63. Impact of Infectious Disease Fellow-Driven Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions on Inpatient Fluoroquinolone Use

Abstract Background Fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics are frequently used in hospitalized patients to treat a wide range of infections but are often misused and implicated in antibiotic-associated adverse events. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of Infectious Disease fellow (IDF)-driven antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions on inpatient FQ use. Methods This is a retrospective study of all admitted patients who received a FQ for greater than 48 hours from 01/01/2019 -12/31/2020 in an urban academic center. “Phase 1” (pre-intervention phase) covered 01/1/2019- 03/31/2019. “Phase 2” (intervention phase) covered 03/03/2020- 12/23/2020. In “Phase 2”, our ASP reviewed FQ use 2-3 days per week and an IDF provided feedback interventions that averaged 30-60 minutes of IDF time spent per day. We categorized FQ use as either: “appropriate”, “appropriate but not preferred”, or “inappropriate”, as determined by local clinical guidelines and ASP team opinion. We compared FQ use in both phases, indications for FQ use, and new Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). Results A total of 386 patients are included (76 in “Phase 1”and 310 in “Phase 2”). Patient characteristics are similar (Table 1). Overall, 63 % of FQ use was empiric, and 50% FQ use was deemed “appropriate”, 28% “appropriate but not preferred”, and 22% “inappropriate”. In “Phase 2”, 126 interventions were conducted, with 86% of these accepted. Appropriate FQ use increased significantly in “Phase 2” vs. “Phase 1” (53.5% vs 35.5%, p = 0.008), with decrease in mean days of FQ use (4.38 days vs 5.87 days, p =.021). Table 2 shows “appropriate” FQ use by clinical indication. New CDIs occurred more in “Phase 1” vs. “Phase 2” (6.6% vs 0.6%, p=.001). Conclusion An IDF-driven ASP intervention has a positive impact on appropriate inpatient use of FQs in our hospital. This highlights a promising ASP model which not only improves appropriate use of FQ, but also offers an opportunity for IDF mentorship and use of available resources to promote ASPs. Disclosures Katie A. McCrink, PharmD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee)

Download Full-text

Eight-Year Experience of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program and the Trend of Carbapenem Use at a Tertiary Acute-Care Hospital in Japan—The Impact of Postprescription Review and Feedback

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz389 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (10) ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Tsubasa Akazawa ◽

Yoshiki Kusama ◽

Haruhisa Fukuda ◽

Kayoko Hayakawa ◽

Satoshi Kutsuna ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Cost Savings ◽

Care Hospital ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Car Use ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

The Impact

Abstract Objective We implemented a stepwise antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). This study evaluated the effect of each intervention and the overall economic impact on carbapenem (CAR) use. Method Carbapenem days of therapy (CAR-DOT) were calculated to assess the effect of each intervention, and antipseudomonal DOT were calculated to assess changes in use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We carried out segmented regression analysis of studies with interrupted time series for 3 periods: Phase 1 (infectious disease [ID] consultation service only), Phase 2 (adding monitoring and e-mail feedback), and Phase 3 (adding postprescription review and feedback [PPRF] led by ID specialist doctors and pharmacists). We also estimated cost savings over the study period due to decreased CAR use. Results The median monthly CAR-DOT, per month per 100 patient-days, during Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 was 5.46, 3.69, and 2.78, respectively. The CAR-DOT decreased significantly immediately after the start of Phase 2, but a major decrease was not observed during this period. Although the immediate change was not apparent after Phase 3 started, CAR-DOT decreased significantly over this period. Furthermore, the monthly DOT of 3 alternative antipseudomonal agents also decreased significantly over the study period, but the incidence of antimicrobial resistance did not decrease. Cost savings over the study period, due to decreased CAR use, was estimated to be US $150 000. Conclusions Adding PPRF on the conventional ASP may accelerate antimicrobial stewardship. Our CAR stewardship program has had positive results, and implementation is ongoing.

