Effects of establishment method and water management on yield and water productivity of tropical lowland rice

AbstractModification of the existing cropping practice is needed to maintain rice (Oryza sativa L.) productivity and reduce irrigation water input. A 2-year field experiment was conducted during the dry rice growing season of 2016 and 2017 at the Asian Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani, Thailand, to investigate the effects of establishment method and irrigation level on growth, yield, and water productivity of irrigated lowland rice. The treatments consisted of two Thai rice cultivars (Pathumthani 1 and RD57), two establishment methods (dry direct seeding [DDS] and transplanting [TP]), and three irrigation levels (continuous flooding [CF], 15 cm threshold water level below the soil surface for irrigation [AWD15], and 30 cm threshold water level below the soil surface for irrigation [AWD30]). Overall, the performance of RD57 was better than Pathumthani 1 under DDS with 50% higher grain yield and 90% higher water productivity at AWD15. RD57 also had higher shoot dry matter, number of tiller m–2, and number of panicle m–2 across establishment methods and irrigation levels. Grain yield and water productivity of RD57 were similar under two establishment methods across irrigation levels, whereas the performance of TP was better than DDS for Pathumthani 1 irrespective of irrigation levels. The highest grain yield and water productivity of Pathumthani 1 was observed at AWD15 under TP and that of RD57 under both establishment methods at the same irrigation level. AWD15 saved 26 and 32% irrigation water under TP and DDS, respectively, compared with TP-CF treatment combination. AWD15 irrigation level could be recommended for greater water productivity without compromising yield when Pathumthani 1 is cultivated through TP and RD57 is cultivated through either DDS or TP. Although water-saving potential was higher compared with CF, AWD30 is not recommended for irrigated lowland rice cultivation due to significant yield reduction.

Download Full-text

Refinement of Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation Method for Rice Cultivation

Bangladesh Rice Journal ◽

10.3329/brj.v17i1-2.20899 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 17 (1-2) ◽

pp. 33-37 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Priya Lal Chandra Paul ◽

MA Rashid ◽

Mousumi Paul

Keyword(s):

Grain Yield ◽

Water Level ◽

Block Design ◽

Water Productivity ◽

Ground Surface ◽

Soil Surface ◽

Ground Level ◽

Wetting And Drying ◽

Alternate Wetting And Drying ◽

Below Ground

Experiments were conducted at BRRI farm Gazipur during Boro season 2010-12 to determine maximum depth of water level below ground surface in alternate wetting and drying (AWD) method. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with four irrigation treatments. The treatments of AWD method were: T1 = continuous standing water, T2 = irrigation when water level reached 15 cm below ground level, T3 = irrigation when water level reached 20 cm below ground level and T4 = irrigation when water level reached 50 cm below ground level. The experiment involved BRRI dhan28 as a test crop. The treatment T2 gave the highest grain yield (5.9 and 6.2 ton/ha) in 2010-11 and 2011-12, respectively. Maximum benefits per hectare were found Tk. 5476 and 4931 for using 807 and 880 mm water during 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively and thus water productivity was 7.1 kg/ha-mm in T2 for both the seasons. Continuous standing (T1) water (1013 and 1100 mm) gave comparable grain yield 5.7 and 6.0 ton/ha in 2010-11 and 2011-12, respectively. Minimum water productivity was found in treatment T1 (5.6 and 5.4 kg/ha-mm) for both the seasons. Application of irrigation when water was 15 cm below soil surface was found most profitable in AWD system and the grain yield was decreased when water level was below 15 cm depth. Therefore, the recommended AWD technology could increase rice yield and save irrigation water by 25-30 percent.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/brj.v17i1-2.20899Bangladesh Rice j. 2013, 17(1&2): 33-37

Download Full-text

INCREASING WATER PRODUCTIVITY OF LOWLAND RICE THROUGH THE WATER SAVING TECHNIQUES AND CROP MANAGEMENT IN RESPONSE TO DROUGHT

Agromet ◽

10.29244/j.agromet.23.2.123-147 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 23 (2) ◽

pp. 123

Author(s):

Didiek Setiobudi ◽

Hasil Sembiring

Keyword(s):

