scholarly journals Prevalence and Impact of Treatment-Resistant Depression in Latin America: a Prospective, Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo Soares ◽  
Gabriela Kanevsky ◽  
Chei Tung Teng ◽  
Rodrigo Pérez-Esparza ◽  
Gerardo Garcia Bonetto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Work Impairment ◽  
Resistant Depression

AbstractApproximately one-third of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The TRAL study will evaluate the prevalence and impact of TRD among patients with MDD in four Latin American countries. In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, patients with MDD were recruited from 33 reference sites in Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, and Argentina. Patients were assessed for TRD, defined as failure to respond to ≥ 2 antidepressant medications of adequate dose and duration. Demographics, previous/current treatments, depressive symptoms, functioning, healthcare resource utilization, and work impairment were also collected and evaluated using descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, t-test for independent samples, or the Mann–Whitney nonparametric test, as appropriate. 1475 patients with MDD were included in the analysis (mean age, 45.6 years; 78% women); 89% were receiving relevant psychiatric treatment. 429 patients met criteria for TRD, and a numerically higher proportion of patients with TRD was present in public versus private sites of care (31% vs 27%). The mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score was 25.0 among all MDD patients and was significantly higher for patients with TRD versus non-TRD (29.4 vs 23.3; P < 0.0001). Patients with TRD, versus those with non-TRD, were significantly more likely to be older, have a longer disease duration, have more comorbidities, be symptomatic, have a higher median number of psychiatric consultations, and report greater work impairment. Patients with TRD have a disproportionate burden of disease compared to those with non-TRD. Appropriate treatment for TRD is a substantial unmet need in Latin America. https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03207282, 07/02/2017.

scholarly journals Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Palhano-Fontes ◽  
Dayanna Barreto ◽  
Heloisa Onias ◽  
Katia C. Andrade ◽  
Morgana M. Novaes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Therapeutic Value ◽  
Antidepressant Effects ◽  
Resistant Depression

AbstractBackgroundRecent open-label trials show that psychedelics, such as ayahuasca, hold promise as fast-onset antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression.MethodsTo test the antidepressant effects of ayahuasca, we conducted a parallel-arm, double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial in 29 patients with treatment-resistant depression. Patients received a single dose of either ayahuasca or placebo. We assessed changes in depression severity with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Hamilton Depression Rating scale at baseline, and at 1 (D1), 2 (D2), and 7 (D7) days after dosing.ResultsWe observed significant antidepressant effects of ayahuasca when compared with placebo at all-time points. MADRS scores were significantly lower in the ayahuasca group compared with placebo at D1 and D2 (p= 0.04), and at D7 (p< 0.0001). Between-group effect sizes increased from D1 to D7 (D1: Cohen'sd= 0.84; D2: Cohen'sd= 0.84; D7: Cohen'sd= 1.49). Response rates were high for both groups at D1 and D2, and significantly higher in the ayahuasca group at D7 (64%v.27%;p= 0.04). Remission rate showed a trend toward significance at D7 (36%v.7%,p= 0.054).ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first controlled trial to test a psychedelic substance in treatment-resistant depression. Overall, this study brings new evidence supporting the safety and therapeutic value of ayahuasca, dosed within an appropriate setting, to help treat depression. This study is registered athttp://clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02914769).

Esketamine: A Novel Option for Treatment-Resistant Depression

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Bozymski ◽  
Ericka L. Crouse ◽  
Erika N. Titus-Lay ◽  
Carol A. Ott ◽  
Jill L. Nofziger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
Resistant Depression ◽  
Suicidal Thoughts And Behaviors

Objective:To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, use requirements, and place in therapy of esketamine for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Data Sources: A comprehensive PubMed search (1966 to October 2019) was conducted using the search terms depression, treatment-resistant, suicide, intranasal, esketamine, and JNJ-54135419. Additional data were obtained from references of identified articles, governmental sources, manufacturer product labeling, and Clinicaltrials.gov . Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language trials evaluating intranasal esketamine for TRD were included and discussed. Data Synthesis: Intranasal esketamine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, in conjunction with an oral antidepressant, for treating TRD in adults. Two short-term trials (TRANSFORM-1 and -2) found statistically significant reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score at day 28 for the fixed 56-mg dose (−4.1; 95% CI = −7.69 to −0.49; P = 0.027 [exploratory]) and flexible-dosed arms (−4.0; 95% CI = −7.31 to −0.64; P = 0.02), though the fixed-dose 84-mg arm (−3.2; 95% CI = −6.88 to 0.45; P = 0.088) of TRANSFORM-1 and TRANSFORM-3 did not (−3.6; 95% CI = −7.2 to 0.07; P = 0.059). Two long-term trials (SUSTAIN-1 and -2) suggested maintenance of response with continued use. Esketamine’s adverse effects include dizziness, dysgeusia, somnolence, dissociation, suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and increased heart rate and blood pressure. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Although providing a novel antidepressant mechanism and formulation for TRD, esketamine’s role in treatment will likely be limited by cost, administration, and diversion concerns. Conclusion: Intranasal esketamine significantly reduced depression symptoms in TRD, though with tolerability issues.

