Genome-wide analyses of direct target genes of an ERF11 transcription factor involved in plant defense against bacterial pathogens

2020 ◽  
Vol 532 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-81
Author(s):  
Juan Wu ◽  
Yong Deng ◽  
Junhe Hu ◽  
Chenzhong Jin ◽  
Xiwu Zhu ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Han Liu ◽  
Jingyue Xu ◽  
Yu Lan ◽  
Hee-Woong Lim ◽  
Rulang Jiang

Proper development of tendons is crucial for the integration and function of the musculoskeletal system. Currently little is known about the molecular mechanisms controlling tendon development and tendon cell differentiation. The transcription factor Scleraxis (Scx) is expressed throughout tendon development and plays essential roles in both embryonic tendon development and adult tendon healing, but few direct target genes of Scx in tendon development have been reported and genome-wide identification of Scx direct target genes in vivo has been lacking. In this study, we have generated a ScxFlag knockin mouse strain, which produces fully functional endogenous Scx proteins containing a 2xFLAG epitope tag at the carboxy terminus. We mapped the genome-wide Scx binding sites in the developing limb tendon tissues, identifying 12,097 high quality Scx regulatory cis-elements in-around 7,520 genes. Comparative analysis with previously reported embryonic tendon cell RNA-seq data identified 490 candidate Scx direct target genes in early tendon development. Furthermore, we characterized a new Scx gene-knockout mouse line and performed whole transcriptome RNA sequencing analysis of E15.5 forelimb tendon cells from Scx–/– embryos and control littermates, identifying 68 genes whose expression in the developing tendon tissues significantly depended on Scx function. Combined analysis of the ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data yielded 32 direct target genes that required Scx for activation and an additional 17 target genes whose expression was suppressed by Scx during early tendon development. We further analyzed and validated Scx-dependent tendon-specific expression patterns of a subset of the target genes, including Fmod, Kera, Htra3, Ssc5d, Tnmd, and Zfp185, by in situ hybridization and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays. These results provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms mediating Scx function in tendon development and homeostasis. The ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data provide a rich resource for aiding design of further studies of the mechanisms regulating tendon cell differentiation and tendon tissue regeneration. The ScxFlag mice provide a valuable new tool for unraveling the molecular mechanisms involving Scx in the protein interaction and gene-regulatory networks underlying many developmental and disease processes.


2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (28) ◽  
pp. 10458-10463 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Bruce ◽  
I. J. Donaldson ◽  
I. C. Wood ◽  
S. A. Yerbury ◽  
M. I. Sadowski ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 2642-2649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Le Crom ◽  
Frédéric Devaux ◽  
Philippe Marc ◽  
Xiaoting Zhang ◽  
W. Scott Moye-Rowley ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Yrr1p is a recently described Zn2Cys6 transcription factor involved in the pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) phenomenon. It is controlled in a Pdr1p-dependent manner and is autoregulated. We describe here a new genome-wide approach to characterization of the set of genes directly regulated by Yrr1p. We found that the time-course production of an artificial chimera protein containing the DNA-binding domain of Yrr1p activated the 15 genes that are also up-regulated by a gain-of-function mutant of Yrr1p. Gel mobility shift assays showed that the promoters of the genes AZR1, FLR1, SNG1, YLL056C, YLR346C, and YPL088W interacted with Yrr1p. The putative consensus Yrr1p binding site deduced from these experiments, (T/A)CCG(C/T)(G/T)(G/T)(A/T)(A/T), is strikingly similar to the PDR element binding site sequence recognized by Pdr1p and Pdr3p. The minor differences between these sequences are consistent with Yrr1p and Pdr1p and Pdr3p having different sets of target genes. According to these data, some target genes are directly regulated by Pdr1p and Pdr3p or by Yrr1p, whereas some genes are indirectly regulated by the activation of Yrr1p. Some genes, such as YOR1, SNQ2, and FLR1, are clearly directly controlled by both classes of transcription factor, suggesting an important role for the corresponding membrane proteins.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (6) ◽  
pp. 3261-3269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Anne Pfeiffer ◽  
James M. Tepperman ◽  
Jutta Dalton-Roesler ◽  
Pablo Leivar ◽  
...  

Light-environment signals, sensed by plant phytochrome photoreceptors, are transduced to target genes through direct regulation of PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR (PIF) transcription factor abundance and activity. Previous genome-wide DNA-binding and expression analysis has identified a set of genes that are direct targets of PIF transcriptional regulation. However, quantitative analysis of promoter occupancy versus expression level has suggested that unknown “trans factors” modulate the intrinsic transcriptional activation activity of DNA-bound PIF proteins. Here, using computational analysis of published data, we have identified PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS (PRR5 and PRR7) as displaying a high frequency of colocalization with the PIF proteins at their binding sites in the promoters of PIF Direct Target Genes (DTGs). We show that the PRRs function to suppress PIF-stimulated growth in the light and vegetative shade and that they repress the rapid PIF-induced expression of PIF-DTGs triggered by exposure to shade. The repressive action of the PRRs on both growth and DTG expression requires the PIFs, indicating direct action on PIF activity, rather than a parallel antagonistic pathway. Protein interaction assays indicate that the PRRs exert their repressive activity by binding directly to the PIF proteins in the nucleus. These findings support the conclusion that the PRRs function as direct outputs from the core circadian oscillator to regulate the expression of PIF-DTGs through modulation of PIF transcriptional activation activity, thus expanding the roles of the multifunctional PIF-signaling hub.


