Effects of outdoor walking surface and slope on hip and knee joint angles in the sagittal plane

2021 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 48-49
Author(s):  
P. Dixon ◽  
V. Shah ◽  
A. Willmott
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 1840008
Author(s):  
Alberto López-Delis ◽  
Cristiano J. Miosso ◽  
João L. A. Carvalho ◽  
Adson F. da Rocha ◽  
Geovany A. Borges

Information extracted from the surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals can allow for the detection of movement intention in transfemoral prostheses. The sEMG can help estimate the angle between the femur and the tibia in the sagittal plane. However, algorithms based exclusively on sEMG information can lead to inaccurate results. Data captured by inertial-sensors can improve this estimate. We propose three myoelectric algorithms that extract data from sEMG and inertial sensors using Kalman-filters. The proposed fusion-based algorithms showed improved performance compared to methods based exclusively on sEMG data, generating improvements in the accuracy of knee joint angle estimation and reducing estimation artifacts.


Author(s):  
Mansoor Amiri ◽  
Farhad Tabatabai Ghomsheh ◽  
Farshad Ghazalian

The purpose of this study was to model the resistance mechanism of Passive Knee Joint Flexion and Extension to create a similar torque mechanism in rehabilitation equipment. In order to better model the behavior of passive knee tissues, it is necessary to exactly calculate the two coefficients of elasticity of time-independent and time-dependent parts. Ten healthy male volunteers (mean height 176.4+/−4.59 cm) participated in this study. Passive knee joint flexion and extension occurred at velocities of 15, 45, and 120 (degree/s), and in five consecutive cycles and within the range of 0 to 100° of knee movement on the sagittal plane on Cybex isokinetic dynamometer. To ensure that the muscles were relaxed, the electrical activity of knee muscles was recorded. The elastic coefficient, (KS) increased with elevating the passive velocity in flexion and extension. The elastic coefficient, (KP) was observed to grow with the passive velocity increase. While, the viscous coefficient (C) diminished with passive velocity rise in extension and flexion. The heightened passive velocity of the motion resulted in increased hysteresis (at a rate of 42%). The desired of passive velocity is lower so that there is less energy lost and the viscoelastic resistance of the tissue in the movement decreases. The Coefficient of Determination, R2 between the model-responses and experimental curves in the extension was 0.96 < R2 < 0.99 and in flexion was 0.95 < R2 < 0.99. This modeling is capable of predicting the true performance of the components of passive knee movement and we can create a resistance mechanism in the rehabilitation equipment to perform knee joint movement. Quantitative measurements of two elastic coefficients of Time-independent and Time-dependent parts passive knee joint coefficients should be used for better accurate simulation the behavior of passive tissues in the knee which is not seen in other studies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason D. Stone ◽  
Adam C. King ◽  
Shiho Goto ◽  
John D. Mata ◽  
Joseph Hannon ◽  
...  

Purpose: To provide a joint-level analysis of traditional (TS) and cluster (CS) set structure during the back-squat exercise. Methods: Eight men (24 [3] y, 177.3 [7.9] cm, 82.7 [11.0] kg, 11.9 [3.5] % body fat, and 150.3 [23.0] kg 1-repetition maximum [1RM]) performed the back-squat exercise (80%1RM) using TS (4 × 6, 2-min interset rest) and CS (4 × [2 × 3], 30-s intraset rest, 90-s interset rest), randomly. Lower-limb kinematics were collected by motion capture, as well as kinetic data by bilateral force platforms. Results: CS attenuated the loss in mean power (TS −21.6% [3.9%]; CS −12.4% [7.5%]; P = .042), although no differences in gross movement pattern (sagittal-plane joint angles) within and between conditions were observed (P ≥ .05). However, joint power produced at the hip increased from repetition (REP) 1 through REP 6 during TS, while a decrease was noted at the knee. A similar pattern was observed in the CS condition but was limited to the hip. Joint power produced at the hip increased from REP 1 through REP 3 but returned to REP 1 values before a similar increase through REP 6, resulting in differences between conditions (REP 4, P = .018; REP 5, P = .022). Conclusions: Sagittal-plane joint angles did not change in either condition, although CS elicited greater power. Differing joint power contributions (hip and knee) suggest potential central mechanism that may contribute to enhanced power output during CS and warrant further study. Practitioners should consider incorporating CS into training to promote greater power adaptations and to mitigate fatigue.


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelina Pantzar-Castilla ◽  
Andrea Cereatti ◽  
Giulio Figari ◽  
Nicolò Valeri ◽  
Gabriele Paolini ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Raman Garimella ◽  
Koen Beyers ◽  
Thomas Peeters ◽  
Stijn Verwulgen ◽  
Seppe Sels ◽  
...  

Abstract Aerodynamic drag force can account for up to 90% of the opposing force experienced by a cyclist. Therefore, aerodynamic testing and efficiency is a priority in cycling. An inexpensive method to optimize performance is required. In this study, we evaluate a novel indoor setup as a tool for aerodynamic pose training. The setup consists of a bike, indoor home trainer, camera, and wearable inertial motion sensors. A camera calculates frontal area of the cyclist and the trainer varies resistance to the cyclist by using this as an input. To guide a cyclist to assume an optimal pose, joint angles of the body are an objective metric. To track joint angles, two methods were evaluated: optical (RGB camera for the two-dimensional angles in sagittal plane of 6 joints), and inertial sensors (wearable sensors for three-dimensional angles of 13 joints). One (1) male amateur cyclist was instructed to recreate certain static and dynamic poses on the bike. The inertial sensors provide excellent results (absolute error = 0.28°) for knee joint. Based on linear regression analysis, frontal area can be best predicted (correlation &gt; 0.4) by chest anterior/posterior tilt, pelvis left/right rotation, neck flexion/extension, chest left/right rotation, and chest left/right lateral tilt (p &lt; 0.01).


