Association of olfatory dysfunction with plasma lipids and blood pressure in a high cardiovascular risk population: sex-specific analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 242 ◽  
pp. 170-171
Author(s):  
Rebeca Fernández-Carrión ◽  
Ignacio M. Gimenez-Alba ◽  
Oscar Coltell ◽  
Jose V. Sorlí ◽  
Olga Portolés ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilir Maraj ◽  
John N. Makaryus ◽  
Anthony Ashkar ◽  
Samy I. McFarlane ◽  
Amgad N. Makaryus

The incidence of hypertension is increasing every year. Blood pressure (BP) control is an important therapeutic goal for the slowing of progression as well as for the prevention of Cardiovascular disease. The management of hypertension in the high cardiovascular risk population remains a real challenge as the population continues to age, the incidence of diabetes increases, and more and more people survive acute myocardial infarction. We will review hypertension management in the high cardiovascular risk population: patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and heart failure (HF) as well as in diabetic patients.


Medic ro ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (124) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Svetlana Moșteoru ◽  
Roxana Pleavă ◽  
Claudia Hudrea ◽  
Laura Gaiţă ◽  
Dan Gaiţă

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (19) ◽  
pp. 1420-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Düsing

AbstractThe optimal target blood pressure (BP) in the treatment of hypertensive patients remains controversial. Recently, the systolic blood pressure trial (SPRINT) has proposed that a target systolic blood pressure of < 120 mmHg provides prognostic benefit in elderly hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk. The results of SPRINT contrast with several other intervention trials which have investigated the effect of intense BP lowering (Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes [SPS3], Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD], Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation [HOPE]-3). The differences in outcomes in SPRINT vs. other intervention trials are, to a large extend, due to an "unobserved" BP measurement procedure utilized in the SPRINT trial. Thus, a BP goal of < 120 mmHg, at least by conventional BP measurement, remains unproven. Independent of SPRINT the controversial evidence with respect to BP targets calls for further studies and, possibly, for more individualized treatment goals.


Author(s):  
Krishna K Patel ◽  
Suzanne V Arnold ◽  
Paul S Chan ◽  
Yuanyuan Tang ◽  
Yashashwi Pokharel ◽  
...  

Introduction: In SPRINT (Systolic blood PRessure INtervention Trial), non-diabetic patients with hypertension at high cardiovascular risk treated with intensive blood pressure (BP) control (<120mmHg) had fewer major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause deaths but higher rates of serious adverse events (SAE) compared with patients treated with standard BP control (<140mmHg). However, the degree of benefit or harm for an individual patient could vary due to heterogeneity in treatment effect. Methods: Using patient-level data from SPRINT, we developed predictive models for benefit (freedom from death or MACE) and harm (increased SAE) to allow for individualized BP treatment goals based on projected risk-benefit for each patient. Interactions between candidate variable and treatment were evaluated in the models to identify differential treatment effects. We performed 10 fold cross-validation for both the models. Results: Among 9361 patients, 8606 (92%) patients had no MACE or death event (benefit) and 3529 (38%) patients had a SAE (harm) over a median follow-up of 3.3 years. The benefit model showed good discrimination (c-index= 0.72; cross-validated c-index= 0.72) with treatment interactions of age, sex, and baseline systolic BP (Figure A), with more benefit of intensive BP treatment in patients who are older, male, and have lower baseline SBP. The SAE risk model showed moderate discrimination (c-index=0.66; cross-validated c-index= 0.65) with a treatment interaction of baseline renal function (Figure B), indicating less harm of intensive treatment in patients with a higher baseline creatinine. The mean predicted absolute benefit of intensive BP treatment was of 2.2% ± 2.5% compared with standard treatment, but ranged from 10.7% lower benefit to 17% greater benefit in individual patients. Similarly, mean predicted absolute harm with intensive treatment was 1.0% ± 1.9%, but ranged from 15.9% lesser harm to 4.9% more harm. Conclusion: Among non-diabetic patients with hypertension at high cardiovascular risk, we developed prediction models using basic clinical data that can identify patients with higher likelihood of benefit vs. harm with BP treatment strategies. These models could be used to tailor the treatment approach based on the projected risk and benefit for each unique patient.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1333-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thacira D. A. Ramos ◽  
Tatianne M. E. Dantas ◽  
Mônica O. S. Simões ◽  
Danielle F. Carvalho ◽  
Carla C. M. Medeiros

