scholarly journals A Model for Advancing Scale-Up of Complex Interventions for Vulnerable Populations: the ALACRITY Center for Health and Longevity in Mental Illness

Author(s):  
Emma E. McGinty ◽  
Karly A. Murphy ◽  
Arlene T. Dalcin ◽  
Elizabeth A. Stuart ◽  
Nae-Yuh Wang ◽  
...  
Aging Brain ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100007
Author(s):  
Joshua Gordon ◽  
Jovier D. Evans

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 544-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Zamboni ◽  
Joanna Schellenberg ◽  
Claudia Hanson ◽  
Ana Pilar Betran ◽  
Alexandre Dumont

Abstract Public health interventions should be designed with scale in mind, and researchers and implementers must plan for scale-up at an early stage. Yet, there is limited awareness among researchers of the critical value of considering scalability and relatively limited empirical evidence on assessing scalability, despite emerging methodological guidance. We aimed to integrate scalability considerations in the design of a study to evaluate a multi-component intervention to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in low- and middle-income countries. First, we reviewed and synthesized existing scale up frameworks to identify relevant dimensions and available scalability assessment tools. Based on these, we defined our scalability assessment process and adapted existing tools for our study. Here, we document our experience and the methodological challenges we encountered in integrating a scalability assessment in our study protocol. These include: achieving consensus on the purpose of a scalability assessment; and identifying the optimal timing of such an assessment, moving away from the concept of a one-off assessment at the start of a project. We also encountered tensions between the need to establish the proof of principle, and the need to design an innovation that would be fit-for-scale. Particularly for complex interventions, scaling up may warrant rigorous research to determine an efficient and effective scaling-up strategy. We call for researchers to better incorporate scalability considerations in pragmatic trials through greater integration of impact and process evaluation, more stringent definition and measurement of scale-up objectives and outcome evaluation plans that allow for comparison of effects at different stages of scale-up.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract Over recent years, immigration to Europe has risen significantly. This development has led to increasing birth rates by non-Western immigrant women. Maternity care systems are not yet adapted to this increased diversity of women. In Denmark, 13 % of all children are currently born by women originating from non-Western countries. Despite a publically funded antenatal care, non-Western immigrant women have lower utilization of Danish antenatal care compared to other women giving birth. Many non-Western immigrant women have an increased prevalence of severe maternal morbidity and higher risks of maternal death, stillbirth and infant death compared to the majority populations. Poor health status at birth can impair the cognitive, sensory and motor development and lead to learning disabilities during school age, and thus reduce equality in life chances. Suboptimal care is a contributing factor to these ethnic disparities. Provision of appropriate antenatal care is pivotal to reduce these serious disparities and challenges to public health, however little is known about models of care, which can overcome these barriers. The MAMAACT intervention was developed to increase response to symptoms of pregnancy complications among maternity care providers as well as non-Western immigrant women. The intervention consisted of postgraduate training of midwives in intercultural communication and health education materials (leaflet and an app) for non-Western immigrant women describing how to respond to warning signs during pregnancy in six different languages, The intervention was implemented at 10 out of 20 Danish maternity wards as part of a national trial from the year 2018 to 2019, potentially reaching 25.000 pregnant women, including 2500 of non-Western origin. This workshop shares insight into innovative ways of providing antenatal care for non-Western immigrant women and will focus on methodological aspects of scientific evaluation of complex interventions for vulnerable populations. The workshop includes an introduction, three presentations, and a discussion with the audience. Using quantitative data, the first presentation will give an overview of ethnic disparities in stillbirth and infant death in Denmark. The second presentation will present qualitative data from the implementation evaluation of the MAMAACT intervention with a focus on the interventions program theory, methodological considerations and evaluation results. Finally, the third presentation will illuminate how the concepts of Health Literacy and cultural health capital contribute to an understanding of mechanisms leading to ethnic disparities and how they can be used for evaluating the impact of the MAMAACT intervention. The final discussion will stimulate knowledge sharing between the participants on how to combine quantitative and qualitative insights in trials, how to build partnerships and recruit vulnerable populations in evaluations, and how to use sociological theory in evaluations. Key messages Reducing ethnic disparity in reproductive health requires maternity care systems to rethink their antenatal care services so they are better equipped to support non-Western immigrant women’s needs. Sharing knowledge on the use of mixed methods, recruitment of vulnerable populations, and the use of sociological theory can contribute to future approaches to evaluate complex interventions.


