scholarly journals A Statewide Assessment of Antifungal Stewardship Activities in Acute-Care Hospitals in Connecticut

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s105-s105
Author(s):  
Romina Bromberg ◽  
Vivian Leung ◽  
Meghan Maloney ◽  
Anu Paranandi ◽  
David Banach
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antifungal Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antifungal Stewardship ◽  
Infectious Diseases Consultation

Background: Morbidity and mortality associated with invasive fungal infections and concerns of emerging antifungal resistance have highlighted the importance of optimizing antifungal therapy among hospitalized patients. Little is known about antifungal stewardship (AFS) practices among acute-care hospitals. We sought to assess AFS activities within Connecticut and to identify opportunities for improvement. Methods: An electronic survey assessing AFS practices was distributed to infectious disease physicians or pharmacy antibiotic stewardship program leaders in Connecticut hospitals. Survey questions evaluated AFS activities based on antibiotic stewardship principles, including several CDC Core Elements. Questions assessed antifungal restriction, prospective audit and feedback practices, antifungal utilization measurements, and the perceived utility of a local or statewide antifungal antibiogram. Results: Responses were received from 15 respondents, which represented 20 of 31 hospitals (65%); these hospitals made up the majority of the acute-care hospitals in Connecticut. Furthermore, 18 of these hospitals (58%) include antifungals in their stewardship programs. Also, 16 hospitals (52%) conduct routine review of antifungal ordering and provide feedback to providers for some antifungals, most commonly for amphotericin B, voriconazole, micafungin, isavuconazole, and flucytosine. All hospitals include guidance on intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) conversions, when appropriate. Only 14 of hospitals (45%) require practitioners to document indication(s) for systemic antifungal use. Most hospitals (17, 55%) provide recommendations for de-escalation of therapy in candidemia, though only 4 (13%) have institutional guidelines for candidemia treatment, and only 11 hospital mandates an infectious diseases consultation for candidemia. Assessing outcomes pertaining to antifungal utilization is uncommon; only 8 hospitals (26%) monitor days of therapy and 5 (16%) monitor antifungal expenditures. Antifungal susceptibility testing on Candida bloodstream isolates is performed routinely at 6 of the hospitals (19%). Most respondents (19, 95%) support developing an antibiogram for Candida bloodstream isolates at the statewide level. Conclusions: Although AFS interventions occur in Connecticut hospitals, there are opportunities for enhancement, such as providing institutional guidelines for candidemia treatment and mandating infectious diseases consultation for candidemia. The Connecticut Department of Public Health implemented statewide Candida bloodstream isolate surveillance in 2019, which includes antifungal susceptibility testing. The creation of a statewide antibiogram for Candida bloodstream infections is underway to support empiric antifungal therapy.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Practices at Acute Care Hospitals Enrolled in the National Healthcare Safety Network, United States, 2011–2015

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Snigdha Vallabhaneni ◽  
Mathew Sapiano ◽  
Lindsey M Weiner ◽  
Shawn R Lockhart ◽  
Shelley Magill
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing ◽  
National Healthcare ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Testing Practices

Abstract We assessed availability of antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) at nearly 4000 acute care hospitals enrolled in the National Healthcare Safety Network. In 2015, 95% offered any AFST, 28% offered AFST at their own laboratory or at an affiliated medical center, and 33% offered reflexive AFST. Availability of AFST improved from 2011 to 2015, but substantial gaps exist in the availability of AFST.

scholarly journals Comparing Etest and Broth Microdilution for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the Most-Relevant Pathogenic Molds

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 3176-3181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Lamoth ◽  
Barbara D. Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Antifungal Therapy ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method

