scholarly journals Daily Addition of a Protein‐rich Breakfast for Long‐term Improvements In Energy Intake Regulation and Body Weight Management in Overweight & Obese ‘Breakfast Skipping’ Young People

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather J Leidy ◽  
Heather A Hoertel ◽  
Steve M Douglas ◽  
Rebecca S Shafer
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Young People ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Breakfast Skipping ◽  
Protein Rich ◽  
Intake Regulation

scholarly journals Effects of a Protein-Rich, Low-Glycaemic Meal Replacement on Changes in Dietary Intake and Body Weight Following a Weight-Management Intervention—The ACOORH Trial

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 376
Author(s):  
Martin Röhling ◽  
Andrea Stensitzky ◽  
Camila L. P. Oliveira ◽  
Andrea Beck ◽  
Klaus Michael Braumann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Intake ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Lifestyle Intervention ◽  
Weight Change ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Daily Energy Intake ◽  
Meal Replacement ◽  
Daily Energy ◽  
Protein Rich

Although meal replacement can lead to weight reduction, there is uncertainty whether this dietary approach implemented into a lifestyle programme can improve long-term dietary intake. In this subanalysis of the Almased Concept against Overweight and Obesity and Related Health Risk (ACOORH) study (n = 463), participants with metabolic risk factors were randomly assigned to either a meal replacement-based lifestyle intervention group (INT) or a lifestyle intervention control group (CON). This subanalysis relies only on data of participants (n = 119) who returned correctly completed dietary records at baseline, and after 12 and 52 weeks. Both groups were not matched for nutrient composition at baseline. These data were further stratified by sex and also associated with weight change. INT showed a higher increase in protein intake related to the daily energy intake after 12 weeks (+6.37% [4.69; 8.04] vs. +2.48% [0.73; 4.23], p < 0.001) of intervention compared to CON. Fat and carbohydrate intake related to the daily energy intake were more strongly reduced in the INT compared to CON (both p < 0.01). After sex stratification, particularly INT-women increased their total protein intake after 12 (INT: +12.7 g vs. CON: −5.1 g, p = 0.021) and 52 weeks (INT: +5.7 g vs. CON: −16.4 g, p = 0.002) compared to CON. Protein intake was negatively associated with weight change (r = −0.421; p < 0.001) after 12 weeks. The results indicate that a protein-rich dietary strategy with a meal replacement can improve long-term nutritional intake, and was associated with weight loss.

scholarly journals Long-term effects of consumption of a novel fat emulsion in relation to body-weight management

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 942-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Diepvens ◽  
S Soenen ◽  
J Steijns ◽  
M Arnold ◽  
M Westerterp-Plantenga
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Fat Emulsion

scholarly journals Energy metabolism in free-living, ‘large-eating’ and ‘small-eating’ women: studies using 2H218O

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dallas Clark ◽  
Frank Tomas ◽  
Robert T. Withers ◽  
Colin Chandler ◽  
Menno Brinkman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Weight Changes ◽  
Free Living ◽  
Women Studies ◽  
Doubly Labelled Water ◽  
Energy Expenditures ◽  
Food Diaries

The doubly-labelled water (2H218O) technique was used to assess the long-term rates of energy expenditure and, after accounting for any changes in body composition, the derived rates of energy intake in weight-stable ‘large-eating’ (n 6) and ‘small-eating’ (n 6) women. The self-reported energy intakes (approximately 11.2 v. 5.6 MJ/d) and energy expenditures (approximately 8.5 v. 12.4 MJ/d) for the ‘large-eating’ and ‘small-eating’ groups respectively, should not be sustainable without significant body-weight changes. 2H218O-assessed rates of energy expenditure for the ‘large-eaters’ (approximately 8.5 MJ/d) and ‘small-eaters’ (approximately 11.3 MJ/d) were in close agreement with the results obtained using 5 d, self-reported activity diaries but the derived rates of energy intake for the ‘large-’ (approximately 8.5 MJ/d) and ‘small-eaters’ (approximately 10.8 MJ/d) were markedly different from those obtained using self-reported, weighed food diaries. When two ‘small-eaters’ were supplied with their self-reported energy intakes (approximately 5 MJ/d) for up to 28 d both subjects lost about 0.75 kg body-weight/week. These results provide no support for the existence of ‘metabolically efficient’ women in the community.

scholarly journals How strongly does appetite counter weight loss? Quantification of the homeostatic control of human energy intake

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Polidori ◽  
Arjun Sanghvi ◽  
Randy Seeley ◽  
Kevin D. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Feedback Control ◽  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
List Type ◽  
Homeostatic Control ◽  
Free Living ◽  
Human Energy

AbstractObjectiveTo quantify the homeostatic feedback control of energy intake in response to long-term covert manipulation of energy balance in free-living humans.MethodsWe used a validated mathematical method to calculate energy intake changes during a 52 week placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients treated with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitor that increases urinary glucose excretion thereby resulting in weight loss without patients being directly aware of the energy deficit. We analyzed the relationship between the body weight time course and the calculated energy intake changes using principles from engineering control theory. ResultsWe discovered that weight loss leads to a proportional homeostatic drive to increase energy intake above baseline by ~100 kcal/day per kg of lost weight – an amount more than 3-fold larger than the corresponding energy expenditure adaptations.ConclusionsWhile energy expenditure adaptations are often thought to be the main reason for slowing of weight loss and subsequent regain, feedback control of energy intake plays an even larger role and helps explain why long-term maintenance of a reduced body weight is so difficult.FundingThis research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases, using data from a study sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.DisclosureD.P. is a full-time employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC. K.D.H. reports patent pending on a method of personalized dynamic feedback control of body weight (US Patent Application No. 13/754,058; assigned to the NIH) and has received funding from the Nutrition Science Initiative to investigate the effects of ketogenic diets on human energy expenditure. R.S. is a paid consultant for Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Takeda, Daichii Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, Nestle, Circuit Therapeutics and Ethicon. R.S., also has received research support from Novo Nordisk, Ethicon, Sanofiand Boehringer Ingelheim. A.S. reports no conflicts of interest.What is already known about this subject?Human body weight is believed to be regulated by homeostatic feedback control of both energy intake and energy expenditure.Adaptations of energy expenditure to weight loss have been well-established, but the homeostatic control of energy intake has yet to be quantified.What this study addsWe provide the first quantification of the homeostatic control of energy intake in free-living humans.The increase in energy intake per kg of weight lost is several-fold larger than the known energy expenditure adaptations.Homeostatic control of energy intake is likely the primary reason why it is difficult to achieve and sustain large weight losses.

