The psychological state and changes in the routine of the patients with rheumatic diseases during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Turkey: a web-based cross-sectional survey

Background:Concern for the susceptibility of rheumatology patients to severe COVID-19 illness has been raised since the start of the pandemic. Rheumatic disease and their immunosuppressant therapies placed many patients into the ‘clinically extremely vulnerable’ group when the UK’s shielding guidance commenced on 23 March 2020. The impact of DMARDs/glucocorticoids/biologics on COVID-19 remains under investigation 1. A recent study suggested caution may be required with rituximab and sulfasalazine in COVID-19 patients 2.Objectives:The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rheumatology patients in Northern Ireland by assessing demographics, rheumatic disease, medications, disease progress, shielding advice, access to primary & tertiary care and incidence of COVID-19 infection.Methods:A web-based cross-sectional survey was completed in Northern Ireland. The study duration was between 23rd November 2020 and 22nd January 2021. The questionnaire included consent, demographic details, medication history, comorbidities, disease course, patient experience, shielding advice, COVID-19 illness and hospitalisation. The survey was publicised by sending 6,032 Belfast Trust NHS patients a link via SMS, posters were displayed in rheumatology departments, and links made available via NHS/Versus Arthritis social media platforms.Results:There were 2,615 responses and of these 2,539 had been completed and were analysed. Most respondents were aged 45+ (78.27%) and female (N=1819). Rheumatoid arthritis (41%) and psoriatic arthritis (29%) were the most common diagnoses. Just over one third (35.27%, N=896) of patients were on biological drugs. Most patients were taking methotrexate (28.04%) followed by hydroxychloroquine (15.20%) and adalimumab (12.52%). The majority (79.6%) continued treatment during the pandemic. There was evidence of disease ‘flaring’ in 30.75% of patients who had stopped treatment. Of the respondents surveyed 7.8% (N=198), tested positive for Covid-19 and of these 77.55% reported that they had received adequate shielding advice, primarily from GP or UK government sources. Only 11.11% (N=22) of those who tested positive for Covid-19 required hospital admission and 2 patients required intensive care support. Both patients requiring ICU were not on immunosuppression. Less than one third of patients testing positive for COVID-19 were on biological drugs (30.3%, N=60). Cardiovascular disease was the most prevalent comorbidity. Of the 22 patients hospitalised with COVID-19, 13.64% (N=3) were on solitary sulphasalazine therapy.Conclusion:The survey showed low levels of COVID-19 hospitalisation despite most patients continuing DMARD/biologic/glucocorticoid therapy. This has been replicated in other studies 1, however data continues to be gathered on the safety of some biologic drugs particularly rituximab 2. Most of our patients received clear understandable shielding guidance from a variety of sources. Many patients expressed fear of mortality, isolation and mental health issues. The survey findings indicated that stopping medication can have a negative impact on disease control.References:[1]Robinson PC, Yazdany J. The COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance: collecting data in a pandemic. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020 Jun;16(6):293-294.[2]Strangfeld A, Schäfer M, Gianfrancesco MA, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Published Online First: 27 January 2021. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219498Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Dengue among Physicians: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey

Behavioral Sciences ◽

10.3390/bs11080105 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (8) ◽

pp. 105

Author(s):

Kranthi Swaroop Koonisetty ◽

Ubydul Haque ◽

Rajesh Nandy ◽

Nasrin Aghamohammadi ◽

Tamanna Urmi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dengue Fever ◽

Viral Infections ◽

Diagnosis And Treatment ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Accurate Identification ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Web Based ◽

Attitudes And Practices ◽

Aedes Mosquitoes ◽

Knowledge Attitudes And Practices

Dengue fever is one of the most important viral infections transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes and a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Accurate identification of cases and treatment of dengue patients at the early stages can reduce medical complications and dengue mortality rate. This survey aims to determine the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) among physicians in dengue diagnosis and treatment. This study was conducted among physicians in Turkey as one nonendemic country and Bangladesh, India, and Malaysia as three dengue-endemic countries. The dosing frequencies, maximum doses, and contraindications in dengue fever were examined. The results found that physicians from Bangladesh, India, and Malaysia have higher KAP scores in dengue diagnosis and treatment compared to physicians in Turkey. This may be due to a lack of physician’s exposure to a dengue patient as Turkey is considered a nonendemic country. This assessment may help establish a guideline for intervention strategies among physicians to have successful treatment outcomes and reduce dengue mortality.