Grain Yield ◽

Irrigation Water ◽

Yield Components ◽

Water Productivity ◽

Moisture Stress ◽

Water Saving ◽

Lowland Rice ◽

Wet Season ◽

Soil Moisture Stress ◽

Rice Varieties

The water saving technology for lowland rice cultivation was very crucial because of in the future irrigation water become scarce and competed with other sectors. The lowering of the availability of irrigation water had the impact for sustainability of rice production. The review of the paper described the pattern of basic water requirement, yield responses of several lowland rice varieties to moisture stress, days interval irrigation and the alternatives of water saving techniques for improving yield and water productivity. The pattern of the actual water requirement (ET+P&S) showed the maximum value of 8.8 mm/day (1.02 lt/sec/ha) for high yielding varieties (HYV) that occurred from heading to 50% flowering. Under limited water supply, irrigation water should be applied that period to prevent yield loss. Soil moisture stress at moderate level (- 0.5 bar) from heading to full flowering was significantly decreased yield about 30% when compared with the yield of continuously flooded 3 cm depth. This period was a critical period of HYV to soil moisture stress. For rotational irrigation purposes, information of the optimum days interval irrigation was important. It was found that 3 days irrigation interval was a critical limit for HYV to achieve higher yield. The SRI model of rice cultivation had the lowest rice yield in the lowland soil, poor drainage, clay soil texture and low permeability. The modified irrigation of the SRI plus fertilizer N based on LCC readings gave a greater yield as well as water productivity. The hybrid and NPT line rice varieties had higher yield components and grain yield than Ciherang variety. Ciherang variety was not favor to grown for the wet season, it was more productive when grown in dry season even with AWD irrigation model. The plant spacing of 25 cm x 25 cm gave higher number of panicle/hill and number of spikelet/panicle under both AWD and continuously flooded 3 cm depth for dry and wet season consistently. The fertilizer N management based on SSNM with low and high rates for the early vegetative stage were not significantly affected all yield components and grain yield. The AWD irrigation could save irrigation water about 18% when compared to the continuously flooded conditions.The grain yield of the hybrid, inbred and NPT line rice varieties was higher for the dry season than wet season under both AWD irrigation and continuous flooding consistently.

Download Full-text

Effect of planting methods and irrigation levels on water productivity of onion (Allium cepa L.)

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research ◽

10.18805/ijare.a-4221 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 51 (05) ◽

Author(s):

M. S. Kahlon

Keyword(s):

Allium Cepa ◽

Irrigation Water ◽

Sandy Loam ◽

Water Productivity ◽

Flood Irrigation ◽

Irrigation Level ◽

Planting Methods ◽

Allium Cepa L ◽

Irrigation Levels ◽

Irrigation Water Productivity

To investigate the effect of planting methods and irrigation levels on irrigation water productivity and onion (Allium cepa L.) yield, a field experiment was conducted on sandy loam soil at the Research Farm of Department of Soil Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during rabi 2011-12. Three planting methods tested include drip irrigated beds, furrow irrigated beds and flat flood irrigation. In drip irrigated beds and furrow irrigated beds three onion rows were planted on 55 cm wide beds at a spacing of 15 cm from row to row. Three levels of irrigation water were tested i.e. IW/PAN-E ratio of 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 in drip irrigated onions and 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 in both bed furrow and flat flood methods of irrigation. The results of the experiment indicated that in drip irrigated beds by applying same quantity and 50 per cent of water as of flat flood irrigation, the yield was increased by 43 and 25 per cent, respectively. Irrespective of irrigation levels, highest onion yield (32.5 t ha-1) was recorded under drip irrigated beds followed by furrow irrigated beds (28.5 t ha-1) and least under flat flood irrigation method (25.0 t ha-1). The onion yield increases with the increase in irrigation level in all the planting methods. The highest irrigation water productivity was observed under drip irrigated beds (1.26 t ha-1 cm) followed by furrow irrigated beds (0.84 t ha-1 cm) and least under flat flood irrigation (0.48 t ha-1 cm) with equivalent IW/PAN-E ratios. Bigger size onions (40 mm and 50 mm) were observed under drip irrigated beds followed by furrow irrigated beds and smallest size bulbs under flat flood method of irrigation. The results revealed that drip irrigation could successfully be used for onion production with significant water saving and higher production.

