scholarly journals Association of periodontitis and diabetic macular edema in various stages of diabetic retinopathy

Author(s):  
Marlene Lindner ◽  
Behrouz Arefnia ◽  
Domagoj Ivastinovic ◽  
Harald Sourij ◽  
Ewald Lindner ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Periodontitis and diabetes are known to have a bidirectional relationship. Diabetic macular edema is a complication of diabetes that is strongly influenced by inflammatory pathways. However, it remains to be established whether inflammation at other locations, such as periodontitis, affects diabetic macular edema. Here, we investigated the prevalence of periodontitis in patients treated for diabetic macular edema. Materials and methods Patients with diabetic macular edema were recruited for this cross-sectional study at the Medical University of Graz. Macular edema was documented by optical coherence tomography. Periodontal status was assessed by computerized periodontal probing and panoramic X-ray imaging. Bleeding on probing, clinical attachment level, probing pocket depth, and plaque index were compared between different stages of diabetic retinopathy. Results Eighty-three eyes of 45 patients with diabetic macular edema were enrolled. Forty-four eyes (53.0%) had early stages of diabetic retinopathy (mild and moderate), and 39 eyes (47.0%) had late stages (severe and proliferative). Patients with mild or moderate DR were more likely to have more severe periodontal conditions than patients with severe or proliferative DR. Fourteen patients with mild DR (82.4%), 7 patients with moderate DR (87.5%), 4 patients with severe DR (100.0%), and 15 patients with proliferative DR (93.8%) had some degree of PD. The periodontal inflamed surface areas and the percentages of tooth sites that bled on probing were significantly higher in patients with early stages of diabetic retinopathy than in those with late stages of the disease (p < 0.05). Patients with periodontal inflamed surface areas of more than 500 mm2 required significantly more intravitreal injections in the last year than those with milder forms of periodontitis (n = 6.9 ± 3.1 versus n = 5.0 ± 3.5, p = 0.03). Conclusion In patients with diabetic macular edema, periodontitis is more prevalent in early stages of diabetic retinopathy. We suggest regular dental check-ups for diabetic patients, especially when diabetic macular edema is already present. Clinical relevance Patients with diabetic macular edema should be screened for periodontitis and vice versa, particularly early in the course of diabetes.

PeerJ ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. e1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar Azrak ◽  
Antonio Palazón-Bru ◽  
Manuel Vicente Baeza-Díaz ◽  
David Manuel Folgado-De la Rosa ◽  
Carmen Hernández-Martínez ◽  
...  

The most described techniques used to detect diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema have to be interpreted correctly, such that a person not specialized in ophthalmology, as is usually the case of a primary care physician, may experience difficulties with their interpretation; therefore we constructed, validated and implemented as a mobile app a new tool to detect diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema (DRDME) using simple objective variables. We undertook a cross-sectional, observational study of a sample of 142 eyes from Spanish diabetic patients suspected of having DRDME in 2012–2013. Our outcome was DRDME and the secondary variables were: type of diabetes, gender, age, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), foveal thickness and visual acuity (best corrected). The sample was divided into two parts: 80% to construct the tool and 20% to validate it. A binary logistic regression model was used to predict DRDME. The resulting model was transformed into a scoring system. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated and risk groups established. The tool was validated by calculating the AUC and comparing expected events with observed events. The construction sample (n= 106) had 35 DRDME (95% CI [24.1–42.0]), and the validation sample (n= 36) had 12 DRDME (95% CI [17.9–48.7]). Factors associated with DRDME were: HbA1c (per 1%) (OR = 1.36, 95% CI [0.93–1.98],p= 0.113), foveal thickness (per 1 µm) (OR = 1.03, 95% CI [1.01–1.04],p< 0.001) and visual acuity (per unit) (OR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.00–0.16],p< 0.001). AUC for the validation: 0.90 (95% CI [0.75–1.00],p< 0.001). No significant differences were found between the expected and the observed outcomes (p= 0.422). In conclusion, we constructed and validated a simple rapid tool to determine whether a diabetic patient suspected of having DRDME really has it. This tool has been implemented on a mobile app. Further validation studies are required in the general diabetic population.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manisha Agarwal ◽  
Mani Sachdeva ◽  
Shalin Shah ◽  
Rajiv Raman ◽  
Padmaja Kumari Rani ◽  
...  