Download Full-text

Cumulative Effect of an Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostic Testing Bundle on Early Streamlining of Antimicrobial Therapy in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy ◽

10.1128/aac.00189-17 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 61 (9) ◽

Cited By ~ 31

Author(s):

P. B. Bookstaver ◽

E. B. Nimmich ◽

T. J. Smith ◽

J. A. Justo ◽

J. Kohn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Antimicrobial Therapy ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Bloodstream Infections ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Beta Lactams ◽

Gram Negative ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Tof Ms

ABSTRACT The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) enhances antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions in optimization of antimicrobial therapy. This quasi-experimental cohort study evaluated the combined impact of an ASP/RDT bundle on the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) and time to de-escalation of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents (BSAA) in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSI). The ASP/RDT bundle consisted of system-wide GNBSI treatment guidelines, prospective stewardship monitoring, and sequential introduction of two RDTs, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel. The preintervention period was January 2010 through December 2013, and the postintervention period followed from January 2014 through June 2015. The postintervention period was conducted in two phases; phase 1 followed the introduction of MALDI-TOF MS, and phase 2 followed the introduction of the FilmArray BCID panel. The interventions resulted in significantly improved appropriateness of EAT (95% versus 91%; P = 0.02). Significant reductions in median time to de-escalation from combination antimicrobial therapy (2.8 versus 1.5 days), antipseudomonal beta-lactams (4.0 versus 2.5 days), and carbapenems (4.0 versus 2.5 days) were observed in the postintervention compared to the preintervention period (P < 0.001 for all). The reduction in median time to de-escalation from combination therapy (1.0 versus 2.0 days; P = 0.03) and antipseudomonal beta-lactams (2.2 versus 2.7 days; P = 0.04) was further augmented during phase 2 compared to phase 1 of the postintervention period. Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program and RDT intervention bundle in a multihospital health care system is associated with improved appropriateness of EAT for GNBSI and decreased utilization of BSAA through early de-escalation.

Download Full-text

2025. Evaluation of the Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Hospital in Northern Italy: Efficacy of a Persuasive Approach on Antibiotics Consumption and Rate of Clostridium difficile Infection

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1705 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S679-S680

Author(s):

Erika Chiari ◽

Davide Mangioni ◽

Ester Pollastri ◽

Liana Signorini ◽

Giovanni Moioli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clostridium Difficile ◽

Clostridium Difficile Infection ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Positive Impact ◽

Epidemiological Data ◽

Tertiary Hospital ◽

Northern Italy ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Bed Days ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) situation in Italian hospitals and regions represents a major public health threat [ECDC, 2017]. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), particularly when based on local epidemiology, have been beneficial in optimizing antibiotic therapy as well as reducing hospital rates of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and AMR [Akpan MR, Antibiotics 2016].. Methods Our ASP program has been conducted at Spedali Civili General Hospital of Brescia, Northern Italy (1300-bed tertiary hospital), between the beginning of 2016 and the end of 2017. A preliminary analysis of local epidemiological data was performed (Table 1). Seven groups (“districts”) were identified according to microbiological and clinical similarities. This was a persuasive-based ASP. First, we trained physicians on general principles of AS, then guidelines for the management of “difficult-to-handle” infections were drafted based on international guidelines and local microbiological data (Table 2).. Results Here we show the results of pre-ASP (2015) vs. post-ASP (2018) analysis on antibiotic consumption (AC) and CDI rates. AC is expressed in DDD/100 bed-days. The overall hospital AC decreased from 84.31 to 76.84 (−9%), consistently with national recommendations [Italian National Plan against AMR, 2017]. In accordance with the local guidelines developed within our ASP, carbapenem consumption decreased from 5.77 to 4.87 (−16%) and fluoroquinolones (FLQ) from 14.45 to 9.94 (−31%). At the same time piperacillin/tazobactam use increased from 5.53 to 8.46 (53%). 3°–4°G cephalosporins and glycopeptides consumption slightly reduced from 11.78 to 11.42 (−3%) and from 4.07 to 3.83 (−6%), respectively. AC of the different districts involved is reported in Table 3. CDI rates decreased from 0.0434/100 bed-days in 2015 to 0.0315/100 bed-days in 2018 (−27%) (Figure 1). Conclusion Our ASP was a persuasive-based program in a setting of high AMR rates. In the short term, it has shown a positive impact in improving AC (in particular of broad-spectrum antibiotics with a high risk of resistance selection and CDI) and CDI rates. Audits for local guidelines adherence and the evaluation of AC, AMR and CDI rates are ongoing as long-term quality measures for assessing the impact of our ASP. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

