Deep brain stimulation for chorea-acanthocytosis: a systematic review

Author(s):  
Yang Wu ◽  
Yang-yang Xu ◽  
Yuan Gao ◽  
Jia-ming Li ◽  
Xiao-wei Liu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 103256
Author(s):  
Alireza Zali ◽  
Reza Jalili Khoshnood ◽  
Mahsa Motavaf ◽  
Alireza Salimi ◽  
Meisam Akhlaghdoust ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
William Omar Contreras López ◽  
Paula Alejandra Navarro ◽  
Santiago Crispín

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Obesity has become a major public health concern worldwide, with current behavioral, pharmacological, and surgical treatments offering varying rates of success and adverse effects. Neurosurgical approaches to treatment of refractory obesity include deep brain stimulation (DBS) on either specific hypothalamic or reward circuitry nuclei, which might contribute to weight reduction through different mechanisms. We aimed to determine the safety and clinical effect of DBS in medical refractory obesity. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review to identify all original studies – observational and experimental – in which DBS was performed to treat refractory obesity. From database inception to April 2021, we conducted our search in PubMed, Scopus, and LILACS databases using the following MeSH terms: “Obesity” OR “Prader-Willi Syndrome” AND “Deep Brain Stimulation.” The main outcomes were safety and weight loss measured with the body mass index (BMI). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methods were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. This study protocol was registered with PROSPERO ID: CRD42019132929. Seven studies involving 12 patients met the inclusion criteria; the DBS target was the nucleus accumbens in four (57.1%), the lateral hypothalamic area in two (29.6%), and the ventral hypothalamus in one (14.3%). Further, 33% of participants had obesity secondary to Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and 66.6% had primary obesity. The global BMI average at baseline was 46.7 (SD: 9.6, range: 32.2–59.1), and after DBS, 42.8 (SD: 8.8, range: 25–53.9), with a mean difference of 3.9; however, the delta in PWS patients was −2.3 and 10 in those with primary obesity. The incidence of moderate side effects was 33% and included manic symptoms (<i>N</i> = 2), electrode fracture (<i>N</i> = 1), and seizure (<i>N</i> = 1); mild complications (41.6%) included skin infection (<i>N</i> = 2), difficulties falling asleep (<i>N</i> = 1), nausea (<i>N</i> = 1), and anxiety (<i>N</i> = 1). <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Despite available small case series and case reports reporting a benefit in the treatment of refractory obesity with DBS, this study emphasizes the need for prospective studies with longer follow-ups in order to further address the efficacy and indications.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Morishita ◽  
Sarah M. Fayad ◽  
Masa-aki Higuchi ◽  
Kelsey A. Nestor ◽  
Kelly D. Foote

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Varjão Vieira ◽  
Paula Ricci Arantes ◽  
Clement Hamani ◽  
Ricardo Iglesio ◽  
Kleber Paiva Duarte ◽  
...  

Objective: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) was proposed in 1999 to treat refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Despite the accumulated experience over more than two decades, 30–40% of patients fail to respond to this procedure. One potential reason to explain why some patients do not improve in the postoperative period is that DBS might not have engaged structural therapeutic networks that are crucial to a favorable outcome in non-responders. This article reviews magnetic resonance imaging diffusion studies (DTI-MRI), analyzing neural networks likely modulated by DBS in OCD patients and their corresponding clinical outcome.Methods: We used a systematic review process to search for studies published from 2005 to 2020 in six electronic databases. Search terms included obsessive-compulsive disorder, deep brain stimulation, diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, diffusion tractography, tractography, connectome, diffusion analyses, and white matter. No restriction was made concerning the surgical target, DTI-MRI technique and the method of data processing.Results: Eight studies published in the last 15 years were fully assessed. Most of them used 3 Tesla DTI-MRI, and different methods of data acquisition and processing. There was no consensus on potential structures and networks underlying DBS effects. Most studies stimulated the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC)/nucleus accumbens. However, the contribution of different white matter pathways that run through the ALIC for the effects of DBS remains elusive. Moreover, the improvement of cognitive and affective symptoms in OCD patients probably relies on electric modulation of distinct networks.Conclusion: Though, tractography is a valuable tool to understand neural circuits, the effects of modulating different fiber tracts in OCD are still unclear. Future advances on image acquisition and data processing and a larger number of studies are still required for the understanding of the role of tractography-based targeting and to clarify the importance of different tracts for the mechanisms of DBS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 16197-16203
Author(s):  
Luiz Henrique Salamoni Abad ◽  
João Vítor Andrade Fortuna Abrantes ◽  
Dominique Hayduk Montecino ◽  
Gabriel Rodrigues Carvalho ◽  
Laura Assis de Castro Paletta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document