Abstract PurposeTo correlate Optical coherence tomography (OCT) based morphological patterns of diabetic macular edema (DME), prognostic biomarkers and grade of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with various stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) secondary to diabetes. DesignMulticentric retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at seven centres across India.MethodsData from medical records of patients with DME and CKD was entered in a common excel sheet across all seven centers. Staging of CKD was based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). ResultsThe most common morphological pattern of DME was cystoid pattern (42%) followed by the mixed pattern (31%). The proportion of different morphological patterns did not significantly vary across various CKD stages (p=0.836). Presence of external limiting membrane-ellipsoid zone (ELM-EZ) defects (p<0.001) and foveal sub-field thickness (p=0.024) showed a direct correlation with the stage of CKD which was statistically significant. Presence of hyper reflective dots (HRD) and disorganization of inner retinal layers (DRIL) showed no significant correlation with the stage of CKD. Sight threatening DR was found to increase from 70% in CKD stage-3 to 82% in stage-4 and 5 of CKD and this was statistically significant (p=0.03).ConclusionsCystoid morphological pattern followed by mixed type was the most common pattern of DME on OCT found in patients suffering from stage 3 to 5 of CKD. However, the morphological patterns of DME did not significantly vary across various CKD stages. ELM-EZ defects may be considered as an important OCT biomarker for advanced stage of CKD.


Author(s):  
Kajal Seema S. ◽  
Jayalekshmi T. ◽  
Manasa S. ◽  
Prasenna M.

Background: The objective of the study was to examine the effect of long-term glycemic control, as measured by glycated hemoglobin levels (HbA1C), on the onset and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) over a period of 10 years.Methods: Patients who were diagnosed to have type 2 diabetes mellitus participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Duration of onset of diabetes and the glycemic control status were analyzed. Fasting and postprandial blood sugar levels and HbA1C levels were tested for every participant. Diabetic retinopathy was graded as per the ETDRS guidelines using stereoscopic fundus photographs. In addition to the clinical evaluation, optical coherence tomography was done to confirm the presence of DME.Results: A total of 212 diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. One sixty-four patients (78.1%) had DR, out of which 71 patients (43.3%) had mild non proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), 42 patients (25.6%) had moderate NPDR, 31 patients (18.9%) had severe NPDR, and 20 (12.2%) had proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Fifty-nine patients with DR (36%) had DME. Duration of diabetes (14.62±6.18 vs 9.72±3.68 years, p<0.001), higher fasting blood glucose (176.79±59.13 vs 138.46±49.44 mg/dl, p<0.001) and higher HbA1c levels (8.21±1.38 vs 7.48±1.25 %, p=0.002) were significantly associated with DR.Conclusions: The stage of diabetic retinopathy rather than metabolic status is a strong predictive factor for the development of diabetic macular edema.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Somedeb Gupta

To evaluate severity of diabetic retinopathy in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy. This was a cross sectional study of 159 eyes of 80 patients aged above 40 years, diagnosed to have Type 2 DM with diabetic nephropathy. All the patients were investigated for albuminuria. The retinopathy was evaluated according to the Early Treatment Diabetes Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) classification into nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Diabetic macular edema was characterized as clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and non-CSME. The severity of retinopathy was correlated with nephropathy. In this study, mean age of the patients were 58.26± 6.43 years and male to female ratio 1.96:1. Out of 80 diabetic patients, 22(27.5%) patients had microalbuminuria and 58 (72.5 %) had macroalbuminuria. In this study, 67 (83.7%) patients had diabetic retinopathy, out of which 14 (20.9%) patients had mild NPDR, 20 (29.9%) had moderate NPDR, 16 (23.9%) had severe NPDR, 5(7.4%) had very severe NPDR and 12 (17.9%) had PDR. In 22 patients with microalbuminuria 6 (27.3%) had mild NPDR, 4 (5.0%) had moderate NPDR and none had maculopathy. In 58 patients with macroalbuminuria, 8 (13.8%) had mild NPDR, 16 (27.6%) had moderate NPDR, 16 (27.6%) severe NPDR, 5 (8.6%) has very severe NPDR, 4(6.9%) had early PDR and 8(13.8%) had high-risk PDR, 14 (24.1%) had CSME and 4 (6.9%) had non-CSME. In our study, diabetic nephropathy patients with macroalbuminuria had more severe type of DR than patients with microalbuminuria.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205031211990086
Author(s):  
Sultan H Al-Rashidi ◽  
Faris S Al-Thunayyan ◽  
Khalid A Alsuhaibani ◽  
Abdulmajeed A Alharbi ◽  
Khalid A Alharbi

