Trade-offs in carbon storage and biodiversity conservation under climate change reveal risk to endemic species

Abstract Several endemic species of Sulawesi have different growths and are generally influenced by local environmental factors. There are three well-known endemic species of Sulawesi, namely Macadamia (Macadamia hildebrandii), Elmerillia (Elmerillia ovalis), and Gophasa (Vitex cofassus). These three species are widely developed in community forests and are the mainstay of the community as building materials and for other purposes. These three species can be used as good absorbers of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in the context of mitigating climate change. Macadamia and Elmerillia species grow well in the highlands, while Gophasa is generally found in the lowlands. From the results of the growth analysis, it is known that Macadamia and Elmerillia are medium growing species, while gophasa are slow-growing species. The results showed that the three endemic species have a good ability to absorb carbon from the air. At the age of 20 years, these three species can store carbon which is quite high, namely 132.38 tons/ha for Macadamia, 152.04 tons/ha for Elmerillia, and 82.65 tons/ha for gophasa. When converted to the ability to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, the three species can absorb 485.85 tons CO2/ha, 557.99 tons CO2/ha, and 303.33 tons CO2/ha, respectively.

Download Full-text

Canadian boreal forests and climate change mitigation

Environmental Reviews ◽

10.1139/er-2013-0039 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 21 (4) ◽

pp. 293-321 ◽

Cited By ~ 77

Author(s):

T.C. Lemprière ◽

W.A. Kurz ◽

E.H. Hogg ◽

C. Schmoll ◽

G.J. Rampley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Climate Change ◽

Carbon Storage ◽

Boreal Forests ◽

Fossil Fuels ◽

Wood Products ◽

Mitigation Strategies ◽

Adaptation To Climate Change ◽

Mitigation Potential ◽

Systems Perspective ◽

Trade Offs

Quantitative assessment of Canada’s boreal forest mitigation potential is not yet possible, though the range of mitigation activities is known, requirements for sound analyses of options are increasingly understood, and there is emerging recognition that biogeophysical effects need greater attention. Use of a systems perspective highlights trade-offs between activities aimed at increasing carbon storage in the ecosystem, increasing carbon storage in harvested wood products (HWPs), or increasing the substitution benefits of using wood in place of fossil fuels or more emissions-intensive products. A systems perspective also suggests that erroneous conclusions about mitigation potential could result if analyses assume that HWP carbon is emitted at harvest, or bioenergy is carbon neutral. The greatest short-run boreal mitigation benefit generally would be achieved by avoiding greenhouse gas emissions; but over the longer run, there could be significant potential in activities that increase carbon removals. Mitigation activities could maximize landscape carbon uptake or maximize landscape carbon density, but not both simultaneously. The difference between the two is the rate at which HWPs are produced to meet society’s demands, and mitigation activities could seek to delay or reduce HWP emissions and increase substitution benefits. Use of forest biomass for bioenergy could also contribute though the point in time at which this produces a net mitigation benefit relative to a fossil fuel alternative will be situation-specific. Key knowledge gaps exist in understanding boreal mitigation strategies that are robust to climate change and how mitigation could be integrated with adaptation to climate change.

Download Full-text

Combating global challenges – climate change, biodiversity loss and poverty simultaneously: Unachievable goal or the only way forward?

SHS Web of Conferences ◽

10.1051/shsconf/202112909022 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 129 ◽

pp. 09022

Author(s):

Denis Vasiliev

Keyword(s):