Download Full-text

Evaluating AquaCrop for simulating response of tomato to irrigation induced salinity

10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9459 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yuki Ito ◽

Alon Ben-Gal

Keyword(s):

Irrigation Water ◽

Gradual Increase ◽

Soil Surface ◽

Water Salinity ◽

Irrigation Level ◽

Experimental Database ◽

Class A ◽

Irrigation Water Salinity ◽

Irrigation Levels ◽

Polyethylene Mulch

AquaCrop is considered a reliable simulation model to predict crop yield. AquaCrop is supported by the FAO and seems to provide reasonable balance between accuracy and simplicity. While AquaCrop handles crop response to conditions of salinity, there have been few studies evaluating its accuracy to this parameter. We evaluated AquaCrop for its ability to simulate crop growth, transpiration and yield under conditions of irrigation-induced salinity using an experimental database of tomato grown during different meteorological conditions and demands under highly varied conditions of irrigation water salinity and irrigation amounts.Field and lysimeter experiments were carried out in the Southern Arava Valley in Israel in fall and spring seasons. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cultivar &#8216;5656&#8217;) was grown. Irrigation in the field was managed with treatments of 30, 60, 100, and 130% of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) of Class A pan with irrigation water salinity (ECI = electrical conductivity of irrigation water) of 3 dS m-1. Irrigation treatments in the lysimeters were six ECI levels from 1 to 11 dS m-1 all at 130% of ET0 and five irrigation levels of 30, 60, 100, 130 and 160 % of ET0 all at ECI of 3 dS m-1. ECI was regulated adding 1:1 Molar concentrations NaCl and CaCl2. Irrigation was applied via drippers from soil surface covered with polyethylene mulch to reduce evaporative losses to a minimum. AquaCrop was run to calculate yield and transpiration in fall and spring. The datasets of meteorological, crop, management, and soil data were obtained from field-measured results.Predicted biomass at the end of both growing periods agreed relatively well with measured biomass. Patterns of accumulated transpiration were different in the two seasons, with gradual increase to a stable maximum in the fall and continued increase in the spring. Irrigation level and salinity were found to effect biomass, transpiration and yield alternatively, with irrigation dominant at low ECI levels and salinity dominant when irrigation application was relatively high. Transpiration was simulated well, showing similar trends of the measured data in lysimeters in both fall and spring. The biomass in fall and spring was predicted relatively well. Following these results, AquaCrop appears applicable for simulation of salinity effects on yield and transpiration, at least under conditions similar to those of the current study.

Download Full-text

Optimum Water Use in Conservation Tillage for Wheat Cultivation

Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research ◽

10.3329/bjar.v37i1.11172 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 37 (1) ◽

pp. 27-37

Author(s):

KK Sarker ◽

PK Sarkar ◽

AZ Sarker ◽

AMFT Islam ◽

Wang Xiaoyan

Keyword(s):

Grain Yield ◽

Water Use ◽

Irrigation Water ◽

Conservation Tillage ◽

Research Centre ◽

Irrigation Level ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Tillage System ◽

Irrigation Levels ◽

Tillage Methods

Conservation tillage system offers numerous benefits over intensive tillage system. This experiment was conducted on conservation tillage using zero tilldrill, power tiller operated seeder (PTOS) and bed planter along with farmers practice of tillage by rotary tiller under different irrigation levels at Wheat Research Centre (WRC), Nashipur, Dinajpur. Irrigation water was applied by 5 irrigation levels at different growth stages of the crop. The irrigation levels were I0 (No irrigation), I1 (17-21 DAS), I2 (17-21 DAS + 50-55 DAS). I3 (17-21 DAS+ 50-55 DAS + 75-80 DAS), and I4 (17-21 DAS + 35-40 DAS + 50-55 DAS + 75 80 DAS). It was observed that the sowing cost was reasonably reduced than that of the farmer's practice. Seasonal water use was less in PTOS than other tillage methods. Grain yield was significantly affected by tillage methods. The higher grain yield was found from PTOS, bed planting, and zero tillage than that of farmer's practice. There was no significant difference within the interaction effect of tillage methods and irrigations. The effect of irrigation level was found highly significant on grain yield. Water use efficiency increased with decrease of irrigation water use and decreased with increase of irrigation. Average yields in all tillage methods under I1, I2, I3, and I4 irrigation levels were found to increase by 33, 43, 52, and 51 percent, respectively, compared to that of I0. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v37i1.11172 Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 37(1): 27-37, March 2012

