scholarly journals The impact of symptom screening on survival among patients with cancer across varying levels of pre‐diagnosis psychiatric care

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinku Sutradhar ◽  
Qing Li ◽  
Paul Kurdyak ◽  
Lisa Barbera
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Symptom Screening ◽  
The Impact

Opioid Prescription After Pain Assessment: A Population-Based Cohort of Elderly Patients With Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1095-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Barbera ◽  
Hsien Seow ◽  
Amna Husain ◽  
Doris Howell ◽  
Clare Atzema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Symptom Screening ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this study was to measure opioid prescription (OP) rates in elderly cancer outpatients around the time of assessment for pain and to evaluate factors associated with receiving OPs for those with severe pain. Patients and Methods The cross-sectional cohort includes all patients with cancer in Ontario older than age 65 years who completed a pain assessment as part of a provincial initiative of systematic symptom screening. Patients were assigned to mutually exclusive categories by pain score severity: 0, 1 to 3 (mild), 4 to 6 (moderate), and 7 to 10 (severe). We linked multiple provincial health databases to examine the proportion of patients with an OP within 7 days after or 30 days before the assessment date. We examined factors associated with OPs for patients with pain scores of 7 to 10. Results The proportion of patients with an OP increased as pain score severity increased: 10% of those with no pain, 24% of those with mild pain, 45% of those with moderate pain, and 67% of those with severe pain. More specifically, for those with severe pain, 41% filled an OP within 7 days of assessment for pain, and 26% had an OP from the 30 days before assessment for pain, leaving 33% without an OP. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with OPs are younger age, male sex, comorbid illness, cancer type, and assessment at home. Conclusion Despite a generous time window for capturing OPs, the proportion of patients without an OP seems high. Further knowledge translation is required to maximize the impact of the symptom screening initiative in Ontario and to optimize management of cancer-related pain.

scholarly journals Feasibility and acceptability of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) or acupuncture for insomnia and related distress among cancer caregivers

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-647
Author(s):  
Allison J. Applebaum ◽  
Kara Buda ◽  
Michael A. Hoyt ◽  
Kelly Shaffer ◽  
Sheila Garland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Informal Caregivers ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Psychological Outcome ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Preliminary Support

AbstractObjectiveInsomnia is a common, distressing, and impairing psychological outcome experienced by informal caregivers (ICs) of patients with cancer. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and acupuncture both have known benefits for patients with cancer, but such benefits have yet to be evaluated among ICs. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of CBT-I and acupuncture among ICs with moderate or greater levels of insomnia.MethodParticipants were randomized to eight sessions of CBT-I or ten sessions of acupuncture.ResultsResults highlighted challenges of identifying interested and eligible ICs and the impact of perception of intervention on retention and likely ultimately outcome.Significance of the resultsFindings suggest preliminary support for non-pharmacological interventions to treat insomnia in ICs and emphasize the importance of matching treatment modality to the preferences and needs of ICs.

scholarly journals Polypharmacy and Malnutrition Management of Elderly Perioperative Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1961
Author(s):  
Eiji Kose ◽  
Hidetaka Wakabayashi ◽  
Nobuhiro Yasuno
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Cancer Cachexia ◽  
Drug Effects ◽  
Drug Efficacy ◽  
Nutritional Management ◽  
Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Anabolic Resistance ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
The Impact

Malnutrition, which commonly occurs in perioperative patients with cancer, leads to decreased muscle mass, hypoalbuminemia, and edema, thereby increasing the patient’s risk of various complications. Thus, the nutritional management of perioperative patients with cancer should be focused on to ensure that surgical treatment is safe and effective, postoperative complications are prevented, and mortality is reduced. Pathophysiological and drug-induced factors in elderly patients with cancer are associated with the risk of developing malnutrition. Pathophysiological factors include the effects of tumors, cachexia, and anorexia of aging. Metabolic changes, such as inflammation, excess catabolism, and anabolic resistance in patients with tumor-induced cancer alter the body’s ability to use essential nutrients. Drug-induced factors include the side effects of anticancer drugs and polypharmacy. Drug–drug, drug–disease, drug–nutrient, and drug–food interactions can significantly affect the patient’s nutritional status. Furthermore, malnutrition may affect pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, potentiate drug effects, and cause side effects. This review outlines polypharmacy and malnutrition, the impact of malnutrition on drug efficacy, drug–nutrient and drug–food interactions, and intervention effects on polypharmacy or cancer cachexia in elderly perioperative patients with cancer.

scholarly journals The impact of tramadol and dihydrocodeine treatment on quality of life of patients with cancer pain

2010 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 1681-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Leppert ◽  
M. Majkowicz
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals What is the impact of Specialist Palliative Care Outpatient Consultations’ on Pain in Adult Patients’ with cancer? A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 102034
Author(s):  
Liam Patton ◽  
Pinar Avsar ◽  
Dr Linda Nugent ◽  
Tom O’Connor ◽  
Declan Patton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
The Impact