Climate Change ◽

Sustainable Development ◽

Biodiversity Conservation ◽

Value Added ◽

Biodiversity Loss ◽

Anthropogenic Activity ◽

Climate Mitigation ◽

Research Approach ◽

Trade Offs ◽

Global Heating

Research background: Globally climate action is gaining momentum. Most significant players on global political arena including the US, the EU and China are actively engaging in addressing the problem of climate change. Sustainable development agenda implies the need to simultaneously reduce harmful impacts of anthropogenic activity on natural ecosystems, reduce poverty and combat global heating. However, when pursuing these three targets often complicated trade-offs emerge. These trade-offs are especially pronounced when competing land-uses are considered. Recent global assessments suggest that the world is failing to slow down biodiversity loss, poverty is going to soar in the nearest future, and global heating is likely to reach temperature limit. All these problems need to be addressed in nearest few decades. The task may seem overwhelming, especially without a clear roadmap. Purpose of the article: The aim of this study is to critically evaluate approaches to climate mitigation, detect trade-offs and synergies with biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation goals and find the optimal strategies capable to resolve all these problems together. Methods: Conceptual research approach - theory adaptation was used. Findings & Value added: Findings of present study suggest that in order to achieve sustainable development only climate actions that benefit biodiversity conservation should be implemented. In case biodiversity is supported by global initiatives it is likely that poverty will be reduced due to sustained provision of ecosystem services, underpinning human wellbeing. Policy recommendations are provided that could help tailoring climate actions to support biodiversity conservation and reduce poverty.

Download Full-text

Quantifying Climate Change Regulating Service of Forest Ecosystem - Focus on Quantifying Carbon Storage and Sequestration

Journal of Climate Change Research ◽

10.15531/ksccr.2014.5.1.21 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hyun-Ah Choi

Keyword(s):

Climate Change ◽

Carbon Storage ◽

Forest Ecosystem

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.1166391.627361 ◽

2009 ◽

Author(s):

Eric Dinerstein

Keyword(s):

Carbon Storage ◽

Trade Offs

Download Full-text

The Biology of Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems

10.1093/oso/9780198739135.001.0001 ◽

2018 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Karen J. Esler ◽

Anna L. Jacobsen ◽

R. Brandon Pratt

Keyword(s):

Climate Change ◽

South Africa ◽

Invasive Species ◽

Habitat Loss ◽

Endemic Species ◽

Geographic Area ◽

Cutting Edge ◽

Wide Range ◽

The Mediterranean ◽

Mediterranean Type Ecosystems

The world’s mediterranean-type climate regions (including areas within the Mediterranean, South Africa, Australia, California, and Chile) have long been of interest to biologists by virtue of their extraordinary biodiversity and the appearance of evolutionary convergence between these disparate regions. Comparisons between mediterranean-type climate regions have provided important insights into questions at the cutting edge of ecological, ecophysiological and evolutionary research. These regions, dominated by evergreen shrubland communities, contain many rare and endemic species. Their mild climate makes them appealing places to live and visit and this has resulted in numerous threats to the species and communities that occupy them. Threats include a wide range of factors such as habitat loss due to development and agriculture, disturbance, invasive species, and climate change. As a result, they continue to attract far more attention than their limited geographic area might suggest. This book provides a concise but comprehensive introduction to mediterranean-type ecosystems. As with other books in the Biology of Habitats Series, the emphasis in this book is on the organisms that dominate these regions although their management, conservation, and restoration are also considered.

Download Full-text

Carbon Dynamics in the Northeastern Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau from 1990 to 2030 Using Landsat Land Use/Cover Change Data

Remote Sensing ◽

10.3390/rs12030528 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (3) ◽

pp. 528 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jingye Li ◽

Jian Gong ◽

Jean-Michel Guldmann ◽

Shicheng Li ◽

Jie Zhu

Keyword(s):

Land Use ◽

Tibetan Plateau ◽

Carbon Storage ◽

Sharp Decrease ◽

Total Carbon ◽

Qinghai Lake ◽

Lake Basin ◽

Ecosystem Carbon ◽

Trade Offs ◽

The Impact

Land use/cover change (LUCC) has an important impact on the terrestrial carbon cycle. The spatial distribution of regional carbon reserves can provide the scientific basis for the management of ecosystem carbon storage and the formulation of ecological and environmental policies. This paper proposes a method combining the CA-based FLUS model and the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model to assess the temporal and spatial changes in ecosystem carbon storage due to land-use changes over 1990–2015 in the Qinghai Lake Basin (QLB). Furthermore, future ecosystem carbon storage is simulated and evaluated over 2020–2030 under three scenarios of natural growth (NG), cropland protection (CP), and ecological protection (EP). The long-term spatial variations in carbon storage in the QLB are discussed. The results show that: (1) Carbon storage in the QLB decreased at first (1990–2000) and increased later (2000–2010), with total carbon storage increasing by 1.60 Tg C (Teragram: a unit of mass equal to 1012 g). From 2010 to 2015, carbon storage displayed a downward trend, with a sharp decrease in wetlands and croplands as the main cause; (2) Under the NG scenario, carbon reserves decrease by 0.69 Tg C over 2020–2030. These reserves increase significantly by 6.77 Tg C and 7.54 Tg C under the CP and EP scenarios, respectively, thus promoting the benign development of the regional ecological environment. This study improves our understanding on the impact of land-use change on carbon storage for the QLB in the northeastern Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP).