scholarly journals A protein-rich beverage consumed as a breakfast meal leads to weaker appetitive and dietary responses v. a protein-rich solid breakfast meal in adolescents

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather J. Leidy ◽  
Louise I. Bales-Voelker ◽  
Corey T. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Young People ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Differential Response ◽  
Solid Meal ◽  
Breakfast Meal ◽  
Energy Needs ◽  
Daily Energy ◽  
Ad Libitum ◽  
Protein Rich

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a protein-rich beverage leads to a differential response in appetite, satiety and subsequent energy intake compared with an energy- and macronutrient-matched solid version in young people. A total of fifteen adolescents (eight girls and seven boys; age 14 (sem 1) years, BMI percentile 79 (sem 4) %) randomly completed two testing days that included protein-rich (PR) breakfast meals (38 % of energy as protein, 48 (sem 2) g/meal) provided as a solid (S) or beverage (B). Breakfast was 24 % of estimated daily energy needs (2146 (sem 96) kJ/meal). Perceived appetite and satiety responses were collected over 5 h followed by an ad libitum lunch buffet. The PR-S meal led to greater reductions in 4 h postprandial appetite ( − 6221 (sem 1171) mm × 240 min) v. the PR-B meal ( − 3570 (sem 957) mm × 240 min; P < 0·05). When examining the data according to hourly responses, the PR-S meal led to greater reductions in appetite during postprandial hours 2, 3 and 4 v. the PR-B meal (all comparisons, P < 0·05). No differences in postprandial hourly or total (4 h) fullness were observed following the PR-S v. PR-B meals. The PR-S meal led to approximately 480 kJ less energy consumed at the ad libitum lunch buffet (1418 (sem 222) kJ) v. the PR-B meal (1900 (sem 326) kJ; P < 0·05). These data indicate that, although the food form of the PR breakfast meals had little, if any, effect on satiety, the appetitive responses were diminished and the subsequent food intake was greater when protein was consumed as a beverage v. a solid meal.

Food Type and Lentil Variety Affect Satiety Responses but Not Food Intake in Healthy Adults When Lentils Are Substituted for Commonly Consumed Carbohydrates

2019 ◽  
Vol 149 (7) ◽  
pp. 1180-1188
Author(s):  
Sandra L Clark ◽  
D Dan Ramdath ◽  
Brittany V King ◽  
Katherine E O'Connor ◽  
Michel Aliani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Test Meal ◽  
Food Products ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Food Type ◽  
Food Ingredients ◽  
Decrease Food Intake

ABSTRACT Background Lentils have potential to increase satiety and may contribute to a body weight management strategy; however, the effects on satiety of replacing common food ingredients with lentils within food products remain largely unknown. Objective The aim of this study was to determine the effects of replacing wheat and rice with 2 lentil varieties within muffins and chilies on satiety, test-meal food intake, and 24-h energy intake. Methods Healthy adults consumed muffins or chilies in which wheat or rice was substituted with green (61.8 g) or red (54 g) lentils in 2 randomized crossover studies (muffin study: n = 24, mean ± SE age: 25.4 ± 0.9 y, BMI (in kg/m2): 23.2 ± 0.5; chili study: n = 24, age: 25.7 ± 1.0 y, BMI: 23.2 ± 0.5), with ≥1-wk washout periods between study visits and studies. Subjective appetite sensations measured over 180 min were summarized with total area under the curve (AUC), food intake was measured at an ad libitum test meal, and 24-h energy intake was measured using weighed food records. Treatment effects were compared within each study using repeated-measures ANCOVA (subjective appetite sensations) and ANOVA (food intake, 24-h energy intake). Results Green, but not red, lentil chili significantly increased fullness AUC (17.5%, P = 0.02) and decreased desire to eat AUC (20.1%, P = 0.02) and prospective food consumption AUC (16.7%, P = 0.04) compared with rice chili, with no significant differences between chili treatments for test-meal food intake or 24-h energy intake. Muffin treatments did not significantly differ for any outcomes. Conclusions Replacing rice with green, but not red lentils within chili increases satiety but does not decrease food intake, whereas replacing wheat with lentils within muffins does not increase satiety or decrease food intake in healthy adults. Further study of the role of lentil replacement in food products in body weight management is warranted. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03128684.

Body weight and the management of lymphoedema

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 576-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie Provan
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Weight Management ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Term Management ◽  
The Way

Overweight and obesity are known risk factors for the development of lymphoedema, and are also well-recognised factors complicating the management of lymphoedema. However, a degree of uncertainty remains regarding the way in which obesity impacts upon the condition, and there is little detail about the practical application of weight management strategies in the population with lymphoedema. This article provides the background for ongoing research into the association between lymphoedema management and obesity. It is hoped that this research will provide important insights into the long-term management of lymphoedema.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document