Identification of a Cryphonectria parasitica laccase gene promoter element involved in cycloheximide-inducible, hypovirus-repressible transcriptional activation

Gene ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 210 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
Donald L. Nuss
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Cryphonectria Parasitica ◽  
Promoter Element ◽  
Laccase Gene

scholarly journals In vitro expression of long and short ovine prolactin receptors: activation of Jak2/STAT5 pathway is not sufficient to account for prolactin signal transduction to the ovine beta-lactoglobulin gene promoter

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bignon ◽  
N Daniel ◽  
L Belair ◽  
J Djiane
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Phosphorylation ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Prolactin Receptors ◽  
Milk Protein Gene ◽  
Prolactin Signaling ◽  
Beta Lactoglobulin

The recent finding that sheep had long (l-oPRLR) and short (s-oPRLR) prolactin receptors provided new tools to further explore prolactin signaling to target genes. Here we used CHO cells transfected with l-oPRLR or s-oPRLR cDNAs to compare the activation of known key steps of prolactin signaling by the two receptors. We found that prolactin stimulated l-oPRLR tyrosine phosphorylation, although it lacked the last tyrosine residue found in other long prolactin receptors. In addition, l-oPRLR and s-oPRLR both responded to prolactin stimulation by (1) Janus kinase 2 (Jak2) tyrosine phosphorylation, (2) DNA-binding activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5), (3) stimulation of transcription from a promoter made of six repeats of STAT5-responsive sequence. However, although it contains STAT5-binding consensus sequences, the ovine beta-lactoglobulin promoter (-4000 to +40) was transactivated by l-oPRLR, but not by s-oPRLR. Taken together, our results indicate that activation of Jak2/STAT5 pathway alone is not sufficient to account for prolactin-induced transcription of this milk protein gene, and that sequences of its promoter, other than STAT5-specific sequences, account for the opposite transcriptional activation capabilities of l-oPRLR and s-oPRLR.

Suppressors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 promoter mutations lacking the upstream element

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 1901-1909
Author(s):  
M A Oettinger ◽  
K Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Micrococcal Nuclease ◽  
Promoter Element ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Upstream Promoter ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Promoter Mutations ◽  
His3 Gene

Transcription of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 gene requires an upstream promoter element and a TATA element. A strain containing his3-delta 13, an allele which deletes the upstream promoter element but contains the TATA box and intact structural gene, fails to express the gene and consequently is unable to grow in medium lacking histidine. In this paper we characterize His+ revertants of his3-delta 13 which are due to unlinked suppressor mutations. Recessive suppressors in three different ope genes allow his3-delta 13 to be expressed at wild-type levels. In all cases, the suppression is due to increased his3 transcription. However, unlike the wild-type his3 gene, whose transcripts are initiated about equally from two different sites (+1 and +12), transcription due to the ope mutations is initiated only from the +12 site, ope-mediated transcription is regulated in a novel manner; it is observed in minimal medium, but not in rich broth. Although ope mutations restore wild-type levels of transcription, his3 chromatin structure, as assayed by micrococcal nuclease sensitivity of the TATA box, resembles that found in the his3-delta 13 parent rather than in the wild-type strain. This provides further evidence that TATA box sensitivity is not correlated with transcriptional activation. ope mutations are pleiotropic in that cells have a crunchy colony morphology and lyse at 37 degrees C in conditions of normal osmolarity. ope mutations are allele specific because they fail to suppress five other his3 promoter mutations. We discuss implications concerning upstream promoter elements and propose some models for ope suppression.

Identification of a mouse GnRH gene promoter element that mediates ovarian (but not hypothalamic) GnRH expression in vivo

2003 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Helen H. Kim ◽  
Andrew Wolfe ◽  
Carilyn J. Nash ◽  
Sally Radovick
Keyword(s):  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Promoter Element

scholarly journals Promoter elements in the transcriptional activation of the human stromelysin-1 gene by the inflammatory cytokine, interleukin 1

1994 ◽  
Vol 302 (2) ◽  
pp. 471-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Quinones ◽  
G Buttice ◽  
M Kurkinen
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Inflammatory Cytokine ◽  
Interleukin 1 ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Flanking Sequence ◽  
Tissue Remodelling ◽  
Native Promoter ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Extracellular Matrix Components ◽  
The Absolute

