Risk factors of gastrointestinal and hepatic adverse drug reactions in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biomedical combination therapy and Chinese medicine

2012 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 615-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miao Jiang ◽  
Qinglin Zha ◽  
Yiting He ◽  
Aiping Lu
Author(s):  
Amanjot Kaur ◽  
Shakti B. Dutta ◽  
Amandeep Singh ◽  
Amit Varma ◽  
Mirza A. Beg ◽  
...  

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease and Methotrexate being widely used as monotherapy and in combination for the treatment of RA. Combination therapy provides additional or even more potentiating effects, therefore have been widely used. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of Methotrexate either alone or in combination.Methods: This study was conducted for one year from 1st January to 31st December 2015. 52 patients diagnosed with RA were included in this study and were divided in two groups, Group-1 (n=29) patients received methotrexate (MTX) 7.5-15mg/week and Group-2 (n=23) patients received methotrexate 7.5mg once a week + Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 200mg twice daily. The patients were followed up for a period of 16 weeks. Statistical analysis was done by using graph pad insta and p value of <0.05 was considered significant.Results: A total of 52 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 50.53±14.81 years. 43 (82.69%) patients were females and 9 (17.30%) were males. 23 (44.23%) patients had positive family history of the disease. The Rheumatoid factor was positive in 42 (80.70%) and anti-CCP was raised in 50 (96.15%) patients. The RAPID-3 and DAS-28 scores on intragroup comparison was highly significant (p <0.0001) and the intergroup comparison was significant (p <0.01) between baseline and 16 weeks in both the groups. The improvement in inflammatory marker CRP was highly significant on intragroup (p <0.0001) and intergroup (p<0.001) comparison between baseline and 16 weeks in both the groups. The mean changes in Vitamin-D3 between baseline and at 16 weeks were insignificant (p >0.05) in both the groups. Total of Adverse drug reactions reported were 42 (50.60%) in group-1 and 41 (49.40%) in group-2.Conclusions: The combination therapy was found to be more efficacious than MTX monotherapy in improving symptoms and quality of life. The adverse drug reactions were mild, more in combination therapy and none of the patients required withdrawal of treatment.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu-min Chen ◽  
Run-yue Huang ◽  
Qing-chun Huang ◽  
Yong-liang Chu ◽  
Jing-yao Yan

Chinese medicines are gaining wider acceptance. They have been used for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for thousands of years, and the need to investigate the interaction between Chinese medicines and western medicines is widely recognized. In this study, a large number of RCTs and CCTs were analyzed to systematically assess the effects and adverse events of Zhengqing Fengtongning (ZQFTN) for RA. Eleven studies that contained 956 participants (508 in the treatment group; 448 in the control group) were included. The results showed that although ZQFTN combined with methotrexate MTX could not decrease the swollen joint count and tender joint count of RA patients better than MTX alone, the combination therapy might relieve the duration of morning stiffness (SMD: −16.06; 95% CI: −28.77 to −3.34), reduce laboratory indexes (RF: SMD: −10.84; 95% CI: −19.39 to −2.29; ESR: SMD: −7.26; 95% CI: −11.54 to −2.99; CRP: SMD: −3.66; 95% CI: −5.94 to −1.38), and improve the overall effect (RR: 1.08; CI: 1.01 to 1.16) better than monotherapy. The combination therapy was significantly better in controlling adverse drug reactions (RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.79). Through this systematic review, we found that ZQFTN combined with MTX for the treatment of RA might have better clinical efficacy than MTX only and might be superior in terms of controlling adverse drug reactions.


Author(s):  
Jette A. van Lint ◽  
Tom Bakker ◽  
Peter M. ten Klooster ◽  
Eugene P. van Puijenbroek ◽  
Harald E. Vonkeman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waldemar Greil ◽  
Xueqiong Zhang ◽  
Hans Stassen ◽  
Renate Grohmann ◽  
René Bridler ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manar Amanouil Said ◽  
Liana Soido Teixeira e Silva ◽  
Aline Maria de Oliveira Rocha ◽  
Gustavo Guimarães Barreto Alves ◽  
Daniela Gerent Petry Piotto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are the sixth leading causes of death worldwide; monitoring them is fundamental, especially in patients with disorders like chronic rheumatic diseases (CRDs). The study aimed to describe the ADRs investigating their severity and associated factors and resulting interventions in pediatric patients with CRDs. Methods A retrospective, descriptive and analytical study was conducted on a cohort of children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). The study evaluated medical records of the patients to determine the causality and the management of ADRs. In order to investigate the risk factors that would increase the risk of ADRs, a logistic regression model was carried out on a group of patients treated with the main used drug. Results We observed 949 ADRs in 547 patients studied. Methotrexate (MTX) was the most frequently used medication and also the cause of the most ADRs, which occurred in 63.3% of patients, followed by glucocorticoids (GCs). Comparing synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) vs biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), the ADRs attributed to the former were by far higher than the latter. In general, the severity of ADRs was moderate and manageable. Drug withdrawal occurred in almost a quarter of the cases. In terms of risk factors, most patients who experienced ADRs due to MTX, were 16 years old or younger and received MTX in doses equal or higher than 0.6 mg/kg/week. Patients with JIA and JDM had a lower risk of ADRs than patients with JSLE. In the multiple regression model, the use of GCs for over 6 months led to an increase of 0.5% in the number of ADRs. Conclusions Although the ADRs highly likely affect a wide range of children and adolescents with CRDs they were considered moderate and manageable cases mostly. However, triggers of ADRs need further investigations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document