scholarly journals Participatory Workshops are Not Enough to Prevent Policy Implementation Failures: An Example of a Policy Development Process Concerning the Drug Interferon-beta for Multiple Sclerosis

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margriet Moret-Hartman ◽  
Rob Reuzel ◽  
John Grin ◽  
Gert Jan van der Wilt
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley E. Steinman ◽  
Victoria Bradford ◽  
Emilee Quinn ◽  
Jennifer J. Otten ◽  
Jennifer McNamara ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas K. Greenfield ◽  
Norman Giesbrecht ◽  
Lee Ann Kaskutas ◽  
Suzanne Johnson ◽  
Lynn Kavanagh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikenna D Ebuenyi ◽  
Emma M. Smith ◽  
Alister Munthali ◽  
Steven W. Msowoya ◽  
Juba Kafumba ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Equity and inclusion are important principles in policy development and implementation. The aim of this study is to explore the extent to which equity and inclusion were considered in the development of Malawi’s National Disability Mainstreaming Strategy and Implementation Plan. Methods: We applied an analytical methodology to review the Malawi’s National Disability Mainstreaming Strategy and Implementation Plan using the EquIPP (Equity and Inclusion in Policy Processes) tool. The EquIPP tool assesses 17 Key Actions to explore the extent of equity and inclusion. Results: The development of the Malawi National Disability Mainstreaming Strategy and Implementation Plan was informed by a desire to promote the rights, opportunities and wellbeing of persons with disability in Malawi. The majority (58%) of the Key Actions received a rating of three, indicating evidence of clear, but incomplete or only partial engagement of persons with disabilities in the policy process. Three (18%) of the Key Actions received a rating of four indicating that all reasonable steps to engage in the policy development process were observed. Four (23%) of the Key Actions received a score five indicating a reference to Key Action in the core documents in the policy development process. Conclusion: The development of disability policies and associated implementation strategies requires equitable and inclusive processes that consider input from all stakeholders especially those whose wellbeing depend on such policies. It is pivotal for government and organisations in the process of policy or strategy development and implementation, to involve stakeholders in a virtuous process of co-production – co-implementation – co-evaluation, which may strengthen both the sense of inclusion and the effectiveness of the policy life-cycle.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-187
Author(s):  
Didid Sulastiyo ◽  
Hariadi Kartodihardjo ◽  
Sudarsono Soedomo

The policy on forest rehabilitation and reclamation have been implemented since 1950, but not effective decrease the extend of the critical forest and land yet. The objective of this research was to formulate option of effectiveness enhancement of forest rehabilitation and reclamation policy implementation. This research applied the theory that developed by Edward III and IDS’s policy process. The policy text (rule in form) of forest rehabilitation and reclamation has not been used effectively to solve the solve the problem on the ground because the lack of sufficient regulation on the pre-condition, maintenance and responsibility in regards to the asset lost, participation, empowerment and transparency. There is divergent in the implementation of forest rehabilitation and reclamation policy. The implementation of policy requires high transaction cost with limited participation and did not legitimate due to ineffective communication, structure of birocracy, disposition/attitude and resources. To increase the effectiveness implementation of policy and institution on forest rehabilitation and reclamation, the goverment have to improve the effectiveness of communication, structure of birocracy, disposition/attitude, and resources. Furthermore, the result of this research also recommends the importance of network development through social movement by using mass-media and social media, which will be usefull to provide pressure on the policy development process by addressing the counter policy narative.Key words: efectiveness, implementation, policy, rehabilitation, reclamation


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Edward H. Poot

<p>The Official Information Act was passed into statute in 1982. Among the purposes of the Act is the enhancement and respect for the law and the promotion of good government. The aim of this paper is to detennine, from a participation perspective, the impact of the Official Information Act 1982 on the core public sector policy process. The paper starts with a background to the Act before reviewing the expected and actual impact of the Act, as outlined in the literature. The policy making process in New Zealand' s core public sector is considered, highlighting opportunities for participation. Participation theory is discussed.  The research involves a survey across the core public sector to gain general views of the impact of the Act on the policy development process. The results are used as the basis for three in-depth case studies of core public sector agencies. The conclusions are that while the Act is an important instrument of accountability, the success of the Act in enabling more effective participation is not so clear. While information is more readily obtainable, technocratic officials and Ministers keen to control information impact on the ability of citizens to participate. It is concluded that for the Act to be of maximum benefit education of officials and a loosening on the control of information will be needed.</p>


2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 627-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas K. Greenfield ◽  
Suzanne P. Johnson ◽  
Norman Giesbrecht

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document