scholarly journals Methodological Challenges for Epidemiologic Studies of Deprescribing at the End of Life

Author(s):  
Jennifer Tjia ◽  
Jennifer L. Lund ◽  
Deborah S. Mack ◽  
Attah Mbrah ◽  
Yiyang Yuan ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose of Review To describe approaches to measuring deprescribing and associated outcomes in studies of patients approaching end of life (EOL). Recent Findings We reviewed studies published through 2020 that evaluated deprescribing in patients with limited life expectancy and approaching EOL. Deprescribing includes reducing the number of medications, decreasing medication dose(s), and eliminating potentially inappropriate medications. Tools such as STOPPFrail, OncPal, and the Unnecessary Drug Use Measure can facilitate deprescribing. Outcome measures vary and selection of measures should align with the operationalized deprescribing definition used by study investigators. Summary EOL deprescribing considerations include medication appropriateness in the context of patient goals for care, expected benefit from medication given life expectancy, and heightened potential for medication-related harm as death nears. Additional data are needed on how EOL deprescribing impacts patient quality of life, caregiver burden, and out-of-pocket medication-related costs to patients and caregivers. Investigators should design deprescribing studies with this information in mind.

Author(s):  
Bregje A.A. Huisman ◽  
Eric C.T. Geijteman ◽  
Nathalie Kolf ◽  
Marianne K. Dees ◽  
Lia van Zuylen ◽  
...  

AbstractPatients with a limited life expectancy have an increased risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. Anticoagulants are often continued until death, independent of their original indication. We aimed to identify the opinions of physicians about the use of anticoagulants at the end of life. A mixed-method research design was used. A secondary analysis was performed on data from a vignette study and an interview study. Participants included general practitioners and clinical specialists. Physicians varied in their opinions: some would continue and others would stop anticoagulants at the end of life because of the risk of thromboembolic or bleeding complications. The improvement or preservation of patients' quality of life was a reason for both stopping and continuing anticoagulants. Other factors considered in the decision-making were the types of anticoagulant, the indication for which the anticoagulant was prescribed, underlying diseases, and the condition and life expectancy of the patient. Factors that made decision-making difficult were the lack of evidence on either strategy, uncertainty about patients' life expectancy, and the fear of harming patients. Which decision was eventually made seems largely dependent on the choice of the patient. In conclusion, there is a substantial variation in physicians' opinions regarding the use of anticoagulants in patients with a limited life expectancy. Physicians agree that the primary goal of medical care at end of life is the improvement or preservation of patients' quality of life. An important barrier to decision-making is the lack of evidence about the risks and benefits of stopping anticoagulants.


Author(s):  
Edwin J. Brokaar ◽  
Frederiek van den Bos ◽  
Loes E. Visser ◽  
Johanneke E. A. Portielje

Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cancer and deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications becomes very relevant when life expectancy decreases due to metastatic disease. Especially preventive medications may no longer be beneficial, because they may decrease quality of life and reduction in morbidity and mortality may be futile. Although deprescribing of preventive medication is common in the last period of life, it is still unusual during active cancer treatment for advanced disease, although life expectancy is often limited to less than 1 to 2 years in that stage. We performed a systematic search of the literature in Pubmed and Embase on the discontinuation of commonly utilized groups of preventive medication and evaluated the evidence of potential benefits and harms in patients aged 65 years or older with cancer and a limited life expectancy (LLE). From 21 included studies, it can be concluded that deprescribing lipid lowering drugs, antihypertensive drugs, osteoporosis drugs and antihyperglycemic drugs is feasible in a considerable part of patients with a LLE. Discontinuation may be performed safely, without the occurrence of serious adverse events or decrease of survival. The only study that addressed quality of life after deprescribing showed that discontinuation of statins improves quality of life in patients with a LLE. Recurrence of symptoms requiring reintroduction occurred in 0-13% of patients on antihyperglycemic treatment and 8-60% of patients using antihypertensive drugs. In order to reduce pill burden and futile treatment clinicians should discuss deprescribing of preventive medication with older patients with advanced cancer and a LLE.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Pasina ◽  
Barbara Brignolo Ottolini ◽  
Laura Cortesi ◽  
Mauro Tettamanti ◽  
Carlotta Franchi ◽  
...  

