scholarly journals Correlates of worry about recurrence in a multiethnic population-based sample of women with breast cancer

Cancer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (9) ◽  
pp. 1827-1836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy K. Janz ◽  
Sarah T. Hawley ◽  
Mahasin S. Mujahid ◽  
Jennifer J. Griggs ◽  
Amy Alderman ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
pp. 640-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apoorva Tewari ◽  
Anees B. Chagpar

As more patients with breast cancer survive treatment, the importance of their long-term quality of life is increasing. One important concern for many survivors is fear of recurrence. To better understand worry about recurrence, we conducted a population-based statistical analysis. The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is the largest annual source of health information for the U.S. population. We obtained data from the 2010 survey, which asked breast cancer survivors about their fear of recurrence and quality of life. Data were analyzed using SUDAAN software. The 2010 NHIS sample represented 2,668,697 breast cancer survivors. On univariate analysis, worry about recurrence was correlated with current age ( P = 0.03) and radiation therapy ( P = 0.04). Worry was strongly associated with perceived risk of recurrence ( P < 0.01) and decreased overall quality of life ( P < 0.01) as well as lower self-reported physical ( P < 0.01) and mental ( P < 0.01) health and poor satisfaction with social activities and relationships ( P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, worry was not independently associated with decreased quality of life ( P = 0.09). However, those who “always worried” about recurrence had a lower quality of life (odds ratio, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.45). Worry about recurrence among breast cancer survivors is associated with age and radiation therapy and is correlated with self-reported physical health, mental health, social relationships, and overall quality of life. It is a significant predictor of decreased quality of life in those who worry the most. Screening for worry about recurrence is an important measure for the improvement of quality of life among breast cancer survivors.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6615-6615
Author(s):  
Sarah T. Hawley ◽  
Ann S. Hamilton ◽  
John Graff ◽  
Steven J. Katz ◽  
Reshma Jagsi

6615 Background: Prior research suggests that receipt of genetic testing to assess risk of disease in patients or their families is not limited to those who meet high-risk criteria (i.e., diagnosed at young age &/or with strong family history). There is little research from large population-based samples describing patterns and correlates of genetic testing receipt or reasons why patients undergo testing. Methods: We surveyed 2290 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer reported to the Detroit & Los Angeles SEER registries from 6/05-2/07. We merged these data to SEER and re-surveyed them again approximately 4 years later (n=1536). The primary outcomes were patient reports of a strong desire for genetic testing, participation in a discussion about genetic testing, and receipt of genetic testing. We also evaluated patient reports of reasons for getting tested. We compared dependent and independent factors using chi-square tests and used logistic regression to evaluate correlates of each outcome. Results: One third (33.9%) reported a strong desire to be tested, of whom 54% discussed testing with a health professional, & 46% were tested. A strong desire to be tested was associated with younger age (F=32.03, P<0.001), minority race (F=62.5, P<0.001), family history of breast &/or ovarian cancer (F=18.5, P<0.001) and worry about recurrence (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3-2.6). Overall, 19.3% were tested. Test receipt was significantly associated with younger age (F=26.8, P<0.001), higher education (OR: 1.8; 95% CI:1.13-2.71), and family history (F=25.1, P<0.001). Of those tested, reasons included: physician recommendation (61.8%), wanting more information about one’s own health (51.8%), wanting more information for family (54.2%), and family desire (13.6%). 7.8% of those not tested indicated it was because of the expense. Conclusions: Many women have a strong desire for genetic testing after diagnosis of breast cancer but often do not discuss testing with professionals. Desire for testing was correlated with pertinent clinical factors but also non-clinical factors such as minority race and worry about recurrence. Results suggest the continued need to address patient desire for testing and selection of appropriate patients for testing.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonine Figueroa ◽  
Brittny C. Davis Lynn ◽  
Lawrence Edusei ◽  
Nicholas Titiloye ◽  
Ernest Adjei ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Chao Chu ◽  
Chia-Jung Hsieh ◽  
Tso-Fu Wang ◽  
Mun-Kun Hong ◽  
Tang-Yuan Chu

2021 ◽  
pp. 100291
Author(s):  
Shoni Philpot ◽  
Philippa Youl ◽  
Hazel Harden ◽  
Michelle Morris ◽  
Colin Furnival ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-575
Author(s):  
Jasmine A. McDonald ◽  
Roshni Rao ◽  
Marley Gibbons ◽  
Rajiv Janardhanan ◽  
Surinder Jaswal ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Incidence of breast cancer (BC), particularly in young women, are rising in India. Without population-based mammography screening, rising rates cannot be attributed to screening. Investigations are needed to understand the potential drivers of this trend. Methods An international team of experts convened to discuss the trends, environmental exposures, and clinical implications associated with BC in India and outlined recommendations for its management. Results Panels were structured across three major BC themes (n = 10 presentations). The symposium concluded with a semi-structured Think Tank designed to elicit short-term and long-term goals that could address the challenges of BC in India. Conclusion There was consensus that the prevalence of late-stage BC and the high BC mortality rates are associated with the practice of detection, which is primarily through clinical and self-breast exams, as opposed to mammography. Triple-Negative BC (TNBC) was extensively discussed, including TNBC etiology and potential risk factors, the limited treatment options, and if reported TNBC rates are supported by rigorous scientific evidence. The Think Tank session yielded long-term and short-term goals to further BC reduction in India and included more regional etiological studies on environmental exposures using existing India-based cohorts and case–control studies, standardization for molecular subtyping of BC cases, and improving the public’s awareness of breast health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document