scholarly journals Sustained Infection Reduction in Outpatient Hemodialysis Centers Participating in a Collaborative Bloodstream Infection Prevention Effort

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 863-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah H. Yi ◽  
Alexander J. Kallen ◽  
Sally Hess ◽  
Virginia R. Bren ◽  
Mary E. Lincoln ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Current Analysis ◽  
Prevention Effort ◽  
Prevention Interventions ◽  
Infection Reduction ◽  
Dialysis Facilities

Among dialysis facilities participating in a bloodstream infection (BSI) prevention collaborative, access-related BSI incidence rate improvements observed immediately following implementation of a bundle of BSI prevention interventions were sustained for up to 4 years. Overall, BSI incidence remained unchanged from baseline in the current analysis.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:863–866

scholarly journals Results of screening for emergent highly resistant bacteria in Tunisian intensive care units

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ben Rejeb ◽  
A Ben Cheikh ◽  
S Bhiri ◽  
H Ghali ◽  
M Kahloul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Prevention Interventions

Abstract Background The infections caused by emergent highly resistant bacteria (eHBR) that develop in intensive care units (ICUs) may result in significant patient illnesses and deaths, extend the duration of hospital stays and generate added costs. Facing this problem, the screening that emphasizes early identification of colonized patients, reduces the prevalence and incidence of infection, improves patient outcomes and reduces healthcare costs. In this context, we have implemented a screening for eHBR in ICUs of Sahloul university hospital of Sousse (Tunisia), which we report in this study the first six-months outcomes. Methods Rectal swab cultures were collected to detect Vancomycin resistant enterococcus (VRE) and Carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) among patients admitted in six ICUs of Sahloul university hospital of Sousse (Tunisia) and more than three times, at least one week apart, between 1 June and 31 December 2018. Results During the study period 174 patients were screened. Of them, 69.5% were male and 73.6% were admitted in surgical ICU. In total, 161 and 152 samples were realized respectively for the detection of CPE and VRE. These samples were positive in 15% and 8.5% respectively for CPE and VRE. Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA 48 was the most isolated CPE (80%). Conclusions Our screening program helped us in infection control by early identification of patients, thereby facilitating an informed decision about infection prevention interventions. Moreover, these results encouraged us to improve and generalize this program throughout the hospital. Key messages eHRB screening becomes an important axis in the prevention of eHRB infections in our facilities. eHRB screening allows the reinforcement of the basic infection prevention and control measures.

scholarly journals The Science Behind Safe School Re-Opening: Leveraging the Pillars of Infection Control to Support Safe Elementary and Secondary Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elissa M Schechter-Perkins ◽  
Polly van den Berg ◽  
Westyn Branch-Elliman
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Safe School ◽  
Elementary And Secondary Education ◽  
School Settings ◽  
Environmental Controls ◽  
Prevention Interventions

Abstract There are limited tools for adapting COVID-19 infection control plans to school settings. We present an infection prevention model for optimizing safe re-opening for elementary and secondary schools during the global COVID-19 pandemic and review the current evidence behind various infection prevention interventions in school settings. The model is adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention fundamental pillars for infection prevention, and includes four categories of intervention: epidemiologic controls (town prevalence metrics, diagnostic testing, quarantine strategies), administrative controls (state vaccination policies, alternative school models, symptom screens, quarantine breaks), engineering/environmental controls (distancing, outdoor space, ventilation), and personal protective equipment (PPE)/Hand hygiene (face coverings, hand sanitizing). The adapted infection control pillars model utilizes implementation-science informed considerations to maximize pragmatism and adherence by leveraging evidence-based strategies. It highlights the necessity of redundant infection prevention interventions, acknowledges the importance of community buy-in to achieve real-world effectiveness, and addresses tactics to overcome implementation barriers. Recommendations are grounded in the Dynamic Sustainability Framework and include suggestions to maintain infection prevention effectiveness over time to ensure ongoing safety.

scholarly journals Survey of Infection Prevention Informatics Use and Practitioner Satisfaction in US Hospitals

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 891-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Masnick ◽  
Daniel J. Morgan ◽  
Marc-Oliver Wright ◽  
Michael Y. Lin ◽  
Lisa Pineles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Record ◽  
Electronic Medical Record ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Infection Preventionists

We surveyed hospital epidemiologists and infection preventionists on their usage of and satisfaction with infection prevention–specific software supplementing their institution’s electronic medical record. Respondents with supplemental software were more satisfied with their software’s infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship capabilities than those without. Infection preventionists were more satisfied than hospital epidemiologists.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(7):891–893

Risk Factors for Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in the Era of Prevention Bundles

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin Callister ◽  
Pauline Limchaiyawat ◽  
Samantha J. Eells ◽  
Loren G. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Hemodynamic Monitoring ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Infection Risk Factors ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Little is known about central line–associated bloodstream infection risk factors in the bundle era. In our case-control investigation, we found that independent risk factors for central line–associated bloodstream infection at our center included the number of recent lab tests, catheter duration, and lack of hemodynamic monitoring as the insertion indication.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;00(0): 1–3

Types of Interventions

2021 ◽  
pp. 40-51
Author(s):  
Jennifer Meddings ◽  
Vineet Chopra ◽  
Sanjay Saint
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
The Past ◽  
Central Catheters

Prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), while initially making great strides in 2003, has declined as use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has grown tremendously over the past two decades. The convenience of a PICC has led to sicker patients being treated outside the intensive care unit, and there has been little recognition of a trade-off between benefits and risks after PICC placement. For these reasons, CLABSI prevention has become more challenging. This chapter describes the contents of an infection prevention bundle for CLABSI. In the case of CLABSI, the intervention outlines appropriate and inappropriate uses of central lines. Several new tools are discussed, which help doctors and nurses think through which device is most appropriate for any given patient.

Use of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Prevention Practices by US Hospitals

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 672-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Krein ◽  
Timothy P. Hofer ◽  
Christine P. Kowalski ◽  
Russell N. Olmsted ◽  
Carol A. Kauffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document