scholarly journals Effectiveness of fast-track pathway for diabetic foot ulcerations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Meloni ◽  
Jose Luis Lazaro Martinez ◽  
Raju Ahluwalia ◽  
Benjamin Bouillet ◽  
Valentina Izzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Early Referral ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Late Referral

Abstract Aim To investigate the effectiveness of fast-track pathway (FTP) in the management of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) after 2 years of implementation. Methods The study group was composed of patients who referred to a specialized DF centre due to DFUs. Those were divided in two groups: early referral (ER) and late referral (LR) patients. According to FTP, ER were considered patients who referred after 2 weeks in the case of uncomplicated non-healing ulcers (superficial, not infected, not ischemic), within 4 days in the case of complicated ulcers (ischemic, deep, mild infection) and within 24 h in the case of severely complicated ulcers (abscess, wet gangrene, fever). Healing, healing time, minor and major amputation, hospitalization, and survival were evaluated. The follow-up was 6 months. Results Two hundred patients were recruited. The mean age was 70 ± 13 years, 62.5% were male, 91% were affected by type 2 diabetes with a mean duration of 18 ± 11 years. Within the group, 79.5% had ER while 20.5% had LR. ER patients showed increased rates of healing (89.9 vs. 41.5%, p = 0.001), reduced healing time (10 vs. 16 weeks, p = 0.0002), lower rates of minor (17.6 vs. 75.6%, p < 0.0001) and major amputation (0.6 vs. 36.6%, p < 0.0001), hospitalization (47.1 vs. 82.9%, p = 0.001), and mortality (4.4 vs. 19.5%, p = 0.02) in comparison to LR. At multivariate analysis, ER was an independent predictor of healing, while LR was an independent predictor for minor and major amputation and hospitalization. Conclusion After the FTP implementation, less cases of LR were reported in comparison to ER. ER was an independent predictor of positive outcomes such as healing, healing time, limb salvage, hospitalization, and survival.

scholarly journals Foot Revascularization Avoids Major Amputation in Persons with Diabetes and Ischaemic Foot Ulcers

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 3977
Author(s):  
Marco Meloni ◽  
Daniele Morosetti ◽  
Laura Giurato ◽  
Matteo Stefanini ◽  
Giorgio Loreni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Minor Amputation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Revascularization Procedures

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of foot revascularization in persons with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and below-the-ankle (BTA) arterial disease. Consecutive patients referred for a new active ischaemic DFU requiring lower limb revascularization were considered. Among those, only patients with a BTA arterial disease were included. Revascularization procedures were retrospectively analysed: in the case of successful foot revascularization (recanalization of pedal artery, or plantar arteries or both) or not, patients were respectively divided in two groups, successful foot perfusion (SFP) and failed foot perfusion (FFP). Healing, minor and major amputation at 12 months of follow-up were evaluated and compared. Eighty patients (80) were included. The mean age was 70.5 ± 10.9 years, 55 (68.7%) were male, 72 (90%) were affected by type 2 diabetes with a mean duration of 22.7 ± 11.3 years. Overall 45 (56.2%) patients healed, 47 (58.7%) had minor amputation and 13 (16.2%) major amputation. Outcomes for SFP and FFP were respectively: healing (89.3 vs. 9.1%, p < 0.0001), minor amputation (44.7 vs. 78.8%, p = 0.0001), major amputation (2.1 vs. 36.3%, p < 0.0001). Failed foot revascularization resulted an independent predictor of non-healing, minor amputation, and major amputation. Foot revascularization is mandatory to achieve healing and avoid major amputation in persons with ischaemic DFU and BTA arterial disease.

scholarly journals Diabetic Foot: Surgical Approach in Emergency

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Setacci ◽  
P. Sirignano ◽  
G. Mazzitelli ◽  
F. Setacci ◽  
G. Messina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Surgical Debridement ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mean Time

