scholarly journals Methods for CpG Methylation Array Profiling Via Bisulfite Conversion

Author(s):  
Fatjon Leti ◽  
Lorida Llaci ◽  
Ivana Malenica ◽  
Johanna K. DiStefano
2003 ◽  
Vol 309 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Sasaki ◽  
Jason Anast ◽  
William Bassett ◽  
Toshifumi Kawakami ◽  
Noriaki Sakuragi ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2288-2288
Author(s):  
Ulrike Baak ◽  
Helmut Orawa ◽  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
Olaf Hopfer ◽  
Thomas Burmeister ◽  
...  

Abstract Promotor demethylation of oncogenes has been associated with transcriptional activation in cancer cells. The proto-oncogene HOX11/TLX1 has been found to be aberrantly expressed in up to 30% of adult T-ALL patients. In few, a translocation between the HOX11 locus at 10q24 and the T-cell receptor locus has been identified. In the majority of cases the mechanism leading to HOX11 reactivation remains unclear. It had been proposed that an epigenetical modification by demethylation of the proximal HOX11 promotor could be responsible for an aberrant expression of HOX11. To test this hypothesis we have correlated the methylation status of CpG residues in the proximal HOX11 promotor with the gene expression status of HOX11 in adult T-ALL samples from the German Multicenter ALL Study (GMALL) 5/93 and 6/99. HOX11 expression was measured in 286 pretreatment peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts by comparative real-time RT-PCR as described previously. The methylation status was then randomly analyzed after bisulphite treatment by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) in 53 T-ALL samples with HOX11 expression (HOX11 positive) and 102 samples without HOX11 expression (HOX11 negative). Of the 150 analyzed patients only 4% of HOX11 positive patients (n=53) and 10% of HOX11 negative patients were methylated (M) in the analyzed promotor area. HOX11 negative patients were significantly more common associated with an unmethylated status (U) then HOX11 positive patients (57% vs 32%, p=0.003). The most prominent methylation phenotype in HOX11 positive patients compared to HOX11 negative samples was a mixed (MU) methylation status (55% vs. 27%, p=0.001). Interestingly, remission duration was significantly higher in pt. with the MU methylation status (M=49%, U=54% vs. MU=76%, p-logrank=0.0362). This translated also into a significant difference in the overall survival (M=55%, U=49%, MU=75%, p-logrank= 0.0202). However, in a multivariate analysis the methylation status could not be confirmed as an independent prognostic factor. The promotor-associated CpG methylation status was found to be remarkably heterogenous in the analyzed adult T-ALL patients with a predominantly unmethylated status in HOX11 negative samples and a mixed methylated/unmethylated picture in HOX11 positive samples. These findings contrast with our initial hypothesis that HOX11 expression is silenced in normal tissue by a promotor-associated CpG methylation and aberrantly reexpressed in leukemia cells by demethylation. However, various CpG residues associated with the HOX11 promotor might be of variable importance for the gene expression and intrinsic limitations of methylation-specific PCR might have influenced our analysis. Bisulphite sequencing techniques as well as the newly developed genome-wide cytosine methylation array could help overcome these issues. Understanding the role of promotor-associated methylation in HOX11 expression could clarify pathways in leukemogenesis and provide a valuable tool for better risk stratification in T-ALL.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2987-2987
Author(s):  
Andreas Reinisch ◽  
Nathalie Etchart ◽  
Nicole A Hofmann ◽  
Margareta Frühwirth ◽  
Anna Ortner ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2987 Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (MSPCs) from numerous tissues are currently tested in clinical trials despite a limited understanding of their in vivo behavior. In this study we used MSPCs from adult and fetal tissues to select the appropriate source for clinical application. We asked whether MSPCs derived from human bone marrow (BM), white adipose tissue (WAT) and umbilical cord (UC), compared to skin fibroblasts, bear an equivalent bone and marrow niche formation potential with of in vivo. Furthermore we evaluated attraction and engraftment of murine as well as human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) into newly formed MSPC-derived niches. To elucidate potential mechanisms responsible for a tissue-specific MSPC potential after transplantation gene expression profiling and DNA methylation analysis on a novel high resolution 450K-CpG methylation array were employed. MSPCs were transplanted subcutaneously to test for their spontaneous bone and marrow niche formation potential in immune-deficient NSG mice (NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ). BM-derived MSPC transplantation reproducibly led to the development of mature bone (17/17 donors) through an endochondral ossification process leading to subsequent marrow niche formation. Additionally, these newly formed hematopoietic microenvironments attracted complete mouse hematopoiesis including immature lineage negative, Sca-1 positive, c-kit positive (LSK) HSPCs. Non-BM derived MSPCs completely lacked bone and marrow niche-forming potential and did not attract hematopoietic cells (0/9 donors). Induction of human hematopoietic chimerism through transplantation of umbilical cord blood (UCB)-derived human CD34+ HSPCs in advance of subcutaneous ectopic bone and marrow development resulted in immigration of re-transplantable human hematopoiesis into extra-medullary ossicles. Comparative 450K-CpG methylation array profiling of MSPCs revealed a tissue-specific epigenetic signature virtually corresponding to the in vivo differentiation. MSPCs from BM but neither fibroblasts nor MSPCs from WAT or UC showed epigenetically imprinted human bone and marrow niche (HuNiche) formation capacity favoring BM-MSPCs for skeletal regeneration. This novel HuNiche model should be ideally suited for studying normal and malignant hematopoiesis regulation in an ectopic human marrow with subsequent human hematopoietic engraftment that mimics clinical BM transplantation reality. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Epigenomes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Celina Whalley ◽  
Karl Payne ◽  
Enric Domingo ◽  
Andrew Blake ◽  
Susan Richman ◽  
...  