43. Impact of a Five-Year Intervention of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on the Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis Selection in Surgery in a Hospital without Restrictions on Antibiotics Prescription in Costa Rica

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.245 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S143-S143

Author(s):

José P Díaz-Madriz ◽

Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel ◽

Jorge A Villalobos-Madriz ◽

Alison V Meléndez-Alfaro ◽

Priscilla Castrillo-Portillo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Bacterial Resistance ◽

Positive Impact ◽

Surgical Site Infections ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽

Defined Daily Doses ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

The Impact ◽

Selection Of

Abstract Background In a private hospital without restrictions on antibiotic prescription, the success of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) depends mainly on prospective feedback and education. Previously, the ASP of this hospital (PROA-HCB) managed to achieve a positive impact on the antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study is to characterize the impact after implementing the PROA-HCB on the optimal prophylaxis selection of all the procedures included in the clinical guideline for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in adult patients. Methods A retrospective observational study that compares the selection, duration, antibiotic consumption, bacterial resistance profiles and patient’s safety outcomes regarding antibiotic use for all surgical prophylaxis prescription over six months for the periods before (pre-ASP) and after a five-year intervention of PROA-HCB (post-ASP). Results After a five-year intervention, the percentage of optimal selection of antibiotic prophylaxis in Surgery was 21.0% (N=1598) in the pre-ASP period and 80.0% (N=841) in the post-ASP period (59% absolute improvement, p < 0.001). Percentage of optimal duration was 69,1% (N=1598) in the pre-ASP period and 78.0% (N=841) in the post-ASP period (8.9% absolute improvement, p < 0.001). Mean ceftriaxone utilization was 217.7 defined daily doses (DDD) per 1,000 patient days DDD for the pre-ASP period and 139.8 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the ASP period (35.8% decrease; p = 0.019). Mean cefazolin utilization was 14.9 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the pre-ASP period and 153.3 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the ASP period (928.6% increase; p = 0.021). Regarding percentage of bacterial resistance, there was detected an improvement in some isolates like Escherichia coli with a decrease of ESBL detection (11% decrease; p = 0.007). In addition, no serious adverse reactions or an increase in surgical site infections were detected after the intervention. Conclusion The implementation of an ASP in the surgical ward showed an overall positive impact on selection and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Furthermore, this intervention could have had a positive impact on antimicrobial resistance and at the same time had no negative effects on the patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

An Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Based on Systematic Infectious Disease Consultation in a Rehabilitation Facility

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2016.233 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 38 (1) ◽

pp. 76-82 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Sara Tedeschi ◽

Filippo Trapani ◽

Maddalena Giannella ◽

Francesco Cristini ◽

Fabio Tumietto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Infectious Disease ◽

Antimicrobial Resistance ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Antibiotic Consumption ◽

Defined Daily Dose ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽

Rehabilitation Hospital ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Resistance Patterns ◽

