Detecting risk factors by home-public health nurse in women with family history of breast cancer

Abstract Background Mammographic density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. In the general population, mammographic density can be modified by various exposures; whether this is true for women a strong family history is not known. Thus, we evaluated the association between reproductive, hormonal, and lifestyle risk factors and mammographic density among women with a strong family history of breast cancer but no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Methods We included 97 premenopausal and 59 postmenopausal women (age range: 27-68 years). Risk factor data was extracted from the research questionnaire closest in time to the mammogram performed nearest to enrollment. The Cumulus software was used to measure percent density, dense area, and non-dense area for each mammogram. Multivariate generalized linear models were used to evaluate the relationships between breast cancer risk factors and measures of mammographic density, adjusting for relevant covariates. Results Among premenopausal women, those who had two live births had a mean percent density of 28.8% vs. 41.6% among women who had one live birth (P=0.04). Women with a high body weight had a lower mean percent density compared to women with a low body weight among premenopausal (17.6% vs. 33.2%; P=0.0006) and postmenopausal women (8.7% vs. 14.7%; P=0.04). Among premenopausal women, those who smoked for 14 years or longer had a lower mean dense area compared to women who smoked for a shorter duration (25.3cm2 vs. 53.1cm2; P=0.002). Among postmenopausal women, former smokers had a higher mean percent density (19.5% vs. 10.8%; P=0.003) and dense area (26.9% vs. 16.4%; P=0.01) compared to never smokers. After applying the Bonferroni correction, the association between body weight and percent density among premenopausal women remained statistically significant. Conclusions In this cohort of women with a strong family history of breast cancer, body weight was associated with mammographic density. These findings suggest that mammographic density may explain the underlying relationship between some of these risk factors and breast cancer risk, and lend support for the inclusion of mammographic density into risk prediction models.

Download Full-text

Risk Factors of Breast Cancer in Relation to a Family History of Breast Cancer in Southern Sweden1

Familial Cancer ◽

10.1159/000412524 ◽

2015 ◽

pp. 34-35 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

H. Olsson ◽

M. Landin Olsson ◽

U. Kristoffersson ◽

J. Ranstam

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Family History ◽

History Of

Download Full-text

Hospital visitors as controls in case-control studies

Revista de Saúde Pública ◽

10.1590/s0034-89102001000500005 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 35 (5) ◽

pp. 436-442 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Gulnar Azevedo S Mendonça ◽

José Eluf-Neto

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Family History ◽

Case Control ◽

Breast Size ◽

Case Control Studies ◽

Family History Of Cancer ◽

History Of ◽

Incident Cases ◽

History Of Cancer

OBJECTIVE: Selecting controls is one of the most difficult tasks in the design of case-control studies. Hospital controls may be inadequate and random controls drawn from the base population may be unavailable. The aim was to assess the use of hospital visitors as controls in a case-control study on the association of organochlorinated compounds and other risk factors for breast cancer conducted in the main hospital of the "Instituto Nacional de Câncer" -- INCA (National Cancer Institute) in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). METHODS: The study included 177 incident cases and 377 controls recruited among female visitors. Three different models of control group composition were compared: Model 1, with all selected visitors; Model 2, excluding women visiting relatives with breast cancer; and Model 3, excluding all women visiting relatives with any type of cancer. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to test the associations. RESULTS: Age-adjusted OR for breast cancer associated with risk factors other than family history of cancer, except smoking and breast size, were similar in the three models. Regarding family history of all cancers, except for breast cancer, there was a decreased risk in Models 1 and 2, while in Model 3 there was an increased risk, but not statistically significant. Family history of breast cancer was a risk factor in Models 2 and 3, but no association was found in Model 1. In multivariate analysis a significant risk of breast cancer was found when there was a family history of breast cancer in Models 2 and 3 but not in Model 1. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that while investigating risk factors unrelated to family history of cancer, the use of hospital visitors as controls may be a valid and feasible alternative.

Download Full-text

Prevalence of germline BRCA mutations in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: global results from the real-world, observational BREAKOUT study

Breast Cancer Research ◽

10.1186/s13058-020-01349-9 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Joyce O’Shaughnessy ◽

