Effectiveness of nitrate addition and increased oil content as methane mitigation strategies for beef cattle fed two contrasting basal diets1

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 1815-1823 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Troy ◽  
C-A. Duthie ◽  
J. J. Hyslop ◽  
R. Roehe ◽  
D. W. Ross ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ana Citlaly Zazueta Gutierrez ◽  
Ana Mireya Romo Valdez ◽  
Beatriz Isabel Castro Perez ◽  
Francisco Gerardo Ríos Ríncon

Objective: Review the heat stress mitigation strategies in intensive cattle feedlots in the tropical region of México.Approach: Beef cattle production is one of the principal activities of the agricultural sector; therefore, to maintain the inventory in intensive finishing pens, a considerable number of cattle are moved to geographic areas where climatic conditions are not always favorable for most of the year. High environmental temperature combined with relative humidity create heat stress conditions andconsequently affecting the productive indicators by compromising the physiologicalstability of the cattle.Implications: The improvement of housing conditions to mitigate the effects of heat stress in beef cattle in intensive finishing involves considering living space, available shade area, feeding and watering space that assure the cattle welfare during their stay in livestock production units. Conclusions: Heat stress mitigation strategies in beef cattle during intensive finishing in practical conditions should contribute to animal welfare and them improvement of the productive indicators at the Mexican dry tropics.


Author(s):  
LG Ribeiro ◽  
◽  
FS Machado ◽  
MM Campos ◽  
R Guimaraes ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 951
Author(s):  
John L. Black ◽  
Thomas M. Davison ◽  
Ilona Box

Anthropomorphic greenhouse gases are raising the temperature of the earth and threatening ecosystems. Since 1950 atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased 28%, while methane has increased 70%. Methane, over the first 20 years after release, has 80-times more warming potential as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Enteric methane from microbial fermentation of plant material by ruminants contributes 30% of methane released into the atmosphere, which is more than any other single source. Numerous strategies were reviewed to quantify their methane mitigation potential, their impact on animal productivity and their likelihood of adoption. The supplements, 3-nitrooxypropanol and the seaweed, Asparagopsis, reduced methane emissions by 40+% and 90%, respectively, with increases in animal productivity and small effects on animal health or product quality. Manipulation of the rumen microbial population can potentially provide intergenerational reduction in methane emissions, if treated animals remain isolated. Genetic selection, vaccination, grape marc, nitrate or biochar reduced methane emissions by 10% or less. Best management practices and cattle browsing legumes, Desmanthus or Leucaena species, result in small levels of methane mitigation and improved animal productivity. Feeding large amounts daily of ground wheat reduced methane emissions by around 35% in dairy cows but was not sustained over time.


2011 ◽  
Vol 166-167 ◽  
pp. 65-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.T. Attwood ◽  
E. Altermann ◽  
W.J. Kelly ◽  
S.C. Leahy ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
...  

animal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C. Leahy ◽  
W.J. Kelly ◽  
R.S. Ronimus ◽  
N. Wedlock ◽  
E. Altermann ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Milka Popova ◽  
Jessie Guyader ◽  
Mathieu Silberberg ◽  
Ahmad Reza Seradj ◽  
Cristina Saro ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTDietary supplementation with linseed, saponins, and nitrate is a promising methane mitigation strategy in ruminant production. Here, we aimed to assess the effects of these additives on the rumen microbiota in order to understand underlying microbial mechanisms of methane abatement. Two 2-by-2 factorial design studies were conducted simultaneously, which also allowed us to make a broad-based assessment of microbial responses. Eight nonlactating cows were fed diets supplemented with linseed or saponin in order to decrease hydrogen production and nitrate to affect hydrogen consumption; also, combinations of linseed plus nitrate or saponin plus nitrate were used to explore the interaction between dietary treatments. Previous work assessed effects on methane and fermentation patterns. Rumen microbes were studied by sequencing 18S and 16S rRNA genes and ITS1 amplicons. Methanogen activity was monitored by following changes inmcrAtranscript abundance. Nitrate fed alone or in combination in both studies dramatically affected the composition and structure of rumen microbiota, although impacts were more evident in one of the studies. Linseed moderately modified only bacterial community structure. Indicator operational taxonomic unit (OTU) analysis revealed that both linseed and nitrate reduced the relative abundance of hydrogen-producingRuminococcaceae. Linseed increased the proportion of bacteria known to reduce succinate to propionate, whereas nitrate supplementation increased nitrate-reducing bacteria and decreased the metabolic activity of rumen methanogens. Saponins had no effect on the microbiota. Inconsistency found between the two studies with nitrate supplementation could be explained by changes in microbial ecosystem functioning rather than changes in microbial community structure.IMPORTANCEThis study aimed at identifying the microbial mechanisms of enteric methane mitigation when linseed, nitrate, and saponins were fed to nonlactating cows alone or in a combination. Hydrogen is a limiting factor in rumen methanogenesis. We hypothesized that linseed and saponins would affect hydrogen producers and nitrate would affect hydrogen consumption, leading to reduced methane production in the rumen. Contrary to what was predicted, both linseed and nitrate had a deleterious effect on hydrogen producers; linseed also redirected hydrogen consumption toward propionate production, whereas nitrate stimulated the growth of nitrate-reducing and, hence, hydrogen-consuming bacterial taxa. This novel knowledge of microbial mechanisms involved in rumen methanogenesis provides insights for the development and optimization of methane mitigation strategies.


2021 ◽  
pp. 127693
Author(s):  
Guilhermo Francklin de Souza Congio ◽  
André Bannink ◽  
Olga Lucía Mayorga Mogollón ◽  
Alexander Nikolov Hristov ◽  
Gustavo Jaurena ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 3540
Author(s):  
Guanghui Yu ◽  
Karen A. Beauchemin ◽  
Ruilan Dong

Methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation accounts for 3 to 5% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to climate change. Cost-effective strategies are needed to reduce feed energy losses as enteric CH4 while improving ruminant production efficiency. Mitigation strategies need to be environmentally friendly, easily adopted by producers and accepted by consumers. However, few sustainable CH4 mitigation approaches are available. Recent studies show that the chemically synthesized CH4 inhibitor 3-nitrooxypropanol is one of the most effective approaches for enteric CH4 abatement. 3-nitrooxypropanol specifically targets the methyl-coenzyme M reductase and inhibits the final catalytic step in methanogenesis in rumen archaea. Providing 3-nitrooxypropanol to dairy and beef cattle in research studies has consistently decreased enteric CH4 production by 30% on average, with reductions as high as 82% in some cases. Efficacy is positively related to 3-NOP dose and negatively affected by neutral detergent fiber concentration of the diet, with greater responses in dairy compared with beef cattle when compared at the same dose. This review collates the current literature on 3-nitrooxypropanol and examines the overall findings of meta-analyses and individual studies to provide a synthesis of science-based information on the use of 3-nitrooxypropanol for CH4 abatement. The intent is to help guide commercial adoption at the farm level in the future. There is a significant body of peer-reviewed scientific literature to indicate that 3-nitrooxypropanol is effective and safe when incorporated into total mixed rations, but further research is required to fully understand the long-term effects and the interactions with other CH4 mitigating compounds.


2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. 756-756
Author(s):  
L. A. Pellarin ◽  
J. O. Sarturi ◽  
P. R. B. Campanili ◽  
L. A. Ovinge ◽  
B. C. Bernhard ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1557-1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Anil Kumar Puniya ◽  
Monica Puniya ◽  
Sumit Singh Dagar ◽  
Sunil Kumar Sirohi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document