ICD-11: Example of Psychotic Disorders

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S31-S31
Author(s):  
W. Gaebel
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Psychotic Disorders ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
Classification Criteria ◽  
World Health ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Diagnostic Reliability ◽  
Deutschland Gmbh ◽  
Health Organization

The revision of the current classification criteria for disorders issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) (International Classification of Disorders, ICD-10) is underway and will also include a revision of the classification criteria of the mental and behavioural disorders. Working groups for specific groups of mental disorders had produced suggestions for revised diagnostic criteria and included a working group on schizophrenia and other primary psychotic disorders. This presentation will focus on this group of mental disorders. Major changes suggested were an introduction of symptom and course specifiers, the inclusion of cognitive symptoms and a de-emphasising of the so-called first rank symptoms of schizophrenia, a cross-sectional approach towards the classification of schizoaffective disorder and a reorganization of the acute psychotic disorders. Initial internet-based field trials showed some incremental improvements of diagnostic reliability, but more crucial for an adjustment of the revised classification criteria will be the expected results of the upcoming clinic-based field trials.Disclosure of interestUnterstützung bei Symposien/Symposia Support.– Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Neuss– Aristo Pharma GmbH, Berlin– Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg– Servier Deutschland GmbH, München– Fakultätsmitglied/Faculty Member– Lundbeck International Neuroscience Foundation (LINF), Dänemark

Psychotic Disorders in ICD-11

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zielasek ◽  
H.-R. Cleveland ◽  
W. Gaebel
Keyword(s):  
Psychotic Disorders ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
World Health ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Research Domain ◽  
Specific Working

SummaryWithin the efforts to revise ICD-10, the World Health Organization (WHO) has appointed a disorder-specific Working Group on the Classification of Psychotic Disorders (WGPD). The WGPD has proposed several changes to the classification criteria of schizophrenia and other primary psychotic disorders in order to increase the clinical utility, reliability and validity of the diagnostic classification. The main proposals include changes to the chapter title, the replacement of existing schizophrenia subtypes with symptom specifiers, stricter diagnostic criteria for schizoaffective disorder, a reorganization of the delusional disorders and the acute and transient psychotic disorders, as well as the revision of course specifiers. These proposed revisions are subject to field trials with the aim of studying whether they will lead to an improvement of the classification system in comparison to its previous version. The proposals are compared with revisions of the according DSM-5 chapter. The impact of novel results from neuroscience and genetics on the current proposals is discussed, also with respect to future classification strategies such as the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project.

Psychotic Disorders in ICD-11

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zielasek ◽  
P. Falkai ◽  
W. Gaebel
Keyword(s):  
Schizoaffective Disorder ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Psychotic Disorders ◽  
Field Trials ◽  
World Health ◽  
Final Version ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization

SummaryFor the development of ICD-11, the World Health Organization (WHO) has inaugurated a Working Group on the Classification of Psychotic Disorders (WGPD). A range of changes of the classification of primary psychotic disorders was developed by this group. While DSM-5 was published in 2013, the ICD-11 proposals are currently undergoing internet-based and clinical field trials and the final version is due in 2017. Among the major changes suggested by the WGPD for ICD-11 are the chapter titles, the replacement of the current schizophrenia subtypes by a number of symptom specifiers, a new set of course specifiers harmonized with DSM-5, transsectional diagnostic criteria for schizoaffective disorder, and a reorganization of the acute and transient psychotic disorders and delusional disorders.

Psychotic disorders in DSM-5 and ICD-11

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Falko Biedermann ◽  
W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker
Keyword(s):  
Psychotic Disorders ◽  
Work Group ◽  
Theoretical Background ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
World Health ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Diagnostic Criterion

