PRM155 - JOINT MODELING OF OVERALL SURVIVAL AND PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL

Abstract Background: Brain metastases (BM) are common in patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. In this study we aim to report clinical outcomes with LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for BM in patients of breast cancer. Methods: Clinical and dosimetric records of breast cancer patients treated for BM at our institute between May, 2015 and December, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients of previously treated or newly diagnosed breast cancer with at least a radiological diagnosis of BM; 1–4 in number, ≤3·5 cm in maximum dimension, with a Karnofsky Performance Score of ≥60 were taken up for treatment with SRS. SRT was generally considered if a tumour was >3·5 cm in diameter, near a critical or eloquent structure, or if the proximity of moderately sized tumours would lead to dose bridging in a single-fraction SRS plan. The median prescribed SRS dose was 15 Gy (range 7–24 Gy) and SRT dose was 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Clinical assessment and MR imaging was done at 6 weeks post-SRS and then every 3 months thereafter. Intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method and subgroups were compared using log rank test. Results: Total, 40 tumours were treated in 31 patients. The median tumour diameter was 2·3 cm (range 1·0–4·6 cm). SRS and SRT were delivered in 27 and 4 patients, respectively. SRS/SRT was given as a boost to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in four patients and as salvage for progression after WBRT in six patients. In general, nine patients underwent prior surgery. The median follow-up was 7·9 months (0·2–34 months). Twenty (64·5%) patients developed local recurrence, 10 (32·3%) patients developed distant intracranial relapse and 7 patients had both local and distant intracranial relapse. The estimated local control at 6 months and 1 year was 48 and 35%, respectively. Median intracranial progression free survival (PFS) was 3·73 months (range 0·2–25 months). Median intracranial PFS was 3·02 months in patients who received SRS alone or as boost after WBRT, while it was 4·27 months in those who received SRS as salvage after WBRT (p = 0·793). No difference in intracranial PFS was observed with or without prior surgery (p = 0·410). Median overall survival (OS) was 21·7 months (range 0·2–34 months) for the entire cohort. Patients who received prior WBRT had a poor OS (13·31 months) as compared to SRS alone (21·4 months; p = 0·699). Conclusion: In patients with BM after breast cancer SRS alone, WBRT + SRS and surgery + SRS had comparable PFS and OS.

Download Full-text

IMMU-08. MODELING UPFRONT GLIOBLASTOMA SURGICAL RESECTION AND STEROID USE REVEALS IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE CHANGES AND SUGGESTS THAT PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTE COUNTS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH TUMOR VOLUME AND PROGNOSIS

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.439 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. ii106-ii106

Author(s):

Balint Otvos ◽

Tyler Alban ◽

Matthew Grabowski ◽

Defne Bayik ◽

Robert Winkelman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Surgical Resection ◽

Cd8 T Cells ◽

Tumor Volume ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Peripheral Lymphocyte ◽

Steroid Use ◽

Free Survival ◽

Steroid Administration

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) and its treatment produces systemic immunosuppression, which is being targeted by immunotherapies. However, it remains unclear how surgical resection and steroids specifically in GBM alter the immune system. To further explore this issue, immunocompetent C57Bl/6 mice were intracranially inoculated with syngeneic glioma cells (GL261 and CT-2A) and growth of tumors was evaluated by MRI. Host immune cell populations were analyzed during surgical resection and steroid administration. Mice with surgically resected tumors had a longer median survival compared to mice subjected to tumor biopsies, and had increased bone marrow sequestration of both CD4 and CD8 T cells with corresponding decreased blood lymphocytes. Furthermore, physiologic doses of dexamethasone administered perioperatively decreased tumor edema, but increased the number and proliferative capacity of both marrow and circulating MDSCs while generating no survival benefit. Independent of therapy or dexamethasone, intracranial tumor volume correlated linearly with decreased CD4 and CD8 T cells in peripheral blood, and increased T cell sequestration within the bone marrow. We validated these parameters in steroid-naïve newly diagnosed GBM patients and observed decreased lymphocytes correlated linearly with increased tumor volume. When initial lymphocyte counts in both steroid-naïve and steroid-administered patients were used in univariate and multivariate models predicting progression-free survival and overall survival, decreased initial lymphocyte counts were an independent predictor of decreased progression free survival and decreased overall survival, with steroid use and initial tumor size falling out of significance during stepwise selection. Taken together, tumor volume is linearly correlated with marrow sequestration of lymphoid cells, but both surgery and steroid administration further suppress active immune responses along lymphoid and myeloid lineages. Furthermore, decreasing peripheral lymphocyte counts at diagnosis of GBM indicate an immune system less able to mount responses to the tumor and portent a worse progression free and overall survival.

