The Legal Framework Protecting Cultural Heritage Sites on the Moon and In Situ Preservation

Author(s):  
Giuliana Rotola
2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Fletcher-Tomenius ◽  
PJ O'Keefe ◽  
M Williams

While the threat to the underwater cultural heritage from the treasure salvage industry is widely recognised, the approach to 'protection' ranges from absolute prohibition to the sale of state licences to the highest bidder. Even the former raises difficult problems of enforceability and the choice of mechanisms to determine whether in situ preservation is the preferred option for any particular wreck site. The common law jurisdictions have tended to prefer a regulated salvage regime, in which the courts themselves have a role in considering whether appropriate archaeological methodology is applied to the recovery of historic artefacts. This article examines the legal and economic basis of such an approach and evaluates whether the underwater cultural heritage has derived any discernible benefit from this judicial creativity. Inter alia, it concludes that the legal framework is itself flawed by uncertainty and that the deliberations of the court are hampered by procedural deficiencies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 870
Author(s):  
Galena Pisoni ◽  
Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez ◽  
Hannie Gijlers ◽  
Linda Tonolli

This paper reviews the literature concerning technology used for creating and delivering accessible museum and cultural heritage sites experiences. It highlights the importance of the delivery suited for everyone from different areas of expertise, namely interaction design, pedagogical and participatory design, and it presents how recent and future artificial intelligence (AI) developments can be used for this aim, i.e.,improving and widening online and in situ accessibility. From the literature review analysis, we articulate a conceptual framework that incorporates key elements that constitute museum and cultural heritage online experiences and how these elements are related to each other. Concrete opportunities for future directions empirical research for accessibility of cultural heritage contents are suggested and further discussed.


Author(s):  
Yuri Putrik ◽  
◽  
Andrei Solovyov,

The paper briefly outlines legal framework of activities run by the modern Russian state for physical safekeeping cultural heritage sites, one of key form of which is making zones of protected natural landscape. The authors trace a graduately process of mainstreaming issues concerning preservation historical and cultural heritage sites and integration of these constructions into a structure of economic, social and cultural development of regions of the country. Researchers analyze a set of current problems in sphere of preservation and state protection of cultural heritage sites (such as lack of monetary funds and skilled workforce for repair and restoration, fulfilling research tasks, etc. Also, the article reviews ongoing programs for preservation cultural heritage sites located in the Russian capital, Moscow.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Анна МИТРОФАНОВА ◽  
Anna MITROFANOVA ◽  
Юрий ФИЛИППОВ ◽  
Yuriy Filippov

The article presents an overview of the theoretical and practical approaches of domestic and foreign authors to the using historical and cultural heritage sites for tourist purposes for the development of regional tourism. Most scientists define cultural heritage sites as one of the most important conditions for the development of cultural and educational tourism. Further development of this territory is provided by strategic planning, state policy, the creation of a regulatory and legal framework, the development of specialized state programs, attraction of investments, creation of a specialized infrastructure, and implementation of a competent marketing policy. The article also presents the limiting factors of the using cultural heritage sites in the Russian Federation on the example of Kaliningrad region. Within the study the authors examine institutional capacities and state instruments for the restoration of cultural heritage objects with the aim of including in a regional tourism product. The authors develop authorial methodology of systematizing cultural heritage sites used for tourist purposes. The criterion for ranking cultural heritage sites is the degree of their preservation, accessibility and functional purpose. This methodology has been tested on cultural heritage sites in the city of Kaliningrad functionally related to fortifications. But it can be used in scientific research and in practice for ranking and other categories of cultural heritage sites of the regions of the Russian Federation.


2020 ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Maximilian Gröber

From military necessity to individual responsibility – the “Al Mahdi” case as a caesura in the criminal punishment of the destruction of cultural property on an international levelIn April 2012, the Islamist group Ansar Dine launched an attack on the UNESCO World Heritage sites in Timbuktu, Mali. Besides illustrating the political and religious backgrounds that led to this action, the purpose of this paper is to highlight the historical development of the international legal framework for the protection of cultural heritage, including the trial against Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, who was in charge of the Timbuktu attacks. As will be shown, the case has the potential to set a precedent. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document