their human tumor counterparts, this study contributes to a framework that may help investigators select the model most relevant to study a particular immune-oncology mechanism, and may rationalize some of the challenges associated with translating preclinical findings to clinical studies.

Molecular and cellular phenotypic differences distinguish murine syngeneic models from human tumors

The clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors that target cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) demonstrates that reactivation of the human immune system delivers durable responses for some patients and represents an exciting approach for cancer treatment. The combination of multiple immunotherapies as well as the combination of immunotherapy with targeted therapy is being pursued vigorously to increase the rate and extend the duration of response. Preclinical in vivo models for immuno-oncology (IO) typically require immunocompetent mice bearing murine syngeneic tumors. To facilitate translation of preclinical studies into human, we characterized the genomic, transcriptomic, and protein expression of a panel of mouse tumor cell lines grown in vitro culture as well as in vivo tumor samples. Our studies identified many genetic and cellular phenotypic differences that distinguish murine syngeneic models from human cancers. For example, only a small fraction of the somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in mouse cell lines directly match SNVs from human actionable cancer genes. At the cellular level, some epithelial tumor models have a more mesenchymal phenotype with relatively low T-lymphocyte infiltration compared to the corresponding human cancers. Furthermore, in contrast to what has been reported for human tumors, we did not observe a correlation between neoantigen load and cytolytic activity in syngeneic models. Finally, the relative immunogenicity of syngeneic tumors does not typically resemble that of human tumors of the same tissue origin. CT26, a colon tumor model, had the highest immunogenicity and was the most responsive model to CTLA4 inhibitor treatment, by contrast to the relatively low immunogenicity and response rate to checkpoint inhibitor therapies in human colon cancers. These differences highlight limitations of syngeneic models for evaluating novel immune therapies and rationalize some of the challenges associated with translating preclinical findings to clinical studies.