Associations between PON1 and CYP1A1 genetic polymorphisms and clinical findings of a Greek population exposed to pesticides

2009 ◽  
Vol 189 ◽  
pp. S214-S215
Author(s):  
Athanasios Alegakis ◽  
Alexandros Zafiropoulos ◽  
George Tzanakakis ◽  
Jyrki Liesivuori ◽  
Charilaos Koutis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Greek Population

Genetic polymorphisms of the apolipoprotein A-IV in a Greek population and their relation to plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels

2002 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Miltiadous ◽  
M Hatzivassiliou ◽  
E Bashiardes ◽  
E Bairaktari ◽  
MA Cariolou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Plasma Lipid ◽  
Greek Population ◽  
Apolipoprotein A

Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 in the Greek population

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kostas Arvanitidis ◽  
Georgia Ragia ◽  
Maria Iordanidou ◽  
Sofia Kyriaki ◽  
Athanasia Xanthi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Greek Population ◽  
Drug Metabolizing Enzymes ◽  
Metabolizing Enzymes

Genetic polymorphisms associated with the prevalence of retinal vein occlusion in a Greek population

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 2637-2648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aikaterini Christodoulou ◽  
Eleni Bagli ◽  
Maria Gazouli ◽  
Marilita M. Moschos ◽  
Georgios Kitsos
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Greek Population ◽  
Vein Occlusion

Genetic polymorphisms and risk of MALT lymphoma in Greek population

2022 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 103330
Author(s):  
A. Velissari ◽  
T.P Vassilakopoulos ◽  
M.K Angelopoulou ◽  
P Korkolopoulou ◽  
G. Bamias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Malt Lymphoma ◽  
Greek Population

scholarly journals Genetic polymorphisms of FAS and EVER genes in a Greek population and their susceptibility to cervical cancer: a case control study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelia Pavlidou ◽  
Alexandros Daponte ◽  
Raquel Egea ◽  
Efthimios Dardiotis ◽  
Georgios M. Hadjigeorgiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Greek Population ◽  
Control Study

Genetic Polymorphisms in a North-Greek Population

1982 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.B. Kaplanoglou ◽  
C.D. Triantaphyllidis
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Greek Population

Clinical Findings with SAL Audiometry: Some Further Observations

1965 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-335
Author(s):  
George E. Lynn ◽  
Jack A. Willeford
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Findings

Spinal Impairment Evaluation: Fifth Edition Changes

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Robert H. Haralson
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Spinal Cord Injuries ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Fourth Edition ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Standard Terminology ◽  
Made In

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, was published in November 2000 and contains major changes from its predecessor. In the Fourth Edition, all musculoskeletal evaluation and rating was described in a single chapter. In the Fifth Edition, this information has been divided into three separate chapters: Upper Extremity (13), Lower Extremity (14), and Spine (15). This article discusses changes in the spine chapter. The Models for rating spinal impairment now are called Methods. The AMA Guides, Fifth Edition, has reverted to standard terminology for spinal regions in the Diagnosis-related estimates (DRE) Method, and both it and the Range of Motion (ROM) Method now reference cervical, thoracic, and lumbar. Also, the language requiring the use of the DRE, rather than the ROM Method has been strengthened. The biggest change in the DRE Method is that evaluation should include the treatment results. Unfortunately, the Fourth Edition's philosophy regarding when and how to rate impairment using the DRE Model led to a number of problems, including the same rating of all patients with radiculopathy despite some true differences in outcomes. The term differentiator was abandoned and replaced with clinical findings. Significant changes were made in evaluation of patients with spinal cord injuries, and evaluators should become familiar with these and other changes in the Fifth Edition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document