PTSD/Substance Use Disorder Comorbidity: Treatment Options and Public Health Needs

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-558
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Najavits ◽  
H. Westley Clark ◽  
Carlo C. DiClemente ◽  
Marc N. Potenza ◽  
Howard J. Shaffer ◽  
...  
Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Servis ◽  
Scott M Fishman ◽  
Mark S Wallace ◽  
Stephen G Henry ◽  
Doug Ziedonis ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The University of California (UC) leadership sought to develop a robust educational response to the epidemic of opioid-related deaths. Because the contributors to this current crisis are multifactorial, a comprehensive response requires educating future physicians about safe and effective management of pain, safer opioid prescribing, and identification and treatment of substance use disorder (SUD). Methods The six UC medical schools appointed an opioid crisis workgroup to develop educational strategies and a coordinated response to the opioid epidemic. The workgroup had diverse specialty and disciplinary representation. This workgroup focused on developing a foundational set of educational competencies for adoption across all UC medical schools that address pain, SUD, and public health concerns related to the opioid crisis. Results The UC pain and SUD competencies were either newly created or adapted from existing competencies that addressed pain, SUD, and opioid and other prescription drug misuse. The final competencies covered three domains: pain, SUD, and public health issues related to the opioid crisis. Conclusions The authors present a novel set of educational competencies as a response to the opioid crisis. These competencies emphasize the subject areas that are fundamental to the opioid crisis: pain management, the safe use of opioids, and understanding and treating SUD.


2021 ◽  
pp. 337-348
Author(s):  
Giang Le Minh ◽  
Steve Shoptaw

Around the world, substance use disorder is best understood along a spectrum that ranges from no use or use that causes no problems (i.e. the majority of people) through occasional use that brings occasional problems of moderate severity (i.e. some people) to frequent use that with severe problems (i.e. a minority of people). Across cultures, few people use substances (<10%) at levels that present severe problems. This chapter provides an overview of global trends of substance use and substance use disorder, offers criteria that define substance use disorder, and presents epidemiology on cannabis, opioids, amphetamine-type stimulants, and cocaine/crack. Relevant findings on public health consequences and intersections between substance use, infectious diseases, and other health threats are presented. A methodological toolbox containing best methods for studying substance use is provided. The chapter closes with a discussion of approaches to treatment and prevention of substance misuse, emphasizing integration of services (e.g. a one-stop shop).


Author(s):  
John F Kelly ◽  
Valerie Earnshaw

Abstract Evidence demonstrates that exposure to the terms “abuse” and “substance abuser” increases stigmatizing and discriminatory attitudes toward individuals suffering from drug and alcohol problems, ultimately leading to suboptimal clinical care delivery and poorer treatment outcomes. The American Psychiatric Association has dropped the term “abuse” from its diagnostic terminology; therefore, the term provides no advantage in terms of clinical precision or public health communication. Although numerous medical and public health associations have advocated against the term “abuse,” it remains embedded in the very titles of our major federal institutions and administrations whose explicit mission is to alleviate these endemic problems. Congress must act to change the names of the National Institutes of Health on addiction (i.e., NIAAA, NIDA) and related federal institutions (SAMHSA, CSAT). The Society of Behavioral Medicine supports the removal of the term “abuse” from the National Institutes of Health and related federal administrations pertaining to addiction and replacement with more neutral and nonstigmatizing terminology (e.g., disorder). Alternative names for the federal organizations that SBM supports are the “National Institute on Alcohol Use Disorder,” the “National Institute on Drug Use Disorders,” the “Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health Services Administration,” and the “Center for Substance Use Disorder Treatment.”


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-147
Author(s):  
Ellen A. Donnelly ◽  
Madeline Stenger ◽  
Shannon Streisel ◽  
Daniel J. O'Connell ◽  
Jessica Arnold

