Collaborative Work Management with a Highly-Available Kanban Board

2018 ◽  
pp. 59-72
Author(s):  
Annette Bieniusa ◽  
Peter Zeller ◽  
Shraddha Barke
Author(s):  
Joaquín Peña ◽  
Alfonso Bravo ◽  
Adela del-Río-Ortega ◽  
Manuel Resinas ◽  
Antonio Ruiz-Cortés

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronish Joyekurun ◽  
Paola Amaldi ◽  
William Wong
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 123-136
Author(s):  
Antonello Mura ◽  
Antioco Luigi Zurru ◽  
Ilaria Tatulli

The educative experience of people with disability leads the inter­na­tio­nal debate towards the value of inclusive learning contexts. Nonetheless, the theoretical and methodological principles of an inclusive education approach have to be outlined. Data collected using explorative questionnaires during a five-years survey in an Italian region's schools show a slow evolution of the scholastic context. From the perspective of Special Pedagogy, the qualitative investigation on three macro-dimensions (the diversity perception, the didactic and methodological means, the wellbeing of pupils) reveals an emerging development of solid awareness among teachers. Findings confirm that the inclusion processes at school are attainable only throughout a series of clear methodological elements: 1) a valorising attitude towards diversity; 2) an orienting learning process; 3) a plural and flexible use of both methodologies and strategies; 4) a collaborative work environment; 5) a continuous training process; 6) a deontological approach. These are the principles that allow teachers to support each student in the manifold itineraries of identity fulfilment, encouraging pupils to express their needs and to develop their abilities in a welcoming and participative context.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Nur Hidayat ◽  
Indah Kusuma Hayati

Recently, the evolvement of globalization era has been the global challenges that cannot be avoided either by private or government sectors, and they are requested to be survived encountering such the condition. The implementation of Quality Management System (QMS) in the operational company is the way how to guarantee the quality of products or services offered to the people. One of the purposes of QMS implementation is to provide a prime satisfaction to the customers. The impact of QMS implementation is expected to increase job performance of the employees. Besides the implementation of Quality Management System (QMS), the impact of global challenges has been increasing the competitive efforts to execute more effective production process. However, it has required manpower protection accordingly. This research aims to find out whether the implementation of quality management system and safety and healthy at work management system have impacted on the job performance of employees. Objects of this research are the employees in the production department at PT Guna Senaputra Sejahtera Plant 1 Bogor. Data analysis technique of this research has applied software Smart PLS (Partial Least Square). PLS has estimated a model of correlation among the latent variables and correlation between latent variables and its indicators. Result of data processing has indicated that the implementation of Quality Management System (QMS) and system of safety and healthy at work have positively and significantly impacted job performance of employees.Keywords : Quality Management System (QMS), Safety and Healthy at Work System ( SHWS / SMK3), and Job Performance of Employees


Author(s):  
John Mckiernan-González

This article discusses the impact of George J. Sánchez’s keynote address “Working at the Crossroads” in making collaborative cross-border projects more academically legitimate in American studies and associated disciplines. The keynote and his ongoing administrative labor model the power of public collaborative work to shift research narratives. “Working at the Crossroads” demonstrated how historians can be involved—as historians—in a variety of social movements, and pointed to the ways these interactions can, and maybe should, shape research trajectories. It provided a key blueprint and key examples for doing historically informed Latina/o studies scholarship with people working outside the university. Judging by the success of Sánchez’s work with Boyle Heights and East LA, projects need to establish multiple entry points, reward participants at all levels, and connect people across generations.I then discuss how I sought to emulate George Sánchez’s proposals in my own work through partnering with labor organizations, developing biographical public art projects with students, and archiving social and cultural histories. His keynote address made a back-and-forth movement between home communities and academic labor seem easy and professionally rewarding as well as politically necessary, especially in public universities. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 749-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam U. Mehta ◽  
Gregory P. Lekovic

Although most widely known as the birthplace of neuro-otology, the House Clinic in Los Angeles has been the site of several major contributions to the field of neurosurgery. From the beginning of the formation of the Otologic Medical Group in 1958 (later renamed the House Ear Clinic), these contributions have been largely due to the innovative and collaborative work of neurosurgeon William E. Hitselberger, MD, and neuro-otologist William F. House, MD, DDS. Together they were responsible for the development and widespread adoption of the team approach to skull-base surgery. Specific neurosurgical advances accomplished at the House Clinic have included the first application of the operative microscope to neurosurgery, the application of middle fossa and translabyrinthine approaches for vestibular schwannoma, and the development of combined petrosal, retrolabyrinthine, and other alternative petrosal approaches and of hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. The auditory brainstem implant, invented at the House Clinic in 1979, was the first ever successful application of central nervous system neuromodulation for restoration of function. Technological innovations at the House Clinic have also advanced neurosurgery. These include the first video transmission of microsurgery, the first suction irrigator, the first debulking instrument for tumors, and the House-Urban retractor for middle fossa surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inez Gavrila Wahyudi ◽  
Johan Setiawan ◽  
Wella Wella

