Warum denken wir „einseitig“? Der Brain-Dominance-Test als Instrument der Personalentwicklung

1992 ◽  
pp. 393-408
Author(s):  
Sjoerd van der Ploeg
Keyword(s):  
Dominance Test ◽  
Brain Dominance

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ PREFERENCES FOR LEARNING ENVIRONMENT ON THE BASIS OF SCHOOL TYPES.

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (36) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megha D’souza ◽  
Shefali Pandya
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
T Test ◽  
Dominance Test ◽  
Environment Scale ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Descriptive Method

Education is a potent force in developing a child into skilled, effective, productive and law-abiding citizen. It is therefore imperative that the environment for the education of the child is conducive and congenial for his growth and development. The aim of the study was to compare students’ preferences for learning environment on the basis of School Types. The study adopted the descriptive method of the Casual – Comparative type. The sample comprised of 574 standard VIII English medium students from schools. The tools used for the study were Preferred Learning Environment Scale by Fraser (1996) and Hemisphericity Dominance Test by Venkataraman. ANOVA and ‘t’ test was used to compare students’ preference for learning environment on the basis of hemisphericity and gender respectively. The findings are discussed in detail in the paper.

scholarly journals Grammatical sensitivity: a correlational-explanatory study on brain dominance and Efl training to improve gains

2011 ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Muriel Oyarce Piraud
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Abstract Reasoning ◽  
Brain Dominance ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Left Brain ◽  
Reasoning Test ◽  
Grammatical Sensitivity ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
The Brain

This article provides a report on a finished piece of research. The study is divided into two stages. Firstly, the brain dominance and grammatical sensitivity of Pedagogy and Medical students in a Chilean university were measured. The correlation of both variables shows that Medical students are better at grammatical sensitivity than Pedagogy students and that left-brain dominance involves higher levels of grammatical sensitivity than right-brain dominance. The instruments used in this stage were: 1) a grammatical sensitivity pre-test (used to assess the students’ levels in this variable), 2) a brain dominance instrument (used to determine the cerebral preferences of the students) and 3) an abstract reasoning test (which measures a person’s ability to identify non numerical or verbal patterns). In the second stage, Pedagogy students underwent a five-session training aimed at improving their grammatical sensitivity. After the training was over, we administered a grammatical sensitivity post- test whose results were compared with the ones in the pre-test; the purpose was to determine if the training could improve the students’ performance in this variable. It was concluded that the training was successful since their grammatical sensitivity improved in 20%. In addition, most students with high attendance to the training (over 80%) improved their grammatical sensitivity after attending it.

scholarly journals K-NN Classification of Brain Dominance

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 2494
Author(s):  
Khairul Amrizal Abu Nawas ◽  
Mahfuzah Mustafa ◽  
Rosdiyana Samad ◽  
Dwi Pebrianti ◽  
Nor Rul Hasma Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Wavelet Analysis ◽  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Gabor Wavelet ◽  
Image Feature ◽  
Band Pass Filter ◽  
K Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Brain Dominance ◽  
Pass Filter ◽  
Band Frequency ◽  
The Brain

<span>The brain dominance is referred to right brain and left brain. The brain dominance can be observed with an Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal to identify different types of electrical pattern in the brain and will form the foundation of one’s personality. The objective of this project is to analyze brain dominance by using Wavelet analysis. The Wavelet analysis is done in 2-D Gabor Wavelet and the result of 2-D Gabor Wavelet is validated with an establish brain dominance questionnaire. Twenty-one samples from University Malaysia Pahang (UMP) student are required to answer the establish brain dominance questionnaire has been collected in this experiment. Then, brainwave signal will record using Emotiv device. The threshold value is used to remove the artifact and noise from data collected to acquire a smoother signal. Next, the Band-pass filter is applied to the signal to extract the sub-band frequency components from Delta, Theta, Alpha, and Beta. After that, it will extract the energy of the signal from image feature extraction process. Next the features were classified by using K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) in two ratios which 70:30 and 80:20 that are training set and testing set (training: testing). The ratio of 70:30 gave the highest percentage of 83% accuracy while a ratio of 80:20 gave 100% accuracy. The result shows that 2-D Gabor Wavelet was able to classify brain dominance with accuracy 83% to 100%.</span>

Diverse Thinking-Style Preferences in a University Course in Mathematics

2001 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacobus G. Maree ◽  
Tobia Steyn
Keyword(s):  
Thinking Style ◽  
Brain Dominance ◽  
Instructional Activities ◽  
University Of Pretoria ◽  
Instrument Analysis ◽  
Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument ◽  
Style Preferences ◽  
University Course ◽  
The University

At the University of Pretoria during 1999 the thinking-style preferences of three groups of students ( ns = 50, 31, and 13) taking a first course in calculus were assessed using the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument. Analysis affirmed diversity in thinking-style preferences among the students and that the groups' scores represent a composite range of such preferences. Clearly, teachers of mathematics should be aware of and accommodate this diversity in instructional activities.

Anomalous brain dominance and the immune system: Do left-handers have specific immunological patterns?

2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charis Lengen ◽  
Marianne Regard ◽  
Helen Joller ◽  
Theodor Landis ◽  
Patrice Lalive
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
Brain Dominance

The Effect of the Inner Game Method versus the Progressive Method on Learning Motor Skills

1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldine Madden ◽  
Carl McGown
Keyword(s):  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Hemispheric Dominance ◽  
Progressive Method ◽  
Brain Dominance ◽  
Gain Scores ◽  
Survey Form ◽  
Technical Manual ◽  
Team Game ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Method Analysis

This study compared the effect of the Gallwey inner game method with the progressive method, as presented in the U.S. Volleyball Association Level 1 Technical Manual, on the learning of volleyball skills. The interaction of the methods with hemispheric dominance was also investigated. Hemisphericity was assessed using the Herrmann Participant Survey Form (HPSF). Volleyball skill was evaluated with a modification of the Barbarich (1980) Forearm Pass Test (BFPT) and a team game called cooperation. Undergraduate volunteers were divided into four groups. Two groups were taught by the inner game method and the other two groups were taught by the progressive method. Analysis of variance on the gain scores of the BFPT revealed no significant differences between the methods for forearm pass. There were also no differences on the team scores for cooperation, nor was there any significant interaction between brain dominance and either method. Thus, the prediction that right hemisphere dominant students would profit more if taught by the inner game method and that left hemisphere dominant students would profit more through the progressive method was not realized.

scholarly journals The Relationship between Predicting Personality Using Physiognomy and Through Using Personality Scale

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mohammad L. Abulaban ◽  
Sahar S. Muzher ◽  
Ahmad M. Thawabieh
Keyword(s):  
Personality Type ◽  
Personality Types ◽  
The Other ◽  
Brain Dominance ◽  
Personality Scale ◽  
Positive Correlations ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims at investigating the relationship between predicting personality types through physiognomy on theone hand and through using personality scale on the other. 474 volunteers participated. 3 scales were used to collectdata: physiognomy judgments, Abulaban physiognomy scale and Herman brain dominance scale. The resultsindicated that there were high positive correlations between the three scales. The study recommends usingphysiognomy as a method to determine personality type as it is easy, valid, and provides fast results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document