Results of the Clinician Apps Survey, How Do RDNs Use Health-related Smartphone Apps in Patient Care Settings?

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (9) ◽  
pp. A93 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Karduck ◽  
K. Chapman-Novakofski
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Tusa ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Pia Elfving ◽  
Sanna Sinikallio ◽  
Pekka Mäntyselkä

Abstract Backround Chronic diseases and multimorbidity are common in the ageing population and affect the health related quality of life. Health care resources are limited and the continuity of care has to be assured. Therefore it is essential to find demonstrable tools for best treatment practices for patients with chronic diseases. Our aim was to study the influence of a participatory patient care plan on the health-related quality of life and disease specific outcomes related to diabetes, ischemic heart disease and hypertension. Methods The data of the present study were based on the Participatory Patient Care Planning in Primary Care. A total of 605 patients were recruited in the Siilinjärvi Health Center in the years 2017–2018 from those patients who were followed up due to the treatment of hypertension, ischemic heart disease or diabetes. Patients were randomized into usual care and intervention groups. The intervention consisted of a participatory patient care plan, which was formulated in collaboration with the patient and the nurse and the physician during the first health care visit. Health-related quality of life with the 15D instrument and the disease-specific outcomes of body mass index (BMI), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) and blood pressure were assessed at the baseline and after a one-year follow-up. Results A total of 587 patients with a mean age of 69 years were followed for 12 months. In the intervention group there were 289 patients (54% women) and in the usual care group there were 298 patients (50% women). During the follow-up there were no significant changes between the groups in health-related quality and disease-specific outcomes. Conclusions During the 12-month follow-up, no significant differences between the intervention and the usual care groups were detected, as the intervention and the usual care groups were already in good therapeutic equilibrium at the baseline. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02992431. Registered 14/12/2016


Author(s):  
Haneen Amawi ◽  
Sayer Alazzam ◽  
Tasnim Alzanati ◽  
Neveen Altamimi ◽  
Alaa Hammad ◽  
...  

Background: The use of health-related applications (apps) on smartphones has become widespread. This is especially of value during the ongoing SAR-COV-2 pandemic, where the accessibility for health care services has been greatly limited. Patients with free access to apps can obtain information to improve their understanding and management of health issues. Currently, there are cancer-related apps available on iPhones and androids. However, there are no guidelines to control these apps and ensure their quality. Furthermore, these apps may significantly modify the patients’ perception and knowledge toward drug-related health services. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the convenience, quality, safety and efficacy of apps for cancer patient care. Methods: The study was conducted by searching all apps related to cancer care on both Google Play Store and Apple iTunes Store. A detailed assessment was then performed using the mobile application rating scale (MARS) and risk assessment tools. Results: The results indicated that on a scale from 1-5, 47% of the apps were rated ≥ 4. The MARS assessment of the apps indicated an overall quality rating of 3.38 ± 0.9 (mean ± SD). The visual appeal of the app was found to have a significant effect on app functionality and user engagement. The potential benefits of these apps come with challenges and limitations. Patents related to smartphone applications targeting patients were also discussed. Conclusion: We recommend a greater emphasis toward producing evidence-based apps. These apps should be rigorously tested, evaluated and updated by experts, particularly clinical pharmacists. Also, these may alter patient attitudes toward services provided by physicians and pharmacists. Finally, these apps should not replace in-person interactive health services.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. e96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmine K Zia ◽  
Thai Le ◽  
Sean Munson ◽  
Margaret M Heitkemper ◽  
George Demiris

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A91.3-A92
Author(s):  
Gautham Sukumar ◽  
Kowshik Kupatira ◽  
Pradeep Banandur ◽  
G Gururaj

IntroductionThis ‘Health and productivity’ project was implemented to identify priority health problems and health related productivity loss in a large automobile industry in India. It hopes to re-emphasize that ‘OH department’ is a partner in productivity.ObjectivesTo estimate prevalence, incidence rates , trends and risk for health problems among employees (year 2010–14)To identify leading causes of hospitalization and out–patient care among employees (year 2010–14).To quantify loss in productive work time attributed to health related absence in year 2014 and forecast to year 2025MethodsA five year records analysis (2010–14) was conducted in a leading automobile industry in year 2015–16. Data was pooled from clinic visit records, annual medical examination , insurance claims and leave records, systematically using employee ID. Trends and incidence rates of leading health risks were computed per 1000 person-months of employment. Leading causes and trends in out-patient and in-patient care of employees were determined. Total work time (man-hours) was computed and health related loss in work-time was derived. Cox-regression was used to assess risk between work department and morbidity. ARIMA method was used to forecast productivity loss till year 2025.ResultsBetween 2010–14, overweight and hypertension were identified as leading health risks. Respiratory, musculoskeletal and digestive disorders were leading causes for clinic visits. Infectious diseases are leading cause for hospitalization. Health related absence accounted for 1.87% of total productive time. Forecasting indicates an increase to 9.31% by year 2025.ConclusionHealth related absence contributes to significant loss in productive work-time. There is scope to reduce these losses by improvement in health situation. Our study provided key information and trends for planning evidence based health promotion programmes in the industry.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1292-1299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan K. Wallman ◽  
Jonas K. Eriksson ◽  
Jan-Åke Nilsson ◽  
Tor Olofsson ◽  
Lars-Erik Kristensen ◽  
...  

