Big Five personality predictors of moral disengagement: A comprehensive aspect-level approach

2022 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 111176
Author(s):  
Manuel Rengifo ◽  
Simon M. Laham
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia E. Atherton ◽  
Emily C. Willroth ◽  
Ted Schwaba ◽  
Ayla J. Goktan ◽  
Eileen K. Graham ◽  
...  

Personality traits are important predictors of health behaviors, healthcare utilization, and health outcomes. However, we know little about the role of personality traits for emergency department outcomes. The present study used data from 200 patients (effective Ns range from 84 to 191), who were being discharged from the emergency department at an urban hospital, to investigate whether the Big Five personality traits were associated with post-discharge outcomes (i.e., filling prescriptions, following up with primary care physician, making an unscheduled return to the emergency department). Using logistic regression, we found few associations among the broad Big Five domains and post-discharge outcomes. However, results showed statistically significant associations between specific Big Five items (e.g., “responsible”) and the three post-discharge outcomes. This study demonstrates the feasibility of assessing personality traits in an emergency medicine setting and highlights the utility of having information about patients’ personality tendencies for predicting post-discharge compliance.


Author(s):  
Sachit Paliwal ◽  
Shraddha Bhadauria ◽  
Subhash Pratap Singh

Purpose:Over the past several decades the behaviours of investors have been the focal point of many researchers to understand the psychological antecedents for investment decision. This paper attempts to examine the impact of specific personality traits on investment intentions to purchase mutual funds with specific focus on the Big Five personality taxonomy.Design/Methodology/Approach:To scrutinize the specific personality predictors, this study employs the multiple regression using theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Findings:The research indicated that individuals who are extraverted intend to engage in mutual fund investment, while those who are higher in neuroticism less intended to engage in this activity. In addition to this,Individuals who are higher on agreeableness are also intended to engage in mutual fund investment.Managerial Implications:The study will aid mutual fund providers to manage the portfolio of mutual fund according to investors'personality traits. Scope for further research / Limitation:Due to time constraints, the study is confined to Delhi-NCR only. The study can considered as a pilot study and could be further explored to more cities in India.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuy-vy Thi Nguyen ◽  
Netta Weinstein ◽  
Richard Ryan

Within the solitude literature exists two separate constructs that reflect different perspectives on how time spent alone is motivated. Autonomous motivation for solitude reflects wanting time alone to find enjoyment and gain meaningful benefits from it, whereas preference for solitude concerns wanting time for oneself over others’ company regardless of reasons for why time alone is wanted. We investigated 4 personality characteristics: introversion from big-five personality theory, dispositional autonomy from self-determination theory, anxious and avoidant attachment from attachment theory. In 4 diary studies (N = 798), university students completed personality measures and reported about their experiences with time spent alone on each day for 7 days. Across all studies, dispositional autonomy consistently predicts autonomous motivation for solitude, but is unrelated to preference for solitude. Contradicting to popular belief that introverts spend time alone because they enjoy it, the results showed no supporting evidence that introversion is predictive of neither forms of motivation for solitude. These findings shed new light on how individuals experience aloneness, suggesting that the tendency to embrace and value time spent alone might be a function of individual difference in the capacity to self-regulate in choiceful and authentic way.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia E. Atherton ◽  
Emily C Willroth ◽  
Ted Schwaba ◽  
Ayla Joyce Goktan ◽  
Eileen Kranz Graham ◽  
...  

