Development of the Dimensions of Adult Mastery Motivation Questionnaire

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Doherty-Bigara ◽  
Linda Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Group Differences ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Task Persistence ◽  
Mastery Motivation ◽  
Consistency Test ◽  
Initial Validation ◽  
Gender And Education ◽  
Five Factors ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Mastery motivation is an important developmental construct that has implications for development across the lifespan. Research to date has focused predominantly on infants and children, with the Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire (DMQ) being the most widely used measure of mastery motivation. This article reports on the development and initial validation of an adult measure: the Dimensions of Adult Mastery Motivation Questionnaire (DAMMQ). Six hundred and twenty-eight adults (68% female) aged from 18 to 90 years completed the questionnaire. Factor analysis produced 24 items that represented five factors: task persistence, preference for challenge, task-related pleasure, task absorption, and self-efficacy. The DAMMQ was found to have good internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity. Within group differences for age, gender and education are reported. The development of the DAMMQ paves the way for future research about mastery motivation in adult populations.

Development and Initial Validation of the Collectivistic Coping Styles Measure with African, Asian, and Latin American International Students

2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Moore ◽  
Madonna G. Constantine
Keyword(s):  
International Students ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Coping Styles ◽  
Health Counseling ◽  
Initial Validation ◽  
Social Support Seeking ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Support Seeking ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Item Scale

We developed and provided initial empirical validation of the Collectivistic Coping Styles Measure (CCSM), a 9-item scale that assessed the degree to which African,Asian, and Latin American international students utilized social support seeking and forbearance to cope with their problems or concerns. We found evidence of good construct and concurrent validity and good internal consistency and test-retest reliability for the CCSM. Implications of the findings for mental health counseling are discussed.

The development of a brief measure of health personality

2020 ◽  
pp. 135910532093117
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Joseph Kim ◽  
Angelica Jasper ◽  
Yousun Baek ◽  
Daniel Russell
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Personality Assessment ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Healthcare Settings ◽  
Brief Assessment ◽  
Five Factors ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Health And Well Being

The purpose of this research was to develop a brief assessment of health personality, defined as a set of individual dispositions that are directly related to health. In Study 1, an initial pool of items was developed with 615 older adults, 65 years of age and older. The scale was reduced to a 15-item version for use in applied health care settings. Results indicated that the ‘Health Personality Assessment scale’ has good internal consistency, and the five-factors correlated significantly with self-reported measures of physical health and well-being. In Study 2, the scale was cross-validated with 254 older adults from the Health Literacy and Cognitive Function among Older Adults Study. The scale was refined and a third study consisted of 3,907 older adults. Reliability and validity of the scale were confirmed. Future research should evaluate the usefulness of this scale in applied healthcare settings.

scholarly journals Portuguese validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in routine practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Silva ◽  
Eunice Barbosa ◽  
João Salgado ◽  
Carla Cunha
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Alliance ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Portuguese Population ◽  
Consistency Test ◽  
General Mental Health ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

This study aimed to validate and explore the psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire (CEQ) for the Portuguese population in the context of routine practice. The sample includes 87 clients from a university psychotherapy clinic. All clients completed self-report measures to assess credibility and expectation (CEQ), as well as measures of general mental health, depressive symptoms and therapeutic alliance in session 1 and session 2. The exploratory analysis revealed the existence of two factors in CEQ for the Portuguese population, factor 1 credibility and factor 2 expectation. The measure demonstrated good internal consistency, test-retest reliability and good adjustment in the confirmatory analysis. In terms of convergent validity, no significant correlation was found between credibility and expectation and the therapeutic alliance. The results corroborate the CEQ psychometric qualities for the Portuguese population, also showing its applicability in a context of routine practice.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of the Purdue Global Online Teaching Effectiveness Scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Reyes-Fournier ◽  
Edward J. Cumella ◽  
Michelle March ◽  
Jennifer Pedersen ◽  
Gabrielle Blackman
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Online Teaching ◽  
Teaching Effectiveness ◽  
Asynchronous Learning ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Online Instructors ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Instructor Effectiveness ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The currently available measures of online teaching effectiveness (OTE) have several flaws, including a lack of psychometric rigor, high costs, and reliance on the construct of traditional on-the-ground teaching effectiveness as opposed to the unique features of OTE (Blackman, Pedersen, March, Reyes-Fournier, & Cumella, 2019). Therefore, the present research sought to establish a psychometrically sound framework for OTE and develop and validate a measure based on this clearly-defined construct. The authors developed pilot questions for the new measure based on a comprehensive review of the OTE literature and their many years of experience as online instructors. Students enrolled in exclusively online coursework and programs at Purdue University Global, N = 213, completed the survey, rating the effectiveness of their instructors. Exploratory Factor Analysis produced four clear OTE factors: Presence, Expertise, Engagement, and Facilitation. The resulting measure demonstrated good internal consistency and high correlations with an established OTE measure; good test-retest reliability; and predictive validity in relation to student achievement. Confirmatory Factor Analysis revealed a good fit of the data and yielded a final 12-item OTE measure. Further refinement and validation of the measure are recommended, particularly with students in other universities, and future research options are discussed.Keywords: online teaching effectiveness, instructor effectiveness, distance learning, student evaluations, asynchronous learning.

