Nebulized Glubran 2 in patients at high risk of bleeding after Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Marino ◽  
A. Picciariello ◽  
G. Lippolis ◽  
D. F. Altomare
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Glubran 2

Abstract 14763: Patients With a Perceived High-bleeding Risk in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Alert-based Computerized Decision Support for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: An Af-Alert Substudy

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Piazza ◽  
Shelley Hurwitz ◽  
Brett Carroll ◽  
Samuel Z Goldhaber
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Computerized Decision Support ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Risk For Bleeding

Introduction: A perceived increased risk of bleeding is one of the most frequent reasons for failure to prescribe anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We previously conducted a randomized controlled trial of alert-based computerized decision support (CDS) to increase prescription of antithrombotic therapy in 458 high-risk hospitalized patients with AF who were not being anticoagulated. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that patients with a perceived high risk for bleeding would have a similar HAS-BLED score and rate of major and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding. Methods: To determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients determined to be high-risk for bleeding, we analyzed the 248 patients in the alert group. Results: A perceived high risk of bleeding was the most common reason (77%) for omitting antithrombotic therapy. Median HAS-BLED scores were similar in these patients compared with those who were not deemed to have an increased bleeding risk (3 vs. 3, p=0.44). Despite being categorized as too high-risk for bleeding to receive antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention at the time of the alert, nearly 12% of these patients were ultimately prescribed anticoagulation over the ensuing 90 days. The frequency of major and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding was similar between the two groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, a perceived high risk of bleeding was the most common reason for failure to prescribe antithrombotic therapy after the CDS alert. History of a prior bleeding event or underlying bleeding disorder was not reflected in a higher HAS-BLED score. Implementation of an alert-based CDS with specific attention to assessment of bleeding risk and mitigation warrants further study to encourage adherence to evidence-based clinical practice guideline recommendations for stroke prevention in AF.

scholarly journals Changes in Antithrombotic Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation in the Hospital in 2011-2012 and 2016-2017 (Pharmacoepidemiological Analysis)

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 686-692
Author(s):  
O. V. Reshetko ◽  
A. V. Sokolov ◽  
N. V. Furman ◽  
V. V. Agapov
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Prosthetic Heart Valve ◽  
Saratov Region ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

Aim. To study the changes that have occurred in the pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the Saratov Region for 5 years by analyzing the antithrombotic therapy of patients who were admitted in a specialized department of the multidisciplinary hospital in Saratov in 2011-2012 and in 2016-2017.Material and methods. A pharmacoepidemiological retrospective study was conducted. The object of the study was the medical records of inpatients (Form 003/y) with the diagnosis “Atrial fibrillation” (ICD-X code I48), that consecutively admitted to the cardiology department of the multidisciplinary hospital in Saratov from January 1, 2011 to December, 31, 2012 (n=211) and from January 1, 2016 to December, 31, 2017 (n=227). Criteria for inclusion in the study: patients over 18 years of age, established diagnosis of non-valvular AF of ischemic genesis. Exclusion criteria from the study: non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, thyrotoxicosis, congenital heart defects, rheumatic heart damage, acute coronary syndrome, endocarditis, myocarditis, pericarditis, pulmonary thromboembolism, the presence of prosthetic heart valve. Pharmacoepidemiological analysis was carried out for the drugs prescribed during hospitalization and given by doctors at discharge of patients from the hospital. The risk of ischemic stroke was assessed using the CHA2DS2-VASc score, and the risk of bleeding – according to the HAS-BLED score.Results. When analyzing the risk of ischemic stroke, it was found that 100% of patients in 2011-2012 years and 98.2% in 2016-2017 years had indications for the prescription of oral anticoagulants (OAСs). In 2011-2012 there were no patients with a low risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc=0). High risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED≥3) occurred in 4.7% of patients in 2011-2012 and in 10.6% in 2016-2017, however, due to the high risk of stroke, the refusal to prescribe OAC in these patients was inappropriate in accordance with the recommendations for the treatment of AF. In the group of patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=0 in 2016-2017 antiplatelet therapy was prescribed in 100% at the hospital stage and at discharge, which contradicts the guidelines, according to which antithrombotic therapy is not recommended to patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=0. In patients with CHA2DS2-VASc=1, a low percentage of anticoagulants prescription was noted. In 2016-2017 OACs were prescribed only in 12.5% of patients at all stages of observation. In 2011-2012 OAC alone was prescribed only to 1 person (20%) at the hospital stage, which does not comply with modern guidelines for the treatment of patients with AF, according to which patients with a risk score CHA2DS2-VASc=1 are recommended to receive OACs in the absence of contraindications. OACs prescription in group CHA2DS2-VASc≥2 occurred only in 15% of patients in 2011-2012 and in a third of patients in 2016-2017 (p<0.05). The frequency of isolated use of OACs significantly increased in 2016-2017 compared to 2011-2012 mainly due to the increase in the spectrum of direct OACs (DOACs) (p<0.05).Conclusion. For 5 years there have been significant changes in the antithrombotic therapy of AF in the Saratov Region. The frequency of prescribing OACs according to indications has increased mainly due to the introduction of the DOACs into clinical practice. However, prevention of stroke remains insufficient.