Evolving oncology provider perspectives on care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18609-e18609
Author(s):  
Divya Ahuja Parikh ◽  
Meera Vimala Ragavan ◽  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Sarah Garrigues ◽  
Eben Lloyd Rosenthal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Provider Perspectives ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

e18609 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid changes in cancer care delivery. We sought to examine oncology provider perspectives on clinical decisions and care delivery during the pandemic and to compare provider views early versus late in the pandemic. Methods: We invited oncology providers, including attendings, trainees and advanced practice providers, to complete a cross-sectional online survey using a variety of outreach methods including social media (Twitter), email contacts, word of mouth and provider list-serves. We surveyed providers at two time points during the pandemic when the number of COVID-19 cases was rising in the United States, early (March 2020) and late (January 2021). The survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests to evaluate differences in early versus late provider responses. Results: A total of 132 providers completed the survey and most were white (n = 73/132, 55%) and younger than 49 years (n = 88/132, 67%). Respondents were attendings in medical, surgical or radiation oncology (n = 61/132, 46%), advanced practice providers (n = 48/132, 36%) and oncology fellows (n = 16/132, 12%) who predominantly practiced in an academic medical center (n = 120/132, 91%). The majority of providers agreed patients with cancer are at higher risk than other patients to be affected by COVID-19 (n = 121/132, 92%). However, there was a significant difference in the proportion of early versus late providers who thought delays in cancer care were needed. Early in the pandemic, providers were more likely to recommend delays in curative surgery or radiation for early-stage cancer (p < 0.001), delays in adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery (p = 0.002), or delays in surveillance imaging for metastatic cancer (p < 0.001). The majority of providers early in the pandemic responded that “reducing risk of a complication from a COVID-19 infection to patients with cancer” was the primary reason for recommending delays in care (n = 52/76, 68%). Late in the pandemic, however, providers were more likely to agree that “any practice change would have a negative impact on patient outcomes” (p = 0.003). At both time points, the majority of providers agreed with the need for other care delivery changes, including screening patients for infectious symptoms (n = 128/132, 98%) and the use of telemedicine (n = 114/132, 86%) during the pandemic. Conclusions: We found significant differences in provider perspectives of delays in cancer care early versus late in the pandemic which reflects the swiftly evolving oncology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of changes in treatment and care delivery on outcomes for patients with cancer.

Age affects the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2638-2638
Author(s):  
Yongjie Wang ◽  
Ronghua Yang ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
Donghua Zhao ◽  
Peng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Sign Test ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Effect Of Age

2638 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as programmed death(ligand)1 (PD-(L)1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, have dramatic effects on treatment in patients with various malignancies. High tumor mutation burden (TMB) is predictive of clinical response to ICI in multiple cancer types. Although age-related immune dysfunction might induce difference on the efficacy of ICIs between younger and older patients, the potential effect of age on the efficacy of ICIs remains little known and controversial. Herein, we aimed to analysis the association between age and the efficacy of ICIs based on MSKCC cohort. Methods: We screened out 1661 patients having complete information with advanced cancer, whose tumors underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) detection and who were treated with at least one dose of ICI in MSKCC cohort. All patients were divided into two groups according to age, the younger group (age ≤50-year old) and the older group (age > 50-year old). We further analyzed the differences in overall survival (OS) and TMB between the two groups. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via Cox regression model for OS and P-values were calculated via the Wilcoxon sign test for TMB. We analyzed the effect of age on ICI in lung cancer using the same way. Results: In 1661 patients with cancer in our study, 312 (19%) younger and 1349 (81%) older patients were found. The pooled HRs for OS was 1.28 (95% CI: 1.09-1.52) in younger group compared with older group. In 1661 patients with cancer, there was 350 (21%) patients with lung cancer, including 30 (9%) younger and 320 (91%) older patients. The pooled HRs for OS was 1.45 (95% CI: 0.95-2.23) in younger group compared with older group in lung cancer. In addition, TMB in older group was higher than in younger group and significant difference of TMB was found via the Wilcoxon sign test (p = 2.6e-10) between the two groups, especially in lung cancer (p = 1e-4). Conclusions: Our study assessed the impact of age on the efficacy of ICIs using the threshold of 50 years old for the first time and we founded that patients in older group had higher TMB and longer OS than younger group.

scholarly journals PCN75 THE IMPACT OF NEUTROPENIC COMPLICATIONS ON SHORT-TERM DISABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. A50
Author(s):  
X Song ◽  
R Fowler ◽  
K McGuffie ◽  
D Hurley ◽  
RL Barron
Keyword(s):  
Short Term ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Seroconversion rates following COVID-19 vaccination amongst patients with malignant disease- the impact of diagnosis and cancer-directed therapies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astha Thakkar ◽  
Jesus Gonzalez Lugo ◽  
Niyati Goradia ◽  
Radhika Gali ◽  
Lauren C. Shapiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Passive Immunization ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Post Vaccination ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Immunization Strategies ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Hormonal Therapies ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
The Impact

As COVID-19 has been shown to adversely affect patients with cancer, prophylactic strategies are critically needed. We determined the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination in a cohort of cancer patients that had received full dosing with one of the FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines. 201 oncology patients underwent anti-spike protein SARS-CoV-2 IgG testing post-vaccination and demonstrated a high rate of seroconversion (94%) overall. When compared to solid tumors (98%), a significantly lower rate of seroconversion was observed in patients with hematological malignancies (85%), particularly recipients of anti-CD20 therapies (70%) and stem cell transplantation (74%). Patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (97%) or hormonal therapies (100%) demonstrated high seroconversion post-vaccination. Patients with prior COVID-19 infection demonstrated higher anti-spike IgG titers post-vaccination. Relatively lower IgG titers were noted following vaccination with the adenoviral when compared to the mRNA-based vaccines. These data demonstrate generally high immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination in oncology patients and identify vulnerable cohorts that need novel vaccination or passive immunization strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document