Invasive mold infections are life-threatening diseases for which appropriate antifungal therapy is crucial. Their epidemiology is evolving, with the emergence of triazole-resistantAspergillusspp. and multidrug-resistant non-Aspergillusmolds. Despite the lack of interpretive criteria, antifungal susceptibility testing of molds may be useful in guiding antifungal therapy. The standard broth microdilution method (BMD) is demanding and requires expertise. We assessed the performance of a commercialized gradient diffusion method (Etest method) as an alternative to BMD. The MICs or minimal effective concentrations (MECs) of amphotericin B, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, and micafungin were assessed for 290 clinical isolates of the most representative pathogenic molds (154Aspergillusand 136 non-Aspergillusisolates) with the BMD and Etest methods. Essential agreements (EAs) within ±2 dilutions of ≥90% between the two methods were considered acceptable. EAs for amphotericin B and voriconazole were >90% for most potentially susceptible species. For posaconazole, the correlation was acceptable forMucoromycotinabut Etest MIC values were consistently lower forAspergillusspp. (EAs of <90%). Excellent EAs were found for echinocandins with highly susceptible (MECs of <0.015 μg/ml) or intrinsically resistant (MECs of >16 μg/ml) strains. However, MEC determinations lacked consistency between methods for strains exhibiting mid-range MECs for echinocandins. We concluded that the Etest method is an appropriate alternative to BMD for antifungal susceptibility testing of molds under specific circumstances, including testing with amphotericin B or triazoles for non-Aspergillusmolds (MucoromycotinaandFusariumspp.). Additional study of molecularly characterized triazole-resistantAspergillusisolates is required to confirm the ability of the Etest method to detect voriconazole and posaconazole resistance amongAspergillusspp.

scholarly journals Epidemiological data and antifungal susceptibility in invasive fungal infections - a Romanian infectious diseases tertiary hospital’s experience. Preliminary report

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-353
Author(s):  
Radu Agrosoaie ◽  
Adrian Streinu-Cercel ◽  
Doina Azoicai ◽  
Codrina Bejan ◽  
Olga Dorobat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Antifungal Therapy ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Invasive Fungal Infections ◽  
First Line ◽  
Antifungal Stewardship

Abstract Introduction: Invasive fungal infections have stood as an important research subject for the past 20 years, being considered as a crucial effect of advancing healthcare services. Low identification rates of invasive fungal infections in blood cultures and low sensibility of biomarkers determine empiric treatments which lead to a change in epidemiological data and antifungal susceptibility. The aim: The epidemiological evaluation of invasive fungal infections and the assessment of antifungal resistance related to this condition. Methods and material: An “antifungal stewardship” retrospective study was developed between January 2010 and April 2016. An epidemiological analysis was performed on 79 cases with proven invasive fungal infections in bloodstream, catheter, and cerebrospinal fluid. We considered: age, gender, HIV status, place of residence, and first option in medical practice of antifungal treatment. The laboratory analysis was performed by the Microbiology Laboratory at “Prof. Dr. Matei Bals” National Institute for Infectious Diseases, Bucharest. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC’s) of 15 isolates were identified using colorimetric micro broth dilution panel YEASTONE ®YO10 and compared with susceptibilities obtained by VITEK2®C system. Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 was used as reference. Results: The incidence of invasive fungal infections was 3.7 on 1000 hospitalized patients. The age of the study population ranged between 12 and 83 years, and most were male (59%). The majority of subjects were from an urban area (84%), and 27% of them were HIV positive. The results obtained in VITEK2C® were similar with those from YEASTONE® YO10 for fluconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B (100%), without any minor, major or very major errors. The fluconazole was the first option of treatment, followed by voriconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin. In 37% of cases the first treatment option was replaced with a secondary antifungal therapy accordingly with antifungal breakpoints obtained by Vitek ®. Conclusions: No rates of resistance to fluconazole, amphotericin B, voriconazole were obtained. Fluconazole was the major first line antifungal therapy. Conclusions: No rates of resistance to fluconazole, amphotericin B, voriconazole were obtained. Fluconazole was the major first line antifungal therapy.

scholarly journals Can We Improve Antifungal Susceptibility Testing?