Increases in opioid-related overdoses have required law enforcement and public health officials to collectively develop new approaches that treat substance use disorders and save lives. This essay describes the Hero Help recovery and behavioural health assistance program, a Delaware-based initiative providing drug treatment to qualifying adults who contact the police and ask for treatment, or to individuals in lieu of an arrest or upon recommendation by a police officer. Led by the New Castle County Division of Police, this collaborative project has brought together stakeholders from public health and criminal justice to coordinate treatment for people suffering from a substance use disorder and/or mental health problems. This essay describes the goals, evolution, and key activities of the program. It further highlights lessons learned, including improving credibility through concerted community outreach, finding ways to overcome the stigma associated with participating in a law enforcement–based program, gaining officer buy-in, and using data to inform treatment responses. Effectively, this essay seeks to disseminate emerging lessons in creating programming responsive to substance use disorder and mental illness among police departments and their community partners.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bohdan Nosyk ◽  
Amanda Slaunwhite ◽  
Karen Urbanoski ◽  
Natt Hongdilokkul ◽  
Heather Palis ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was preceded by an ongoing overdose crisis and linked to escalating drug overdose deaths in British Columbia (BC). At the outset of these dual public health emergencies, the BC government announced interim Risk Mitigation Guidance (RMG) that permitted prescribing medication alternatives to substances, including opioids, alcohol, stimulants, and benzodiazepines, an intervention sometimes referred to as ‘Safe Supply’. This protocol outlines the approach for a study of the implementation of RMG and its impacts on COVID-19 infection, drug-related and systemic harms, continuity of care for people with substance use disorder, as well as their behavioural, psychosocial, and well-being outcomes.MethodsWe conduct a parallel mixed-method study that involves both analysis of population-level administrative health data and primary data collection, including a 10-week longitudinal observational study (target n=200), a cross-sectional survey (target n=200), and qualitative interviews (target n=60). We have implemented a participatory approach to this evaluation, partnering with people with lived or living experience of substance use, as well as researchers and public health decision-makers across the province. Linked population-level administrative databases will analyze data from a cohort of BC residents with an indication of substance use disorder between 1996 and 2000. We will conduct a high-dimensional propensity score matching and marginal structural modeling to construct a control group and assess the impact of RMG dispensation receipt on a collaboratively-determined set of primary and secondary outcomes.DiscussionThis study constitutes the first formal evaluation of a province-wide program providing regulated pharmaceutical alternatives to the toxic drug supply. The study features an integrated knowledge translation approach, including communications with people with lived/living experience of substance use and consortium meetings with various stakeholders. Supported by the unique research context in BC, our selected mixed method study design will provide an exceptionally strong evidence base to judge not only the impact of the initial implementation of RMG, but also critical evidence on the implementation of the program, which can be used to adapt its future iterations if deemed successful.


2018 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda C. Bennett ◽  
Crystal Gibson ◽  
Angela M. Rohan ◽  
Julia F. Howland ◽  
Kristin M. Rankin

Introduction: Mental health and substance use are growing public health concerns, but established surveillance methods do not measure the burden of these conditions among women of reproductive age. We developed a standardized indicator from administrative data to identify inpatient hospitalizations related to mental health or substance use (MHSU) among women of reproductive age, as well as co-occurrence of mental health and substance use conditions among those hospitalizations. Materials and Methods: We used inpatient hospital discharge data from 2012-2014 for women aged 15-44 residing in Illinois and Wisconsin. We identified MHSU-related hospitalizations through the principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis and first-listed ICD-9-CM external cause of injury code (E code). We classified hospitalizations as related to 1 of 3 mutually exclusive categories: a mental disorder, a substance use disorder, or an acute MHSU-related event. We defined co-occurrence as the presence of both mental health and substance use codes in any available diagnosis or E-code field. Results: Of 1 173 758 hospitalizations of women of reproductive age, 150 318 (12.8%) were related to a mental disorder, a substance use disorder, or an acute MHSU-related event, for a rate of 135.6 hospitalizations per 10 000 women. Of MHSU-related hospitalizations, 115 163 (76.6%) were for a principal mental disorder, 22 466 (14.9%) were for a principal substance use disorder, and 12 709 (8.5%) were for an acute MHSU-related event; 42.4% had co-occurring mental health codes and substance use codes on the discharge record. Practice Implications: MHSU-related disorders and events are common causes of hospitalization for women of reproductive age, and nearly half of these hospitalizations involved co-occurring mental health and substance use diagnoses or events. This new indicator may improve public health surveillance by establishing a systematic and comprehensive method to measure the burden of MHSU-related hospitalizations among women of reproductive age.


2022 ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
Peter St. George ◽  
Christina Kinnevey

Context: America is in the midst of a substance use disorder (SUD) epidemic, which has only worsened in the current COVID-19 pandemic. SUD is a public health crisis that affects an everincreasing proportion of the population and is extraordinarily difficult to treat. Misused substances induce neuroplastic changes that not only predispose individuals to relapse but also persist after completing treatment recommendations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mishka Terplan ◽  
Maayan Lawental ◽  
Melanie Bryant Connah ◽  
Caitlin Eileen Martin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document