Download Full-text

High Nitrogen Fertilization Modulates Morpho-Physiological Responses, Yield, and Water Productivity of Lowland Rice under Deficit Irrigation

Agronomy ◽

10.3390/agronomy11071291 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (7) ◽

pp. 1291

Author(s):

Nasr M. Abdou ◽

Mohamed A. Abdel-Razek ◽

Shimaa A. Abd El-Mageed ◽

Wael M. Semida ◽

Ahmed A. A. Leilah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Nitrogen Fertilizer ◽

Irrigation Water ◽

Nitrogen Fertilization ◽

Deficit Irrigation ◽

Physiological Responses ◽

Water Productivity ◽

Water Shortage ◽

Rice Production ◽

Lowland Rice ◽

Nitrogen Fertilizers

Sustainability of rice production under flooding conditions has been challenged by water shortage and food demand. Applying higher nitrogen fertilization could be a practical solution to alleviate the deleterious effects of water stress on lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in semi-arid conditions. For this purpose, field experiments were conducted during the summer of 2017 and 2018 seasons. These trials were conducted as split-split based on randomized complete blocks design with soil moisture regimes at three levels (120, 100 and 80% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc), nitrogen fertilizers at two levels (N1—165 and N2—200 kg N ha−1) and three lowland Egyptian rice varieties [V1 (Giza178), V2 (Giza177) and V3 (Sakha104)] using three replications. For all varieties, growth (plant height, tillers No, effective tillers no), water status ((relative water content RWC, and membrane stability index, MSI), physiological responses (chlorophyll fluorescence, Relative chlorophyll content (SPAD), and yield were significantly increased with higher addition of nitrogen fertilizer under all water regimes. Variety V1 produced the highest grain yield compared to other varieties and the increases were 38% and 15% compared with V2 and V3, respectively. Increasing nitrogen up to 200 kg N ha−1 (N2) resulted in an increase in grain and straw yields by 12.7 and 18.2%, respectively, compared with N1. The highest irrigation water productivity (IWP) was recorded under I2 (0.89 kg m−3) compared to (0.83 kg m−3) and (0.82 kg m−3) for I1 and I3, respectively. Therefore, the new applied agro-management practice (deficit irrigation and higher nitrogen fertilizer) effectively saved irrigation water input by 50–60% when compared with the traditional cultivation method (flooding system). Hence, the new proposed innovative method for rice cultivation could be a promising strategy for enhancing the sustainability of rice production under water shortage conditions.

Download Full-text

Performances of Sheet-Pipe Typed Subsurface Drainage on Land and Water Productivity of Paddy Fields in Indonesia

Water ◽

10.3390/w13010048 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 48

Author(s):

Chusnul Arif ◽

Budi Indra Setiawan ◽

Satyanto Krido Saptomo ◽

Hiroshi Matsuda ◽

Koremasa Tamura ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Grain Yield ◽

Water Productivity ◽

Type System ◽

Soil Surface ◽

Subsurface Drainage ◽

Crop Productivity ◽

Paddy Fields ◽

Soil Conditions ◽

Rice Varieties ◽

Soil Aeration

Subsurface drainage technology may offer a useful option in improving crop productivity by preventing water-logging in poor drainage paddy fields. The present study compared two paddy fields with and without sheet-pipe type subsurface drainage on land and water productivities in Indonesia. Sheet-pipe typed is perforated plastic sheets with a hole diameter of 2 mm and made from high-density polyethylene. It is commonly installed 30–50 cm below the soil surface and placed horizontally by a machine called a mole drainer, and then the sheets will automatically be a capillary pipe. Two fields were prepared, i.e., the sheet-pipe typed field (SP field) and the non-sheet-pipe typed field (NSP field) with three rice varieties (Situ Bagendit, Inpari 6 Jete, and Inpari 43 Agritan). In both fields, weather parameters and water depth were measured by the automatic weather stations, soil moisture sensors and water level sensors. During one season, the SP field drained approximately 45% more water compared to the NSP field. Thus, it caused increasing in soil aeration and producing a more significant grain yield, particularly for Inpari 43 Agritan. The SP field produced a 5.77 ton/ha grain yield, while the NSP field was 5.09 ton/ha. By producing more grain yield, the SP field was more effective in water use as represented by higher water productivity by 20%. The results indicated that the sheet-pipe type system developed better soil aeration that provides better soil conditions for rice.