This research was made with purpose to measure the capability of human resource and work management in PT. X using COBIT 5.0. In the assessment process, researcher applied 1 domain (align, plan, and organize) with 2 processed, Manage Human Resource APO 07) and Manage Service Agreement (APO 09). Data collection was obtained from the distribution of questionnaires to IT division (there were 127 items of the question and 10 respondents). The result of this research figured out that APO 07 stopped in level 2 with score 82.50 in level 3 and APO 09 ended in level 3 with score 84.10 in level 4. In conclusion, there were still few problems that made human resources in PT X unable to reach level 5. PT.X ought to do audit regularly in deep and holistically.   Keywords— Align Plan and Organize, Capabilities Level, COBIT 5.0, Manage Human Resources, Manage Service Agreement REFERENCES [1] Sumarsono, Sonny. 2003. Ekonomi Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: LPFE-UI. [2] Gondodiyoto, Sanyoto. 2003. Audit Sistem Informasi (Pendekatan COBIT). Bekasi : Mitra Wacana Media. [3] ISACA. 2013. COBIT 5 A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. USA : Enterprise GRC Solution Inc. [4] ISACA 2013. COBIT 5 for Information Security. USA : Enterprise GRC Solution Inc. [5] Arbie, E. 2000. Pengantar Sistem Informasi Manajemen, Edisi ke-7. Jakarta : Bina Alumni Indonesia. [6] Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Metodelogi Penelitian. Yogyakarta : Bina Aksara. [7] Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta. [8] Davis, Chris, Mike Schiller, & Kevin Wheeler. 2011. IT Auditing Using Controls to Protect Information Assets, 2nd Edition. English : Mc Graw Hill. [9] Follet, Mary Parker. 1999. Visionary Leadership and Strategic Management. MCB University Press. Women in Management Review Volume 14. Number 7.Gondodiyoto, Sanyoto. 2003. Audit Sistem Informasi (Pendekatan COBIT). Bekasi : Mitra Wacana Media. [10] Hasibuan,M. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara. [11] Hasibuan,M. 2003. Organisasi dan Motivasi. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara. [12] Herzberg, Frederick. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi Edisi 10. Yogyakarta: Andy. [13] Jogiyanto. 2005. Sistem Teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta : Andi Offset. [14] ISACA. 2012. COBIT 5 Enabling Processes. USA : Enterprise GRC Solution Inc. [15] ISACA. 2003. Audit and Control of Information System. USA : Enterprise GRC Solution Inc. [16] Kusumah, Wijaya dan Dwitagama Dedi. 2011. Mengenal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta : PT Indeks. [17] Littlejohn, Stephen W. 1999. Theories of Human Communication, 6th Ed. Belmont CA : Wadsworth Publishing. [18] Muhyuzir T.D. 2001. Analisa Perancangan Sistem Pengolahan Data, Cetakan kedua. Jakarta : PT Elex Media Komputindo. [19] O’Brien, James A. 2010. Management Information System (11th Edition). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. [20] O’Brien, James A. 2005. Pengantar Sistem Informasi: Perspektif Bisnis dan Manjerial (12th Edition). Jakarta: Salemba.


Author(s):  
Rubí Estela Morales-Salas ◽  
Daniel Montes-Ponce

A virtual learning environment is conceived as an interaction space that ease the realization of mediated activities by technology, in this case the internet; besides using multimedia materials, learning objects, social networks, among others; which have changed imminently the traditional education. In this article an instrument is proposed in a checklist format, to evaluate any platform that has interaction spaces such as a Virtual Learning Environment, in this case responding to four spaces or general indicators: information Space, Mediation / Interaction Space, Instructional Design Space and Exhibition Space. Criteria are used according to the interactions and activities carried out by the consultant and virtual student. These, in turn, come up from the analysis and interaction of the advisers achieved in the discussion forums and portfolio activities through collaborative work. It was situated as a qualitative research, with a descriptive nature since it is not limited to data collection only, but also it refers and analyzes the interaction of the advisers achieved in the discussion forums and portfolio activities through the collaborative work of the workshop course "Virtual Learning Environments" developed in a virtual learning environment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (0) ◽  
pp. 56-63
Author(s):  
Laura Silvia Hernández Gutiérrez ◽  
Angélica García-Gómez ◽  
Argimira Vianey Barona Nuñez ◽  
Erick López Léon

The education based on simulation is an educationalstrategy where students learn from their errors, developing skills, knowledge, competences,etc. in a controlled environment. During the process of teaching by simulation, it is necessaryto execute various types of assessments (diagnostic, summative, formative) in order tomake adjustments or changes in the educational process of the students, therefore identifying areas of opportunity for improvement. With the simulation, different processes can be taught, like interprofessionalism and collaborative work. Nowadays, there is a major concern for added safety and the quality of care for the patients and their families. Therefore, a WHO study group determined the basic interprofessional competences, and has been given the task of disseminating and promoting interprofessional education. Some educational institutions in the US, Canada and Europe have integrated interprofessional and collaborative work in simulation practices. All the activity by simulation must be evaluated in order to provide feedback to the participants and establish improvement strategies. The assessment of the interprofessional work focuses on the evaluation of common skills and competencies among various health professionals.


Descartes once argued that, with sufficient effort and skill, a single scientist could uncover fundamental truths about our world. Contemporary science proves the limits of this claim. From synthesizing the human genome to predicting the effects of climate change, some current scientific research requires the collaboration of hundreds (if not thousands) of scientists with various specializations. Additionally, the majority of published scientific research is now coauthored, including more than 80% of articles in the natural sciences. Small collaborative teams have become the norm in science. This is the first volume to address critical philosophical questions about how collective scientific research could be organized differently and how it should be organized. For example, should scientists be required to share knowledge with competing research teams? How can universities and grant-giving institutions promote successful collaborations? When hundreds of researchers contribute to a discovery, how should credit be assigned—and can minorities expect a fair share? When collaborative work contains significant errors or fraudulent data, who deserves blame? In this collection of essays, leading philosophers of science address these critical questions, among others. Their work extends current philosophical research on the social structure of science and contributes to the growing, interdisciplinary field of social epistemology. The volume’s strength lies in the diversity of its authors’ methodologies. Employing detailed case studies of scientific practice, mathematical models of scientific communities, and rigorous conceptual analysis, contributors to this volume study scientific groups of all kinds, including small labs, peer-review boards, and large international collaborations like those in climate science and particle physics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document