Download Full-text

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Reconstruction: A Canadian Perspective

Plastic Surgery ◽

10.1177/22925503211030017 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 229255032110300

Author(s):

Caroline F. Illmann ◽

Christopher Doherty ◽

Margaret Wheelock ◽

Joshua Vorstenbosch ◽

Joan E. Lipa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Reconstruction ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Web Based ◽

Reconstructive Procedures ◽

Surgical Access ◽

Canadian Perspective ◽

Canadian Provinces ◽

The Impact

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges and restrictions in surgical access across Canada, including for breast reconstructive services which are an integral component of comprehensive breast cancer care. We sought to determine how breast reconstructive services are being restricted, and what strategies may be employed to optimize the provision of breast reconstruction through a pan-Canadian evaluation from the providers’ perspective. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey of Canadian plastic and reconstructive surgeons who perform breast reconstruction. The 33-item web-based questionnaire was developed by a pan-Canadian working group of breast reconstruction experts and disseminated via email to members of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgery. The questionnaire queried respondents on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions on surgeons’ breast reconstruction practice patterns and opinions on strategies for resource utilization. Results: Responses were received from 49 surgeons, who reported practicing in 8 of 10 Canadian provinces. Restrictions on the provision of breast reconstructive procedures were most limited during the First Wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, where all respondents reported at least some reduction in capacity and more than a quarter reporting complete cessation. Average reported reduction in capacity ranged from 31% to 78% across all 3 waves. Autologous, delayed, and prophylactic reconstructions were most commonly restricted. Conclusion: This study provides a pan-Canadian impact assessment on breast reconstructive services during the COVID-19 pandemic from the providers’ perspective. To uphold the standards of patient-centred care, a unified approach to strategically reorganize health care delivery now and in the future is needed.

Download Full-text

Breast-feeding promotion in hospitals and prospective breast-feeding rates during the first year of life in two national surveys 1997–1998 and 2017–2019 in Germany

Public Health Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s1368980021001099 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-13

Author(s):

Nele Hockamp ◽

Constanze Burak ◽

Erika Sievers ◽

Silvia Rudloff ◽

Anja Burmann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Feeding ◽

Infant Nutrition ◽

Feeding Habits ◽

First Year ◽

Feeding Rates ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Web Based ◽

Phone Calls ◽

First Year Of Life

Abstract Objectives: The present study aimed to assess the current state of breast-feeding promotion in hospitals and the prevalence of breast-feeding during the first year of life in Germany and to compare the results with a study 20 years earlier. Design: In the studies on ‘breast-feeding and infant nutrition in Germany’ named ‘SuSe’, a cross-sectional survey in hospitals was combined with a subsequent prospective survey of breast-feeding and infant nutrition during the first year of life (0·5, 2, 4, 6 and 12 months after birth) in mother–infant pairs who were recruited in the hospitals. Written questionnaires and phone calls were used in SuSe I and web-based questionnaires in SuSe II. Breast-feeding promotion and prevalence were evaluated using recommendations from the WHO and the UNICEF. Setting: Two nationwide surveys SuSe I (1997–1998) and SuSe II (2017–2019). Participants: In SuSe I, 177 hospitals and 1717 mother–infant pairs and in SuSe II 109 hospitals and 962 mother–infant pairs were included. Results: In SuSe II, hospitals implemented seven of the WHO ‘Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding’ to a greater extent than the hospitals in SuSe I. More mothers exclusively breastfed for 4 months (57 % v. 33 %) and continued breast-feeding until 6 (78 % v. 48 %) and 12 months (41 % v. 13 %). In both studies, exclusive breast-feeding decreased between 4 and 6 months of age due to the introduction of complementary feeding. Conclusions: In Germany, breast-feeding habits have come closer to the recommendations over the last 20 years.

