scholarly journals Impact of thyroid cancer treatment on assisted reproductive technology outcomes in women with infertility

Author(s):  
Ning Huang ◽  
Lin Zeng ◽  
Jie Yan ◽  
Hongbin Chi ◽  
Jie Qiao

Abstract Purpose We investigated the effect of different surgical procedures and radioactive iodine treatment (RAIT) on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) outcomes and evaluated whether possible risk factors, including age, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels, and thyroid antibody positivity, were associated with adverse IVF/ICSI outcomes. Methods This retrospective study included 76 women with infertility who had received thyroid cancer (TC) treatment among 137,698 infertile women who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles at the Peking University Third Hospital between 2010 and 2019. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were assessed. Results We found that the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in women who underwent partial thyroidectomy were 7- and 6-fold higher, respectively, than those in women who underwent total thyroidectomy. We observed no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between the RAIT and non-RAIT groups, even after adjusting for age, TSH levels, surgical treatment, and thyroid antibody positivity. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age and TSH levels were not associated with decreased clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Women with thyroid antibody positivity had significantly lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates than women without thyroid antibody positivity. Conclusion Our study showed lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in women who underwent total thyroidectomy than in women who underwent partial thyroidectomy. Thyroid antibody positivity is an important risk factor for adverse IVF/ICSI outcomes in women who have received TC treatment.

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Petanovsk. Kostova

Abstract Study question Study aim is to compare implantation,clinical pregnancy and livebirth rates between giving1500IU of hCG4hours after GnRHagonist,on trigger day or GnRHagonist as alone trigger with luteal support withHCG1500IU.35h later on OPUday. Summary answer Adjuvant doze of1500IUhCG4h after bolus of GnRHagonist on trigger day significantly improve quality of blastocyst,implantation,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates without increasing the risk ofOHSS. What is known already The use of GnRHagonist for final oocyte maturation in antagonist cycle significantly decrease the incidence of OHSS,but there have been studies showing lower pregnancy rates in patients triggered with GnRHagonist compared with hCG in autologous cycles,attributed to a defective luteal phase, especially in high–risk patients despite intensive luteal phase support.To improve the results of IVF,an alternative approach is adding a small bolus dose of hCG(1500IU)35h later,on the OPU day after GnRHagonist trigger which provides more sustained support for the corpus luteum.The question is does low doses of hCGgiven on the same day with GnRHagonist trigger is making better quality oocytes. Study design, size, duration Single center prospective longitudinal cohort study fromJanuary2017 to Decembar2019.The initial inclusion criteria were:women age≥18and≤39years,AMH≥3,3ng/ml and ≥12 antral follicles on basal ultrasound.Patients with history of OHSS and PCO are also included in the study.Patients with applied “freeze-all” technique with peak estradiol≥4000pg/ml on trigger day>18oocytes on the OPU day,and recognized significant risk for developing OHSS were also included.The cumulative implantation,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were analyzed,only in embryos from the same COS protocol in every patient. Participants/materials, setting, methods A total of 231 patients were entered for final analysis,who underwent a flexible antagonist protocol,ICSI and fresh or thawed ET on 3th(38.53%) or 5th( 61.47%)day in women’s autologous cycles.Patients were randomized in one of two groups: GroupA-Dual trigger group 1500IUof hCG 4h after GnRH agonist application on trigger day and GroupB –1500IU of HCG 35h later,on the OPU day.We used nonparametric and parametric statistical tests.Significant differences were considered all values ​​of p < 0.05 Main results and the role of chance Both groups are homogenous regarding several variables:age,BMI,type of sterility,smoking status,AMH,PCO, spermogram.There is no significant difference between the two(AvsB)groups according to average number of retrieved oocytes(13.6 vs 14.6 p > 0,05),M II oocytes(11.03 vs 11.99 p > 0.05).The dual trigger group(A)had a higher fertility rate(69.99% vs 64.11% p < 0,05)compared with GnRHagonist trigger group(B).There are no significant difference between groups(AvsB)according to cumulative average number of:transferred embryos(2.4vs2.5 p > 0.05)TQE transfered on 3th day(1.5.vs 1.3.p>0.05);transferred blastocyst(2.6 vs2.7 >0.05);cryo embryos(2.5vs1.9 p > 0.05),but there are significant difference according to cumulative implantation rate of transferred blastocyst in favor of group A(48.18% vs 33.89%p<0.05).Analyzes of morphological characteristics of transferred blastocyst depicted in the order of degree of blastocyst expansion,inner cellular mass(ICM)and trofoectoderm(TE) and ranking overall blastocysts quality from“excellent”,“good”,“average” and “pore” ,shows that there are significantly more percentage of patient with embryo transfer of “excellent” or even one “excellent” blastocyst in group A (30.56%,31.94% vs 21.54%,23.08% p < 0.05) in opposite of percentage of patients with embryo transfer with “poore “” blastocyst in group B (37.5% vs 46.15.%p<0.05). Clinical pregnanacy rate (71.68% vs 50.84% p < 0.05) , and live birth rate (60,18% vs 42,58% ), were significantly higher in group A. There were no cases of moderate or severe OHSS in both groups. Limitations, reasons for caution Dual trigger in GnRH antagonist protocols should be advocated as a safe approach but undetected high risk patients are reasons for caution for developing clinically significant OHSS. Wider implications of the findings: Adjuvant low dose of hCG on GnRHagonist trigger day improve clinical pregnancy and live birth rates without increasing the risk of clinically significant OHSS.Protocol of dual trigger and freezing all oocytes or embryos in patients with high risk of developing OHSS is promising technique in everyday practice. Trial registration number 8698