The Impact

OBJECTIVETo assess the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on antibiotic consumption, Clostridium difficile infections (CDI), and antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rehabilitation hospital.DESIGNQuasi-experimental study of the periods before (from January 2011 to June 2012) and after (from July 2012 to December 2014) ASP implementation.SETTING150-bed rehabilitation hospital dedicated to patients with spinal-cord injuries.INTERVENTIONBeginning in July 2012, an ASP was implemented based on systematic bedside infectious disease (ID) consultation and structural interventions (ie, revision of protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis and education focused on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions). Antibiotic consumption, occurrence of CDI, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of selected microorganisms were compared between periods before and after the ASP implementation.RESULTSAntibiotic consumption decreased from 42 to 22 defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 patient days (P<.001). The main reductions involved carbapenems (from 13 to 0.4 DDD per 100 patient days; P=.01) and fluoroquinolones (from 11.8 to 0.99 DDD per 100 patient days; P=.006), with no increases in mortality or length of stay. The incidence of CDI decreased from 3.6 to 1.2 cases per 10,000 patient days (P=.001). Between 2011 and 2014, the prevalence of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains decreased from 55% to 12% in P. aeruginosa (P<.001) and from 96% to 73% in A. baumannii (P=.03). The prevalence of ESBL-producing strains decreased from 42% to 17% in E. coli (P=.0007) and from 62% to 15% in P. mirabilis (P=.0001). In K. pneumoniae, the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant strains decreased from 42% to 17% (P=.005), and the prevalence of in methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains decreased from 77% to 40% (P<.0008).CONCLUSIONSAn ASP based on ID consultation was effective in reducing antibiotic consumption without affecting patient outcomes and in improving antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rehabilitation hospital.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;1–7

Download Full-text

1115. Reducing Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Multimodal Stewardship Intervention

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.979 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S396-S397

Author(s):

Maryrose R Laguio-Vila ◽

Mary L Staicu ◽

Mary Lourdes Brundige ◽

Jose Alcantara-Contreras ◽

Hongmei Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Urinary Tract ◽

Phase I ◽

Urinary Tract Infections ◽

Broad Spectrum ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Intervention Phase ◽

Broad Spectrum Antibiotics ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Tract Infections

Abstract Background Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the second most common reason for antibiotics in hospitalized patients, with most receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA) regardless of infection severity. The antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) conducted a multimodal stewardship intervention targeting reduction in one BSA, ceftriaxone, and promoted narrow-spectrum antibiotics (NSA) such as cefazolin and cephalexin for uncomplicated UTIs. Methods Phase 1: In February 2018, the ASP created a pocket card (Figure 1) containing (1) a urinary antibiogram outlining the most common urine pathogens and their local susceptibility to NSA and (2) NSA guidelines for UTIs with 0–1 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. ASP performed a daily prospective audit with feedback on all new orders of ceftriaxone and promoted prescription of NSA. Phase 2: In August 2018, a Best Practice Alert (BPA) in the electronic medical record (EMR) was designed to interrupt providers ordering ceftriaxone with the indication of a UTI, and prompted NSA prescription instead. Quarterly didactic sessions on UTI antibiotic use and BPA functionality were done. We compared antibiotics usage rates across the 3 study phases (pre-intervention, phase I and phase II) by computing rate ratios (RRs) using Poisson regression. Results Compared with pre-intervention, phase 1 resulted in a significant decrease in ceftriaxone DOT (RR: 1.06, CI: 1.03–1.09, P < 0.001) and ceftriaxone orders for UTI (RR: 1.14, P < 0.001) and an increase in cefazolin DOT (RR: 0.89, P = 0.029) and orders for UTI (RR; 0.12, P < 0.001). It also resulted in a significant increase in cephalexin DOT (RR: 0.92, P = 0.002) and orders for UTI (RR: 0.58, P < 0.001). In phase 2, an additional significant reduction in ceftriaxone DOT (RR: 1.04, CI: 1.01–1.08, P = 0.018) and orders for UTI (RR: 1.62, P < 0.001) and an increase in cefazolin DOT (RR: 0.96, P < 0.001) and orders for UTI (RR; 0.56, P < 0.001) occurred, when comparing phase I to phase 2. It also resulted in a decrease in cephalexin DOT (RR: 0.83, P < 0.001) and orders for UTI (RR: 0.70, P < 0.001). Conclusion A multimodal stewardship intervention using a pocket card with guidelines and urine antibiogram, and an EMR BPA successfully reduced BSA and increased NSA for treatment of uncomplicated UTIs. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

786. Diagnostic stewardship of C difficile PCR testing with two step algorithm- A rural community hospital experience

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.976 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S437-S438

