scholarly journals P030: Acute pain resolution after an emergency department visit: a 14-day trajectory analysis

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S73-S74
Author(s):  
R. Daoust ◽  
J. Paquet ◽  
A. Cournoyer ◽  
E. Piette ◽  
J. Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
The Other ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Intensity Level ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Mild Pain

Introduction: The objective of the study was to evaluate the acute pain intensity evolution in ED discharged patients using Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM). This method identified patient groups with similar profiles of change over time without assuming the existence of a particular pattern or number of groups. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of ED patients aged ≥18 years with an acute pain condition (≤ 2 weeks) and discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary assessing daily pain intensity level (0-10 numeric rating scale) and pain medication use. Results: Among the 372 included patients, six distinct post-ED pain intensity trajectories were identified: two started with severe levels of pain, one remained with severe pain intensity (12.6% of the sample) and the other ended with moderate pain intensity level (26.3%). Two other trajectories had severe initial pain, one decreased to mild pain (21.7%) and the other to no-pain (13.8%). Another trajectory had moderate initial pain which decreased to a mild level (15.9%) and the last one started with mild pain intensity and had no pain at the end of the 14-day (9.7%). The pain trajectory patterns were significantly associated with age, type of painful conditions, pain intensity at ED discharge, and with opioid consumption. Conclusion: Acute pain resolution following an ED visit seems to progress through six different trajectory patterns that are more informative than simple linear models and could be useful to adapt acute pain management in future research.

scholarly journals P029: Are acute pain trajectories after an emergency department visit associated with chronic pain at 3 months?

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S73
Author(s):  
R. Daoust ◽  
J. Paquet ◽  
A. Cournoyer ◽  
E. Piette ◽  
J. Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Intensity Level ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Pain Condition

Introduction: Studies suggest that acute pain evolution after an emergency department (ED) visit has been associated with the development of chronic pain. Using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM), we aimed to evaluate if ED discharged patients with similar pain intensity profiles of change over 14 days are associated with chronic pain at 3 months. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of patients aged 18 years or older who visited the ED for an acute pain condition (≤2 weeks) and were discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary in which they listed their daily pain intensity level (0-10 numeric rating scale). Three months post-ED visit, participants were interviewed by phone to report their pain intensity related to the initial pain. Results: A total of 305 patients were retained at 3 months (mean age ± SD: 55 ± 15 years, 49% women). Using GBTM, six distinct pain intensity trajectories were identified during the first 14 days of the acute pain period; two linear one with moderate or severe pain during the follow-up (representing almost 40% of the patients) and four cubic polynomial order trajectories, with mild or no-pain at the end of the 14 days (low final pain). Twelve percent (11.9; ±95%CI: 8.2-15.4) of the patients had chronic pain at 3 months. Controlling for age, sex and types of pain condition, patients with trajectories of moderate or severe pain and those with only severe pain were 5.1 (95%CI: 2.2-11.8) and 8.2 (95%CI: 3.4-20.0) times more likely to develop chronic pain at 3 months, respectively, compared to the low final pain group. Conclusion: Trajectories could be useful to early identification of patients at risk of chronic pain.

scholarly journals THE DIFFERENCE OF PAIN SCALE USING NUMERIC RATING SCALE AND VISUAL ANALOG SCALE IN POST-OPERATIVE PATIENTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Natya Ayu Paluwih ◽  
Riama Marlyn Sihombing ◽  
Kinanthi Lebdawicaksaputri
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Mild Pain ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Perceived Pain ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Numeric Rating

Post-operative pain is acute and subjective therefore the perceived pain intensity will be different. In one of the western Indonesia Hospitals in measuring the pain threshold using 2 tools namely Numeric Rating Scale and Wong Baker Face. Measurement of the pain intensity can be done with NRS and VAS scale. The objective of this research was to identify the difference of pain scale using the NRS and VAS scale in post-operative patients. The research method was descriptive quantitative using comparative approach. The study was conducted on 1 November 2017 – 12 December 2017.The population of the study are the post-operative patients at the In-Patient wards in a private hospital in Western Part of Indonesia. The samples were obtained using purposive sampling with n = 41. Research instrument consists of observation sheet using NRS and VAS scale. The results showed most respondents during the first eight hours using NRS scale had mild pain (80.5%); first 16 hours had light pain (63.4%); and had mild pain in the first 24 hours (85.4%). Using VAS scale, most of the respondents on the first eight hours has mild pain (87.8%); first 16 hours has mild pain (68.3%); and has mild pain in the first 24 hours (87.8%). The conclusion of this study is there is no difference in pain scale of post-operative patients using VAS scale and NRS scale. So, hospitals can also use the VAS scale to assess pain scale in post-operative patients.