Objective.To compare how costs relate to disability, disease activity, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.Antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF)-treated patients with RA in southern Sweden (n = 2341) were monitored 2005–2010. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), and EQ-5D scores were linked to register-derived costs of antirheumatic drugs (excluding anti-TNF agents), patient care, and work loss from 30 days before to 30 days after each visit (n = 13,289). Associations of HAQ/DAS28/EQ-5D to healthcare (patient care and drugs) and work loss costs (patients < 65 yrs) were studied in separate regression models, comparing standardized β coefficients by nonparametric bootstrapping to assess which measure best reflects costs. Analyses were conducted based on both individual means (linear regression, comparing between-patient associations) and by generalized estimating equations (GEE), using all observations to also account for within-patient associations of HAQ/DAS28/EQ-5D to costs.Results.Regardless of the methodology (linear or GEE regression), HAQ was most closely related to both cost types, while work loss costs were also more closely associated with EQ-5D than DAS28. The results of the linear models for healthcare costs were standardized β = 0.21 (95% CI 0.15–0.27), 0.16 (0.11–0.21), and –0.15 (−0.21 to −0.10) for HAQ/DAS28/EQ-5D, respectively (p < 0.05 for HAQ vs DAS28/EQ-5D). For work loss costs, the results were standardized β = 0.43 (95% CI 0.39–0.48), 0.27 (0.23–0.32), and −0.34 (−0.38 to −0.29) for HAQ/DAS28/EQ-5D, respectively (p < 0.05 for HAQ vs DAS28/EQ-5D and for EQ-5D vs DAS28).Conclusion.Overall, HAQ disability is a better marker of RA costs than DAS28 or EQ-5D HRQOL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Andrews ◽  
M. P. Craven ◽  
A. R. Lang ◽  
B. Guo ◽  
R. Morriss ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A variety of smartphone apps and wearables are available both to help patients monitor their health and to support health care professionals (HCPs) in providing clinical care. As part of the RADAR-CNS consortium, we have conducted research into the application of wearables and smartphone apps in the care of people with multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, or depression. Methods We conducted a large online survey study to explore the experiences of HCPs working with patients who have one or more of these conditions. The survey covered smartphone apps and wearables used by clinicians and their patients, and how data from these technologies impacted on the respondents' clinical practice. The survey was conducted between February 2019 and March 2020 via a web-based platform. Detailed statistical analysis was performed on the answers. Results Of 1009 survey responses from HCPs, 1006 were included in the analysis after data cleaning. Smartphone apps are used by more than half of responding HCPs and more than three quarters of their patients use smartphone apps or wearable devices for health-related purposes. HCPs widely believe the data that patients collect using these devices impacts their clinical practice. Subgroup analyses show that views on the impact of this data on different aspects of clinical work varies according to whether respondents use apps themselves, and, to a lesser extent, according to their clinical setting and job role. Conclusions Use of smartphone apps is widespread among HCPs participating in this large European survey and caring for people with epilepsy, multiple sclerosis and depression. The majority of respondents indicate that they treat patients who use wearables and other devices for health-related purposes and that data from these devices has an impact on clinical practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taha Nazir ◽  
Nida Taha

The philosophy of patient care is a wide and complicated topic of literature. That is elaborated by different health institution to harmonize their local clinical activities. Undoubtedly, that is working successfully to satisfy patients, fulfill the requirement of clinicians and cover maximum mutual benefits within officially allocated budget. However, patient care has different comprehension in different demographic and socio-political setting. But, in general, the meaning, understanding and composition of clinical and pharmaceutical patient care may be same all over world. The pharmacists, clinicians and administration adopt, exercise and emphasize on certain parts depending upon the type of challenges, kind of patients and available health care facilities. Thus, the health care is an emerging field that always remained under consideration. The local and international experts like to work, contribute and improve it to enhance the public health. Even some time judiciary, parliament and local intelligentsia focus and emphasize to address some particular health related problems. So, we may need to elaborate the comprehension to satisfy the literature and logical need of health and medicine including identification of problems, designing treatment protocol and handling the complication of therapy. That may potentially improve the overall outcomes and maximize the patient’s benefit. After twenty five years the definition of pharmaceutical care is still unsatisfactory. The confusion remained about what this term comprises and how to distinguish it from other terms. The board of the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) felt essential to rephrase pharmaceutical care and to answer the question: "What is Pharmaceutical Care ". The patient care is not perfectly incorporated into the health care system in most part of the world. However, pharmacy practice has shown positive attitudes toward patient care provision. Thus, an advanced working should focus to improve the understanding the concept of patient care and overcome barriers.


Author(s):  
Iddagoda Hewage Don Sandun Prabath ◽  
Vishva Samindi Mohottala ◽  
Withanage Dona Dasun Prasanni ◽  
Ranathunge Thilina Ruchiranga Ranathunga ◽  
Yasith Mathangasinghe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document