Objectives: Blindness is one of the most widespread final pathways of diabetic retinopathy and its associated diabetic macular edema. The general practitioners are the first to encounter these diabetic patients. Fundoscopy is now considered as an ideal way for the diagnosis of patients with diabetic retinopathy. Therefore, this study was undertaken to know the ability and skills of general practitioners for the diagnosis and management of patients with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Methods: This study was conducted in all major cities in Qassim province of Saudi Arabia during January to May 2017. A validated questionnaire was used to assess the general practitioners’ knowledge and practice for the management of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Questions related to referrals, diagnosis, and treatment options to diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema were asked to the general practitioners. Results: Of 96 general practitioners, 76 returned the questionnaire with a response rate of 79.2%. Only 26.3% general practitioners referred patients with type 1 diabetes to ophthalmologists as per guidelines set by the American Academy of Ophthalmology, whereas 74% of general practitioners showed good knowledge for referring patients with type 2 diabetes to ophthalmology clinics. Lack of knowledge was also noticed for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy, as only 36.8% of general practitioners replied positive for dilated fundus examination option, whereas 78.9% of general practitioners chose laser photocoagulation as a treatment option. Similar response from them was observed for patients with diabetic macular edema. Furthermore, data also showed years in practice of general practitioners was well correlated with their knowledge for the management of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Conclusion: The general practitioners included in this study showed lack of knowledge in handling patients with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Therefore, refresher courses are needed that highlight the acquisition of their skills in fundoscopy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veena H. R. ◽  
Sribhargava Natesh ◽  
Sudhir Patil

Periodontal disease (PD), a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by destruction of the supporting tissues of the teeth, increases the risk of complications in diabetics. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a microvascular complication of prolonged hyperglycaemia. There appears to be a similarity in the pathogenesis of DR and PD. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the association, if any, between DR and PD, correlate the severity of DR with the severity of PD, and investigate the association between glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), serum creatinine and periodontal variables. The periodontal status of 200 adult diabetic patients in the age group of 30–65 years with varying severity of DR was assessed. Evaluation of the severity of PD was assessed by recording clinical parameters. Haematological investigations including glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and serum creatinine were estimated before the initiation of treatment for DR. A statistically significant association between the mean duration of diabetes mellitus (DM) and the severity of DR and PD was found. The severity of PD was directly correlated with the severity of DR. There was a significant association between the levels of HbA1c and serum creatinine and severity of DR and PD. There could be a plausible relationship between DR and PD. Further prospective studies on a larger population with longer follow-ups are required to ascertain whether PD and its severity directly affect the progression and severity of DR.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Durgul Acan ◽  
Mehmet Calan ◽  
Duygu Er ◽  
Tugba Arkan ◽  
Nilufer Kocak ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e2015038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo De Sanctis

