scholarly journals Internet‐based field trials of the ICD ‐11 chapter on mental disorders

2022 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-164
Author(s):  
Michele Fabrazzo
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Klinkman ◽  
D. Goldberg

SummaryThis paper describes the necessity of adapting the major classifications of mental disorders exemplified by the ICD-11 and the DSM-5 for the special needs of primary medical care. An earlier version of the classification – the ICD-10-PHC – is described, and the process of adapting it is described in detail. The new 28 item version of the classification is described, and the procedures to be adopted in the Field Trials to be held during 2013 are set out, together with the specific problems these field trials will address.


2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niall McLaren

The project to develop the successor to fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has been under way for 10 years, yet it is still several years from completion, and the field trials, the most difficult and expensive part, have not even started. This article explores the reasons why the project is struggling, arguing that the defects the Diagnostic and Statistical Model-V (DSM-V) Committee has found are not chance or random problems that can be overcome by more money but rather represent serious conceptual errors in the very basis of the ideas underlying the project. As a result of these errors, it is predicted that the entire notion of valid categories of mental disorder will collapse in self-contradiction. One of the most recent suggestions for a new disorder, psychotic risk syndrome (now APSS), is used to demonstrate how the principles of science cannot accommodate the unstated ideological demands driving the DSM-V project.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1778-1778
Author(s):  
H. Sass

In most of the somatic disciplines of medicine there is no doubt about the importance of diagnosis for patient care, research, teaching and regulatory affairs. In psychiatry however, the status of diagnosis has been antiguous for long times. In this paper the reasons for this difference will be discussed in the light of the historical development of diagnosis and classification in the beginnings of modern psychiatry. Especially during the period of antipsychiatric reasoning it was even regarded as harmful and dangerous for patients for be diagnosed in a scientific terminology. As a consequence the research in the field of mental disorder was hindered and blurred, and in addition also the scientific basis of our discipline was questioned. The American Psychiatric Association published in 1952 the „Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders” (DSM-I), which was the first official manual of mental disorders to contain a glossary of descriptions of the diagnostic categories. A major breakthrough was the publication of DSM-III in 1980, which was not only characterized by explicit criteria for inclusion and exclusion, but also by strictly defined algorithms and by systematic field trials during the development of the manual. The DSM-approach to diagnosis in psychiatry became of major importance for research and practice in our field. Later, ICD-9 was transformed into ICD-10 by WHO with a certain tendency to adopt the basic principles of the DSM-system. Contemporary psychiatry is completely ruled by these two schemes of operationalized diagnosis. Advantages and disadvantages of this approach to classification for patient care, research and administration as well as possible alternatives and future directions will be analyzed. Special attention is given to the question, whether psychopathology and phenomenology are still relevant as methodological elements in psychiatry, even in an era of major progress of neurobiology in the sense of natural sciences.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S31-S31
Author(s):  
W. Gaebel

The revision of the current classification criteria for disorders issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) (International Classification of Disorders, ICD-10) is underway and will also include a revision of the classification criteria of the mental and behavioural disorders. Working groups for specific groups of mental disorders had produced suggestions for revised diagnostic criteria and included a working group on schizophrenia and other primary psychotic disorders. This presentation will focus on this group of mental disorders. Major changes suggested were an introduction of symptom and course specifiers, the inclusion of cognitive symptoms and a de-emphasising of the so-called first rank symptoms of schizophrenia, a cross-sectional approach towards the classification of schizoaffective disorder and a reorganization of the acute psychotic disorders. Initial internet-based field trials showed some incremental improvements of diagnostic reliability, but more crucial for an adjustment of the revised classification criteria will be the expected results of the upcoming clinic-based field trials.Disclosure of interestUnterstützung bei Symposien/Symposia Support.– Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Neuss– Aristo Pharma GmbH, Berlin– Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg– Servier Deutschland GmbH, München– Fakultätsmitglied/Faculty Member– Lundbeck International Neuroscience Foundation (LINF), Dänemark


1994 ◽  
pp. 125-135
Author(s):  
Yoshibumi Nakane ◽  
Yoshiro Ohkubo ◽  
Ryo Takahashi ◽  
Itaru Yamashita ◽  
Masahisa Nishizono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Baran

AbstractReductionist thinking in neuroscience is manifest in the widespread use of animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Broader investigations of diverse behaviors in non-model organisms and longer-term study of the mechanisms of plasticity will yield fundamental insights into the neurobiological, developmental, genetic, and environmental factors contributing to the “massively multifactorial system networks” which go awry in mental disorders.


2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Norma Leclair ◽  
Steve Leclair ◽  
Robert Barth

Abstract Chapter 14, Mental and Behavioral Disorders, in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, defines a process for assessing permanent impairment, including providing numeric ratings, for persons with specific mental and behavioral disorders. These mental disorders are limited to mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and psychotic disorders, and this chapter focuses on the evaluation of brain functioning and its effects on behavior in the absence of evident traumatic or disease-related objective central nervous system damage. This article poses and answers questions about the sixth edition. For example, this is the first since the second edition (1984) that provides a numeric impairment rating, and this edition establishes a standard, uniform template to translate human trauma or disease into a percentage of whole person impairment. Persons who conduct independent mental and behavioral evaluation using this chapter should be trained in psychiatry or psychology; other users should be experienced in psychiatric or psychological evaluations and should have expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of mental and behavioral disorders. The critical first step in determining a mental or behavioral impairment rating is to document the existence of a definitive diagnosis based on the current edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The article also enumerates the psychiatric disorders that are considered ratable in the sixth edition, addresses use of the sixth edition during independent medical evaluations, and answers additional questions.


2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
KERRI WACHTER
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
Gertraud Teuchert-Noodt ◽  
Ralf R. Dawirs

Abstract: Neuroplasticity research in connection with mental disorders has recently bridged the gap between basic neurobiology and applied neuropsychology. A non-invasive method in the gerbil (Meriones unguiculus) - the restricted versus enriched breading and the systemically applied single methamphetamine dose - offers an experimental approach to investigate psychoses. Acts of intervening affirm an activity dependent malfunctional reorganization in the prefrontal cortex and in the hippocampal dentate gyrus and reveal the dopamine position as being critical for the disruption of interactions between the areas concerned. From the extent of plasticity effects the probability and risk of psycho-cognitive development may be derived. Advance may be expected from insights into regulatory mechanisms of neurogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus which is obviously to meet the necessary requirements to promote psycho-cognitive functions/malfunctions via the limbo-prefrontal circuit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document