Download Full-text

Corona virus fear among health workers during the early phase of pandemic response in Nepal: a web-based cross-sectional study

10.1101/2020.11.04.367912 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Pratik Khanal ◽

Navin Devkota ◽

Minakshi Dahal ◽

Kiran Paudel ◽

Shiva Raj Mishra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Family Member ◽

Chronic Diseases ◽

Early Phase ◽

Health Workers ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Web Based ◽

Factors Associated

AbstractBackgroundHealth workers involved in COVID-19 response might be at risk of developing fear and psychological distress. This study aimed to identify factors associated with COVID-19 fear among health workers in Nepal during the early phase of pandemic.MethodsA web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in the month of April-May 2020 among 475 health workers directly involved in COVID-19 management. The Fear Scale of COVID 19 (FCV-19S) was used to measure the status of fear. Scatter plots were used to observe the relationship between fear and other psychological outcomes: anxiety, depression and insomnia. Multivariable logistic regression was done to identify factors associated with COVID fear.ResultsCOVID-19 fear score was moderately correlated with anxiety and depression, and weakly correlated with insomnia (p<0.001). Nurses (AOR=2.29; 95% CI: 1.23-4.26), health workers experiencing stigma (AOR=1.83; 95% CI: 1.12-2.73), those working in affected district(AOR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.12-2.77) and presence of family member with chronic diseases (AOR=1.50; 95% CI: 1.01-2.25) was associated with higher odds of developing COVID-19 fear as compared to other health workers, health workers not experiencing stigma, working in non-affected district and not having family member with chronic diseases respectively.ConclusionNurses, health workers facing stigma, those working in affect district and having family member with chronic diseases were more at risk of developing COVID-19 fear. It is thus recommended to improve work environment to reduce fear among health workers, employ stigma reduction interventions, and ensure personal and family support for those having family member with chronic diseases.

Download Full-text

Knowledge, Attitude and Perception towards COVID-19 Pandemic among Veterinary Professionals and Impacts: A Cross-Sectional Nationwide-Based Survey

COVID ◽

10.3390/covid1030053 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (3) ◽

pp. 645-665

Author(s):

Olubukola Adenubi ◽

Oluwawemimo Adebowale ◽

Hezekiah Adesokan ◽

Abimbola Oloye ◽

Noah Bankole ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Best Practices ◽

Physical Status ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Web Based ◽

Postgraduate Qualification ◽

Level Of Knowledge ◽

Policy Measures ◽

Household Members ◽

Good Attitude

This study evaluated the knowledge, attitude and perception (KAP) towards COVID-19 pandemic control among veterinarians in Nigeria. A nation-wide web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted. Information on KAP towards the COVID-19 pandemic was gathered (April 23 and May 31, 2020) and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify associated factors. A total of 368 veterinarians participated in the study. The majority of respondents were males (72.8%), between the ages of 30–39 years (39.7%). Generally, respondents displayed a good level of knowledge about COVID-19 (72.4% ± 9.9%, range 44.1–91.2%), while the general attitude level was poor (65.4% ± 10.8, range 35.3–94.1%). Various determinants for good attitude among respondents were: if they were above 60 years old (aOR = 4.49, 95% CI: 1.379–14.594, p = 0.013), possessed postgraduate qualification (aOR = 1.63, 95 CI: 1.045–2.553, p = 0.031), worked over 30 years post DVM (aOR = 5.63, 95% CI: 1.966–16.100, p = 0.001), had household members between five and 10 (aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.130–2.641, p = 0.012), and if respondents’ residence was on total lockdown (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.070–2.590, p = 0.024). The pandemic had moderate impacts on social, financial and physical status of the participants. Stricter policy measures and educational programs should be implemented to keep veterinarians and the populace informed about the best practices recommended for COVID-19 management.

