Comparison of gene expression of immune mediators in lung and pulmonary lymph node granulomas from cattle experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis

2014 ◽  
Vol 160 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dairu Shu ◽  
Axel Heiser ◽  
D. Neil Wedlock ◽  
Dongwen Luo ◽  
Geoffrey W. de Lisle ◽  
...  
Oral Oncology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S46
Author(s):  
F.K.J. Leusink ◽  
P.J. Slootweg ◽  
M.W.M. van den Brekel ◽  
R.J. Baatenburg de Jong ◽  
F.C.P. Holstege ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Noshad Peyravian ◽  
Stefania Nobili ◽  
Zahra Pezeshkian ◽  
Meysam Olfatifar ◽  
Afshin Moradi ◽  
...  

This study aimed at building a prognostic signature based on a candidate gene panel whose expression may be associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM), thus potentially able to predict colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and patient survival. The mRNA expression levels of 20 candidate genes were evaluated by RT-qPCR in cancer and normal mucosa formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of CRC patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the prognosis performance of our model by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) values corresponding to stage and metastasis. A total of 100 FFPE primary tumor tissues from stage I–IV CRC patients were collected and analyzed. Among the 20 candidate genes we studied, only the expression levels of VANGL1 significantly varied between patients with and without LNMs (p = 0.02). Additionally, the AUC value of the 20-gene panel was found to have the highest predictive performance (i.e., AUC = 79.84%) for LNMs compared with that of two subpanels including 5 and 10 genes. According to our results, VANGL1 gene expression levels are able to estimate LNMs in different stages of CRC. After a proper validation in a wider case series, the evaluation of VANGL1 gene expression and that of the 20-gene panel signature could help in the future in the prediction of CRC progression.


1998 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. A623
Author(s):  
HR Kim ◽  
SJ Pang ◽  
HY Jung ◽  
WS Hong ◽  
YI Min ◽  
...  

Lung Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasumitsu Moriya ◽  
Akira Iyoda ◽  
Yasuhiro Kasai ◽  
Takashi Sugimoto ◽  
Junya Hashida ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy G. Casanova ◽  
Manuel L. Gonzalez-Garay ◽  
Belinda Sun ◽  
Christian Bime ◽  
Xiaoguang Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Rationale Despite the availability of multi-“omics” strategies, insights into the etiology and pathogenesis of sarcoidosis have been elusive. This is partly due to the lack of reliable preclinical models and a paucity of validated biomarkers. As granulomas are a key feature of sarcoidosis, we speculate that direct genomic interrogation of sarcoid tissues, may lead to identification of dysregulated gene pathways or biomarker signatures. Objective To facilitate the development sarcoidosis genomic biomarkers by gene expression profiling of sarcoidosis granulomas in lung and lymph node tissues (most commonly affected organs) and comparison to infectious granulomas (coccidiodomycosis and tuberculosis). Methods Transcriptomic profiles of immune-related gene from micro-dissected sarcoidosis granulomas within lung and mediastinal lymph node tissues and compared to infectious granulomas from paraffin-embedded blocks. Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were profiled, compared among the three granulomatous diseases and analyzed for functional enrichment pathways. Results Despite histologic similarities, DEGs and pathway enrichment markedly differed in sarcoidosis granulomas from lymph nodes and lung. Lymph nodes showed a clear immunological response, whereas a structural regenerative response was observed in lung. Sarcoidosis granuloma gene expression data corroborated previously reported genomic biomarkers (STAB1, HBEGF, and NOTCH4), excluded others and identified new genomic markers present in lung and lymph nodes, ADAMTS1, NPR1 and CXCL2. Comparisons between sarcoidosis and pathogen granulomas identified pathway divergences and commonalities at gene expression level. Conclusion These findings suggest the importance of tissue and disease-specificity evaluation when exploring sarcoidosis genomic markers. This relevant translational information in sarcoidosis and other two histopathological similar infections provides meaningful specific genomic-derived biomarkers for sarcoidosis diagnosis and prognosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document