Download Full-text

Single arm, phase two study of low-dose metronomic eribulin in metastatic breast cancer

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment ◽

10.1007/s10549-021-06175-x ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Pavani Chalasani ◽

Kiah Farr ◽

Vicky Wu ◽

Isaac Jenkins ◽

Alex Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Low Dose ◽

Response Rate ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Background Treatment options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. In a phase III trial, eribulin demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival compared to treatment of physician’s choice, but had limited tolerability because of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. Based on prior studies of alternative treatment schedules with other therapies, we hypothesized that a low-dose metronomic schedule of eribulin would permit patients to remain on treatment more consistently without treatment delays, resulting in longer time to progression, and improved toxicity profile. Methods We conducted a multi-site single arm, phase II trial patients with MBC. All patients were treated with metronomic eribulin (0.9 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.) Treatment was continued until the patient developed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or chose to stop the study. Patients must have had prior taxane exposure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate. Exploratory biomarkers were performed to analyze change in levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), circulating endothelial precursors, and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) with response to therapy. Findings We consented 86 patients and 59 were evaluable for final analysis. Median age was 59 years; 78% had HER2 negative tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months with overall survival (OS) of 14.3 months. Objective response rate was 15% with clinical benefit rate of 48%. Reported grade 3 neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were 18% and 5%, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was seen in 3% of patients. Interpretation Metronomic weekly low-dose eribulin is an active and tolerable regimen with significantly less myelosuppression, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy than is seen with the approved dose and schedule, allowing longer duration of use and disease control, with similar outcomes compared to the standard dose regimen.

Download Full-text

Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Ovarian Research ◽

10.1186/s13048-021-00793-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Qingduo Kong ◽

Hongyi Wei ◽

Jing Zhang ◽

Yilin Li ◽

Yongjun Wang

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Early Stage ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Free Survival ◽

Review Manager ◽

Early Stage Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Background Laparoscopy has been widely used for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding whether survival outcomes of laparoscopy are equivalent to those of laparotomy among patients with eEOC. The result of survival outcomes of laparoscopy is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of eEOC. Methods According to the keywords, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from January 1994 to January 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for patients with eEOC were assessed for eligibility. Only studies including outcomes of overall survival (OS) were enrolled. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (Version 12.0) and Review Manager (Version 5.2). Results A total of 6 retrospective non-random studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no difference between two approaches for patients with eEOC in OS (HR = 0.6, P = 0.446), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.6, P = 0.137) and upstaging rate (OR = 1.18, P = 0.54). But the recurrence rate of laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of laparotomic surgery (OR = 0.48, P = 0.008). Conclusions Laparoscopy and laparotomy appear to provide comparable overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes for patients with eEOC. Further high-quality studies are needed to enhance this statement.

Download Full-text

P-129 Concomitant RAS and BRAF mutations: Impact on overall survival and progression free survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Annals of Oncology ◽

10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.184 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 32 ◽

pp. S142-S143

Author(s):

A. Pretta ◽

M. Persano ◽

G. Pinna ◽

C. Donisi ◽

E. Cimbro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Braf Mutations ◽

Free Survival ◽

Colorectal Cancer Patients

Download Full-text

Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy ◽

10.1007/s00262-021-02964-x ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yang Wang ◽

Jun Nie ◽

Ling Dai ◽

Weiheng Hu ◽

Jie Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Meaningful Improvement ◽

Free Survival ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Doublet Chemotherapy ◽

Platinum Doublet

Abstract Background The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253). Conclusions The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.

Download Full-text

HOTAIR as a Prognostic Predictor for Diverse Human Cancers: A Meta- and Bioinformatics Analysis

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers11060778 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 (6) ◽

pp. 778 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Halil Ibrahim Toy ◽

Didem Okmen ◽

Panagiota I. Kontou ◽

Alexandros G. Georgakilas ◽

Athanasia Pavlopoulou

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Bioinformatics Analysis ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Predictive Biomarker ◽

Free Survival ◽

Human Cancers ◽

Potential Biomarker

Several studies suggest that upregulated expression of the long non-coding RNA HOX transcript antisense RNA (HOTAIR) is a negative predictive biomarker for numerous cancers. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to further investigate the prognostic value of HOTAIR expression in diverse human cancers. To this end, a systematic literature review was conducted in order to select scientific studies relevant to the association between HOTAIR expression and clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS)/metastasis-free survival (MFS) of cancer patients. Collectively, 53 eligible studies including a total of 4873 patients were enrolled in the current meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the relationship between HOTAIR and cancer patients’ survival. Elevated HOTAIR expression was found to be significantly associated with OS, RFS/DFS and PFS/MFS in diverse types of cancers. These findings were also corroborated by the results of bioinformatics analysis on overall survival. Therefore, based on our findings, HOTAIR could serve as a potential biomarker for the prediction of cancer patient survival in many different types of human cancers.

Download Full-text