T4 Impact of Opioid-Minimizing Pain Protocols after Burn Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S3-S4
Author(s):  
Deepanjli Donthula ◽  
Christopher R Conner ◽  
Van Thi Thanh Truong ◽  
Charles Green ◽  
Chuantao Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pain ◽  
Posterior Probability ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Lengths Of Stay ◽  
Pain Scores

Abstract Introduction Traditionally, opioids have been the mainstay of treatment for background, breakthrough, procedural, and postoperative pain after burns. However, in addition to an impetus to reduce provider-driven opioid exposure, there is increasing evidence that opioids can worsen acute pain through induction of hyperalgesia. In 2019, we implemented a pill-based, opioid-minimizing pain protocol and protocolized moderate sedation for dressing changes. We hypothesized that these protocols would reduce inpatient opioid exposure without increasing acute pain scores. Methods Two groups of consecutive patients admitted to the burn service were compared: Pre (01/2018 to 07/2019) and Post (01/2020 to 06/2020) implementation of the protocols (08/2019 to 12/2019). Patient demographics, burn characteristics, and lengths of stay were abstracted from the burn registry. Opioid exposure and pain scale scores were obtained from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was total morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included MME/day, pain domain specific MME, pain scores, and lengths of stay. Pain was estimated by creating a normalized pain score (range 0–1) from three different pain scales (Numeric Rating Scale, Behavioral Pain Scale, and Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale). Groups were compared using Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Chi Square. Treatment effect was estimated using Bayesian generalized linear models. Results There were no differences in demographics or burn characteristics between the Pre (n=495) and Post groups (n=174), including TBSA burn (Pre 4% [2, 10] versus Post 5% [2, 10], p=0.898). The Post group had significantly lower total MME (IRR 0.72, 95% CrI 0.57–0.93, posterior probability 99%), MME/day (IRR 0.76, 95% CrI 0.65–0.90, posterior probability 99%), and domain-specific total MME (Table). No difference in average normalized pain scores was seen. The Pre group were hospitalized longer than the Post group (5 days [2, 14] versus 4 days [1, 9], p=0.012). Conclusions Implementation of opioid-minimizing protocols for acute burn pain were associated with a significant reduction in inpatient opioid exposure without increased pain scores. More information is needed to understand the association with reduced hospital days.

Pain in Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle – an Investigation Based on Data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)

2018 ◽  
Vol 156 (02) ◽  
pp. 160-167
Author(s):  
Daniel Körner ◽  
Philipp Kohler ◽  
Steffen Schröter ◽  
Aline Naumann ◽  
Markus Walther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
The Other ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Preoperative Pain ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
The One ◽  
Cartilage Therapy

Abstract Background The aim of the study was to investigate parameters influencing the preoperative pain intensity in patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle. The evaluation covered patient-related parameters such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), as well as defect-related parameters, such as localisation, size and stage (according to the classification of the International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] and the Berndt-Harty-Loomer classification). We also examined the correlation between the different surgical techniques and additional factors, such as debridement of an impingement or stabilisation of the ankle on the one hand, and the preoperative pain intensity on the other. Material and Methods 259 patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle were operated in 32 clinical centres between October 2014 and December 2016 and enrolled consecutively in the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). 151 patients were available for analysis. The preoperative pain intensity was assessed at the time of surgery with online questionnaires, using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain (NRS). Results The median preoperative pain intensity in the complete study population (n = 151) was 3 (range 0 – 10). There was no correlation between the age and the preoperative pain intensity (ρ = − 0.06). Further, there was not detected a difference between the two genders according to the preoperative pain intensity (p = 0.31). In female patients a higher BMI correlated with a higher preoperative pain intensity (ρ = 0.16). Within the group of patients with a solitary treated talus lesion there was no difference according to the preoperative pain intensity between the different localizations of the defect (medial vs. lateral talus) (p = 0.82). Within the group of patients with a solitary treated talus or tibia lesion there was no correlation between the defective area or the lesion stage according to the ICRS classification on the one hand, and the preoperative pain intensity on the other (ρ = 0.09, and ρ = 0.04, respectively). According to the Berndt-Harty-Loomer classification a higher lesion stage (stage four and five) was associated with a higher preoperative pain intensity (ρ = 0.13). There was no difference according to the preoperative pain intensity between the group of patients that received a debridement of a bony or soft tissue impingement in addition to the cartilage therapy and the group of patients without this kind of additional therapy (p = 0.10). Further, there was no difference according to the preoperative pain intensity between the group of patients that received a stabilisation of the ankle joint in addition to the cartilage therapy and the group of patients without a stabilisation procedure (p = 0.83). Conclusion Osteochondral lesions of the ankle can be associated with a moderate and in some cases high pain intensity. In female patients a higher BMI is associated with a higher pain intensity. Further, a higher lesion stage according to the Berndt-Harty-Loomer classification is associated with a higher pain intensity, which highlights the clinical relevance of this classification.

