Frailty and All-cause Mortality in Acute Hospital Inpatients With Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S308
Author(s):  
N. Sae-Rian ◽  
S. Htwe ◽  
S. Bhaskaran ◽  
P. Thein
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Hospital ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Hospital Inpatients

Edoxaban treatment of elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in routine clinical practice: 1-year results of the non-interventional Global ETNA-AF program

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Yamashita ◽  
C.C Wang ◽  
Y.-H Kim ◽  
R De Caterina ◽  
P Kirchhof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Intracranial Haemorrhage ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Clinical Event ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Private Company ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and the need for appropriate anticoagulation increase with age. The benefit/risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban in elderly population with AF in regular clinical practice is therefore of particular interest. Purpose Analyses of Global ETNA-AF data were performed to report patient characteristics, edoxaban treatment, and 1-year clinical events by age subgroups. Methods Global ETNA-AF is a multicentre, prospective, noninterventional program conducted in Europe, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and other Asian countries. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and 1-year clinical event data were analysed in four age subgroups. Results Of 26,823 patients included in this analysis, 50.4% were ≥75 years old and 11.6% were ≥85 years. Increase in age was generally associated with lower body weight, lower creatinine clearance, higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, and a higher percentage of patients receiving the reduced dose of 30 mg daily edoxaban. At 1-year, rates of ISTH major bleeding and ischaemic stroke were generally low across all age subgroups. The proportion of intracranial haemorrhage within major bleeding events was similar across age groups. All-cause mortality increased with age more than cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion Data from Global ETNA-AF support the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban in elderly AF patients (including ≥85 years) in routine clinical care with only a small increase in intracranial haemorrhage. The higher all-cause mortality with increasing age is not driven by cardiovascular causes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Daiichi Sankyo

scholarly journals Mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation with or without heart failure following hospital discharge

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kartas ◽  
A Samaras ◽  
D Vasdeki ◽  
G Dividis ◽  
G Fotos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Endpoint Event ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Abstract Background The association of heart failure (HF) with the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess all-cause mortality in patients following hospitalization with comorbid AF in relation to the presence of HF. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data from 977 patients discharged from the cardiology ward of a single tertiary center between 2015 and 2018 and followed for a median of 2 years. The association between HF and the primary endpoint of death from any cause was assessed using multivariable Cox regression. Results HF was documented in 505 (51.7%) of AF cases at discharge, including HFrEF (17.9%), HFmrEF (16.5%) and HFpEF (25.2%). A primary endpoint event occurred in 212 patients (42%) in the AF-HF group and in 86 patients (18.2%) in the AF-no HF group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 3.13; P<0.001). HF was associated with a higher risk of the composite secondary endpoint of death from any cause, AF or HF-specific hospitalization (aHR 1.69; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.16 p<0.001). The associations of HF with the primary and secondary endpoints were significant and similar for AF-HFrEF, AF-HFmrEF, AF-HFpEF. Conclusions HF was present in half of the patients discharged from the hospital with comorbid AF. The presence of HF on top of AF was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality than did absence of HF, irrespective of HF subtype. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Impact of Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on Long-Term Prognosis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972110004
Author(s):  
Shuang Wu ◽  
Yan-min Yang ◽  
Jun Zhu ◽  
Jia-meng Ren ◽  
Juan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Net Reclassification Improvement ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

We performed a retrospective analysis involving 1269 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to evaluate the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on long-term outcomes. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and combined end point events (CEEs). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis were performed. During a median follow-up of 3.32 years, 285 deaths and 376 CEEs occurred. With the elevation of the NLR, the incidence of all-cause mortality (2.77, 4.14, 6.12, and 12.18/100 person-years) and CEEs (4.19, 7.40, 8.03, and 15.22/100 person-years) significantly increased. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that the highest NLR quartile was independently associated with the incidence of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.19-2.65) and CEEs (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.18-2.33). When the NLR was analyzed as a continuous variable, a 1-unit increment in log NLR was related to 134% increased risk of all-cause mortality and 119% increased risk of CEEs. Net reclassification improvement analysis revealed that NLR significantly improved risk stratification for all-cause death and CEEs by 15.0% and 9.6%, respectively. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio could be an independent predictor of long-term outcomes in patients with AF.

scholarly journals Prevalence and Impact of Atrial Fibrillation in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2490
Author(s):  
Giulio Francesco Romiti ◽  
Bernadette Corica ◽  
Gregory Y. H. Lip ◽  
Marco Proietti
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Geographical Location ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Cardiovascular Complications ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Degree Of Heterogeneity