Author(s):

Raghavendra Tirupathi ◽

Ruth Freshman ◽

Norma Montoy ◽

Melissa Gross

Keyword(s):

Phase 1 ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Step Test ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Risk Adjustment Model ◽

Step Algorithm ◽

Two Phases ◽

The Impact ◽

Test Ordering

Abstract Background An estimated 15% of hospitalized patients are asymptomatic carriers of C. diff. Inappropriate testing can lead to over diagnosis, treatment, isolation & substantial financial penalties. Ours is a rural 310 bed hospital with nurse driven C. diff test ordering protocol. Due to inadvertent test ordering, we had an uptick in the HO-CDI incidence with rates as high as 0.94 per 1000 patient days in 2017. In order to streamline testing, we initiated an infection preventionist(IP) led diagnostic stewardship program which was implemented in two phases in 2017-2019 Methods The phase 1 involved daily review by IPs regarding the legitimacy of PCR order for minimum 3 loose stools in 24 hours, use of laxatives, presence of symptoms.There were concerns nationally that then CDI risk adjustment model from NHSN in 2017 does not optimally account for the impact of specific CDI testing methods used by individual hospitals on CDI SIRs. Hence, in Jan 2018 NHSN’s MDRO/CDI Protocol stated “Results of the final test that are placed in the patient’s medical record should be used to determine whether event meets the CDI LabID defn”.This led to phase 2 in mar 2019 which involved two step testing which started with C diff PCR assay with positive test reflexed to the toxin A/B assay. Results During the first phase, and a full year of the protocol in 2018, the number of completed PCR tests decreased to 626 (compared to 940 PCR tests in 2016) with an 34% decrease. In the year following implementation of the Diagnostic Stewardship, HO CDI decreased from 60 in 2017 to 43 events in 2018 with a reduction of 28%. Subsequently, HO CDI further decreased in 2019 to 28 with a reduction of 35%. Since the start of the project in 2017, HO CDI have decreased 54% in total. The reduction in 314 C diff PCR tests in the first year[2017-2018] led to a savings of $8300 in lab supplies. No readmissions with C difficile infection documented within 30 days on patients who did not meet the criterion for testing. Significant decrease in the usage of C difficile antibiotics. After the start of the two step test, we have seen a precipitous drop in our HO-CDI rates to less than 0.3 per 1000 pt days by the end of 2019. Quarterly comparison of HO CDI incidence for 2017-2020 HO CDI incidence before and following phase 1 and phase 2 interventions C. difficile antibiotic use trends during intervention period Conclusion IP run diagnostic stewardship programs with two step tests are highly successful in streamlining testing and in discriminating infection from colonization Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

1068. Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) Managed by an Infectious Disease Physician and Pharmacists in a Community Hospital

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.932 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S378-S379

Author(s):

Jeanne Brady PharmD ◽

Mahendra Poudel

Keyword(s):

Infectious Disease ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Community Hospital ◽

Critical Role ◽

Resistant Bacteria ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽

Infectious Disease Physician ◽

Stewardship Program ◽

Days Of Therapy ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is one of the basis for the control of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR), optimization of antibiotic use, minimization of adverse events, and reduction of unnecessary costs. We demonstrate the design, development, and participation in ASP program following CDC and Prevention Core Elements strategies.1,3,4 The objective is to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacists working in conjunction with infectious disease (ID) physician on tracking and documenting antibacterial utilization in per patient-days, pharmacist clinical interventions, prescriber practices, and antibiotic purchases. Methods We conducted a multidisciplinary-team project of pharmacist-led prospective-audit-with-feedback ASP from 2015 to 2018. The ID physician and clinical pharmacist conducted patient care rounds twice weekly to make recommendations that include de-escalation, intensification of treatment, alternative therapy, dose optimization, order clarification, stop date/duration, additional monitoring, education, restriction enforcement, consult, IV to PO conversion, rejection of recommendation, and total monitored interventions requiring no changes. Results Pharmacist tracked between 150 and 200 interventions monthly through the EMR system, reflecting both self-stewardship and during rounds with ID physician. Figures 2–8: Charts display the number of patient-days of therapy per 1,000 days at risk and yearly SVMH Antibacterial Utilization Rates compared nationally to other Teaching and Nonteaching hospitals.5 Below each graph exhibits yearly Drug Spend per patient-days of Therapy.6 Conclusion Overall, the antibiotic utilization rates decreased over 4 years, particularly with aztreonam, meropenem, and levofloxacin.The formalization of an antimicrobial stewardship partnership between ID physician and pharmacy team led to increases in pharmacist-recommended interventions, streamlining of antimicrobial therapy, as well as decreases in antimicrobial purchasing costs. Proactively working in conjunction with hospitalists allows the pharmacists to play a critical role in sustaining a robust ASP service at our community hospital. The ASP at SVMH can serve as a model for other community hospitals with similar resources. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

69. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on post-elective caesarean antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infections

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.114 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S53-S53

Author(s):

Xue Fen Valerie Seah

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽

Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Antibiotic Prescribing ◽

Oral Antibiotic ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Oral Antibiotics ◽

Post Intervention ◽

Intervention Phase

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) aim to improve appropriate antimicrobial use. This study aims to evaluate the impact of ASP interventions on post-elective caesarean (eLSCS) oral antibiotic prophylaxis use. In a subgroup of those without surgical site infection (SSI) risk factors, 30-day SSI rates was compared in those who received post-eLSCS oral antibiotics vs. those without. Methods This pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted over 9 months (2 months pre- and 7 months post-intervention) in all women admitted for eLSCS in our institution. Interventions included eLSCS surgical prophylaxis guideline dissemination, where a single antibiotic dose within 60 minutes before skin incision was recommended. Post-eLSCS oral antibiotics was discouraged in those without SSI risk factors (e.g. obesity). This was followed by ASP intervention notes (phase 1) for 3 months, and an additional phone call to the ward team for the next 4 months (phase 2). Results A total of 894 women were reviewed. There were 244 women in the pre-intervention phase, 274 in post-intervention phase 1 and 376 in phase 2. Pre-intervention post-eLSCS antibiotic prescribing rates was 82% (200), compared to 54% (148) in phase 1 and 49% (180) in phase 2 (p< 0.001). There were 560 women without SSI risk factors. Of these, only 4 of 301 (1.3%) who received oral antibiotics, and 3 of 259 (1.2%) without oral antibiotics developed post-op SSI (p=1.000). Conclusion ASP can reduce post-eLSCS antibiotic prophylaxis. In those without SSI risk factors, use of post-eLSCS oral antibiotics did not impact SSI rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

The Effects of Technology Supports on Community Grocery Shopping Skills for Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis

Journal of Special Education Technology ◽

10.1177/0162643421989970 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 016264342198997

Author(s):

Sojung Jung ◽

Ciara Ousley ◽

David McNaughton ◽

Pamela Wolfe

Keyword(s):

Developmental Disabilities ◽

Positive Impact ◽

Single Case ◽

Effect Sizes ◽

Future Research ◽

Intellectual And Developmental Disabilities ◽

Positive Effects ◽

Analytic Review ◽

Wide Range ◽

The Impact

In this meta-analytic review, we investigated the effects of technology supports on the acquisition of shopping skills for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) between the ages of 5 and 24. Nineteen single-case experimental research studies, presented in 15 research articles, met the current study’s inclusion criteria and the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) standards. An analysis of potential moderators was conducted, and we calculated effect sizes using Tau-U to examine the impact of age, diagnosis, and type of technology on the reported outcomes for the 56 participants. The results from the included studies provide evidence that a wide range of technology interventions had a positive impact on shopping performance. These positive effects were seen for individuals across a wide range of ages and disability types, and for a wide variety of shopping skills. The strongest effect sizes were observed for technologies that provided visual supports rather than just auditory support. We provide an interpretation of the findings, implications of the results, and recommended areas for future research.

Download Full-text