scholarly journals LO10: Quantity of opioid to prescribe for acute pain to limit misuse after emergency department discharge

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S30-S31
Author(s):  
R. Daoust ◽  
J. Paquet ◽  
E. Piette ◽  
J. Morris ◽  
A. Cournoyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Medication ◽  
Urban Hospital ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Emergency Department Discharge

Introduction: A 2008 survey found that 1.9% of the entire US population was using prescription pain medication non-medically and that 56% obtained them from a friend or relatives. Diversion of pain medication may occur when a portion of the prescription is unused for pain relief after an ED visit. We hypothesized that at least 10 pills (~40%) of an opioid prescription 2 weeks after an ED visit, will not be consumed and become available for potential misuse. Objective: Determine the quantity of unused opioids pills for common acute pain diagnoses, 2 weeks after an ED visit for acute pain. Methods: Prospective observational cohort study of consecutive ED patients from a tertiary academic urban hospital with 60,000 ED visits annually. Inclusion criteria: aged ≥18 years, acute pain conditions present ≤2 weeks, pain intensity at triage of ≥4 (on a 0-10 numeric rating scale; NRS), and discharged with a new opioid prescription. ED physicians identified (24/7) eligible patients. They recorded the pain complaint/location, the final diagnosis, the quantity and type of prescribed pain medication. Discharged patients completed paper or electronic 14-day diary (REDCap database) to document their pain medication consumption. As a mitigation strategy, they were also contacted by phone at 2 weeks for the same information. A paired t-test was used to test the difference between the amounts of opioids prescribed and consumed. Results: 350 patients were recruited. Mean age 50 (SD ±16) and 54.2% were men. Painful diagnosis: fracture (18.2%), acute back pain (15.3%), renal colic (15.3%), Sprain (excluding back/neck pain) (6.9%), Contusion (6.4%), acute neck pain (5.8%), abdominal pain (4.9%), and other (27.2%). Opioids prescribed: oxycodone (47%), morphine (37%) and hydromorphone (16%). Means quantity of opioid pills prescribed: 24 (IC95%: 23-26). Filled opioid prescription: 92%. Means quantity of opioid pills consumed: 8 (IC95%: 7-9). Means quantity of unused opioids pills: 16. Opioid pills available for misuse in our cohort: 5,600 pills. Conclusion: After an ED visit for acute pain a significant portion of opioids prescribed is unused and available for misuse. A large pragmatic study should be done to confirm that an opioid prescription strategy based on our results will limit unused opioid pills while maintaining pain relief.

scholarly journals ASSOCIATIONS OF PAIN INTENSITY WITH SEDENTARY BEHAVIOR AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN OLDER ADULTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S20-S21
Author(s):  
Kushang Patel ◽  
Andrea LaCroix ◽  
Paul Crane ◽  
Rod L Walker ◽  
KatieRose Richmire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Sedentary Behavior ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mild Pain

Abstract Exercise is recommended for several painful, age-associated conditions; however, relationships between pain intensity and objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity have not been investigated in older adults. Accordingly, we analyzed cross-sectional data on 936 older adults in the ACT Study who self-reported their pain intensity on a 0-10 rating scale (0=no pain; 1-3=mild pain; and 4-10=moderate/severe pain) and wore an activPAL accelerometer. A total of 181 (19.3%) reported no pain, while 564 (60.3%) and 191 (20.4%) reported mild and moderate/severe pain, respectively. Linear regression models adjusted for age and sex estimated that compared to those with no pain, participants with moderate/severe pain walked significantly fewer steps/day (b-coefficient=-778 [95%CI: -1377, -179]) and had fewer sit-to-stand transitions/day (b-coefficient=-2.9 [95%CI: -5.6, -0.1]). In contrast, there were no significant differences in these outcomes comparing no pain versus mild pain. Future research will examine effects of pain treatments (opioids) and diagnoses on accelerometer-measured outcomes.

scholarly journals Relationship between acute pain trajectories after an emergency department visit and chronic pain: a Canadian prospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e040390
Author(s):  
Raoul Daoust ◽  
Jean Paquet ◽  
Alexis Cournoyer ◽  
Éric Piette ◽  
Judy Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Trajectories ◽  
Numeric Rating