Objective: Older people approaching the end of life are at a high risk for adverse drug reactions. Approaching the end of life should change the therapeutic aims, triggering a reduction in the number of drugs.The main aim of this study is to describe the preventive and symptomatic drug treatments prescribed to patients discharged with a limited life expectancy from internal medicine and geriatric wards. The secondary aim was to describe the potentially severe drug-drug interactions (DDI). Materials and Methods: We analyzed Registry of Polytherapies Societa Italiana di Medicina Interna (REPOSI), a network of internal medicine and geriatric wards, to describe the drug therapy of patients discharged with a limited life expectancy. Results: The study sample comprised 55 patients discharged with a limited life expectancy. Patients with at least 1 preventive medication that could be considered for deprescription at the end of life were significantly fewer from admission to discharge (n = 30; 54.5% vs. n = 21; 38.2%; p = 0.02). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, lipid-lowering drugs, and clonidine were the most frequent potentially avoidable medications prescribed at discharge, followed by xanthine oxidase inhibitors and drugs to prevent fractures. Thirty-seven (67.3%) patients were also exposed to at least 1 potentially severe DDI at discharge. Conclusion: Hospital discharge is associated with a small reduction in the use of commonly prescribed preventive medications in patients discharged with a limited life expectancy. Cardiovascular drugs are the most frequent potentially avoidable preventive medications. A consensus framework or shared criteria for potentially inappropriate medication in elderly patients with limited life expectancy could be useful to further improve drug prescription.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Amy Little Jones ◽  
Nrupen Anjan Bhavsar ◽  
Amy Pickar Abernethy ◽  
Yousuf Zafar

82 Background: Clinicians have difficulty predicting longitudinal changes in patient symptom burden and quality of life, and then how those changes might affect treatment preference. The primary aim of this pilot study was to investigate how self-reported symptom burden, quality of life, and treatment preference change over time in mCRC patients with limited life expectancy. Methods: Eligible mCRC patients had incurable disease, received chemotherapy at Duke or Duke Raleigh, were > = 18 years old, and spoke English. Patients were surveyed at each clinic visit and followed for up to 3.8 years on study. Measures included FACT-C (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal), PCM (Patient Care Monitor; a validated, 87-item review of systems survey; items measured on a 0-10 scale), and QQQ (Quality-Quantity Questionnaire; a validated, 8-item measure of cancer patient preference for quantity vs. quality of life; items measured on a 1-5 Likert scale). Demographic, disease, and treatment data were abstracted from the medical record. Results: The 56 patients were primarily male (68%) and Caucasian (79%) with a mean age of 55 at diagnosis of metastatic disease. Patients answered surveys a mean of 6.8 times each, with a median 364 days between first and last surveys. Over time, patients reported most symptoms improved or stayed the same (72%, n = 63 symptoms). Mean symptom scores that improved the most from first to last survey were fatigue (3.92 to 3.03) and nausea (2.1 to 1.4), while pain (1.9 to 2.5) and cough (0.4 to 0.7) worsened the most. Decision making about treatment preference also did not change over time, with mean QQQ scores from first survey (22, n = 28) to last survey (22, n = 16) remaining stable. Mean QQQ length and quality scores likewise were unchanged (12.9 to 12.8; 12.4 to 12.2 respectively). Conclusions: In this pilot study of mCRC patients with limited life expectancy, reported symptom burden scores remained stable or modestly improved over time, while preferences for quality vs. quantity of life remained stable. These findings suggest that patients with advanced cancer might perceive symptom burden differently over the course of their treatment.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e043766
Author(s):  
Shakti Shrestha ◽  
Arjun Poudel ◽  
Kathryn J Steadman ◽  
Lisa M Nissen

BackgroundMaking a meaningful decision on deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medications in older adults with life-limiting illnesses (LLIs) and limited life expectancy (LLE) is often challenging. Therefore, we aimed to elicit opinion and gain consensus on a deprescribing tool for use in this population.Methods and analysisA modified-Delphi method will be used to obtain a consensus from a panel of experts in geriatric therapeutics on a deprescribing tool for use in people aged ≥65 years with LLIs and LLE. Through an online survey, in the initial round, the panel will anonymously elicit their opinion on a series of items related to the conceptual model of the deprescribing tool, its practicality and deprescribing of medications, while on the controlled feedback in subsequent rounds till a consensus is reached or the panellists stop revising their answers. In each round, panel members will be using a 5-point Likert scale to rate their agreement with the statement. Consensus will be considered on ≥75% of agreement on the statements.Ethics and disseminationAll the participants will receive an invitation and participant information but they need to consent for the participation. Ethics approval has been granted from the University of Queensland Health and Behavioural Sciences, Low and Negligible Risk Ethics Sub-Committee (reference: 2020001069). The results of this project will be disseminated through conferences and a peer-reviewed clinical journal.