scholarly journals Long-term deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junus M. van der Wal ◽  
Isidoor O. Bergfeld ◽  
Anja Lok ◽  
Mariska Mantione ◽  
Martijn Figee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Internal Capsule ◽  
Maintenance Phase ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Resistant Depression ◽  
Deep Brain

ObjectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) reduces depressive symptoms in approximately 40%–60% of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but data on long-term efficacy and safety are scarce. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of DBS targeted at the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) in 25 patients with TRD during a 1-year, open-label, maintenance period, which followed a 1-year optimisation period.MethodsDepression severity was measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and self-reported Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR). Primary outcomes were response rate (≥50% HAM-D-17 score reduction) after the maintenance phase, approximately 2 years after DBS surgery, and changes in depression scores and occurrence of adverse events during the maintenance phase.ResultsOf 25 operated patients, 21 entered and 18 completed the maintenance phase. After the maintenance phase, eight patients were classified as responder (observed response rate: 44.4%; intention-to-treat: 32.0%). During the maintenance phase, HAM-D-17 and MADRS scores did not change, but the mean IDS-SR score decreased from 38.8 (95% CI 31.2 to 46.5) to 35.0 (95% CI 26.1 to 43.8) (p=0.008). Non-responders after optimisation did not improve during the maintenance phase. Four non-DBS-related serious adverse events occurred, including one suicide attempt.ConclusionsvALIC DBS for TRD showed continued efficacy 2 years after surgery, with symptoms remaining stable after optimisation as rated by clinicians and with patient ratings improving. This supports DBS as a viable treatment option for patients with TRD.Trial registration numberNTR2118.

scholarly journals Managing Esketamine Treatment Frequency Toward Successful Outcomes: Analysis of Phase 3 Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 426-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Nijs ◽  
Ewa Wajs ◽  
Leah Aluisio ◽  
Ibrahim Turkoz ◽  
Ella Daly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Spray ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Maintenance Phase ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Frequency ◽  
Resistant Depression ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Esketamine nasal spray was recently approved for treatment-resistant depression. The current analysis evaluated the impact of symptom-based treatment frequency changes during esketamine treatment on clinical outcomes. Methods This is a post-hoc analysis of an open-label, long-term (up to 1 year) study of esketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression (SUSTAIN 2). During a 4-week induction phase, 778 patients self-administered esketamine twice weekly plus a new oral antidepressant daily. In responders (≥50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score from baseline), esketamine treatment frequency was thereafter decreased during an optimization/maintenance phase to weekly for 4 weeks and then adjusted to the lowest frequency (weekly or every other week) that maintained remission (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ≤ 12) based on a study-defined algorithm. The relationship between treatment frequency and symptom response, based on clinically meaningful change in Clinical Global Impression–Severity score, was subsequently evaluated 4 weeks after treatment frequency adjustments in the optimization/maintenance phase. Results Among 580 responders treated with weekly esketamine for the first 4 weeks in the optimization/maintenance phase (per protocol), 26% continued to improve, 50% maintained clinical benefit, and 24% worsened. Thereafter, when treatment frequency could be reduced from weekly to every other week, 19% further improved, 49% maintained benefit, and 32% worsened. For patients no longer in remission after treatment frequency reduction, an increase (every other week to weekly) resulted in 47% improved, 43% remained unchanged, and 10% worsened. Conclusions These findings support individualization of esketamine nasal spray treatment frequency to optimize treatment response in real-world clinical practice. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02497287

scholarly journals Additional intranasal oxytocin to escitalopram improves depressive symptoms in resistant depression: An open trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Scantamburlo ◽  
M. Hansenne ◽  
V. Geenen ◽  
J.J. Legros ◽  
M. Ansseau
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Open Trial ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ◽  
Resistant Depression ◽  
Synthetic Oxytocin

AbstractThe aim of this open trial was to assess the antidepressant/anxiolytic effects of oxytocin used as an adjunct to antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression. Fourteen patients, who have not responded to 40 mg of escitalopram, received intranasal synthetic oxytocin during 4 weeks, in association with antidepressant. This is the first open trial study suggesting OT in association with escitalopram significantly reduced scores on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

Clinical and neurocognitive characteristics associated with treatment-resistant depression

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S542-S542 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Serafini ◽  
G. Adavastro ◽  
G. Canepa ◽  
C. Conigliaro ◽  
M. Pompili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Color Word ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Anxiety Symptoms ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Interference Test ◽  
Resistant Depression