The Self-efficacy Questionnaire for School Situations: Development and Psychometric Evaluation

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Heyne ◽  
Neville King ◽  
Bruce Tonge ◽  
Stephanie Rollings ◽  
Melinda Pritchard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Social Stress ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Behavioural Treatment ◽  
School Work ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Doing School ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Treatment Procedures

Following Bandura's theory, a Self-efficacy Questionnaire for School Situations (SEQ-SS) was developed to assess the cognitions of school refusers. The instrument contains twelve school-related situations which are rated by children according to their belief about their ability to cope with each situation. Factor analysis yielded two reliable factors labelled Academic/Social Stress and Separation/Discipline Stress. Psychometric evaluation also revealed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Total self-efficacy scores for 135 school refusers ranged from very low to very high. Self-efficacy was highest with regard to doing school work and lowest with regard to answering peers' questions about absences. The clinical utility of the SEQ-SS is discussed, with implications for the selection of cognitive and behavioural treatment procedures. The application of the instrument in future research is also considered.

Translation and Validation of Kannada Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-262
Author(s):  
Rahul Krishnamurthy ◽  
Radish Kumar Balasubramanium
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Consistency Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Perceived Severity ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Dysphagia Handicap Index ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Translation And Validation

Background The Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) is a 25-item questionnaire that assesses the quality of life among individuals with dysphagia. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Kannada version of DHI (DHI-K). Method Eighty-eight individuals with dysphagia and an equal number of healthy individuals filled out the DHI-K. Internal consistency and test–retest reproducibility were used for reliability testing. Validity was established by comparing DHI-K scores of patients with dysphagia and healthy controls. Results The overall Cronbach's α for DHI-K was .81, indicating good internal consistency. Cohen's κ agreement for test–retest reliability of self-perceived severity was found to be .9. Correlation between subscales of DHI and self-perceived severity was analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficient and was found to very high. The control group has significantly lower scores for all scales when compared to the dysphagia group (physical: t (174) = 31.74, p < .001; functional: t (174) = 32.65, p < .001; emotional: t (174) = 36.3, p < .001; total: t (174) = 34.08, p < .001). Conclusions This study demonstrates that DHI-K has good internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity. The results of the study also reveal that it is a reliable and valid tool for assessment of handicap in Kannada-speaking dysphagia population.

Reliability and Factor Validity of a Farsi Version of the Positive and Negative Perfectionism Scale

2009 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali Besharat
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
General Health Questionnaire ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Consistency Test ◽  
Cultural Validity ◽  
Good Internal Consistency ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
The University ◽  
Farsi Version

This study investigated reliability and factor validity of a Farsi version of the Positive and Negative Perfectionism Scale in 606 undergraduate students (257 men, 349 women) from the University of Tehran. All participants were asked to complete the scale, along with the General Health Questionnaire (Goldberg, 1972) and the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (Coopersmith, 1967). Findings indicated good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the two-factor structure of the Farsi version of the Positive and Negative Perfectionism Scale. These factors were similar to the factors found in previous studies and were accordingly labeled Positive Perfectionism and Negative Perfectionism. The results provide evidence for applicability of the scale and its cross-cultural validity.