Author(s):  
Arjun Poudel ◽  
Shakti Shrestha ◽  
Anna Lukacisinova ◽  
Lisa Nissen

Background: Deprescribing interventions have shown to improve medication appropriateness in older people. However, the evidence on the actual benefits and risks of deprescribing in older adults at the end of life are limited. Due to the lack of evidence on the safety and efficacy of medication in these populations, the most appropriate deprescribing approach is unclear. We aimed to conduct a narrative review of research on existing deprescribing guidelines targeted to frail older people at the end of life. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Google Scholar to identify studies from inception to January 2021 on deprescribing guidelines/tools for frail older adults near end-of-life or palliative situation or life-limiting illnesses or limited life expectancy were included. Results: A total of nine studies were included. The deprescribing guidelines used in these studies were helpful to some extent in optimising medications in patients with limited life expectancy and life-limiting illnesses. Some of them have been tested in prospective studies that showed their usefulness in minimising the number of potentially inapproapriate medications. These studies however were not randomised and involved small sample sizes and had little insight into the clinical outcomes of using these tools. Conclusions: The existing tools and guidelines on deprescribing do not represent the end of life care nor address the medication appropriateness among individuals with a specific condition. An explicit and rigorous consensus-based guideline needs to be developed and tested in a well-designed clinical trial to measure clinically significant outcomes


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-251
Author(s):  
Marcos Hajime Tanaka ◽  
Marcello Martins de Souza ◽  
Daniel Luiz Ceroni Gibson ◽  
Monica Paschoal Nogueira

ABSTRACT Objective: Patients with metastatic bone lesions have a limited life expectancy. These metastatic lesions compromise the proximal femur, and fractures are quite common. The survival of these patients depends on the behavior of the primary tumor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life of patients with extensive metastatic lesion of the proximal femur with pathological or imminent fracture, treated with non-conventional endoprosthesis. Methods: From May 2008 to August 2012, twenty-five (25) patients with bone metastases of the proximal femur, with pathological or imminent fracture were recruited into this study. These patients had survived for at least six weeks after surgery and the TESS questionnaire (Toronto Extremity Salvage Score) was administered. Results: The final score of the TESS was an average of 57 points (SD 23.78 points). There was no significant difference in TESS values considering: sex, presence of fracture, or site of the bone lesion. Conclusion: The TESS questionnaire provides information about the function and quality of life of patients with malignant tumors of the lower limbs, from the patient's perspective. The results can be considered positive, when compared to the limited life expectancy and complexity of this group of patients. Level of evidence III, Therapeutic studies, retrospective comparative study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitriona B. O’Neill ◽  
Coral L. Atoria ◽  
Eileen M. O’Reilly ◽  
Martin C. Henman ◽  
Peter B. Bach ◽  
...  

CONTEXT AND QUESTION ASKED: In patients with metastatic cancer, chemotherapy may provide symptom control, prevent complications, prolong life, or improve quality of life. Except in rare cases, however, patients with metastatic disease will not be cured. In older patients with metastatic cancer, hospitalization for treatment toxicity may reduce the quality of an already limited life expectancy. We evaluated the association between chemotherapy for metastatic cancer and risk of hospitalization. MAIN CONCLUSION: Hospitalizations are common in patients with incurable advanced malignancies and are more likely among those who receive chemotherapy. APPROACH: In the linked SEER-Medicare dataset, we identified Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older with a primary diagnosis of metastatic breast, colorectal, ovarian, bladder, lung, pancreas, esophageal, stomach, or prostate cancer between 2001 and 2009 who died by the end of 2010. Chemotherapy recipients and nonrecipients were pair-matched by age, sex, race, comorbidity, geographic region and survival duration. The primary endpoint was hospital admission, identified in inpatient claims between cancer diagnosis and the first of hospice admission or death. We also identified the subset of admissions associated with a primary or secondary diagnosis code suggestive of an adverse effect of chemotherapy. The association between chemotherapy and hospitalization was estimated in separate multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models for each cancer site, accounting for the matched-pairs design and controlling for unmatched demographic and disease characteristics. RESULTS: Of 18,486 patients who received chemotherapy for metastatic cancer, 92% were hospitalized at least once for any reason, including 51% hospitalized for a likely toxicity. The corresponding rates among matched non-recipients were 83% and 34% (Figure). In nearly all cancers, chemotherapy recipients had a greater risk of hospitalization for a likely toxicity or for any cause. Chemotherapy recipients had substantially higher hospitalization for infection or fever (21% v 15%), hematologic complications (11% v 3%), dehydration (13% v 6%), and PE or DVT (9% v 4%) compared with nonrecepients. Chemotherapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of likely toxicity-related hospitalization in nearly all cancers, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and other treatment. The association was greatest in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.60) and smallest in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.47). INTERPRETATION: Older patients receiving chemotherapy for incurable advanced cancers are at high risk of hospitalization, of which a non-negligible proportion is likely attributable to adverse effects of treatment. Infection, fever, dehydration, and hematologic complications constitute a large proportion of these events, some of which may be preventable through evidence-based patient management, prophylactic interventions, and effective outpatient care. Our findings might be limited to older patients with advanced cancer who have a generally poor prognosis or limited expected survival. SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Understanding the common reasons for hospital admissions and developing toxicity management programs and educational resources may help patients and their families make informed treatment decisions, minimize adverse effects and reduce hospitalizations in this population with limited life expectancy. [Figure: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document