Christine Brezden-Masley ◽

Marina Cazzaniga ◽

Tapashi Dalvi ◽

Graham Walker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Risk Factor ◽

Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽

Family History ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽

First Line ◽

History Of

Abstract Background The global observational BREAKOUT study investigated germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm) prevalence in a population of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods Eligible patients had initiated first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy for HER2-negative MBC within 90 days prior to enrollment. Hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients had experienced disease progression on or after prior endocrine therapy, or endocrine therapy was considered unsuitable. gBRCAm status was determined using baseline blood samples or prior germline test results. For patients with a negative gBRCAm test, archival tissue was tested for somatic BRCAm and homologous recombination repair mutations (HRRm). Details of first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy were also collected. Results Between March 2017 and April 2018, 384 patients from 14 countries were screened and consented to study enrollment; 341 patients were included in the full analysis set (median [range] age at enrollment: 56 [25–89] years; 256 (75.3%) postmenopausal). Overall, 33 patients (9.7%) had a gBRCAm (16 [4.7%] in gBRCA1 only, 12 [3.5%] in gBRCA2 only, and 5 [1.5%] in both gBRCA1 and gBRCA2). gBRCAm prevalence was similar in HR-positive and HR-negative patients. gBRCAm prevalence was 9.0% in European patients and 10.6% in Asian patients and was higher in patients aged ≤ 50 years at initial breast cancer (BC) diagnosis (12.9%) than patients aged > 50 years (5.4%). In patients with any risk factor for having a gBRCAm (family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer, aged ≤ 50 years at initial BC diagnosis, or triple-negative BC), prevalence was 10.4%, versus 5.8% in patients without these risk factors. HRRm prevalence was 14.1% (n = 9/64) in patients with germline BRCA wildtype. Conclusions Patient demographic and disease characteristics supported the association of a gBRCAm with younger age at initial BC diagnosis and family history of BC and/or ovarian cancer. gBRCAm prevalence in this cohort, not selected on the basis of risk factors for gBRCAm, was slightly higher than previous results suggested. gBRCAm prevalence among patients without a traditional risk factor for harboring a gBRCAm (5.8%) supports current guideline recommendations of routine gBRCAm testing in HER2-negative MBC, as these patients may benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy. Trial registration NCT03078036.

Download Full-text

Correlation between Breast Self-Examination Practices and Demographic Characteristics, Risk Factors and Clinical Stage of Breast Cancer among Iraqi Patients

Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences ◽

10.3889/oamjms.2019.805 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 7 (19) ◽

pp. 3216-3220

Author(s):

Ahmad S. A. Al-Gburi ◽

Nada A. S. Alwan

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Family History ◽

Early Detection ◽

Clinical Stage ◽

Cancer Control ◽

Demographic Characteristics ◽

Breast Self Examination ◽

History Of ◽

Self Examination

BACKGROUND: Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among women globally. The disease can be cured with limited resources if detected early. Breast self-examination (BSE) is considered a cost-effective feasible approach for early detection of that cancer in developing countries. AIM: To determine the correlation between BSE performance and demographic characteristics, risk factors and clinical stage of BC among Iraqi patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included a total of 409 female patients diagnosed with BC at the Referral Training Center for Early Detection of Breast Cancer and the National Cancer Research Center in Baghdad. The studied variables included the age of the patient, occupation, marital and educational status, parity, history of lactation, contraceptive pill intake, family history of cancer and the clinical stage of the disease. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that the most important predictors for practicing BSE was family history of BC or any other cancers (OR = 3.87, P = 0.018) followed by being a governmental employee (OR = 1.87, P = 0.024), history of contraceptive use (OR = 1.80, P = 0.011) and the high level of education (OR = 1.73, P = 0.004). On the other hand, there was no significant correlation between the practice of BSE and the BC stage at the time of presentation. CONCLUSION: There is a relatively poor practice of BSE among Iraqi patients diagnosed with BC. It is mandatory to foster the national cancer control strategies that focus on raising the level of awareness among the community through public education as a major approach to the early detection of cancer in Iraq.

Download Full-text

BREAST CANCER;

The Professional Medical Journal ◽

10.29309/tpmj/2014.21.06.2160 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 21 (06) ◽

pp. 1128-1132

Author(s):

Abeer Nisar ◽

M Naim Siddiqi ◽

Naveed ur Rehman ◽

Raza ur Rahman

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Family History ◽

Menopausal Status ◽

Positive Family History ◽

American Woman ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Civil Hospital ◽

Early Menarche ◽

History Of

Objective: To assess the risk factors for breast cancer in patients attending oncology OPD of civil hospital Karachi, Pakistan. Introduction: Breast cancer is the single largest cause of death among women1,2. The probability of American woman developing breast cancer in their life is 7 in 11. Studies from subcontinent show that the incidence of breast cancer is increasing, with an estimated 80,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Breast cancer is the second most common type of cancer after lung cancer in Pakistan and ranked first in women. Only 10% women are diagnosed, out of them, 75% women do not get treatment and die within 5 years6. Data from Pakistan about the risk factors or association is not only scanty but also does not comment on the use of fatty diet in breast cancer patients. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study conducted at Oncology OPD of civil hospital Karachi (CHK) from October 2009 -April 2011. One Hundred and Fifty consecutive patients having histopathalogical diagnosis of breast cancer were assessed for different risk factors that included marital status, parity, age, menopausal status, family history of breast cancer, prolong use of oral contraceptives, breast feeding, , early menarche, trauma to the breast and fatty diet. Result: Mean age of patients was 48 years. Three fourth (73%) of these female were above the age of 40 years. Consumption of fatty diet was found in 62.67% while positive family history of breast cancer was present in 34% of the cases. Early menarche and being nulliparous were not as strong risk factors as in previous studies. Conclusions: Our study has highlighted the need of further exploration in this area that would not only help this population but also enhance our understanding of different risk factors. This will have important implications for the overall management of breast cancer.

Download Full-text