Exploring rumen methanogen genomes to identify targets for methane mitigation strategies

2011 ◽  
Vol 166-167 ◽  
pp. 65-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.T. Attwood ◽  
E. Altermann ◽  
W.J. Kelly ◽  
S.C. Leahy ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 1815-1823 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Troy ◽  
C-A. Duthie ◽  
J. J. Hyslop ◽  
R. Roehe ◽  
D. W. Ross ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
LG Ribeiro ◽  
◽  
FS Machado ◽  
MM Campos ◽  
R Guimaraes ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 951
Author(s):  
John L. Black ◽  
Thomas M. Davison ◽  
Ilona Box

Anthropomorphic greenhouse gases are raising the temperature of the earth and threatening ecosystems. Since 1950 atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased 28%, while methane has increased 70%. Methane, over the first 20 years after release, has 80-times more warming potential as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Enteric methane from microbial fermentation of plant material by ruminants contributes 30% of methane released into the atmosphere, which is more than any other single source. Numerous strategies were reviewed to quantify their methane mitigation potential, their impact on animal productivity and their likelihood of adoption. The supplements, 3-nitrooxypropanol and the seaweed, Asparagopsis, reduced methane emissions by 40+% and 90%, respectively, with increases in animal productivity and small effects on animal health or product quality. Manipulation of the rumen microbial population can potentially provide intergenerational reduction in methane emissions, if treated animals remain isolated. Genetic selection, vaccination, grape marc, nitrate or biochar reduced methane emissions by 10% or less. Best management practices and cattle browsing legumes, Desmanthus or Leucaena species, result in small levels of methane mitigation and improved animal productivity. Feeding large amounts daily of ground wheat reduced methane emissions by around 35% in dairy cows but was not sustained over time.


animal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C. Leahy ◽  
W.J. Kelly ◽  
R.S. Ronimus ◽  
N. Wedlock ◽  
E. Altermann ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Milka Popova ◽  
Jessie Guyader ◽  
Mathieu Silberberg ◽  
Ahmad Reza Seradj ◽  
Cristina Saro ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTDietary supplementation with linseed, saponins, and nitrate is a promising methane mitigation strategy in ruminant production. Here, we aimed to assess the effects of these additives on the rumen microbiota in order to understand underlying microbial mechanisms of methane abatement. Two 2-by-2 factorial design studies were conducted simultaneously, which also allowed us to make a broad-based assessment of microbial responses. Eight nonlactating cows were fed diets supplemented with linseed or saponin in order to decrease hydrogen production and nitrate to affect hydrogen consumption; also, combinations of linseed plus nitrate or saponin plus nitrate were used to explore the interaction between dietary treatments. Previous work assessed effects on methane and fermentation patterns. Rumen microbes were studied by sequencing 18S and 16S rRNA genes and ITS1 amplicons. Methanogen activity was monitored by following changes inmcrAtranscript abundance. Nitrate fed alone or in combination in both studies dramatically affected the composition and structure of rumen microbiota, although impacts were more evident in one of the studies. Linseed moderately modified only bacterial community structure. Indicator operational taxonomic unit (OTU) analysis revealed that both linseed and nitrate reduced the relative abundance of hydrogen-producingRuminococcaceae. Linseed increased the proportion of bacteria known to reduce succinate to propionate, whereas nitrate supplementation increased nitrate-reducing bacteria and decreased the metabolic activity of rumen methanogens. Saponins had no effect on the microbiota. Inconsistency found between the two studies with nitrate supplementation could be explained by changes in microbial ecosystem functioning rather than changes in microbial community structure.IMPORTANCEThis study aimed at identifying the microbial mechanisms of enteric methane mitigation when linseed, nitrate, and saponins were fed to nonlactating cows alone or in a combination. Hydrogen is a limiting factor in rumen methanogenesis. We hypothesized that linseed and saponins would affect hydrogen producers and nitrate would affect hydrogen consumption, leading to reduced methane production in the rumen. Contrary to what was predicted, both linseed and nitrate had a deleterious effect on hydrogen producers; linseed also redirected hydrogen consumption toward propionate production, whereas nitrate stimulated the growth of nitrate-reducing and, hence, hydrogen-consuming bacterial taxa. This novel knowledge of microbial mechanisms involved in rumen methanogenesis provides insights for the development and optimization of methane mitigation strategies.


2021 ◽  
pp. 127693
Author(s):  
Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio ◽  
André Bannink ◽  
Olga Lucía Mayorga Mogollón ◽  
Alexander Nikolov Hristov ◽  
Gustavo Jaurena ◽  
...  

Archaea ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Hook ◽  
André-Denis G. Wright ◽  
Brian W. McBride

Methanogens are the only known microorganisms capable of methane production, making them of interest when investigating methane abatement strategies. A number of experiments have been conducted to study the methanogen population in the rumen of cattle and sheep, as well as the relationship that methanogens have with other microorganisms. The rumen methanogen species differ depending on diet and geographical location of the host, as does methanogenesis, which can be reduced by modifying dietary composition, or by supplementation of monensin, lipids, organic acids, or plant compounds within the diet. Other methane abatement strategies that have been investigated are defaunation and vaccines. These mitigation methods target the methanogen population of the rumen directly or indirectly, resulting in varying degrees of efficacy. This paper describes the methanogens identified in the rumens of cattle and sheep, as well as a number of methane mitigation strategies that have been effectivein vivo.


2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1557-1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Anil Kumar Puniya ◽  
Monica Puniya ◽  
Sumit Singh Dagar ◽  
Sunil Kumar Sirohi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles G. Brooke ◽  
Breanna M. Roque ◽  
Negeen Najafi ◽  
Maria Gonzalez ◽  
Abigail Pfefferlen ◽  
...  

AbstractWith increasing interest in feed based methane mitigation strategies, fueled by local legal directives aimed at methane production from the agricultural sector in California, identifying local sources of biological feed additives will be critical in keeping the implementation of these strategies affordable. In a recent study, the red alga Asparagopsis taxiformis stood out as the most effective species of seaweed to reduce methane production from enteric fermentation. Due to the potential differences in effectiveness based on the location from where A. taxiformis is collected and the financial burden of collection and transport, we tested the potential of A. taxiformis, as well as the brown seaweed Zonaria farlowii collected in the nearshore waters off Santa Catalina Island, CA, USA, for their ability to mitigate methane production during in-vitro rumen fermentation. At a dose rate of 5% dry matter (DM), A. taxiformis reduced methane production by 74% (p ≤ 0.01) and Z. farlowii reduced methane production by 11% (p ≤ 0.04) after 48 hours and 24 hours of in-vitro rumen fermentation respectively. The methane reducing effect of A. taxiformis and Z. farlowii described here make these local macroalgae promising candidates for biotic methane mitigation strategies in the largest milk producing state in the US. To determine their real potential as methane mitigating feed supplements in the dairy industry, their effect in-vivo requires investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document