On the turbulent flow over a wavy boundary

1970 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 721-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russ E. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Numerical Solutions ◽  
Approximate Solutions ◽  
Travelling Wave ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Wave Surface ◽  
Asymptotic Results ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
The Mean

Two hypotheses concerning the turbulent flow over an infinitesimal-amplitude travelling wave are investigated. One hypothesis, originally made by Miles, is that the wave does not affect the turbulence and therefore the turbulent Reynolds stresses are dependent only on height above the mean wave surface. Alternatively, the proposal that turbulent stresses are primarily dependent on height above the instantaneous wave surface is examined. Numerical solutions of the appropriate equations are compared with Stewart's recent experimental results and with the approximate solutions employed by Miles and others. No definite conclusion can be reached from comparison with experimental results since the predicted flows are quite sensitive to details of the mean velocity profile near the wave surface where no data was taken. It is found that the asymptotic results do not apply for the conditions investigated.

Measurements of Losses and Reynolds Stresses in the Secondary Flow Downstream of a Low-Speed Linear Turbine Cascade

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. MacIsaac ◽  
S. A. Sjolander ◽  
T. J. Praisner
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Pressure Probe ◽  
Turbine Cascade ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Hole Pressure ◽  
The Mean

Experimental measurements of the mean and turbulent flow field were preformed downstream of a low-speed linear turbine cascade. The influence of turbulence on the production of secondary losses is examined. Steady pressure measurements were collected using a seven-hole pressure probe and the turbulent flow quantities were measured using a rotatable x-type hotwire probe. Each probe was traversed downstream of the cascade along planes positioned at three axial locations: 100%, 120% and 140% of the axial chord (Cx) downstream of the leading edge. The seven-hole pressure probe was used to determine the local total and static pressure as well as the three mean velocity components. The rotatable x-type hotwire probe, in addition to the mean velocity components, provided the local Reynolds stresses and the turbulent kinetic energy. The axial development of the secondary losses is examined in relation to the rate at which mean kinetic energy is transferred to turbulent kinetic energy. In general, losses are generated as a result of the mean flow dissipating kinetic energy through the action of viscosity. The production of turbulence can be considered a preliminary step in this process. The measured total pressure contours from the three axial locations (1.00, 1.20 and 1.40Cx) demonstrate the development of the secondary losses. The peak loss core in each plane consists mainly of low momentum fluid that originates from the inlet endwall boundary layer. There are, however, additional losses generated as the flow mixes with downstream distance. These losses have been found to relate to the turbulent Reynolds stresses. An examination of the turbulent deformation work term demonstrates a mechanism of loss generation in the secondary flow region. The importance of the Reynolds shear stress to this process is explored in detail.

Turbulent flow over large-amplitude wavy surfaces

1984 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 27-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Buckles ◽  
Thomas J. Hanratty ◽  
Ronald J. Adrian
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Velocity Fields ◽  
Laser Doppler Velocimeter ◽  
Free Shear Layer ◽  
Wave Surface ◽  
Velocity Measurements ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Wavy Surfaces ◽  
The Mean

The laser-Doppler velocimeter is used to measure the mean and the fluctuating velocity for turbulent flow over a solid sinusoidal wave surface having a wavelength λ of 50.8 mm and a wave amplitude of 5.08 mm. For this flow, a large separated region exists, extending from x/λ = 0.14 to 0.69. From the mean velocity measurements, the time-averaged streamlines and therefore the extent of the separated region are calculated. Three flow elements are identified: the separated region, an attached boundary layer, and a free shear layer formed by the detachment of the boundary layer from the wave surface. The characteristics of these flow elements are discussed in terms of the properties of the mean and fluctuating velocity fields.

Laboratory studies of the velocity field over deep-water waves

1970 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Field ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Water Waves ◽  
Numerical Solutions ◽  
Viscous Sublayer ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Measured Velocity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Deep Water Waves

The mean-velocity field over monochromatic, 1·96 Hz, deep-water waves was measured by means of hot-wire anemometers for a range of wind speeds (relative to wave speed) of 0·4 to 3·0. The mean-velocity profile, over waves 0·64 cm in amplitude, was the same as that over a rough plate; that is, the mean velocity varied as the logarithm of the height above the mean-water level, except very close to the water, where the effect of the viscous sublayer became important. The wave-induced perturbation-velocity field and its associated Reynolds stresses were also measured and compared with numerical solutions of various linear equations governing shearing flow over a wavy boundary. The comparison showed that the measured velocity field was not well predicted by these theories.

Measurements of Losses and Reynolds Stresses in the Secondary Flow Downstream of a Low-Speed Linear Turbine Cascade

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. MacIsaac ◽  
S. A. Sjolander ◽  
T. J. Praisner
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Pressure Probe ◽  
Turbine Cascade ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Hole Pressure ◽  
The Mean

Experimental measurements of the mean and turbulent flow field were preformed downstream of a low-speed linear turbine cascade. The influence of turbulence on the production of secondary losses is examined. Steady pressure measurements were collected using a seven-hole pressure probe and the turbulent flow quantities were measured using a rotatable x-type hotwire probe. Each probe was traversed downstream of the cascade along planes positioned at three axial locations: 100%, 120%, and 140% of the axial chord (Cx) downstream of the leading edge. The seven-hole pressure probe was used to determine the local total and static pressure as well as the three mean velocity components. The rotatable x-type hotwire probe, in addition to the mean velocity components, provided the local Reynolds stresses and the turbulent kinetic energy. The axial development of the secondary losses is examined in relation to the rate at which mean kinetic energy is transferred to turbulent kinetic energy. In general, losses are generated as a result of the mean flow dissipating kinetic energy through the action of viscosity. The production of turbulence can be considered a preliminary step in this process. The measured total pressure contours from the three axial locations (1.00, 1.20, and 1.40Cx) demonstrate the development of the secondary losses. The peak loss core in each plane consists mainly of low momentum fluid that originates from the inlet endwall boundary layer. There are, however, additional losses generated as the flow mixes with downstream distance. These losses have been found to relate to the turbulent Reynolds stresses. An examination of the turbulent deformation work term demonstrates a mechanism of loss generation in the secondary flow region. The importance of the Reynolds shear stresses to this process is explored in detail.