Trials ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan Wong ◽  
Leanne Hassett ◽  
Harriet Koorts ◽  
Anne Grunseit ◽  
Allison Tong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is currently little evidence of planning for real-world implementation of physical activity interventions. We are undertaking the ComeBACK (Coaching and Exercise for Better Walking) study, a 3-arm hybrid Type 1 randomised controlled trial evaluating a health coaching intervention and a text messaging intervention. We used an implementation planning framework, the PRACTical planning for Implementation and Scale-up (PRACTIS), to guide the process evaluation for the trial. The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol for the process evaluation of the ComeBACK trial using the framework of the PRACTIS guide. Methods A mixed methods process evaluation protocol was developed informed by the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance on process evaluations for complex interventions and the PRACTIS guide. Quantitative data, including participant questionnaires, health coach and administrative logbooks, and website and text message usage data, is being collected over the trial period. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with trial participants, health coaches and health service stakeholders will explore expectations, factors influencing the delivery of the ComeBACK interventions and potential scalability within existing health services. These data will be mapped against the steps of the PRACTIS guide, with reporting at the level of the individual, provider, organisational and community/systems. Quantitative and qualitative data will elicit potential contextual barriers and facilitators to implementation and scale-up. Quantitative data will be reported descriptively, and qualitative data analysed thematically. Discussion This process evaluation integrates an evaluation of prospective implementation and scale-up. It is envisaged this will inform barriers and enablers to future delivery, implementation and scale-up of physical activity interventions. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to describe the application of PRACTIS to guide the process evaluation of physical activity interventions. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) Registration date: 10/12/2018.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela A. Riddell ◽  
G. K. Mini ◽  
Rohina Joshi ◽  
Amanda G. Thrift ◽  
Rama K. Guggilla ◽  
...  

Background: To improve the control of hypertension in low- and middle-income countries, we trialed a community-based group program co-designed with local policy makers to fit within the framework of India's health system. Trained accredited social health activists (ASHAs), delivered the program, in three economically and developmentally diverse settings in rural India. We evaluated the program's implementation and scalability.Methods: Our mixed methods process evaluation was guided by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council guidelines for complex interventions. Meeting attendance reports, as well as blood pressure and weight measures of attendees and adherence to meeting content and use of meeting tools were used to evaluate the implementation process. Thematic analysis of separate focus group discussions with participants and ASHAs as well as meeting reports and participant evaluation were used to investigate the mechanisms of impact.Results: Fifteen ASHAs led 32 community-based groups in three rural settings in the states of Kerala and Andhra Pradesh, Southern India. Overall, the fidelity of intervention delivery was high. Six meetings were delivered over a 3-month period to each of the intervention groups. The mean number of meetings attended by participants at each site varied significantly, with participants in Rishi Valley attending fewer meetings [mean (SD) = 2.83 (1.68)] than participants in West Godavari (Tukeys test, p = 0.009) and Trivandrum (Tukeys test, p < 0.001) and participants in West Godavari [mean (SD) = 3.48 (1.72)] attending significantly fewer meetings than participants in Trivandrum [mean (SD) = 4.29 (1.76), Tukeys test, p < 0.001]. Culturally appropriate intervention resources and the training of ASHAs, and supportive supervision of them during the program were critical enablers to program implementation. Although highly motivated during the implementation of the program ASHA reported historical issues with timely remuneration and lack of supportive supervision.Conclusions: Culturally appropriate community-based group programs run by trained and supported ASHAs are a successful and potentially scalable model for improving the control of hypertension in rural India. However, consideration of issues related to unreliable/insufficient remuneration for ASHAs, supportive supervision and their formal role in the wider health workforce in India will be important to address in future program scale up.Trial Registration: Clinical Trial Registry of India [CTRI/2016/02/006678, Registered prospectively].


Author(s):  
Lara Fairall ◽  
Merrick Zwarenstein ◽  
Graham Thornicroft

The evidence on what interventions are currently known to be effective in mental health is summarized in the 2009 PLoS Medicine series on packages of care for mental, neurological, and substance-use disorders in LAMIC and the WHO mhGAP guidelines published in 2010. But far less is known about how best to deliver and scale-up these interventions in real-life settings. How to translate this evidence into practice, in ways that are culturally appropriate and sensitive has been identified as the key research priority in global mental health. This chapter discusses the potential contribution of trials to the genesis of interventions that are both effective and highly applicable to real-world settings by considering two frameworks : the development–evaluation–implementation process proposed by the Medical Research Council (MRC) in Britain in their 2000 and 2008 guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions and the PRagmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) tool.