IntroductionTreatment resistant depression (TRD) is a disabling condition associated with a relevant psychosocial impairment worldwide.ObjectivesThis exploratory study is aimed to evaluate the main clinical and neurocognitive characteristics in a sample of 21 subjects admitted to the Psychiatric Clinic of University of Genoa as inpatients between 2015 and 2016 and diagnosed with TRD according to Thase and Rush staging method.MethodsPatients have been assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). The Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Trial Making Test (TMT-A/B), Stroop Color Word Interference Test, Verbal Fluency Test, and Rey auditory-verbal learning test (RAVLT) have been administered as well.ResultsSubjects with early-onset (< 50 years) depression had a longer illness duration, higher depressive episodes and more impaired performance at RAVLT while individuals with late-onset (> 50 years) depression showed a higher severity of depressive symptoms and more anxiety symptoms. Depressive symptoms were positively associated with anxiety (r = 0.82; P = 0.00) and negatively with TMT-A/B (r = −0.56, P = 0.01), Stroop Color Word Interference Test (r = −0.72, P = 0.005 and r = −0.616, P = 0.008), and RAVLT (r = −0.60; P = 0.02) performances. According to regression analyses, anxiety symptoms were the only significant predictor of depression severity (P = 0.02).ConclusionsEarly-onset depression is associated with more disability and worse neurocognitive performance whereas late-onset depression is linked to more anxiety symptoms and more depressive symptoms severity. Clinicians should closely monitor patients with TRD for the presence of anxiety symptoms that may represent a significant risk factor of poorer long-term outcome.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

scholarly journals Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression (SAINT-TRD)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor J. Cole ◽  
Katy H. Stimpson ◽  
Brandon S. Bentzley ◽  
Merve Gulser ◽  
Kirsten Cherian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Neuropsychological Testing ◽  
Anterior Cingulate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Delayed Response ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Resistant Depression

AbstractBackgroundCurrent treatments for depression are limited by suboptimal efficacy, delayed response, and frequent side effects. Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation treatment that is FDA-approved for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Recent methodological advancements suggest iTBS could be improved through 1) treating with multiple sessions per day at optimally-spaced intervals, 2) applying a higher overall pulse-dose of stimulation and 3) precision targeting of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) to subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) circuit. We examined the feasibility, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of an accelerated, high-dose, resting-state functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI)-guided iTBS protocol for TRD termed ‘Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT)’.MethodsTwenty-one participants with TRD received open-label SAINT. FcMRI was used to individually target the region of L-DLPFC most anticorrelated with sgACC. Fifty iTBS sessions (1800 pulses per session, 50-minute inter-session interval) were delivered as 10 daily sessions over 5 consecutive days at 90% resting motor threshold (adjusted for cortical depth). Neuropsychological testing was conducted before and after SAINT.ResultsNineteen of 21 participants (90.48%) met criteria for remission (≤10 on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) immediately after SAINT. Neuropsychological testing demonstrated no negative cognitive side-effects. There were no seizures or other severe adverse events.DiscussionOur accelerated, high-dose, iTBS protocol with fcMRI-guided targeting (SAINT) was well tolerated and safe. Efficacy was strikingly high, especially for this treatment-resistant population. Double-blinded sham-controlled trials are required to confirm the high remission rate found in this initial study.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03240692

scholarly journals Use of 30-Hz Accelerated iTBS in Drug-Resistant Unipolar and Bipolar Depression in a Public Healthcare Setting: A Case Series

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Cantù ◽  
Giandomenico Schiena ◽  
Domenico Sciortino ◽  
Lorena Di Consoli ◽  
Giuseppe Delvecchio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Resistant Depression ◽  
Depressive Episodes ◽  
Hamilton Rating Scale

Background: Depressive episodes, especially when resistant to pharmacotherapy, are a hard challenge to face for clinicians and a leading cause of disability worldwide. Neuromodulation has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), in particular transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In this article, we present a case series of six patients who received TMS with an accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) protocol in a public healthcare setting.Methods: We enrolled a total number of six participants, affected by a treatment-resistant depressive episode, in either Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or Bipolar Disorder (BD). Patients underwent an accelerated iTBS protocol, targeted to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), 3-week-long, with a total of 6 days of overall stimulation. On each stimulation day, the participants received 3 iTBS sessions, with a 15-min pause between them. Patients were assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), and the Mania Rating Scale (MRS). At baseline (T0), at the end of the second week (T1), and at the end of the cycle of stimulation (T2).Results: The rANOVA (repeated Analysis of Variance) statistics showed no significant effect of time on the rating scale scores, with a slight decrease in MADRS scores and a very slight increase in HAM-A and HAM-D scores. No manic symptoms emerged during the entire protocol.Conclusions: Although accelerated iTBS might be considered a less time-consuming strategy for TMS administration, useful in a public healthcare setting, our results in a real-word six-patient population with TRD did not show a significant effect. Further studies on wider samples are needed to fully elucidate the potential of accelerated iTBS protocols in treatment-resistant depression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document