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Darmon ◽  
E Molinari ◽  
D F Albertini ◽  
P Patrizio ◽  
D H Barad ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Is the resistance to standard infertility treatments of the H-PCOS-like phenotype reversed through reconstitution of androgen levels and can principle diagnostic markers of H-PCOS be validated? Summary answer Pre-supplementation with dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) eliminated treatment resistance of H-PCOS in comparison to matched infertile controls, also validating previously reported diagnostic features of this condition. What is known already H-PCOS evolves at older ages from a hyper-androgenic “lean” PCOS phenotype at young ages. Its ontogeny diverts from other PCOS phenotype between 20s and mid–30s by going from being hyper- to being hypo-androgenic due to insufficiency in adrenal androgen production, believed to represent an autoimmune process. In contrast to other PCOS phenotypes, the “lean” PCOS phenotype appears highly treatment resistant to standard fertility treatments. Study design, size, duration Retrospective case control study. Participants/materials, setting, methods We investigated 54 H-PCOS patients with qualifying diagnostic criteria1,2 and 50 matched infertility patients without diagnostic H-PCOS criteria as controls. Both study groups underwent routine in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, including androgen pre-supplementation in both groups via dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) for women diagnosed as hypo-androgenic. Main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. 1Gleicher et al., J Sterodi Biochem Mol Biol 2017;167:144–152; 2Gleicher N, et al., Endocrine 2018;59(3):661–676 Main results and the role of chance Study groups were similar in age, number of prior IVF cycles and previous live births. H-PCOS patients in contrast to controls, however, demonstrated previously reported characteristics of H-PCOS diagnosis, including a significantly higher DHEA/DHEAS ratio, significantly higher AMH, confirming higher functional ovarian reserve, significantly lower free testosterone and significantly higher sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), further confirming lower androgens. Finally, H-PCOS patients also demonstrated significantly increased evidence for immune system hyperactivity. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were separately assessed in first IVF cycles and cumulatively. Both analyses demonstrated, even after age-adjustments, absolutely no outcome differences in cycle cancellations, numbers of oocytes retrieved, first and cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates. At least one pregnancy was achieved in 12 women in both groups (22.2% and 24.0%) and at least one live birth in 11 (20.4%) vs. 8 (14.8%), respectively. Limitations, reasons for caution As a retrospective case control study, here presented data must be interpreted with caution. The close match between H-PCOS and control patients and the very clear differentiation in patient characteristics between the two groups, however, support the credibility of this study. Wider implications of the findings: This study demonstrated that androgen reconstitution in H-PCOS patients completely reversed treatment resistance compared to well-matched infertile control patients. It also validated previously defined diagnostic criteria of H-PCOS, hopefully facilitating a timelier diagnosis of a, still, widely overlooked condition in female infertility. Trial registration number NA


2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. e323-e324
Author(s):  
Kassie Jean Bollig ◽  
Henok G. Woldu ◽  
Judy E. Stern ◽  
Albert L. Hsu

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel Pereira ◽  
Queenie V. Neri ◽  
Jovana P. Lekovich ◽  
Steven D. Spandorfer ◽  
Gianpiero D. Palermo ◽  
...  