Background: In patients with COVID-19, cardiovascular complications are common and associated with poor prognosis. Among these, an association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and COVID-19 has been described; however, the extent of this relationship is unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the epidemiology of AF in COVID-19 patients and its impact on all-cause mortality. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed and reported according to PRISMA guidelines, and a protocol for this study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021227950). PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched for relevant studies. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Overall, 31 studies were included in the analysis, with a total number of 187,716 COVID-19 patients. The prevalence of AF was found to be as high as 8% of patients with COVID-19 (95% CI: 6.3–10.2%, 95% prediction intervals (PI): 2.0–27.1%), with a high degree of heterogeneity between studies; a multiple meta-regression model including geographical location, age, hypertension, and diabetes showed that these factors accounted for more than a third of the heterogeneity. AF COVID-19 patients were less likely to be female but more likely older, hypertensive, and with a critical status than those without AF. Patients with AF showed a significant increase in the risk of all-cause mortality (OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 2.76–5.71), with a high degree of heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis focusing on new-onset AF showed the consistency of these results. Conclusions: Among COVID-19 patients, AF is found in 8% of patients. AF COVID-19 patients are older, more hypertensive, and more likely to have a critical status. In COVID-19 patients, AF is associated with a 4-fold higher risk of death. Further studies are needed to define the best treatment strategies to improve the prognosis of AF COVID-19 patients.

EXPRESS: Comparative effectiveness and safety of edoxaban vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study

2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110294
Author(s):  
Peter Nielsen ◽  
Mette Soegaard ◽  
Martin Jensen ◽  
Anne G Ording ◽  
Gregory Lip
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Inverse Probability ◽  
Standard Clinical Practice ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Event Rates

Background and purpose: The effectiveness and safety of edoxaban 60 mg and 30 mg for stroke prevention compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been well-described in a nationwide cohort of Caucasian patients treated in standard clinical practice. Methods: We used Danish nationwide registries to identify patients with AF during June 2016 and November 2018 who were treated with edoxaban or warfarin and computed rates per 100 person-years of thromboembolic, all-cause mortality, and bleeding events using an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach to account for baseline confounding. We used weighted pooled logistic regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing events between edoxaban 60 mg and warfarin users; edoxaban 30 mg was not included in formal comparisons. Results: We identified 6451 AF patients, mean age was 72 years and 40% were females. A total of 1772 patients were treated with edoxaban 60 mg, 537 with edoxaban 30 mg, and 4142 with warfarin. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was similar between warfarin and edoxaban 60 mg with a score of 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4). In the inverse probability of treatment-weighted pseudo-population, the thromboembolic event rate for edoxaban 60 mg was 0.95 and 1.0 for warfarin, corresponding weighted HR of 1.00 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.59, 1.71). Edoxaban 60 mg users were associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (3.93) compared to warfarin (6.04), with a HR of 0.64 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.88). The event rates for bleeding were 3.36 and 3.14, respectively; HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.77, 1.57) Conclusion: Edoxaban 60 mg is a safe and effective treatment compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in routine clinical care for white European patients with AF, with non-significantly different risks for stroke and clinically relevant bleeding, but lower all-cause mortality. 

scholarly journals Cardiovascular risk after hospitalisation for unexplained syncope and orthostatic hypotension

Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 487-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekrem Yasa ◽  
Fabrizio Ricci ◽  
Martin Magnusson ◽  
Richard Sutton ◽  
Sabina Gallina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Orthostatic Hypotension ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Unexplained Syncope ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship of hospital admissions due to unexplained syncope and orthostatic hypotension (OH) with subsequent cardiovascular events and mortality.MethodsWe analysed a population-based prospective cohort of 30 528 middle-aged individuals (age 58±8 years; males, 40%). Adjusted Cox regression models were applied to assess the impact of unexplained syncope/OH hospitalisations on cardiovascular events and mortality, excluding subjects with prevalent cardiovascular disease.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 15±4 years, 524 (1.7%) and 504 (1.7%) participants were hospitalised for syncope or OH, respectively, yielding 1.2 hospital admissions per 1000 person-years for each diagnosis. Syncope hospitalisations increased with age (HR, per 1 year: 1.07, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.09), higher systolic blood pressure (HR, per 10 mm Hg: 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.12), antihypertensive treatment (HR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.59), use of diuretics (HR: 1.77, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.38) and prevalent cardiovascular disease (HR: 1.59, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.23), whereas OH hospitalisations increased with age (HR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.12) and prevalent diabetes (HR: 1.82, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.70). After exclusion of 1399 patients with prevalent cardiovascular disease, a total of 473/464 patients were hospitalised for unexplained syncope/OH before any cardiovascular event. Hospitalisation for unexplained syncope predicted coronary events (HR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.30), heart failure (HR: 2.24, 95% CI 1.65 to 3.04), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.26), aortic valve stenosis (HR: 2.06, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.32), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.37) and cardiovascular death (HR: 1.72, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.42). OH-hospitalisation predicted stroke (HR: 1.66, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.23), heart failure (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.62), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.89, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.41) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.30).ConclusionsPatients discharged with the diagnosis of unexplained syncope or OH show higher incidence of cardiovascular disease and mortality with only partial overlap between these two conditions.

Are Prolonged Ventricular Pauses in Atrial Fibrillation a Marker of Poor Prognosis?

Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorte Marie Stavnem ◽  
Rakin Hadad ◽  
Bjørn Strøier Larsen ◽  
Olav Wendelboe Nielsen ◽  
Mark Aplin Frederiksen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Long Term Prognosis ◽  
Rate Limiting

Background: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the long-term prognosis of long electrocardiographic pauses in the ventricular action is not well-studied. Methods: Consecutive Holter recordings in patients with AF (n=200) between 2009-2011 were evaluated, focusing on pauses of at least 2.5 s. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and pacemaker implantation. Results: Forty-three patients (21.5%) had pauses with a mean of 3.2 s and SD of 0.9 s. After a median follow-up of 99 months (ranging 89-111), 47% (20/43) of the patients with, and 45% (70/157) without pauses were deceased. Pauses of ≥ 2.5 s did not constitute a risk of increased mortality: HR = 0.75; (95% CI: 0.34 - 1.66); p = 0.48. Neither did pauses of ≥ 3.0 s: HR = 0.43; (95% CI: 0.06 - 3.20); p = 0.41. Sixteen percent of patients with pauses underwent pacemaker implantation during follow-up. Only pauses in patients referred to Holter due to syncope and/or dizzy spells were associated with an increased risk of pacemaker treatment: HR = 4.7 (95% CI: 1.4-15.9), p = 0.014, adjusted for age, sex and rate-limiting medication. Conclusion: In patients with AF, prolonged electrocardiographic pauses of ≥ 2.5 s or ≥ 3.0 s are not a marker for increased mortality in this real-life clinical study.

Abstract P609: Restarting Anticoagulant Therapy After Intracranial Hemorrhage With Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hoon Shin ◽  
Jaehun Jung ◽  
Gi Hwan Bae
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Hemorrhagic Events ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Severe Hemorrhage

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) should be treated with anticoagulants to prevent stroke and systemic embolism. Resuming anticoagulation after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) poses a clinical conundrum. The absence of evidence-based guidelines to address this issue has led to wide variations in restarting anticoagulation after ICH. This study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits of anticoagulation therapy on all-cause mortality, severe thromboembolism, and severe hemorrhage and compare the effect of novel direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin on post-ICH mortality in patients with AF. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed using health insurance claim data obtained between 2002 and 2017 from individuals with newly developed ICH with comorbid AF. We excluded participants aged < 40 years and those with traumatic ICH, subdural hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were severe thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and non-users were analyzed for survival with propensity score matching. Results: Among 6735 participants, 1743 (25.9%) and 1690 (25.1%) used anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, respectively. Anticoagulant (HR, 0.321; 95% CI, 0.264-0.390; P < 0.0001) or antiplatelet users (HR, 0.393; 95% CI, 0.330-0.468; P < 0.0001) had a lower risk of all-cause mortality than non-users. However, there was no difference between the two drug users (HR, 1.183; 95% CI, 0.94-1.487; P = 0.152; reference: anticoagulant). The risk of acute thrombotic events, although not hemorrhagic events, was significantly lower in anticoagulant users than in antiplatelet users. In addition, anticoagulation between 6 to 8 weeks post-ICH showed a tendency of the lowest risk of death. Further, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality than warfarin. Conclusions: Our results showed that in patients with AF, resuming anticoagulants between 6 and 8 weeks after ICH improved all-cause mortality, severe thromboembolism, and severe hemorrhage. Further, compared with warfarin, NOAC had additional benefits.

scholarly journals Acute cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with hyperthyroidism: a population-based cohort study

2017 ◽  
Vol 176 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaf M Dekkers ◽  
Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó ◽  
Suzanne C Cannegieter ◽  
Jan P Vandenbroucke ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Arterial Embolism ◽  
Registration System ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Objective Several studies have shown an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in hyperthyroidism, but most studies have been too small to address the effect of hyperthyroidism on individual cardiovascular endpoints. Our main aim was to assess the association among hyperthyroidism, acute cardiovascular events and mortality. Design It is a nationwide population-based cohort study. Data were obtained from the Danish Civil Registration System and the Danish National Patient Registry, which covers all Danish hospitals. We compared the rate of all-cause mortality as well as venous thromboembolism (VTE), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischemic and non-ischemic stroke, arterial embolism, atrial fibrillation (AF) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the two cohorts. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated. Results The study included 85 856 hyperthyroid patients and 847 057 matched population-based controls. Mean follow-up time was 9.2 years. The HR for mortality was highest in the first 3 months after diagnosis of hyperthyroidism: 4.62, 95% CI: 4.40–4.85, and remained elevated during long-term follow-up (>3 years) (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.33–1.37). The risk for all examined cardiovascular events was increased, with the highest risk in the first 3 months after hyperthyroidism diagnosis. The 3-month post-diagnosis risk was highest for atrial fibrillation (HR: 7.32, 95% CI: 6.58–8.14) and arterial embolism (HR: 6.08, 95% CI: 4.30–8.61), but the risks of VTE, AMI, ischemic and non-ischemic stroke and PCI were increased also 2- to 3-fold. Conclusions We found an increased risk for all-cause mortality and acute cardiovascular events in patients with hyperthyroidism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document