scholarly journals Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frits I. Mulder ◽  
Floris T. M. Bosch ◽  
Nick van Es
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Vascular Medicine ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Deep Vein

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a frequent complication in ambulatory cancer patients. Despite the high risk, routine thromboprophylaxis is not recommended because of the high number needed to treat and the risk of bleeding. Two recent trials demonstrated that the number needed to treat can be reduced by selecting cancer patients at high risk for VTE with prediction scores, leading the latest guidelines to suggest such an approach in clinical practice. Yet, the interpretation of these trial results and the translation of the guideline recommendations to clinical practice may be less straightforward. In this clinically-oriented review, some of the controversies are addressed by focusing on the burden of VTE in cancer patients, discussing the performance of available risk assessment scores, and summarizing the findings of recent trials. This overview can help oncologists, hematologists, and vascular medicine specialists decide about thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Management of Giant Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis With a High Risk of Bleeding

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. e00199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faysal Alhasan ◽  
Gilles Jadd Hoilat ◽  
Waddah Malas ◽  
Syed K. Mahmood ◽  
Jaroslav Zivny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pancreatic Necrosis ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

scholarly journals Modified regional citrate anticoagulation is optimal for hemodialysis in patients at high risk of bleeding: a prospective randomized study of three anticoagulation strategies

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Lin ◽  
Li Song ◽  
Renwei Huang ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Shuifu Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Regional Citrate Anticoagulation ◽  
Expansion Chamber ◽  
Citrate Anticoagulation ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Background Recommended regular saline flushing presents clinical ineffectiveness for hemodialysis (HD) patients at high risk of bleeding with heparin contraindication. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has previously been used with a Ca2+ containing dialysate with prefiltered citrate in one arm (RCA-one). However, anticoagulation is not always achievable and up to 40% results in serious clotting in the venous expansion chamber. In this study, we have transferred one-quarter of the TSC from the prefiltered to the post filter based on RCA-one, which we have called RCA-two. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of RCA-two with either saline flushing or RCA-one in HD patients with a high bleeding risk. Method In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trial, 52 HD patients (77 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-2 and RCA-one group in part one of the trial, and 45 patients (64 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-2 and saline group in part two of the trial. Serious clotting events, adverse events and blood analyses were recorded. Results Serious clotting events in the RCA-two group were significantly lower compared with the RCA-one and saline group (7.89% vs. 30.77%, P = 0.011; 3.03% vs. 54.84%, P < 0.001, respectively). The median circuit survival time was 240 min (IQR 240 to 240) in the RCA-two group, was significantly longer than 230 min (IQR 155 to 240, P < 0.001) in the RCA-one group and 210 min (IQR 135 to 240, P = 0.003) in the saline group. The majority of the AEs were hypotension, hypoglycemia and chest tightness, most of which were mild in intensity. Eight patients (20.51%) in the RCA-one group, 4 patients (12.90%) in the saline group and 10 patients (26.31%) in the RCA-two group, P > 0.05. Conclusions Our data demonstrated that the modified anticoagulation protocol was more effective and feasible during hemodialysis therapy for patients at high risk of bleeding. Trial registration GDREC, GDREC2017250H. Registered February 2, 2018; retrospectively registered.

scholarly journals Modified IMPROVE VTE Risk Score and Elevated D-Dimer Identify a High Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Acutely Ill Medical Population for Extended Thromboprophylaxis

TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. e59-e65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽  
Concetta Lipardi ◽  
Jianfeng Xu ◽  
Colleen Peluso ◽  
Theodore E. Spiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Cutoff Score ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
D Dimer