ObjectivesInadequate acute pain management can reduce the quality of life, cause unnecessary suffering and can often lead to the development of chronic pain. Using group-based trajectory modelling, we previously identified six distinct pain intensity trajectories for the first 14-day postemergency department (ED) discharge; two linear ones with moderate or severe pain during follow-up (~40% of the patients) and four cubic polynomial order trajectories with mild or no pain at the end of the 14 days (low final pain trajectories). We assessed if previously described acute pain intensity trajectories over 14 days after ED discharge are predictive of chronic pain 3 months later.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingTertiary care trauma centre academic hospital.ParticipantsThis study included 18 years and older ED patients who consulted for acute (≤2 weeks) pain conditions that were discharged with an opioid prescription. Patients completed a 14-day diary in which they listed their daily pain intensity (0–10 numeric rating scale).OutcomesThree months after ED visit, participants were questioned by phone about their current pain intensity (0–10 numeric rating scale). Chronic pain was defined as patients with current pain intensity ≥4 at 3 months.ResultsA total of 305 participants remained in the study at 3 months, 49% were women and a mean age of 55±15 years. Twelve per cent (11.9; 95% CI 8.2 to 15.4) of patients had chronic pain at the 3-month follow-up. Controlling for age, sex and pain condition, patients with moderate or severe pain trajectories and those with only a severe pain trajectory were respectively 5.1 (95% CI 2.2 to 11.8) and 8.2 (95% CI 3.4 to 20.0) times more likely to develop chronic pain 3 months later compared with patients in the low final pain trajectories.ConclusionSpecific acute pain trajectories following an ED visit are closely related to the development of chronic pain 3 months later.Trial registration numberNCT02799004; Results.

scholarly journals Pre-Hospital Pain Management in Children with Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3056
Author(s):  
Ada Holak ◽  
Michał Czapla ◽  
Marzena Zielińska
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Medical Teams

Background: The all-too-frequent failure to rate pain intensity, resulting in the lack of or inadequacy of pain management, has long ceased to be an exclusive problem of the young patient, becoming a major public health concern. This study aimed to evaluate the methods used for reducing post-traumatic pain in children and the frequency of use of such methods. Additionally, the methods of pain assessment and the frequency of their application in this age group were analysed. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2452 medical records of emergency medical teams dispatched to injured children aged 0–18 years in the area around Warsaw (Poland). Results: Of all injured children, 1% (20 out of 2432) had their pain intensity rated, and the only tool used for this assessment was the numeric rating scale (NRS). Children with burns most frequently received a single analgesic drug or cooling (56.2%), whereas the least frequently used method was multimodal treatment combining pharmacotherapy and cooling (13.5%). Toddlers constituted the largest percentage of patients who were provided with cooling (12%). Immobilisation was most commonly used in adolescents (29%) and school-age children (n = 186; 24%). Conclusions: Low frequency of pain assessment emphasises the need to provide better training in the use of various pain rating scales and protocols. What is more, non-pharmacological methods (cooling and immobilisation) used for reducing pain in injured children still remain underutilized.

Comparison of Frenotomy Techniques for the Treatment of Ankyloglossia in Children: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 428-443
Author(s):  
Usman Khan ◽  
Jake MacPherson ◽  
Michael Bezuhly ◽  
Paul Hong
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Comprehensive Search ◽  
High Level ◽  
Numeric Rating

Objective To compare the effectiveness of conventional (CF), laser (LF), and Z-plasty (ZF) frenotomies for the treatment of ankyloglossia in the pediatric population. Data Sources A comprehensive search of PUBMED, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases was performed. Review Methods Relevant articles were independently assessed by 2 reviewers according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results Thirty-five articles assessing CF (27 articles), LF (4 articles), ZF (3 articles), and/or rhomboid plasty frenotomy (1 article) were included. A high level of outcome heterogeneity prevented pooling of data. All 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were of low quality. Both CF (5 articles with 589 patients) and LF (2 articles with 78 patients) were independently shown to reduce maternal nipple pain on a visual analog or numeric rating scale. There were reports of improvement with breastfeeding outcomes as assessed on validated assessment tools for 88% (7/8) of CF articles (588 patients) and 2 LF articles (78 patients). ZF improved breastfeeding outcomes on subjective maternal reports (1 article with 18 infants) only. One RCT with a high risk of bias concluded greater speech articulation improvements with ZF compared to CF. Only minor adverse events were reported for all frenotomy techniques. Conclusions Current literature does not demonstrate a clear advantage for one frenotomy technique when managing children with ankyloglossia. Recommendations for future research are provided to overcome the methodological shortcomings in the literature. We conclude that all frenotomy techniques are safe and effective for treating symptomatic ankyloglossia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document