Download Full-text

Sleep disturbance and anxiety symptom among public during the second wave of COVID-19 in Beijing: A web-based cross-sectional survey

Journal of Affective Disorders ◽

10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.068 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yanan liu ◽

Xi Wang ◽

Pengfei Sun ◽

Qi Zhang ◽

Cheng Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sleep Disturbance ◽

Anxiety Symptom ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Web Based ◽

Second Wave

Download Full-text

Bedside ultrasound education in Canadian medical schools: A national survey

Canadian Medical Education Journal ◽

10.36834/cmej.36646 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. e78-e86 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Peter Steinmetz ◽

Octavian Dobrescu ◽

Sharon Oleskevich ◽

John Lewis

Keyword(s):

Medical School ◽

Undergraduate Curriculum ◽

Medical Schools ◽

School Curriculum ◽

Bedside Ultrasound ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Web Based ◽

Ultrasound Education ◽

Current Characteristics

Background: This study was carried out to determine the extent and characteristics of bedside ultrasound teaching in medical schools across Canada.Methods: A cross-sectional, survey-based study was used to assess undergraduate bedside ultrasound education in the 17 accredited medical schools in Canada. The survey, consisting of 19 questions was pilot-tested, web-based, and completed over a period of seven months in 2014.Results: Approximately half of the 13 responding medical schools had integrated bedside ultrasound teaching into their undergraduate curriculum. The most common trends in undergraduate ultrasound teaching related to duration (1-5 hours/year in 50% of schools), format (practical and theoretical in 67% of schools), and logistics (1:4 instructor to student ratio in 67% of schools). The majority of responding vice-deans indicated that bedside ultrasound education should be integrated into the medical school curriculum (77%), and cited a lack of ultrasound machines and infrastructure as barriers to integration.Conclusions: This study documents the current characteristics of undergraduate ultrasound education in Canada.

Download Full-text

Risk perception and psychological state of healthcare workers in referral hospitals during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, Uganda

BMC Psychology ◽

10.1186/s40359-021-00706-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Richard Migisha ◽

Alex Riolexus Ario ◽

Benon Kwesiga ◽

Lilian Bulage ◽

Daniel Kadobera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psychological Distress ◽

Risk Perception ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

General Health Questionnaire ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Well Being ◽

Psychological State ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Referral Hospitals

Abstract Background Safeguarding the psychological well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs) is crucial to ensuring sustainability and quality of healthcare services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs may be subject to excessive mental stress. We assessed the risk perception and immediate psychological state of HCWs early in the pandemic in referral hospitals involved in the management of COVID-19 patients in Uganda. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in five referral hospitals from April 20–May 22, 2020. During this time, we distributed paper-based, self-administered questionnaires to all consenting HCWs on day shifts. The questionnaire included questions on socio-demographics, occupational behaviors, potential perceived risks, and psychological distress. We assessed risk perception towards COVID-19 using 27 concern statements with a four-point Likert scale. We defined psychological distress as a total score > 12 from the 12-item Goldberg’s General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). We used modified Poisson regression to identify factors associated with psychological distress. Results Among 335 HCWs who received questionnaires, 328 (98%) responded. Respondents’ mean age was 36 (range 18–59) years; 172 (52%) were male. The median duration of professional experience was eight (range 1–35) years; 208 (63%) worked more than 40 h per week; 116 (35%) were nurses, 52 (14%) doctors, 30 (9%) clinical officers, and 86 (26%) support staff. One hundred and forty-four (44%) had a GHQ-12 score > 12. The most common concerns reported included fear of infection at the workplace (81%), stigma from colleagues (79%), lack of workplace support (63%), and inadequate availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) (56%). In multivariable analysis, moderate (adjusted prevalence ratio, [aPR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–4.0) and high (aPR = 3.8, 95% CI 2.0–7.0) risk perception towards COVID-19 (compared with low-risk perception) were associated with psychological distress. Conclusions Forty-four percent of HCWs surveyed in hospitals treating COVID-19 patients during the early COVID-19 epidemic in Uganda reported psychological distress related to fear of infection, stigma, and inadequate PPE. Higher perceived personal risk towards COVID-19 was associated with increased psychological distress. To optimize patient care during the pandemic and future outbreaks, workplace management may consider identifying and addressing HCW concerns, ensuring sufficient PPE and training, and reducing infection-associated stigma.

Download Full-text