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) was published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 2013, and the Work Group on the Classification of Psychotic disorders (WGPD), installed by the World Health Organization (WHO), is expected to publish the new chapter about schizophrenia and other primary psychotic disorders in 2017. We reviewed the available literature to summarize the major changes, innovations, and developments of both manuals. If available and possible, we outline the theoretical background behind these changes. Due to the fact that the development of ICD-11 has not yet been completed, the details about ICD-11 are still proposals under ongoing revision. In this ongoing process, they may be revised and therefore have to be seen as proposals. DSM-5 has eliminated schizophrenia subtypes and replaced them with a dimensional approach based on symptom assessments. ICD-11 will most likely go in a similar direction, as both manuals are planned to be more harmonized, although some differences will remain in details and the conceptual orientation. Next to these modifications, ICD-11 will provide a transsectional diagnostic criterion for schizoaffective disorders and a reorganization of acute and transient psychotic and delusional disorders. In this manuscript, we will compare the 2 classification systems.

scholarly journals Revision of the classification of mental disorders in ICD–11 and DSM–V: work in progress

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Sartorius
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
World Health Organization ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
World Health ◽  
Dsm V ◽  
The World ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Work Done

SummaryThis editorial summarises the work done to prepare ICD–11 and DSM–V (which should be published in 2015 and 2013 respectively). It gives a brief description of the structures that have been put in place by the World Health Organization and by the American Psychiatric Association and lists the issues and challenges that face the two organisations on their road to the revisions of the classifications. These include dilemmas about the ways of presentation of the revisions (e.g. whether dimensions should be added to categories or even replace them), about different versions of the classifications (e.g. the primary care and research versions), about ways to ensure that the best of evidence as well as experience are taken into account in drafting the revision and many other issues that will have to be resolved in the immediate future.

scholarly journals Quality of Life and Functioning of People With Mental Disorders Who Underwent Deinstitutionalization Using Assisted Living Facilities: A Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rejane Coan Ferretti Mayer ◽  
Maíra Ramos Alves ◽  
Sueli Miyuki Yamauti ◽  
Marcus Tolentino Silva ◽  
Luciane Cruz Lopes
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Assisted Living ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
World Health ◽  
Assisted Living Facilities ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Whodas 2.0 ◽  
Health Organization

ContextPeople with mental disorders can acquire long-term disabilities, which could impair their functioning and quality of life (QoL), requiring permanent care and social support. Systematic data on QoL and functioning, which could support a better management of these people, were not available.ObjectiveTo analyze the QoL, level of functioning and their association with sociodemographic and clinical factors of people with mental disorders who underwent deinstitutionalization using assisted living facilities.MethodsA Cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2018 and July 2019, through interviews using the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) to determine the QoL scores, and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to determine the level of functioning. All adults (≥18 years old) with mental disorders, who underwent deinstitutionalization, users of assisted living facilities and assisted by the Psychosocial Assistance Centers III, in a city in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, were selected. For statistical analysis of the associated factors, Student’s t-test was used for dichotomous variables and ANOVA for polynomial variables. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure the association between QoL and functioning scores.ResultsOut of 359 people who underwent deinstitutionalization with mental disorders, 147 met the eligibility criteria. The mean total score for the WHOQOL-BREF was 66.5 ± 13.4 and the mean score for WHODAS 2.0 was 10.4 ± 7.6. An association was found between people who were studying (n = 65.8; 95%CI, 63.5–68.1 vs. n = 73.9; 95%CI, 67.5–80.3; p = 0.04) and better WHOQOL-BREF QoL scores or WHODAS 2.0 levels of functioning (n = 10.9; 95%CI, 9.6–12.2 vs. n = 5.1; 95%CI, 2.5–7.7; p = 0.01). A weak negative correlation (r = 0.41) emerged between higher QoL scores and functioning improvement.ConclusionThis study indicates that the QoL of the sample is associated by their functioning levels, which, in turn, may reflect on their social interactions. Public policies that favor interventions increasing socialization of this population can result in better health outcomes. The QoL and functioning scores provide valuable insights to develop public policies more suited to this population profile.