Stromelysin-1, a tissue-remodelling metalloproteinase synthesized by fibroblasts, has proteolytic activity against a variety of extracellular matrix components. Stromelysin-1 gene transcription is induced by the inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-1. In fibroblasts transiently transfected with constructs containing 5′-deletion mutants of the human stromelysin-1 gene promoter, IL-1-induced transcriptional activity was abolished with the removal of region -102 to -54. This region includes an AP-1 binding site at positions -70 to -64. The AP-1 site alone increased the basal activity of and conferred minimal IL-1 inducibility onto the heterologous gene promoter of thymidine kinase. Interestingly, although the removal of the AP-1 site from the native promoter (-1303 to +4) affected the absolute levels of IL-1-induced and basal promoter activity, it did not alter their ratio, indicating the involvement of regions outside the AP-1 site in the IL-1 response. Of the stromelysin-1 5′ flanking sequence examined, only the region -274 to -54 could confer IL-1 inducibility to a heterologous promoter independently of the AP-1 site. This region also bound specific nuclear factors. Further analysis revealed that the region composed of -86 to -71 and -63 to -54 could independently respond to IL-1 and bind protein of whole cell extracts. Protein binding to this region and to the AP-1 site was modestly induced by IL-1 treatment. From these results we conclude that, in fibroblasts, the AP-1 site (-70 to -64) is not necessary for the IL-1 response; however, it probably interacts through protein associations with the responsive region immediately surrounding it in the absolute transcriptional activation of the human stromelysin-1 gene by IL-1.

Constitutive binding of yeast heat shock factor to DNA in vivo

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 5040-5042
Author(s):  
B K Jakobsen ◽  
H R Pelham
Keyword(s):  
Heat Shock ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Heat Shock Factor ◽  
Promoter Element ◽  
Synthetic Promoter

We measured the binding of yeast heat shock factor (HSF) to DNA in vivo by using an interference assay in which HSF excludes GAL4 from a synthetic promoter element containing overlapping binding sites for each protein. The results show that HSF binds to DNA in unstressed cells and that binding is not sufficient for transcriptional activation.

scholarly journals p110 CUX1 Cooperates with E2F Transcription Factors in the Transcriptional Activation of Cell Cycle-Regulated Genes

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 3127-3138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Truscott ◽  
Ryoko Harada ◽  
Charles Vadnais ◽  
François Robert ◽  
Alain Nepveu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
In Vitro Assays ◽  
Dominant Negative Mutant ◽  
Dna Polymerase Α ◽  
Reporter Assays

ABSTRACT The transcription factor p110 CUX1 was shown to stimulate cell proliferation by accelerating entry into S phase. As p110 CUX1 can function as a transcriptional repressor or activator depending on promoter context, we investigated its mechanism of transcriptional activation using the DNA polymerase α gene promoter as a model system. Linker-scanning analysis revealed that a low-affinity E2F binding site is required for transcriptional activation. Moreover, coexpression with a dominant-negative mutant of DP-1 suggested that endogenous E2F factors are indeed needed for p110-mediated activation. Tandem affinity purification, coimmunoprecipitation, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and reporter assays indicated that p110 CUX1 can engage in weak protein-protein interactions with E2F1 and E2F2, stimulate their recruitment to the DNA polymerase α gene promoter, and cooperate with these factors in transcriptional activation. On the other hand, in vitro assays suggested that the interaction between CUX1 and E2F1 either is not direct or is regulated by posttranslational modifications. Genome-wide location analysis revealed that targets common to p110 CUX1 and E2F1 included many genes involved in cell cycle, DNA replication, and DNA repair. Comparison of the degree of enrichment for various E2F factors suggested that binding of p110 CUX1 to a promoter will favor the specific recruitment of E2F1, and to a lesser extent E2F2, over E2F3 and E2F4. Reporter assays on a subset of common targets confirmed that p110 CUX1 and E2F1 cooperate in their transcriptional activation. Overall, our results show that p110 CUX1 and E2F1 cooperate in the regulation of many cell cycle genes.

scholarly journals STAT3 Is Required for the gp130-mediated Full Activation of the c-myc Gene

1999 ◽  
Vol 189 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuo Kiuchi ◽  
Koichi Nakajima ◽  
Makoto Ichiba ◽  
Toshiyuki Fukada ◽  
Masahiro Narimatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Signal Transducers ◽  
Receptor Complexes ◽  
Myc Gene ◽  
Extracellular Stimuli ◽  
Rapid Activation

The signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) family members have been implicated in regulating the growth, differentiation, and death of normal and transformed cells in response to either extracellular stimuli, including cytokines and growth factors, or intracellular tyrosine kinases. c-myc expression is coordinately regulated by multiple signals in these diverse cellular responses. We show that STAT3 mostly mediates the rapid activation of the c-myc gene upon stimulation of the interleukin (IL)-6 receptor or gp130, a signal transducing subunit of the receptor complexes for the IL-6 cytokine family. STAT3 does so most likely by binding to cis-regulatory region(s) of the c-myc gene. We show that STAT3 binds to a region overlapping with the E2F site in the c-myc promoter and this site is critical for the c-myc gene promoter– driven transcriptional activation by IL-6 or gp130 signals. This is the first identification of the linkage between a member of the STAT family and the c-myc gene activation, and also explains how the IL-6 family of cytokines is capable of inducing the expression of the c-myc gene.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document