Introduction. Critical limb lschemia (CLI) and particularly diabetic foot (DF) are still considered “Cinderella” in our departments. Anyway, the presence of arterial obstructive disease increases the risk of amputation by itself; when it is associated with foot infection, the risk of amputation is greatly increased.Methods. From January 2007 to December 2011, 375 patients with DF infection and CLI have been admitted to our Unit; from 2007 to 2009, 192 patients (Group A) underwent surgical debridement of the lesion followed by a delayed revascularization; from 2010 to 2011, 183 patients (Group B) were treated following a new 4-step protocol: (1) early diagnosis with a 24 h on call DF team; (2) urgent treatment of severe foot infection with an aggressive surgical debridement; (3) early revascularization within 24 hours; (4) definitive treatment: wound healing, reconstructive surgery, and orthesis. We reported rates of mortality, major amputation, and foot healing at 6 months of followup.Results. The majority of patients in both groups were male; no statistical differences in medical history and clinical condition were reported at the baseline. The main difference between the two groups was the mean time from debridement to revascularization (3 days in Group A and 24 hours in Group B). After 6 months of follow-up, mortality was 11% in Group A versus 4.4% in Group B. Major amputation rate was 39.6% and 24.6% in Groups A and B, respectively. Wound healing was achieved in 17.8% in Group A and 20.8% in Group B.Conclusions. This protocol requires a lot of professional skills that should to reach the goal to avoid major amputations in patients with DF. Only an interdisciplinary integrated DF team and an early intervention may significantly impact the outcome of our patients: “Time is Tissue”!

Use of Nevelia Dermal-Epidermal Regenerative Template in the Management of Ischemic Diabetic Foot Postsurgical Wounds

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Uccioli ◽  
Marco Meloni ◽  
Valentina Izzo ◽  
Laura Giurato
Keyword(s):  
Skin Graft ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers

The purpose of this cross-sectional study is evaluate the effectiveness of a dermal-epidermal substitute (DES) composed of 3-dimensional porous matrix of type 1, purified, stabilized, bovin-origin collagen (Nevelia, SYMATESE, Chaponost, France) without a subsequent skin graft in the treatment ischemic postsurgical diabetic foot ulcers. This study group was composed of a sample of consecutive diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia and postsurgical wounds. All patients received a preset limb salvage protocol including the application of the DES, but none received a skin graft. Patients were closely followed until wound healing or different outcome. The outcome measures were healing, nonhealing, major amputation, and death evaluated at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Forty-one patients were included. The average postsurgical wound area was 69.6 ± 50 cm2. Twenty-one patients (51%) healed; 10 patients (24%) did not heal after 1 year of follow-up; however, all of them achieved a mean ulcer size reduction >50%; 7 patients (17%) were amputees; 3 patients (7.3%) died. In a later follow-up (2 years), wounds in 8 additional patients healed. Successful revascularization was an independent predictor of healing (hazard ratio = 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5-14-9; P = .0001), the postsurgical ulcer size (>50 cm2) was an independent predictor of nonhealing (hazard ratio = 6.2, 95% CI = 2.1-38.4; P = .0001) while recurrence of critical limb ischemia was an independent predictor of major amputation (odds ratio = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.1-4.5; P = .002). The DES composed of type 1 bovin-origin collagen is useful in the treatment of large postsurgical diabetic foot ulcers, even when the skin graft is not a suitable therapeutic option.

Pilonidal Sinus: How to Choose Between Excision and Open Granulation Versus Excision and Primary Closure?

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 255-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perruchoud ◽  
Vuilleumier ◽  
Givel
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Primary Healing

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure as treatments for pilonidal sinus. Subjects and methods: We evaluated a group of 141 patients operated on for a pilonidal sinus between 1991 and 1995. Ninety patients were treated by excision and open granulation, 34 patients by excision and primary closure and 17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus. Results: The first group, receiving treatment of excision and open granulation, experienced the following outcomes: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time; 72 days; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 40; average off-work delay, 38 days; and average follow-up time, 43 months. There were five recurrences (6%) in this group during the follow-up period. For the second group treated by excision and primary closure, the corresponding outcome measurements were as follows: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time, 23 days; primary healing failure rate, 9%; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 6; average off-work delay, 21 days. The average follow-up time was 34 months, and two recurrences (6%) were observed during the follow-up period. In the third group, seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases. Discussion and conclusion: This series of 141 patients is too limited to permit final conclusions to be drawn concerning significant advantages of one form of treatment compared to the other. Nevertheless, primary closure offers the advantages of quicker healing time, fewer post-operative visits and shorter time off work. When a primary closure can be carried out, it should be routinely considered for socio-economical and comfort reasons.

scholarly journals Healing below the ankle is possible in patients with diabetes mellitus and a forefoot gangrene