Download Full-text

Lupin grain yields and fertiliser effectiveness are increased by banding superphosphate below the seed

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture ◽

10.1071/ea9910357 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 31 (3) ◽

pp. 357 ◽

Cited By ~ 24

Author(s):

RJ Jarvis ◽

MDA Bolland

Keyword(s):

Grain Yield ◽

Vegetative Growth ◽

Field Experiments ◽

Soil Surface ◽

Growing Season ◽

Lupinus Angustifolius ◽

Grain Yields ◽

P Content ◽

Better Than

Five field experiments with lupins (Lupinus angustifolius) measured the effectiveness, for production, of 4 superphosphate placements either: (i) drilled with the seed to a depth of 4 or 5 cm; (ii) applied to the soil surface (topdressed) before sowing; or (iii) banded 2.5-5 cm and 7.5-8 cm below the seed while sowing. Levels of applied phosphate (P) from 0 to 36 kg P/ha were tested. In all experiments lupin grain yield responded to the highest level of superphosphate applied. At this P level, the average grain yield from all trials was 1.16 t/ha for the deepest banded treatment. This was 0.38 t/ha (49%) better than P drilled with the seed, and 0.62 t/ha (115%) better than P topdressed. Relative to superphosphate drilled with the seed and regardless of the lupin cultivar or the phosphate status of the soil, the effectiveness of superphosphate was increased by 10-90% by banding below the seed, and decreased by 30-60% by topdressing. Increasing the levels of superphosphate drilled with the seed generally reduced the density of seedlings and reduced early vegetative growth, probably due to salt or P toxicity. However, during the growing season, the plants treated with high levels of superphosphate recovered, so that eventually yields of dried tops and grain responded to increasing superphosphate drilled with the seed. In each experiment there was a common relationship between yield and P content in lupin tissue, regardless of how the superphosphate was applied, suggesting that lupins responded solely to P, and other factors did not alter yield. We recommend that farmers band superphosphate 5-8 cm below the seed while sowing, rather than continue the present practices of either drilling the fertiliser with the seed, or topdressing it before sowing.

Download Full-text

Grain Yield and Resource Use Efficiencies of Upland and Lowland Rice Cultivars under Aerobic Cultivation

Agronomy ◽

10.3390/agronomy9100591 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (10) ◽

pp. 591 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Liu ◽

Zhan ◽

Hussain ◽

Nie

Keyword(s):

Grain Yield ◽

Resource Use ◽

Upland Rice ◽

Water Productivity ◽

Lowland Rice ◽

Growth Potential ◽

Yield Potential ◽

Rice Cultivars ◽

Panicle Number ◽

Aerobic Cultivation

Aerobic rice has the potential to replace transplanted flooded rice, as rice cultivation is seriously threatened by environmental and social factors. Although the recently released upland rice cultivars have higher drought tolerance, low yield potential of these cultivars makes them less feasible for high-yielding rice planting regions under aerobic cultivation. In this study, typical lowland rice cultivars (Huanghuazhan and Yangliangyou6) were evaluated for grain yield and resource use efficiencies under aerobic cultivation as compared with upland rice cultivars (Lvhan1 and Hanyou3). Averaged across different years, lowland rice cultivars recorded 26.9%, 14.6%, and 26.6% higher grain yield, water productivity, and nitrogen use efficiency for grain production (NUEg), respectively, as compared with upland cultivars. The higher grain yield of lowland rice cultivars under aerobic cultivation was mainly attributed to the higher aboveground biomass and the spikelet number per panicle, along with a higher harvest index and panicle number per unit area with respect to upland rice cultivars. During the entire growing season in aerobic cultivation, rainfall accounted for 60% to 85% of the total water use, which indicates that lowland rice cultivars could make better use of the rainfall because of a longer growth duration and a higher growth potential. In summary, this study suggests that with appropriate irrigation, lowland rice cultivars could grow well and furnish higher yield than the current upland rice cultivars under aerobic cultivation.

Download Full-text