Development and preliminary testing of a technology-enhanced intervention to improve energy intake regulation in children

Appetite ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 104830
Author(s):  
Nicole A. Reigh ◽  
Barbara J. Rolls ◽  
Jennifer S. Savage ◽  
Susan L. Johnson ◽  
Kathleen L. Keller
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya M. Halliday ◽  
Mollie H. White ◽  
Allison K. Hild ◽  
Molly B. Conroy ◽  
Edward L. Melanson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Basolo ◽  
Takafumi Ando ◽  
Douglas C. Chang ◽  
Tim Hollstein ◽  
Jonathan Krakoff ◽  
...  

ObjectiveCirculating albumin is negatively associated with adiposity but whether it is associated with increased energy intake, lower energy expenditure or weight gain has not been examined.MethodsIn study 1 (n=238; 146 men), we evaluated whether fasting albumin concentration was associated with 24-h energy expenditure and ad libitum energy intake. In study 2 (n=325;167 men), we evaluated the association between plasma albumin and change in weight and body composition.ResultsAfter adjustment for known determinants of energy intake lower plasma albumin concentration was associated with greater total daily energy intake (β= 89.8 kcal/day per 0.1 g/dl difference in plasma albumin, p=0.0047). No associations were observed between plasma albumin concentrations and 24-h energy expenditure or 24-h respiratory quotient (p>0.2). Over 6 years, volunteers gained on average 7.5 ± 11.7 kg (p<0.0001). Lower albumin concentrations were associated with greater weight [β=3.53 kg, p=0.039 (adjusted for age, sex, follow up time), CI 0.16 to 6.21 per 1 g/dl difference albumin concentration] and fat mass (β=2.3 kg, p=0.022), respectively, but not with changes in fat free mass (p=0.06).ConclusionsLower albumin concentrations were associated with increased ad libitum food intake and weight gain, indicating albumin as a marker of energy intake regulation.Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifiers NCT00340132, NCT00342732.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 905-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy K. Wasse ◽  
James A. King ◽  
David J. Stensel ◽  
Caroline Sunderland

Ambient temperature during exercise may affect energy intake regulation. Compared with a temperate (20 °C) environment, 1 h of running followed by 6 h of rest tended to decrease energy intake from 2 ad libitum meals in a hot (30 °C) environment but increase energy intake in a cool (10 °C) environment (p = 0.08). Core temperature changes did not appear to mediate this trend; whether acylated ghrelin is involved is unclear. Further research is warranted to clarify these findings.


1977 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 907 ◽  
Author(s):  
AR Egan

In data from two separate experiments in which the same herbage diets were fed to sheep, a relationship was observed between the protein/energy ratio in digestion products and the level of voluntary feed intake: I = 0.16P—0.16 (SEb = 0.015; r2 = 0.85), where I is the voluntary intake of digestible energy (DE) (MJ/W0.75), P the protein digested in the intestine (g/MJ DE) and W the body weight (kg). When supplementary casein was infused into the duodenum of sheep fed on 15 basal diets, intake changes were greatest (up to 15% increase) with six roughage diets, in which estimated truly digestible protein contributed 5.5 g digested protein (DP) per MJ DE (about 10% of DE as protein) or less. No responses were observed with two other roughages in the same range or with seven roughages for which the estimated truly digestible protein contributed more than 6 g per MJ DE (about 13% of DE as protein). The change in voluntary intake was not found to be simply linked to the protein input, in that a consistent overall estimated protein/energy ratio in digestion products was not established as voluntary intake changed in response to protein infusion. The estimated resultant protein/energy ratios established were always high (7.4–9.4 g DP/MJ DE) relative to those observed on the basal diets (3.4–8.4 g DP/MJ DE). In a further experiment with a wheat hay–straw diet, voluntary intake was measured during periods of infusion of acetic acid per rumen, and/or protein (casein) infusion per duodenum. Energy infusion and protein infusion could be shown qualitatively to have opposed effects on oral intake. However, oral intake adjustments did not appear to act to preserve or re-establish any specific Protein/energy ratio in the total nutrients absorbed. The observations are discussed in relation to factors controlling energy intake, and the effect of protein inadequacy upon level of energy intake in the sheep. *Part VII, Aust. J. Agric. Res., 23: 247 (1972).


Nutrition ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 67-68 ◽  
pp. 110547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Crovesy ◽  
Eliane L. Rosado

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
MS Westerterp-Plantenga ◽  
EMR Kovacs ◽  
KJ Melanson

Appetite ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda M. Davy ◽  
Emily L. Van Walleghen ◽  
Jeb S. Orr

1974 ◽  
Vol 14 (67) ◽  
pp. 133 ◽  
Author(s):  
JF Dillon

The voluntary nutrient intake and productivity of White Leghorn x Australorp crossbred layers given diets ranging in metabolizable energy (M.E.) from 11.30 to 13.81 MJ kg-1 were examined to determine their ability to adjust daily energy intake. Pullets housed on deep litter and in cages had a characteristic M.E. intake of 1.35 and 1.30 MJ per bird day respectively. Pullets in deep-litter pens regulated their energy intake until the M.E. content of the diet reached 12.97 MJ kg-1 but 'overconsumed' by 7.7 per cent when the dietary energy was raised to 13.81 MJ M.E. kg-1. Caged pullets were less able to regulate energy intake and 'overconsumed' by 8.0 and 14.8 per cent when the diet contained 12.97 and 13.81 MJ M.E. kg-1 respectively. During the period of production studied it would appear to be economic to use diets of up to 12.1 3 MJ M.E. kg-1 though the optimum may be less, depending on the production situation. Productivity was not significantly altered when the protein of the diets was either reduced according to predicted 'overconsumption', or lowered to as little as 14.2 per cent when the highest energy diet was given. Savings in the cost of high energy diets may, therefore, be achieved by adjusting the protein content for 'overconsumption'. Birds offered a diet containing 13.81 MJ M.E. kg-1 for five hours per day had a productivity and efficiency of energy utilization similar to that of birds on lower energy diets ad libitum. The greater cost per unit energy of such a diet, however, militates against restricted feeding of high energy diets under field conditions. An unexpected peak in egg production and efficiency of energy utilization was observed when access to the diet with an M.E. content of 13.81 MJ kg-1 was allowed between 11.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. each day. The possible significance of this observation is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document