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 205031212110291
Author(s):  
Targ Elgzyri ◽  
Jan Apelqvist ◽  
Eero Lindholm ◽  
Hedvig Örneholm ◽  
Magdalena Annersten Gershater
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Foot Ulcer ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Severe Form ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Vascular Intervention ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Background: Forefoot gangrene in patients with diabetes is a severe form of foot ulcers with risk of progress and major amputation. No large cohort studies have examined clinical characteristics and outcome of forefoot gangrene in patients with diabetes. The aim was to examine clinical characteristics and outcome of forefoot gangrene in patients with diabetes admitted to a diabetic foot centre. Methods: Patients with diabetes and foot ulcer consecutively presenting were included if they had forefoot gangrene (Wagner grade 4) at initial visit or developed forefoot gangrene during follow-up at diabetic foot centre. Patients were prospectively followed up until final outcome, either healing or death. The median follow-up period until healing was 41 (3–234) weeks. Results: Four hundred and seventy-six patients were included. The median age was 73 (35–95) years and 63% were males. Of the patients, 82% had cardiovascular disease and 16% had diabetic nephropathy. Vascular intervention was performed in 64%. Fifty-one patients (17% of surviving patients) healed after auto-amputation, 150 after minor amputation (48% of surviving patients), 103 had major amputation (33% of surviving patients) and 162 patients deceased unhealed. Ten patients were lost at follow-up. The median time to healing for all surviving patients was 41 (3–234) weeks; for auto-amputated, 48 (10–228) weeks; for minor amputated, 48 (6–234) weeks; and for major amputation, 32 (3–116) weeks. Conclusion: Healing without major amputation is possible in a large proportion of patients with diabetes and forefoot gangrene, despite these patients being elderly and with extensive co-morbidity.

Outcomes after Emergency Admission with a Diabetic Foot Attack Indicate a High Rate of Healing and Limb Salvage But Increased Mortality: 18-Month Follow-up Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Vainieri ◽  
Raju Ahluwalia ◽  
Hani Slim ◽  
Daina Walton ◽  
Chris Manu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Emergency Admission ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract Aim The diabetic foot attack (DFA) is perhaps the most devastating form of diabetic foot infection, presenting with rapidly progressive skin and tissue necrosis, threatening both limb and life. However, clinical outcome data in this specific group of patients are not available. Methods Analysis of 106 consecutive patients who underwent emergency hospitalisation for DFA (TEXAS Grade 3B or 3D and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Class 4 criteria). Outcomes evaluated were: 1) Healing 2) major amputation 3) death 4) not healed. The first outcome reached in one of these four categories over the follow-up period (18.4±3.6 months) was considered. We also estimated amputation free survival. Results Overall, 57.5% (n=61) healed, 5.6% (n=6) underwent major amputation, 23.5% (n=25) died without healing and 13.2% (n=14) were alive without healing. Predictive factors associated with outcomes were: Healing (age<60, p=0.0017; no Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) p= 0.002; not on dialysis p=0.006); major amputation (CRP>100 mg/L, p=0.001; gram+ve organisms, p=0.0013; dialysis, p= 0.001), and for death (age>60, p= 0.0001; gram+ve organisms p=0.004; presence of PAD, p=0.0032; CRP, p=0.034). The major amputation free survival was 71% during the first 12 months from admission, however it had reduced to 55.4% by the end of the follow-up period. Conclusions In a unique population of hospitalised individuals with DFA, we report excellent healing and limb salvage rates using a dedicated protocol in a multidisciplinary setting. An additional novel finding was the concerning observation that such an admission was associated with high 18-month mortality, almost all of which was after discharge from hospital.

scholarly journals Real-World Clinical Outcomes Associated with Canagliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain: The Real-Wecan Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2275
Author(s):  
Juan J. Gorgojo-Martínez ◽  
Manuel A. Gargallo-Fernández ◽  
Alba Galdón Sanz-Pastor ◽  
Teresa Antón-Bravo ◽  
Miguel Brito-Sanfiel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Real World ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Baseline Hba1c ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Antihyperglycemic Therapy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Hba1c Levels

The aims of this multicentric retrospective study were to assess in a real-world setting the effectiveness and safety of canagliflozin 100 mg/d (CANA100) as an add-on to the background antihyperglycemic therapy, and to evaluate the intensification of prior sodium–glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) therapy by switching to canagliflozin 300 mg/d (CANA300) in patients with T2DM. One cohort of SGLT2i-naïve patients with T2DM who were initiated on CANA100 and a second cohort of patients with prior background SGLT-2i therapy who switched to CANA300 were included in the study. The primary outcome of the study was the mean change in HbA1c over the follow-up time. In total, 583 patients were included—279 in the cohort of CANA100 (HbA1c 8.05%, weight 94.9 kg) and 304 in the cohort of CANA300 (HbA1c 7.51%, weight 92.0 kg). Median follow-up periods in both cohorts were 9.1 and 15.4 months respectively. CANA100 was associated to significant reductions in HbA1c (−0.90%) and weight (−4.1 kg) at the end of the follow-up. In those patients with baseline HbA1c > 8% (mean 9.25%), CANA100 lowered HbA1c levels by 1.51%. In the second cohort, patients switching to CANA300 experienced a significant decrease in HbA1c (−0.35%) and weight (−2.1 kg). In those patients with baseline HbA1c > 8% (mean 8.94%), CANA300 lowered HbA1c levels by 1.12%. There were significant improvements in blood pressure in both cohorts. No unexpected adverse events were reported. In summary, CANA100 (as an add-on therapy) and CANA300 (switching from prior SGLT-2i therapy) significantly improved several cardiometabolic parameters in patients with T2DM.

