scholarly journals Skeletal muscle radiodensity and visceral adipose tissue index are associated with survival in renal cell cancer – A multicenter population-based cohort study

Author(s):  
J.S.F. Maurits ◽  
J.P.M. Sedelaar ◽  
P.F.A. Mulders ◽  
K.K.H. Aben ◽  
L.A.L.M. Kiemeney ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 2445-2455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Ross ◽  
John Rissanen ◽  
Heather Pedwell ◽  
Jennifer Clifford ◽  
Peter Shragge

Ross, Robert, John Rissanen, Heather Pedwell, Jennifer Clifford, and Peter Shragge. Influence of diet and exercise on skeletal muscle and visceral adipose tissue in men. J. Appl. Physiol. 81(6): 2445–2455, 1996.—The effects of diet only (DO) and diet combined with either aerobic (DA) or resistance (DR) exercise on subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), lean tissue (LT), and skeletal muscle (SM) tissue were evaluated in 33 obese men (DO, n= 11; DA, n = 11; DR, n = 11). All tissues were measured by using a whole body multislice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) model. Within each group, significant reductions were observed for body weight, SAT, and VAT ( P < 0.05). The reductions in body weight (∼10%) and SAT (∼25%) and VAT volume (∼35%) were not different between groups ( P > 0.05). For all treatments, the relative reduction in VAT was greater than in SAT ( P < 0.05). For the DA and DR groups only, the reduction in abdominal SAT (∼27%) was greater ( P < 0.05) than that observed for the gluteal-femoral region (∼20%). Conversely, the reduction in VAT was uniform throughout the abdomen regardless of treatment ( P > 0.05). MRI-LT and MRI-SM decreased both in the upper and lower body regions for the DO group alone ( P < 0.05). Peak O2 uptake (liters) was significantly improved (∼14%) in the DA group as was muscular strength (∼20%) in the DR group ( P< 0.01). These findings indicate that DA and DR result in a greater preservation of MRI-SM, mobilization of SAT from the abdominal region, by comparison with the gluteal-femoral region, and improved functional capacity when compared with DO in obese men.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Greco ◽  
Vincenzo Cirimele ◽  
CarloAugusto Mallio ◽  
BrunoBeomonte Zobel ◽  
RosarioFrancesco Grasso

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. e20
Author(s):  
T. Eskelinen ◽  
T. Tammela ◽  
A. Kotsar ◽  
T. Murtola

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 769-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Kuk ◽  
Katherine Kilpatrick ◽  
Lance E. Davidson ◽  
Robert Hudson ◽  
Robert Ross

The relationship between skeletal muscle mass, visceral adipose tissue, insulin sensitivity, and glucose tolerance was examined in 214 overweight or obese, but otherwise healthy, men (n = 98) and women (n = 116) who participated in various exercise and (or) weight-loss intervention studies. Subjects had a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test and (or) insulin sensitivity measures by a 3 h hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp technique. Whole-body skeletal muscle mass and visceral adipose tissue were measured using a multi-slice magnetic resonance imaging protocol. Total body skeletal muscle mass was not associated with any measure of glucose metabolism in men or women (p > 0.10). These observations remained independent of age and total adiposity. Conversely, visceral adipose tissue was a significant predictor of various measures of glucose metabolism in both men and women with or without control for age and (or) total body fat (p < 0.05). Although skeletal muscle is a primary site for glucose uptake and deposition, these findings suggest that unlike visceral adipose tissue, whole-body skeletal muscle mass per se is not associated with either glucose tolerance or insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese men and women.


2008 ◽  
Vol 168 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth F. Adams ◽  
Michael F. Leitzmann ◽  
Demetrius Albanes ◽  
Victor Kipnis ◽  
Steven C. Moore ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 776-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Y. C. Heng ◽  
Kim N Chi ◽  
Nevin Murray ◽  
Tao Jin ◽  
Jorge A Garcia ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Allan ◽  
B. J. G. Strauss ◽  
H. G. Burger ◽  
E. A. Forbes ◽  
R. I. McLachlan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document