2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (13) ◽  
pp. 4212-4223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Guo ◽  
Jian Li ◽  
Nickolas Steinauer ◽  
Madeline Wong ◽  
Brent Wu ◽  
...  

In up to 15% of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs), a recurring chromosomal translocation, termed t(8;21), generates the AML1–eight–twenty-one (ETO) leukemia fusion protein, which contains the DNA-binding domain of Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) and almost all of ETO. RUNX1 and the AML1–ETO fusion protein are coexpressed in t(8;21) AML cells and antagonize each other's gene-regulatory functions. AML1–ETO represses transcription of RUNX1 target genes by competitively displacing RUNX1 and recruiting corepressors such as histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3). Recent studies have shown that AML1–ETO and RUNX1 co-occupy the binding sites of AML1–ETO–activated genes. How this joined binding allows RUNX1 to antagonize AML1–ETO–mediated transcriptional activation is unclear. Here we show that RUNX1 functions as a bona fide repressor of transcription activated by AML1–ETO. Mechanistically, we show that RUNX1 is a component of the HDAC3 corepressor complex and that HDAC3 preferentially binds to RUNX1 rather than to AML1–ETO in t(8;21) AML cells. Studying the regulation of interleukin-8 (IL8), a newly identified AML1–ETO–activated gene, we demonstrate that RUNX1 and HDAC3 collaboratively repress AML1–ETO–dependent transcription, a finding further supported by results of genome-wide analyses of AML1–ETO–activated genes. These and other results from the genome-wide studies also have important implications for the mechanistic understanding of gene-specific coactivator and corepressor functions across the AML1–ETO/RUNX1 cistrome.


Oncogene ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (17) ◽  
pp. 2044-2056 ◽  
Author(s):  
L H Mochmann ◽  
J Bock ◽  
J Ortiz-Tánchez ◽  
C Schlee ◽  
A Bohne ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Suen Tsou ◽  
Pamela J. Palisoc ◽  
Mustafa Ali ◽  
Dinesh Khanna ◽  
Amr H Sawalha

AbstractSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease of unknown etiology characterized by widespread fibrosis and vascular complications. We utilized an assay for genome-wide chromatin accessibility to examine the chromatin landscape and transcription factor footprints in both endothelial cells (ECs) and fibroblasts isolated from healthy controls and patients with diffuse cutaneous (dc) SSc. In both cell types, chromatin accessibility was significantly reduced in SSc patients compared to healthy controls. Genes annotated from differentially accessible chromatin regions were enriched in pathways and gene ontologies involved in the nervous system. In addition, our data revealed that chromatin binding of transcription factors SNAI2, ETV2, and ELF1 was significantly increased in dcSSc ECs, while recruitment of RUNX1 and RUNX2 was enriched in dcSSc fibroblasts. Significant elevation of SNAI2 and ETV2 levels in dcSSc ECs, and RUNX2 levels in dcSSc fibroblasts were confirmed. Further analysis of publicly available ETV2-target genes suggests that ETV2 may play a critical role in EC dysfunction in dcSSc. Our data, for the first time, uncovered the chromatin blueprint of dcSSc ECs and fibroblasts, and suggested that neural-related characteristics of SSc ECs and fibroblasts could be a culprit for dysregulated angiogenesis and enhanced fibrosis. Targeting these pathways and the key transcription factors identified might present novel therapeutic approaches for this disease.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud Fagny ◽  
Marieke Lydia Kuijjer ◽  
Maike Stam ◽  
Johann Joets ◽  
Olivier Turc ◽  
...  

AbstractEnhancers are important regulators of gene expression during numerous crucial processes including tissue differentiation across development. In plants, their recent molecular characterization revealed their capacity to activate the expression of several target genes through the binding of transcription factors. Nevertheless, identifying these target genes at a genome-wide level remains a challenge, in particular in species with large genomes, where enhancers and target genes can be hundreds of kilobases away. Therefore, the contribution of enhancers to regulatory network is still poorly understood in plants. In this study, we investigate the enhancer-driven regulatory network of two maize tissues at different stages: leaves at seedling stage and husks (bracts) at flowering. Using a systems biology approach, we integrate genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic data to model the regulatory relationship between transcription factors and their potential target genes. We identify regulatory modules specific to husk and V2-IST, and show that they are involved in distinct functions related to the biology of each tissue. We evidence enhancers exhibiting binding sites for two distinct transcription factor families (DOF and AP2/ERF) that drive the tissue-specificity of gene expression in seedling immature leaf and husk. Analysis of the corresponding enhancer sequences reveals that two different transposable element families (TIR transposon Mutator and MITE Pif/Harbinger) have shaped the regulatory network in each tissue, and that MITEs have provided new transcription factor binding sites that are involved in husk tissue-specificity.SignificanceEnhancers play a major role in regulating tissue-specific gene expression in higher eukaryotes, including angiosperms. While molecular characterization of enhancers has improved over the past years, identifying their target genes at the genome-wide scale remains challenging. Here, we integrate genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic data to decipher the tissue-specific gene regulatory network controlled by enhancers at two different stages of maize leaf development. Using a systems biology approach, we identify transcription factor families regulating gene tissue-specific expression in husk and seedling leaves, and characterize the enhancers likely to be involved. We show that a large part of maize enhancers is derived from transposable elements, which can provide novel transcription factor binding sites crucial to the regulation of tissue-specific biological functions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document