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 181-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody B. Bremner ◽  
William R. Holcomb ◽  
Christopher D. Brown ◽  
Michael G. Miller
Keyword(s):  

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 4539
Author(s):  
Igor Tak ◽  
Willem-Paul Wiertz ◽  
Maarten Barendrecht ◽  
Rob Langhout

Aim: Study concurrent validity of a new sensor-based 3D motion capture (MoCap) tool to register knee, hip and spine joint angles during the single leg squat. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: University laboratory. Participants: Forty-four physically active (Tegner ≥ 5) subjects (age 22.8 (±3.3)) Main outcome measures: Sagittal and frontal plane trunk, hip and knee angles at peak knee flexion. The sensor-based system consisted of 4 active (triaxial accelerometric, gyroscopic and geomagnetic) sensors wirelessly connected with an iPad. A conventional passive tracking 3D MoCap (OptiTrack) system served as gold standard. Results: All sagittal plane measurement correlations observed were very strong for the knee and hip (r = 0.929–0.988, p < 0.001). For sagittal plane spine assessment, the correlations were moderate (r = 0.708–0.728, p < 0.001). Frontal plane measurement correlations were moderate in size for the hip (ρ = 0.646–0.818, p < 0.001) and spine (ρ = 0.613–0.827, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The 3-D MoCap tool has good to excellent criterion validity for sagittal and frontal plane angles occurring in the knee, hip and spine during the single leg squat. This allows bringing this type of easily accessible MoCap technology outside laboratory settings.


Author(s):  
Daniel Alejandro Ponce-Saldias ◽  
◽  
Daniel Martins ◽  
Carlos Rodrigo de Mello-Roesler ◽  
Otavio Teixeira-Pinto ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 1647-1658 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Bosco ◽  
R. E. Poppele

1. We showed previously that neurons in the dorsal spinocerebellar tract (DSCT) may encode whole-limb parameters of movement and posture rather than localized proprioceptive information. Neurons were found to respond to hindlimb movements in the sagittal plane with maximum activity for foot placements in one direction and minimum activity for placements in the opposite direction. In contrast, movement direction is not specifically encoded by response activity when movement are restricted to a single joint. 2. We now describe the spatiotemporal characteristics of DSCT directional sensitivity for the responses of 267 neurons to small amplitude (0.5 cm) perturbations of the cat hindlimb. A small platform attached to the left hind foot was perturbed along four or eight directions in the sagittal plane, eliciting significant responses in 261 (98%) of the cells. The responses typically consisted of a sequence of peaks and troughs in poststimulus spike density lasting 150 ms or more following limb perturbation. 3. Peaks of activity in particular poststimulus intervals were broadly tuned for the direction of the perturbation, as determined by fitting the firing rates recorded in response to each perturbation direction to a cosine model. The parameters of the cosine model, namely the amplitude of modulation, the direction of maximum response, and the goodness of fit to the model, were computed for each 4 ms poststimulus interval. The parameters all showed the same tendency to wax and wane with respect to poststimulus time. For each period during which the cell activity was highly correlated with tuning model, the tuning indicated a different best direction. Thus each cell's directional tuning could be characterized by a set of tuning maxima associated with specific poststimulus times, when the amplitude of the tuning reached a local maximum and the fit to the cosine model was highly significant (R2 > 0.85). 4. Directions of the tuning maxima for the total population of cells were not uniformly distributed within particular poststimulus intervals. There was a statistically significant directional bias for upward directed perturbations in the poststimulus interval between 20 and 40 ms, followed by a period of downward bias from 45 to 55 ms. Between 60 and 85 ms, the distribution of tuning maxima was significantly skewed backward, whereas a very strong bias for the forward direction was present at about 100 ms. 5. Because the tuning was determined from responses to a very small perturbations of the limb in a given posture, it was not clear whether the responses were related to specific joint angles or muscle lengths, or whether they somehow represented the kinematics of the whole limb. To address this point, we examined the responses of 95 cells in two animals that were each tested in two different limb positions. One position was an approximation of the normal standing position. The other position consisted of a shortening of the limb axis (with major changes in all joint angles) in one animal, or a rotation of the limb axis backward (with little change in joint angles) in the other. 6. We compared each cell's responses to the same perturbations applied in the two limb positions and found they could be identical, scaled in time or magnitude, or completely different in the two positions. A greater percentage of cells with different responses was found in the experiment with the limb axis rotated. In the other experiment, in which there were major differences in joint angles in the two positions, the responses were mostly the same or scaled in time in the two positions. We also determined the population directional biases for the two positions in each experiment, and found that phase differences between the vectors representing population biases for the two positions were minimized when they were measured relative to the orientation of the limb axis (limb coordinates) rather than to the extrinsic vertical (lab coordinates). 7.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document