Objective: This cross-sectional study was designed to give insights into relationship between Insulin-Growth-Factor 1 (IGF-1) levels and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a sample of  thalassaemia major(TM) patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Τhis relation was not previously evaluated, despite the fact that both diseases co-exist  in the same patient. The  study   also  describes the clinical and biochemical profile of the associated complications in TM patients with and without IDDM.   Design: A population-based cross-sectional study.  Participants:The study  includes 19 consecutive TM patients with IDDM and 31 age- and sex-matched TM patients without  IDDM who visited our out-patient clinics for an endocrine assessment Methods: An extensive medical history, with data on associated complications and current medications, was obtained. Blood samples were drawn in the morning after an overnight fast to measure the serum concentrations of IGF-1, glucose, fructosamine , free thyroxine (FT4), thyrotropin (TSH) and biochemical analysis . Serologic screening assays for hepatitis C virus seropositivity (HCVab and HCV-RNA) were also evaluated,  applying routine laboratory methods.Plasma total IGF-1 was measured by a chemiluminescent immunometric assay (CLIA) method. Ophthalmology evaluation was done by the same researcher using stereoscopic fundus biomicroscopy through dilated pupils. DR was graded using the scale developed by the Global Diabetic Retinopathy Group. Iron stores were assessed by direct and indirect methods. Results:Eighteen TM patients with IDDM (94.7 %) and 10 non-diabetic patients (32.2 %) had IGF-1 levels below the 2.5th percentile of the normal values for the Italian population. The mean serum IGF-1 concentrations were significantly lower in the diabetic versus the non-diabetic TM groups (p < 0.001). DR was present in in 4 (21 %) of 19 TM patients with IDDM and was associated with the main classical risk factors, namely inefficient glycemic control  and duration of disease but not  hypertension. Using the scale developed by the Global Diabetic Retinopathy Group, the DR in our patients was classified as non proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Only few numbers of microaneurysms [1-3] were detected. Our data also confirm the strong association of IDDM in TM patients with other endocrine and non-endocrine complications.Conclusions: These results , although on a small number of patients, suggest a possible ‘protective’ role of low IGF-1 in the development of DR in TM patients 


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-214
Author(s):  
Rushda Sharmin Binte Rouf ◽  
SM Ashrafuzzaman ◽  
Zafar Ahmed Latif

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and nephropathy are two major complications of diabetes mellitus carrying significant morbidity and mortality. In this study DR was investigated in different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to find out possible association of these two devastating complications.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 150 diabetic patients having CKD in BIRDEM. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60ml/min/1.73m2and/or urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) >30 mg/day in at least two occasions in 3 months apart. Retinopathy was assessed by direct fundoscopic examination and confirmed by color fundus photography. Severe DR (SDR) included proliferative diabetic retinopathy, severe non-proliferative DR and maculopathy; whereas microaneurysm regarded as non-severe retinopathy.Results: Majority (68%) of the respondents had some form of retinopathy (38.35% SDR and 29.65% nonsevere). There was strong association between different levels of albuminuria (UAER) and DR (p<0.0001). On the contrary DR did not correspond with stages of CKD (P=0.349). Hypertension (79.5%) and dyslipidaemia (59%) were common co-morbidities.Conclusion: This study concluded that DR prevalence was more in nephropathy along with significant association with UAER. Whereas different stages of CKD was not associated with stages of DR . This finding focused the necessity of regular retinal examination irrespective of the stage of renal involvement.Birdem Med J 2018; 8(3): 210-214


Diabetology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Sara Cherchi ◽  
Alfonso Gigante ◽  
Maria Anna Spanu ◽  
Pierpaolo Contini ◽  
Gisella Meloni ◽  
...  

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the main causes of visual loss in individuals aged 20–64 years old. The aim of this study was to investigate, in a multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study, sex-gender difference in DR in a large sample of type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM). 20,611 T2DM regularly attending the units for the last three years were classified as having: (a) No DR (NDR), (b) nonproliferative DR (NPDR), or (c) preproliferative/proliferative DR (PPDR). DR of all grades was present in 4294 T2DM (20.8%), with a significant higher prevalence in men as compared to women (22.0% vs. 19.3% p < 0.0001). Among DR patients, both NPDR and PPDR were significantly more prevalent in men vs. women (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0016, respectively). Women had similar age and BMI, but longer diabetes duration, worse glycemic metabolic control, and more prevalence of hypertension and chronic renal failure (CRF) of any grade vs. men. No significant differences between sexes were evident in term of drug therapy for diabetes and associate pathologies. Conclusions: In this large sample of T2DM, men show higher prevalence of DR vs. women, in spite of less represented risk factors, suggesting that male sex per se might be a risk factor for DR development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document