Autologous Skin Fibroblast and Keratinocyte Grafts in the Treatment of Chronic Foot Ulcers in Aging Type 2 Diabetic Patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Monami ◽  
Maria Vivarelli ◽  
Carla Maria Desideri ◽  
Giulio Ippolito ◽  
Niccolò Marchionni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healing Time ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Type 2 Diabetic Patients ◽  
Skin Cell ◽  
Type 2 Diabetic

Background: We assessed the tolerability and efficacy of autologous skin cell grafts in older type 2 diabetic patients with chronic foot ulcers. Methods: Treatment with Hyalograft 3D and Laserskin Autograft was proposed to a consecutive series of type 2 diabetic patients older than 65 years affected by long-standing (&gt;6 months) foot ulcers with an area greater than 15 cm2. Ulcer healing rates and measurements of ulcer area were determined monthly for 12 months. Results: Seven patients with 12 ulcers, nine of which received the described treatment, were enrolled. During 12-month follow-up, all of the ulcers healed except one. In the remaining eight ulcers, the median healing time was 21 weeks (interquartile range, 4–29 weeks). Conclusions: Autologous skin cell grafts are feasible, well tolerated, and apparently effective in the treatment of diabetic ulcers of the lower limbs in advanced age. Age did not seem to moderate healing times. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 101(1): 55–58, 2011)

Extensive curettage using a high-speed burr versus dehydrated alcohol instillation for the treatment of enchondroma of the hand

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Cha ◽  
H. D. Shin ◽  
K. C. Kim ◽  
I. Y. Park
Keyword(s):  
Analogue Scale ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Proximal Phalanx ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
Pathological Fractures ◽  
Active Motion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
High Speed Burr

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with different adjuvant methods after curettage for enchondromas of the hand. Sixty-two patients with enchondroma were treated with high-speed burring (29 patients) or alcohol instillation (33 patients) after curettage. The mean follow-up was 40.8 months. No significant differences in the visual analogue scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, total range of active motion, grip strength, and complete healing time were observed between the groups. The distribution of the results of the formula by Wilhelm and Feldmeier were not significantly different between the groups. No surgery-related complications, postoperative pathological fractures, or recurrence was found in either group. For the treatment of enchondroma in the metacarpal and proximal phalanx, alcohol instillation immediately after curettage was as effective as extensive curettage using a high-speed burr.

Treatment of persistent epithelial defects with single-dose autologous serum eye drops

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110483
Author(s):  
Selma Özbek-Uzman ◽  
Züleyha Yalnız-Akkaya ◽  
Evin Şingar Özdemir ◽  
Ayşe Burcu
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Autologous Serum ◽  
Eye Drops ◽  
Artificial Tears ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Preservative Free ◽  
Serum Eye Drops

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of single-dose autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs) for treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defects (PEDs). Methods: About 34 eyes of 26 patients treated from March 2016 to May 2020 with a single dose of ASEDs for PEDs that did not respond to conventional treatment were retrospectively evaluated. Patient demographics, predisposing factors, size, and duration of the PED, duration of treatment, and dosage of ASEDs, PED healing time, success rate of the ASED treatment, and follow-up time after the onset of ASED treatment were recorded. Autologous serum eye drops (20%) were prepared by diluting the serum with preservative-free artificial tears in single-dose vials. Vials were stored at −20°C and used daily after dissolving. Results: The mean patient age was 47.0 ± 18.5 years, and 13 (50%) of the patients were male. The most common indication for ASEDs was PED after keratoplasty. The mean duration of ASED treatment was 8.5 ± 6.3 months, and mean follow-up time was 22.8 ± 12.2 months. Autologous serum eye drop treatment was effective in 25 (73.5%) eyes and partially effective in 5 (14.7%) eyes. None of the eyes displayed complications related to the treatment. Conclusion: In patients with PED for whom conservative treatment is insufficient, ASEDs prepared by dilution with preservative-free artificial tears in single-dose vials and administered based on the daily use principle appear to be effective and safe.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document