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Durand ◽  
Danièle Maubon ◽  
Muriel Cornet ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Delphine Aldebert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Inhibition ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Antifungal Stewardship ◽  
Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations

Systemic antifungal agents are increasingly used for prevention or treatment of invasive fungal infections, whose prognosis remains poor. At the same time, emergence of resistant or even multi-resistant strains is of concern as the antifungal arsenal is limited. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is therefore of key importance for patient management and antifungal stewardship. Current AFST methods, including reference and commercial types, are based on growth inhibition in the presence of an antifungal, in liquid or solid media. They usually enable Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) to be determined with direct clinical application. However, they are limited by a high turnaround time (TAT). Several innovative methods are currently under development to improve AFST. Techniques based on MALDI-TOF are promising with short TAT, but still need extensive clinical validation. Flow cytometry and computed imaging techniques detecting cellular responses to antifungal stress other than growth inhibition are also of interest. Finally, molecular detection of mutations associated with antifungal resistance is an intriguing alternative to standard AFST, already used in routine microbiology labs for detection of azole resistance in Aspergillus and even directly from samples. It is still restricted to known mutations. The development of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and whole-genome approaches may overcome this limitation in the near future. While promising approaches are under development, they are not perfect and the ideal AFST technique (user-friendly, reproducible, low-cost, fast and accurate) still needs to be set up routinely in clinical laboratories.

scholarly journals Role and Interpretation of Antifungal Susceptibility Testing for the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Frederic Lamoth ◽  
Russell E. Lewis ◽  
Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis
Keyword(s):  
Antifungal Therapy ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility ◽  
Invasive Fungal Infections ◽  
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Candida Auris ◽  
Candida Spp ◽  
Neutropenic Patients

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and timely appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for good outcomes. Emerging antifungal resistance among Candida and Aspergillus spp., the major causes of IFI, is concerning and has led to the increasing incorporation of in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) to guide clinical decisions. However, the interpretation of AST results and their contribution to management of IFIs remains a matter of debate. Specifically, the utility of AST is limited by the delay in obtaining results and the lack of pharmacodynamic correlation between minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and clinical outcome, particularly for molds. Clinical breakpoints for Candida spp. have been substantially revised over time and appear to be reliable for the detection of azole and echinocandin resistance and for outcome prediction, especially for non-neutropenic patients with candidemia. However, data are lacking for neutropenic patients with invasive candidiasis and some non-albicans Candida spp. (notably emerging Candida auris). For Aspergillus spp., AST is not routinely performed, but may be indicated according to the epidemiological context in the setting of emerging azole resistance among A. fumigatus. For non-Aspergillus molds (e.g., Mucorales, Fusarium or Scedosporium spp.), AST is not routinely recommended as interpretive criteria are lacking and many confounders, mainly host factors, seem to play a predominant role in responses to antifungal therapy. This review provides an overview of the pre-clinical and clinical pharmacodynamic data, which constitute the rationale for the use and interpretation of AST testing of yeasts and molds in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Pharmacist-Driven Antibiotic Stewardship Program in Febrile Neutropenic Patients: A Single Site Prospective Study in Thailand

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 456
Author(s):  
Kittiya Jantarathaneewat ◽  
Anucha Apisarnthanarak ◽  
Wasithep Limvorapitak ◽  
David J. Weber ◽  
Preecha Montakantikul
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Empirical Therapy ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Great Opportunity ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Determine Role ◽  
Neutropenic Patients ◽  
Infectious Diseases Consultation

The antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) is a necessary part of febrile neutropenia (FN) treatment. Pharmacist-driven ASP is one of the meaningful approaches to improve the appropriateness of antibiotic usage. Our study aimed to determine role of the pharmacist in ASPs for FN patients. We prospectively studied at Thammasat University Hospital between August 2019 and April 2020. Our primary outcome was to compare the appropriate use of target antibiotics between the pharmacist-driven ASP group and the control group. The results showed 90 FN events in 66 patients. The choice of an appropriate antibiotic was significantly higher in the pharmacist-driven ASP group than the control group (88.9% vs. 51.1%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was greater appropriateness of the dosage regimen chosen as empirical therapy in the pharmacist-driven ASP group than in the control group (97.8% vs. 88.7%, p = 0.049) and proper duration of target antibiotics in documentation therapy (91.1% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.039). The multivariate analysis showed a pharmacist-driven ASP and infectious diseases consultation had a favorable impact on 30-day infectious diseases-related mortality in chemotherapy-induced FN patients (OR 0.058, 95%CI:0.005–0.655, p = 0.021). Our study demonstrated that pharmacist-driven ASPs could be a great opportunity to improve antibiotic appropriateness in FN patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document