Personality traits are important predictors of health behaviors, healthcare utilization, and health outcomes. However, we know little about the role of personality traits for emergency department outcomes. The present study used data from 200 patients (effective Ns range from 84 to 191), who were being discharged from the emergency department at an urban hospital, to investigate whether the Big Five personality traits were associated with post-discharge outcomes (i.e., filling prescriptions, following up with primary care physician, making an unscheduled return to the emergency department). Using logistic regression, we found few associations among the broad Big Five domains and post-discharge outcomes. However, results showed statistically significant associations between specific Big Five items (e.g., “responsible”) and the three post-discharge outcomes. This study demonstrates the feasibility of assessing personality factors in an emergency medicine setting and highlights the utility of having information about patients’ personality tendencies for predicting post-discharge compliance.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Oshio ◽  
Shingo Abe ◽  
Pino Cutrone ◽  
Samuel D. Gosling

The Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003 ) is a widely used very brief measure of the Big Five personality dimensions. Oshio, Abe, and Cutrone (2012) have developed a Japanese version of the TIPI (TIPI-J), which demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability and validity. Until now, all studies examining the validity of the TIPI-J have been conducted in the Japanese language; this reliance on a single language raises concerns about the instrument’s content validity because the instrument could demonstrate reliability (e.g., retest) and some forms of validity (e.g., convergent) but still not capture the full range of the dimensions as originally conceptualized in English. Therefore, to test the content validity of the Japanese TIPI with respect to the original Big Five formulation, we examine the convergence between scores on the TIPI-J and scores on the English-language Big Five Inventory (i.e., the BFI-E), an instrument specifically designed to optimize Big Five content coverage. Two-hundred and twenty-eight Japanese undergraduate students, who were all learning English, completed the two instruments. The results of correlation analyses and structural equation modeling demonstrate the theorized congruence between the TIPI-J and the BFI-E, supporting the content validity of the TIPI-J.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 124-132
Author(s):  
Marc-André Bédard ◽  
Yann Le Corff

Abstract. This replication and extension of DeYoung, Quilty, Peterson, and Gray’s (2014) study aimed to assess the unique variance of each of the 10 aspects of the Big Five personality traits ( DeYoung, Quilty, & Peterson, 2007 ) associated with intelligence and its dimensions. Personality aspects and intelligence were assessed in a sample of French-Canadian adults from real-life assessment settings ( n = 213). Results showed that the Intellect aspect was independently associated with g, verbal, and nonverbal intelligence while its counterpart Openness was independently related to verbal intelligence only, thus replicating the results of the original study. Independent associations were also found between Withdrawal, Industriousness and Assertiveness aspects and verbal intelligence, as well as between Withdrawal and Politeness aspects and nonverbal intelligence. Possible explanations for these associations are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-93
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Cucina ◽  
Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos ◽  
Arwen H. DeCostanza

Abstract. Varimax rotated principal component scores (VRPCS) have previously been offered as a possible solution to the non-orthogonality of scores for the Big Five factors. However, few researchers have examined the reliability and validity of VRPCS. To address this gap, we use a lab study and a field study to investigate whether using VRPCS increase orthogonality, reliability, and criterion-related validity. Compared to the traditional unit-weighting scoring method, the use of VRPCS enhanced the reliability and discriminant validity of the Big Five factors, although there was little improvement in criterion-related validity. Results are discussed in terms of the benefit of using VRPCS instead of traditional unit-weighted sum scores.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara A. Palmer ◽  
Meagan A. Ramsey ◽  
Jennifer N. Morey ◽  
Amy L. Gentzler

Abstract. Research suggests that sharing positive events with others is beneficial for well-being, yet little is known about how positive events are shared with others and who is most likely to share their positive events. The current study expanded on previous research by investigating how positive events are shared and individual differences in how people share these events. Participants (N = 251) reported on their likelihood to share positive events in three ways: capitalizing (sharing with close others), bragging (sharing with someone who may become jealous or upset), and mass-sharing (sharing with many people at once using communication technology) across a range of positive scenarios. Using cluster analysis, five meaningful profiles of sharing patterns emerged. These profiles were associated with gender, Big Five personality traits, narcissism, and empathy. Individuals who tended to brag when they shared their positive events were more likely to be men, reported less agreeableness, less conscientiousness, and less empathy, whereas those who tended to brag and mass-share reported the highest levels of narcissism. These results have important theoretical and practical implications for the growing body of research on sharing positive events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document