Development of the Fear of Intimacy Components Questionnaire (FICQ)

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Pedro Sobral ◽  
Maria Emília Costa
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Fear Of Intimacy ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
New Instrument ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract. We developed a new instrument designed to measure fear of intimacy in romantic relationships. We suggest assessing fear of intimacy through two dimensions: self-revelation and dependence. The Fear of Intimacy Components Questionnaire (FICQ) was validated across three studies in which a 10-item solution systematically emerged. Consistently with a two component perspective, a two-factor solution fitted data the best: fear of losing the self (FLS) and fear of losing the other (FLO). Qualitative analyses verified content validity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses tested the factor structure. Multigroup analyses supported the structural invariance across gender, age, and relationship status. Both factors showed adequate discriminant validity and internal consistency, and good 3-week period test-retest reliability. Associations between the FICQ and insecure attachment orientations demonstrated convergent validity. The association between the FICQ and relationship satisfaction above and beyond a preexisting measure offered criterion validity. By going beyond traditional self-revelation-focused conception of fear of intimacy, that is, by proposing a bi-dimensional structure to fear of intimacy, we believe that this new measure will contribute to future research on fear of intimacy.

scholarly journals Affective and cognitive components of students’ attitudes towards communication learning - validation of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale in a cohort of polish medical students

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Przymuszała ◽  
Magdalena Cerbin-Koczorowska ◽  
Patrycja Marciniak-Stępak ◽  
Łucja Zielińska-Tomczak ◽  
Martyna Piszczek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Behavioral Control ◽  
Attitude Scale ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Perceived Behavioral Control ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cognitive Components ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background The Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) is a recognized tool for assessment of attitudes towards communication learning. In the original version, it consists of 26 items divided on theoretical assumptions into two subscales: Positive and Negative Attitudes Scales. However, the evidence for its structure seems unsatisfactory, and a simple division into positive and negative attitudes may be insufficient to describe attitudes of medical students towards communication learning. Moreover, the existing evidence of the test-retest reliability of the CSAS seems limited. Consequently, this study aimed to provide more evidence on its psychometric properties while validating the CSAS questionnaire in a cohort of Polish medical students. Methods The CSAS was translated, adapted into Polish, and validated in a cohort of 389 Polish medical students. Statistical analysis involved, among others, parallel analysis to determine the number of factors, confirmatory factor analysis to compare the proposed model with theory-based ones, and test-retest reliability analysis. Results Conducted analysis revealed that in the examined population, the CSAS should rather consist of four than two subscales. Proposed four subscales addressed perceived outcomes of communication learning, positive and negative attitudes towards it (affective components), and factors motivating students to learn communication (a cognitive component of attitudes). Results of test-retest reliability were satisfactory for individual items and subscales. Conclusions This study presented a valid and reliable version of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale for Polish medical students and confirmed previous assumptions that CSAS may also be appropriate for assessment of affective and cognitive components of attitudes. Future research should, based on Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior, make attempts to develop a tool assessing not only attitudes but also subjective norms and perceived behavioral control.

Psychometric analysis of the Comfort with Communication in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (C-COPE) instrument

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 404-412
Author(s):  
Mary E Minton ◽  
Mary J Isaacson ◽  
Patricia Da Rosa
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Validity Index ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Five Factors ◽  
Instrument Measuring ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
End Of Life Communication

Background: Nurses must be comfortable facilitating palliative and end-of-life communication with patients and their families. Aim: A validated instrument measuring the comfort of nurses with conducting end-of-life communication is essential for meeting the goals and wishes of patient care. This study aimed to develop and conduct a psychometric evaluation of the Comfort with Communication in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (C-COPE) instrument. Methods: Face, content, and construct validity, including test-retest reliability, were conducted. Results: Four experts subjectively confirmed face content validity and the quantitative item content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.67 to 1 and scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.98. Principal axis factoring with Promax rotation yielded a five-factor solution accounting for 66.2% of the variance. The items loading on the five factors ranged from 0.46–0.96 (factor 1), 0.67–0.93 (factor 2), 0.49–0.86 (factor 3), 0.68–0.79 (factor 4), and 0.24–0.96 (factor 5). Internal consistency reliability (coefficient a) was 0.90 for the total C-COPE, and above 0.75 for each factor. The five factors are ‘cultural/spiritual considerations,’ ‘team considerations,’ ‘addressing decision-making,’ ‘addressing symptomatology,’ and ‘deliberate awareness.’ Test-retest reliability yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87 (CI 95%, 0.82–0.91). Conclusions: The C-COPE is a reliable and valid instrument measuring nurse comfort with palliative and end of-life care communication, yet requires testing in more diverse samples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document