Progress in the Development of ICD-11 and DSM-V Classifications of Mental Disorders

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Sartorius
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Task Force ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
World Health ◽  
Advisory Group ◽  
Special Unit ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Health Organization

The International classification of diseases - which includes a chapter dealing with mental disorders - will be revised and its 11th Revision will be published in 2014.A special unit within the World Health Organization coordinates the process of revision and the numerous tasks that have to be undertaken to ensure full participation of the WHO member states in the process of revision as well as the consideration of evidence on which the classification is to be based.The Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Control of the WHO has created a special advisory group that should help it in considering the evidence and proposals made by scientists, governments, organizations and interested individuals and in producing the draft of the classification of mental disorders for inclusion into the 11th Revision of the ICD: This group has, in turn, developed several structures that will deal with the tasks that will arise in the revision process. At the same time the American Psychiatric Association has created a DSM 5 Task Force that should develop proposals for the 5th Revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual that will be published in 2012.The lecture will describe the processes and structures that have been put in place by the two organizations and refer to the issues that have arisen or are likely to arise in the course of work that should lead to the proposals for the ICD 11 and the DSM 5.

Diagnosis and classification of mental disorders and alcohol- and drug-related problems: a research agenda for the 1980s

1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 907-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
World Health ◽  
Common Language ◽  
Drug Related Problems ◽  
Diagnosis And Classification ◽  
The 1960S ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Health Field ◽  
Diagnosis Classification

The development and promotion of a ‘common language’ in the mental health field is a lasting objective of the World Health Organization. In the 1960s, experts from 35 countries participated in the WHO programme on the standardization of psychiatric diagnosis, classification and statistics which reviewed the state of the field and resulted in the glossary of mental disorders, first produced as a companion to ICD-8 and later incorporated, with modifications, in Chapter V of ICD-9.

Internet-based survey applied to experts in schizophrenia: Socio-demographic and professional variables associated to response pattern

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S570-S570
Author(s):  
G. Guilera ◽  
M. Barrios ◽  
O. Pino ◽  
D. Salas ◽  
J. Gómez-Benito
Keyword(s):  
Response Pattern ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Occupational Therapists ◽  
World Health ◽  
International Classification Of Functioning ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Core Set ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
Health Organization

IntroductionIn the framework of the development of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for schizophrenia, we conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey using open-ended questions. An international pool of experts from diverse health care disciplines was surveyed to identify problems in functioning experienced by individuals with schizophrenia.ObjectivesThe purpose of the study is to explore possible associations between experts’ socio-demographic and professional profiles, and whether they answered or not the survey.MethodsOut of 307 invited experts, 189 (61.56%) filled in the survey. However, 37 experts were excluded in the data analysis as they had completed only a part of the questionnaire. Thus, there were 152 of the experts classified as “respondents” and the remaining 155 as “non-respondents”. The association between the response pattern and the socio-demographic and professional variables (i.e., gender, World Health Organization region, discipline, and years of experience) was analysed by means of Chi2 tests.ResultsThere was a statistically significant association between the response pattern and the gender of the expert (χ2(1) = 4.927, P = 0.026; V = 0.127), showing that 56.3% of female and 43.6% of male experts answered the survey. When comparing the response pattern in terms of discipline, a statistically significant association was also found (χ2(4) = 10.101, P = 0.039; V = 0.183), showing that those who tend to answer the survey are occupational therapists (71.4%), followed by psychologists (58.0%), social workers (52.6%), nurses (52.0%), and psychiatrists (41.3%).ConclusionsFemales and occupational therapists presented the higher response rate to the expert survey.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals How many categories do we need?

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. 912-912
Author(s):  
N. Sartorius
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
World Health ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Competing Interest ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract of presentation by Prof. N. Sartorius.The presentation will discuss the dependence of the classification of mental disorders on its use. While scientists searching for causes of mental disorders or assessing the effectiveness of a new treatment will need highly homogenous groups of people showing a particular well defined syndrome, practicing clinicians will wish to limit the number of categories in a classification of mental disorders to a level which makes a difference in treatment or management. The World Health Organization has recognized this difference in need and preference and produced in the framework of the 10th Revision of the International Classification of diseases (ICD) a classification of mental disorders in three versions–a version for practicing psychiatrists, a version for use in scientific investigations and a version for use in primary health care. The three versions were translatable (“telescoped”) into each other. The field tests of the three versions of the classification demonstrated that they are easy to use, can be used reliably and fit the syndromes usually encountered in health care services. These findings further supported the Sir Aubrey Lewis’ proposal to accept the division of classifications into a public and several (or many) private versions translatable into each other.Disclosure of interestThe author has not supplied his declaration of competing interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document