Background: Abnormal CpG methylation in cancer is ubiquitous and generally detected in tumour specimens using a variety of techniques at a resolution encompassing single CpG loci to genome wide coverage. Analysis of samples with very low DNA inputs, such as formalin fixed (FFPE) biopsy specimens from clinical trials or circulating tumour DNA is challenging at the genome-wide level because of lack of available input. We present the results of low input experiments into the Illumina Infinium HD methylation assay on FFPE specimens and ctDNA samples. Methods: For all experiments, the Infinium HD assay for methylation was used. In total, forty-eight FFPE specimens were used at varying concentrations (lowest input 50 ng); eighteen blood derived specimens (lowest input 10 ng) and six matched ctDNA input (lowest input 10 ng)/fresh tumour specimens (lowest input 250 ng) were processed. Downstream analysis was performed in R/Bioconductor for quality control metrics and differential methylation analysis as well as copy number calls. Results: Correlation coefficients for CpG methylation were high at the probe level averaged R2 = 0.99 for blood derived samples and R2 > 0.96 for the FFPE samples. When matched ctDNA/fresh tumour samples were compared, R2 > 0.91 between the two. Results of differential methylation analysis did not vary significantly by DNA input in either the blood or FFPE groups. There were differences seen in the ctDNA group as compared to their paired tumour sample, possibly because of enrichment for tumour material without contaminating normal. Copy number variants observed in the tumour were generally also seen in the paired ctDNA sample with good concordance via DQ plot. Conclusions: The Illumina Infinium HD methylation assay can robustly detect methylation across a range of sample types, including ctDNA, down to an input of 10 ng. It can also reliably detect oncogenic methylation changes and copy number variants in ctDNA. These findings demonstrate that these samples can now be accessed by methylation array technology, allowing analysis of these important sample types.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 779-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
I-Ying Kuo ◽  
Jia-Ming Chang ◽  
Shih-Sheng Jiang ◽  
Chung-Hsin Chen ◽  
I-Shou Chang ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
Kirsten L. Greene ◽  
Hong Zhao ◽  
Hiroaki Shiina ◽  
Long-Cheng Li ◽  
Yuichiro Tanaka ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Manda Ghahremani ◽  
Courtney W Hannah ◽  
Maria Peneherrera ◽  
Karla L Bretherick ◽  
Margo R Fluker ◽  
...  

Background/Purpose: Premature ovarian failure (POF) affects 1% of women with a largely idiopathic and poorly understood etiology. The objective of this study was to identify specific epigenetic alterations by measuring DNA methylation of gene regulatory regions in women with POF vs. controls. Methods: Blood samples were collected from idiopathic POFpatients (Amenorrhea for at least 3 months and 2 serum FSH levels of > 40mIU/ml obtained > 1 month apart prior to age 40) and control women (CW) (healthy pregnancy after age 37 with out a pregnancy loss). Genomic DNA was extracted from EDTA anticoagulated blood and bisulfite converted for analysis using the Illumina Golden Gate Methylation Panel which measures DNA methylation at 1506 CpG sites in the promoter regions of 807 genes in 10 POF and 12 CW. Candidate genes with altered epigenetic marks between POF and CW at a nominal P-value < 0.05 were identified using a t-testcomparison within the Illumina bead studio software. Genes of interest were further analyzed for quantitative methylation at specific CpG sites using pyrosequencing in 30 POF and 30 CW. Results: Comparison of DNA methylation profiles of our initial POF and CW groups identified several genes with statistically significanthyper- or hypo- methylation in the POF group (P < 0.05), including the Androgen Receptor (AR)promoter region, which was significantly hypermethylated. To further validate these results, DNA methylation of the AR gene promoter was quantified bypryosequencing in a larger group of POF and CW. Pyrosequencing further confirmed a significantly higher DNA methylation of the AR promoter region inPOF vs. CW (P=0.007). Conclusions: This is a novel study identifying epigenetic alterations in POF. The hypermethylation of the AR gene in POF patients may cause decreased level of the AR in these women. This is especially interesting given a recent report of induced POF in AR deficient mice^1. Specific epigenetic markers, as identified by DNA methylation array profiling in blood, may serve as useful biomarkers for POF and other fertility disorders. However, it will need to be determined if these methylation changes are present prior to diagnosis, or are a consequence of menopause itself. Reference: 1.Hiroko S. et al. Premature ovarian failure in androgenreceptor deficient mice. PNAS;103:224-9


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document