Download Full-text

Soil organic carbon storage by shaded and unshaded coffee systems and its implications for climate change mitigation in China

The Journal of Agricultural Science ◽

10.1017/s002185962100006x ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Ziwei Xiao ◽

Xuehui Bai ◽

Mingzhu Zhao ◽

Kai Luo ◽

Hua Zhou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Climate Change ◽

Linear Regression ◽

Organic Carbon ◽

Soil Organic Carbon ◽

Multiple Linear Regression ◽

Carbon Storage ◽

Soil Ph ◽

Soil Bulk Density ◽

Soil N ◽

And Storage

Abstract Shaded coffee systems can mitigate climate change by fixation of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in soil. Understanding soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and the factors influencing SOC in coffee plantations are necessary for the development of sound land management practices to prevent land degradation and minimize SOC losses. This study was conducted in the main coffee-growing regions of Yunnan; SOC concentrations and storage of shaded and unshaded coffee systems were assessed in the top 40 cm of soil. Relationships between SOC concentration and factors affecting SOC were analysed using multiple linear regression based on the forward and backward stepwise regression method. Factors analysed were soil bulk density (ρb), soil pH, total nitrogen of soil (N), mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual moisture (MAM), mean annual precipitation (MAP) and elevations (E). Akaike's information criterion (AIC), coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and residual sum of squares (RSS) were used to describe the accuracy of multiple linear regression models. Results showed that mean SOC concentration and storage decreased significantly with depth under unshaded coffee systems. Mean SOC concentration and storage were higher in shaded than unshaded coffee systems at 20–40 cm depth. The correlations between SOC concentration and ρb, pH and N were significant. Evidence from the multiple linear regression model showed that soil bulk density (ρb), soil pH, total nitrogen of soil (N) and climatic variables had the greatest impact on soil carbon storage in the coffee system.

Download Full-text

Identifying integrated options for agricultural climate change mitigation

International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management ◽

10.1108/ijccsm-09-2012-0053 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 192-211 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

John Tzilivakis ◽

Kathleen Lewis ◽

Andrew Green ◽

Douglas Warner

Keyword(s):

Climate Change ◽

Climate Change Mitigation ◽

Effective Means ◽

Integrated Approach ◽

Management Options ◽

Content Type ◽

Mitigation Options ◽

Trade Offs ◽

Environmental Objectives ◽

Change Mitigation

Purpose – In order to achieve reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, it is essential that all industry sectors have the appropriate knowledge and tools to contribute. This includes agriculture, which is considered to contribute about a third of emissions globally. This paper reports on one such tool: IMPACCT: Integrated Management oPtions for Agricultural Climate Change miTigation. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – IMPACCT focuses on GHGs, carbon sequestration and associated mitigation options. However, it also attempts to include information on economic and other environmental impacts in order to provide a more holistic perspective. The model identifies mitigation options, likely economic impacts and any synergies and trade-offs with other environmental objectives. The model has been applied on 22 case study farms in seven Member States. Findings – The tool presents some useful concepts for developing carbon calculators in the future. It has highlighted that calculators need to evolve from simply calculating emissions to identifying cost-effective and integrated emissions reduction options. Practical implications – IMPACCT has potential to become an effective means of provided targeted guidance, as part of a broader knowledge transfer programme based on an integrated suite of guidance, tools and advice delivered via different media. Originality/value – IMPACCT is a new model that demonstrates how to take a more integrated approach to mitigating GHGs on farms across Europe. It is a holistic carbon calculator that presents mitigation options in the context other environmental and economic objectives in the search for more sustainable methods of food production.

Download Full-text