Author(s):  
Gemma Richardson

Social media has added a new dynamic for those living with mental illness. There are several benefits to using social media to obtain information and support for mental health issues, but there are also new challenges and drawbacks. This chapter explores social media for mental health initiatives, with a focus on two case studies: Facebook's suicide prevention tools and the Bell Let's Talk campaign. These case studies highlight the unique ways that social media can be harnessed to raise awareness and provide support and resources to vulnerable populations, while also providing insights into the challenges of utilizing these platforms.


2019 ◽  
pp. 343-352
Author(s):  
Amy Fettig ◽  
David C. Fathi

This chapter explores how civil society advocacy campaigns working to reform and abolish solitary confinement are interacting with recent and ongoing federal litigation. The authors posit that the evolution of policy, practice, litigation, and public knowledge regarding solitary confinement is pushing the law forward. Momentum for greater legal protections is growing in the courts and the combination of people power and jurisprudential development is leading to substantial new protections for prisoners, including the exclusion of vulnerable populations, such as youth, people with mental illness, and pregnant women, from solitary confinement. Additionally, courts are increasingly questioning the extreme duration of solitary confinement in the United States and the reasons used to justify it, such as automatic solitary confinement of people sentenced to death. At the same time, state departments of corrections are settling class action lawsuits brought on behalf of prisoners in solitary confinement by agreeing to major policy innovations and alternatives to the use of segregation.


Author(s):  
Gemma Richardson

Social media has added a new dynamic for those living with mental illness. There are several benefits to using social media to obtain information and support for mental health issues, but there are also new challenges and drawbacks. This chapter explores social media for mental health initiatives, with a focus on two case studies: Facebook's suicide prevention tools and the Bell Let's Talk campaign. These case studies highlight the unique ways that social media can be harnessed to raise awareness and provide support and resources to vulnerable populations, while also providing insights into the challenges of utilizing these platforms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison McFadden ◽  
Lindsay Siebelt ◽  
Joyce L. Marshall ◽  
Anna Gavine ◽  
Lisa-Christine Girard ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Many infants worldwide are not breastfeeding according to WHO recommendations and this impacts on the health of women and children. Increasing breastfeeding is identified as a priority area supported by current policy targets. However, interventions are complex and multi-component and it is unclear which elements of interventions are most effective to increase breastfeeding in which settings. Breastfeeding counselling is often part of complex interventions but evidence is lacking on the specific effect of counselling interventions on breastfeeding practices. The aim of this systematic review is to examine evidence on effectiveness of breastfeeding counselling to inform global guidelines. Methods A systematic search was conducted of six electronic databases in January 2018. Randomised controlled trials comparing breastfeeding counselling with no breastfeeding counselling or different formulations of counselling were included if they measured breastfeeding practices between birth and 24 months after birth. Results From the 5180 records identified in searches and a further 11 records found by hand searching, 63 studies were included. Of these, 48 were individually-randomised trials and 15 were cluster-randomised trials. A total of 69 relevant comparisons were reported involving 33,073 women. There was a significant effect of counselling interventions on any breastfeeding at 4 to 6 weeks (Relative risk [RR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.77, 0.94) and 6 months (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87, 0.94). Greater effects were found on exclusive breastfeeding at 4 to 6 weeks (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72, 0.87) and 6 months (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78, 0.91). Counselling delivered at least four times postnatally is more effective than counselling delivered antenatally only and/or fewer than four times. Evidence was mostly of low quality due to high or unclear risk of bias of the included trials and high heterogeneity. Conclusions Breastfeeding counselling is an effective public health intervention to increase rates of any and exclusive breastfeeding. Breastfeeding counselling should be provided face-to-face, and in addition, may be provided by telephone, both antenatally and postnatally, to all pregnant women and mothers with young children. To inform scale-up globally there is a need to further understand the elements of breastfeeding interventions such as counselling and their effectiveness in different contexts and circumstances. Study registration This systematic review was registered in Prospero (CRD42018086494).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document