Objective. To investigate the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles where sibling oocytes from a single donor were split between two recipients based on strict sperm morphology.Methods. Retrospective cohort study. All ICSI cycles had one donor’s oocytes split between two recipients in a 1 : 1 ratio based on strict sperm morphology, that is, one male partner had morphology of 0% and the other had morphology of >1%. Fertilization, positive hCG, clinical pregnancy, spontaneous miscarriage, and live birth rates of the aforementioned groups were compared.Results. The baseline characteristics of the two groups (n=103), including semen parameters of the male partners, were comparable. There was no difference in the fertilization rates when comparing the 0% group to the >1% group (78.7% versus 81.6%;P=0.66). The overall positive hCG, clinical pregnancy, spontaneous miscarriage, and live birth rates for the 0% group were 61.2%, 49.5%, 10.7%, and 38.8%, respectively. The corresponding rates in the >1% group were positive hCG (63.1%), clinical pregnancy (55.3%), spontaneous miscarriage (7.77%), and live birth (46.6%).Conclusions. The fertilization and pregnancy outcomes of ICSI cycles for strict sperm morphology of 0% versus morphology of >1% are equivalent. These results can provide reassurance to couples undergoing ICSI for severe teratospermia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Vissers ◽  
T C Sluckin ◽  
C C Repelaer van Driel-Delprat ◽  
R Schats ◽  
C J M Groot ◽  
...  

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does a previous Caesarean section affect reproductive outcomes, including live birth, in women after IVF or ICSI? SUMMARY ANSWER A previous Caesarean section impairs live birth rates after IVF or ICSI compared to a previous vaginal delivery. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Rates of Caesarean sections are rising worldwide. Late sequelae of a Caesarean section related to a niche (Caesarean scar defect) include gynaecological symptoms and obstetric complications. A systematic review reported a lower pregnancy rate after a previous Caesarean section (RR 0.91 CI 0.87–0.95) compared to a previous vaginal delivery. So far, studies have been unable to causally differentiate between problems with fertilisation, and the transportation or implantation of an embryo. Studying an IVF population allows us to identify the effect of a previous Caesarean section on the implantation of embryos in relation to a previous vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We retrospectively studied the live birth rate in women who had an IVF or ICSI treatment at the IVF Centre, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between 2006 and 2016 with one previous delivery. In total, 1317 women were included, of whom 334 had a previous caesarean section and 983 had previously delivered vaginally. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS All secondary infertile women, with only one previous delivery either by caesarean section or vaginal delivery, were included. If applicable, only the first fresh embryo transfer was included in the analyses. Patients who did not intend to undergo embryo transfer were excluded. The primary outcome was live birth. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used with adjustment for possible confounders ((i) age; (ii) pre-pregnancy BMI; (iii) pre-pregnancy smoking; (iv) previous fertility treatment; (v) indication for current fertility treatment: (a) tubal, (b) male factor and (c) endometriosis; (vi) embryo quality; and (vii) endometrial thickness), if applicable. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. Live birth rates were significantly lower in women with a previous caesarean section than in women with a previous vaginal delivery, 15.9% (51/320) versus 23.3% (219/941) (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.45–0.87) in the ITT analyses. The rates were also lower for ongoing pregnancy (20.1 versus 28.1% (OR 0.64 95% CI 0.48–0.87)), clinical pregnancy (25.7 versus 33.8% (OR 0.68 95% CI 0.52–0.90)) and biochemical test (36.2 versus 45.5% (OR 0.68 95% CI 0.53–0.88)). The per protocol analyses showed the same differences (live birth rate OR 0.66 95% CI 0.47–0.93 and clinical pregnancy rate OR 0.72 95% CI 0.54–0.96). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study is limited by its retrospective design. Furthermore, 56 (16.3%) cases lacked data regarding delivery outcomes, but these were equally distributed between the two groups. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The lower clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer indicate that implantation is hampered after a caesarean section. Its relation with a possible niche (caesarean scar defect) in the uterine caesarean scar needs further study. Our results should be discussed with clinicians and patients who consider an elective caesarean section. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Not applicable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This study has been registered in the Dutch Trial Register (Ref. No. NL7631 http://www.trialregister.nl).


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianyuan Song ◽  
Tingting Liao ◽  
Kaiyou Fu ◽  
Jian Xu

Objectives: Unexplained infertility has been one of the indications for utilization of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, whether ICSI should be preferred to IVF for patients with unexplained infertility remains an open question. This study aims to determine if ICSI improves the clinical outcomes over conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) in couples with unexplained infertility.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 549 IVF and 241 ICSI cycles for patients with unexplained infertility at a fertility center of a university hospital from January 2016 and December 2018. The live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Other outcome measures included the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and fertilization rate.Results: The live birth rate was 35.2% (172/488) in the IVF group and 33.3% (65/195) in ICSI group, P = 0.635. The two groups also had similar clinical pregnancy rates, implantation rates, and miscarriage rates. The fertilization rate of IVF group was significantly higher than that of ICSI group (53.8 vs. 45.7%, P = 0.000, respectively). Sixty-one and 46 patients did not transfer fresh embryos in IVF and ICSI cycles, respectively. Patients with IVF cycles had lower cancellation rates than those with ICSI (11.1 vs. 19.1%, P = 0.003, respectively).Conclusion: ICSI does not improve live birth rates but yields higher cancellation rates than conventional IVF in the treatment of unexplained infertility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document