AbstractAn individualized approach to identify acutely ill medical patients at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and a low risk of bleeding to optimize the benefit and risk of extended thromboprophylaxis (ET) is needed. The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) VTE risk score has undergone extensive external validation in medically ill patients for in-hospital use and a modified model was used in the MARINER trial of ET also incorporating an elevated D-dimer. The MAGELLAN study demonstrated efficacy with rivaroxaban but had excess bleeding. This retrospective analysis investigated whether the modified IMPROVE VTE model with an elevated D-dimer could identify a high VTE risk subgroup of patients for ET from a subpopulation of the MAGELLAN study, which was previously identified as having a lower risk of bleeding. We incorporated the modified IMPROVE VTE score using a cutoff score of 4 or more or 2 and 3 with an elevated D-dimer (>2 times the upper limit of normal) to the MAGELLAN subpopulation. In total, 56% of the patients met the high-risk criteria. In the placebo group, the total VTE event rate at Day 35 was 7.94% in the high-risk group and 2.83% for patients in the lower-risk group. A reduction in VTE was observed with rivaroxaban in the high-risk group (relative risk [RR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51–0.91, p = 0.008) and in the lower-risk group (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.40 -1.20, p = 0.187). The modified IMPROVE VTE score with an elevated D-dimer identified a nearly threefold higher VTE risk subpopulation of patients where a significant benefit exists for ET using rivaroxaban.

P1558Clinical utility of the PRECISE-DAPT score in the prediction of hemorrhagic events in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Rioboo ◽  
E Abuassi Alnakeeb ◽  
S Raposeiras Roubin ◽  
I Munoz Pousa ◽  
M Cespon Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Introduction The clinical utility and validity of the PRECISE-DAPT bleeding risk score for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unknown. We investigated the previous aspect in a contemporary population treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) at discharge. Methods Retrospectively, from 2010 to 2016, we studied 3,814 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of ACS. All patients were treated with in-hospital PCI and DAPT at discharge. Elderly was defined if patients aged ≥75 years. Patients were categorized into three risk strata according to their PRECISE-DAPT score (very low-low: <17 points, moderate: 18–24 points, and high risk: ≥25 points). We included the first bleeding event occurred during the first year after discharge. Bleeding events were defined according to the BARC classification system, and divided into two subgroups: BARC 2–5 and BARC 3–5. The ability to separate high bleeding risk patients from lower bleeding risk patients was checked by the cumulative incidence function curves and compared using the Fine-Gray test, thus adjusting for death (non-bleeding related) as a competing risk. Discrimination (C statistic) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test) were used to test the predictive capacity of the score in pts aged ≥75 years and <75 years. Results 25.2% (n=961/3814) were ≥75 years old, 38.4% of them were women. DAPT duration was 11.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5–13.7) vs. 12.0 (RIQ 8.2–14.1) months in the elderly vs. younger; (p<0.001). 92.5% (n=889) of the elderly were at high risk of bleeding (PRECISE-DAPT≥25 points), compared to 21.3% (n=607) of the youngest. The incidence of BARC 2–5 and BARC 3–5 was 7.4% and 2.7% in the elderly compared to 5.1% and 1.4% among the younger patients (p<0.001). The figure shows the ability of the PRECISE-DAPT score at capturing the risk of BARC 2–5 bleeding (panel A and B), in both age groups. Using the cut-off point ≥25, the effect in the prediction of BARC 2–5 bleeding and BARC 3–5 did not differ significantly between the elderly and those <75 years: sHR = 1.9 (95% CI: 1.2–6.00) in the elderly vs. 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3–2.5) in the other group (p=0.99) and sHR = 3.3 (95% CI: 1.9–6.0) vs. 3.6 (95% CI: 1.9–6.7) (p=0.83), respectively. There were no significant differences between the elderly and those under 75 years in terms of statistical C values either for BARC 2–5 bleeding (0.60 vs. 0.58) or BARC 3–5 bleeding (0.64 vs. 0.67). The score performed well in term of calibration in both groups (all p-values >0.3). Conclusion Although the use of PRECISE-DAPT resulted in classifying the majority of elderly patients at high risk of bleeding and despite exhibiting modest discriminative power, it performed well at classifying patients according to their risk of 1-year out-of-hospital bleeding in both age groups. PRECISE-DAPT appears to identify the truly low risk patients among the elderly, as compared to the younger group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document