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the presence of carotid thickening and its relationship with the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth score.MethodsWe carried out a cross-sectional study involving 512 brazilian adolescents. Variables such as sex, body mass index, concentrations of non-high-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin A1c levels that make up the score, and carotid thickening through the intima-media complex measured by ultrasound were evaluated. We adopted two cut-off points to evaluate carotid thickening, being considered altered for those higher or equal to the z-score 2+ and ⩾75th percentile. The association was assessed using the χ2 test and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.ResultsHigh cardiovascular risk was present in 10.2% of the adolescents; carotid thickness was present in 4.3% determined by the z-score 2+ and in 25.0% determined by the 75th percentile. When measured by the z-score, carotid thickening was associated with high systolic blood pressure (p=0.024), high-non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (p=0.039), and high cardiovascular risk assessed by the score and by the 75th percentile, with body mass index >30 (p=0.005). In the multivariate analysis, high cardiovascular risk was found to be independently associated with the presence of carotid thickness evaluated by the z-score, with risk four times greater (p=0.010) of presenting with this condition compared with individuals with low risk, and this fact was not observed when factors were analysed alone.ConclusionThe presence of high cardiovascular risk in adolescents assessed by the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth score was associated with marked thickening of the carotid artery in healthy adolescents.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1-2 (33-34) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
V. Skybchyk ◽  
◽  
O. Pylypiv ◽  

Context. It is known that in addition to transient ischemic attacks and insults, hypertension is often the cause of asymptomatic brain damage, including cognitive impairment (CI). Most of these studies show a positive relationship between midlife hypertension and cognitive decline at the advanced age. CI significantly affect the quality of life of patients, reduce the ability to learn, acquire new knowledge and skills, force them to change their usual way of life and often stop or reduce professional activities. Objective. To analyze the condition of cognitive functions in patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension of 2nd-3rd degrees, with moderate and high cardiovascular risk and evaluate their gender peculiarities. Materials and methods. The study included 90 patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension. The average age of patients with hypertension was 49.66 ± 8.74 years old. The average course of the disease was 7.7 ± 3.9 years. The comparison group consisted of 46 healthy individuals with normal blood pressure levels and without hypertension in anamnesis (the average age - 45.88 ± 3.03 years old). Applied methods included general clinical, methods of neuropsychological testing (MMSE, GPCOG, W. Schulte test), standard general clinical and biochemical laboratory methods (blood lipid spectrum, blood glucose, creatinine with GFR, electrolytes), instrumental (12-lead ECG, ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure, echocardiography in B-, D-modes), and statistical methods. Results. Patients with hypertension scored significantly less on the MMSE scale (26.82 ± 1.41 scores vs. 28.89 ± 0.82 scores, p = 0.001) and GPCOG (6.63 ± 1.88 scores vs. 8.35 ± 0.71 scores, p = 0.001) compared with healthy individuals and spent more time on performing Walter Schulte test (46.51 ± 8.59 seconds vs. 36.69 ± 6.77 seconds, p = 0.001). Moderate CI were detected in 36 patients (40.00 %) among the examined hypertensive patients; it means that the total score of MMSE was 24-26 scores (the norm is 27-30 scores). The total score on the MMSE scale was 25.47 ± 0.88 in hypertensive patients with CI and was significantly lower than in hypertensive patients without CI (р = 0.001). Cognitive functions in patients with CI were characterized by poorer indices of memory, counting and executive functions. It should be noted that the revealed changes had more reliable manifestations in male hypertensive patients. In particular, the total score on the MMSE scale was 26.57 ± 1.37, while in female ones it was 27.19 ± 1.41 scores (p = 0.04). CI on the MMSE scale were diagnosed in 43.4 % (n = 23) of male patients and in 35.1 % (n = 13) of female patients. The total score was also higher on the GPCOG scale in female patients - 6.89 ± 1.85 scores vs. 6.45 ± 1.89 scores, p = 0.26. Instead, the time to complete the tasks according to the Walter Schulte tables was longer in male patients - 47.74 ± 8.85 seconds vs. 47.73 ± 7.99 seconds, p = 0.10, respectively. The parameters of counting functions were significantly lower (p = 0.01) in the group of male hypertensive patients compared with female ones. Besides, men had lower indicators of short-term memory and orientation, women reproduced worse verbal material, but the difference was statistically insignificant (p-value more than 0.05). The sum of scores on the MMSE scale conversely correlated with male gender (r = -0.22, p = 0.03). The risk of low values of MMSE indices in male patients with hypertension was 42.00 % higher than in female ones (OR = 1.42 ± 0.32, with 95% CІ [0.18-2.65]). Conclusions. Hypertension is a significant independent risk factor for developing new cases of cognitive impairment. In particular, among the patients with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension of 2nd-3rd degrees, with moderate and high cardiovascular risk, moderate cognitive impairment was revealed in 36 patients (40,00 %), the revealed changes were more manifested in male hypertensive patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document