Prediction of Confined Coaxial Turbulent Jet Mixing With a Streamwise Differencing Scheme

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. R. Sharif ◽  
M. A. Gadalla
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Low Velocity ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Jet Mixing ◽  
Air Jet ◽  
Air Stream ◽  
Constant Diameter ◽  
Flow Domain ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Secondary Air

Abstract Isothermal turbulent mixing of an axisymmetric primary air jet with a low velocity annular secondary air stream inside a constant diameter cylindrical enclosure is predicted. The flow domain from the inlet to the fully developed downstream locations is considered. The predicted flow field properties include the mean velocity and pressure and the Reynolds stresses. Different velocity and diameter ratios between the primary and the secondary jets have been investigated to characterize the flow in terms of these parameters. A bounded stream-wise differencing scheme is used to minimize numerical diffusion and oscillation errors. Predictions are compared with available experimental data to back up numerical findings.

Hot Wire Measurements at the Exit of a Centrifugal Compressor Impeller

1979 ◽  
Vol 193 (1) ◽  
pp. 341-347
Author(s):  
A. Goulas ◽  
R. C. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Centrifugal Compressor ◽  
Magnetic Tape ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Hot Wire ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Isentropic Flow ◽  
Compressor Impeller ◽  
The Mean

Hot wire measurements at the exit of a small centrifugal compressor impeller are reported. Three different hot wire readings were obtained and stored on a magnetic tape for each point by gating the analogue hot wire signal with a pulse which indicated circumferential position. The combination of the three readings yielded the mean velocity and some Reynolds stresses at each point. The measurements show a ‘jet-wake’ profile towards the shroud and ‘isentropic’ flow near the hub.

On Turbulent Flow Between Parallel Plates

1953 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-114
Author(s):  
S. I. Pai
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Velocity Distribution ◽  
Poiseuille Flow ◽  
The Other ◽  
Turbulent Velocity ◽  
Parallel Plates ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Reynolds Equations ◽  
Mean Pressure ◽  
The Mean

Abstract The Reynolds equations of motion of turbulent flow of incompressible fluid have been studied for turbulent flow between parallel plates. The number of these equations is finally reduced to two. One of these consists of mean velocity and correlation between transverse and longitudinal turbulent-velocity fluctuations u 1 ′ u 2 ′ ¯ only. The other consists of the mean pressure and transverse turbulent-velocity intensity. Some conclusions about the mean pressure distribution and turbulent fluctuations are drawn. These equations are applied to two special cases: One is Poiseuille flow in which both plates are at rest and the other is Couette flow in which one plate is at rest and the other is moving with constant velocity. The mean velocity distribution and the correlation u 1 ′ u 2 ′ ¯ can be expressed in a form of polynomial of the co-ordinate in the direction perpendicular to the plates, with the ratio of shearing stress on the plate to that of the corresponding laminar flow of the same maximum velocity as a parameter. These expressions hold true all the way across the plates, i.e., both the turbulent region and viscous layer including the laminar sublayer. These expressions for Poiseuille flow have been checked with experimental data of Laufer fairly well. It also shows that the logarithmic mean velocity distribution is not a rigorous solution of Reynolds equations.

scholarly journals Self-consistent triple decomposition of the turbulent flow over a backward-facing step under finite amplitude harmonic forcing

2019 ◽  
Vol 475 (2225) ◽  
pp. 20190018
Author(s):  
E. Yim ◽  
P. Meliga ◽  
F. Gallaire
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Finite Amplitude ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Backward Facing Step ◽  
Eddy Viscosity Model ◽  
Coherent Interaction ◽  
Self Consistent ◽  
The Mean

We investigate the saturation of harmonically forced disturbances in the turbulent flow over a backward-facing step subjected to a finite amplitude forcing. The analysis relies on a triple decomposition of the unsteady flow into mean, coherent and incoherent components. The coherent–incoherent interaction is lumped into a Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) eddy viscosity model, and the mean–coherent interaction is analysed via a semi-linear resolvent analysis building on the laminar approach by Mantič-Lugo & Gallaire (2016 J. Fluid Mech. 793 , 777–797. ( doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.109 )). This provides a self-consistent modelling of the interaction between all three components, in the sense that the coherent perturbation structures selected by the resolvent analysis are those whose Reynolds stresses force the mean flow in such a way that the mean flow generates exactly the aforementioned perturbations, while also accounting for the effect of the incoherent scale. The model does not require any input from numerical or experimental data, and accurately predicts the saturation of the forced coherent disturbances, as established from comparison to time-averages of unsteady RANS simulation data.

Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Flow Through a 90° Elbow

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravon Venters ◽  
Brian Helenbrook ◽  
Goodarz Ahmadi
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Streamline Curvature ◽  
Secondary Motion ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Flow Transitions

Abstract Turbulent flow in an elbow has been numerically investigated. The flow was modeled using two approaches; Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) methods. The DNS allows for all the scales of turbulence to be evaluated, providing a detailed depiction of the flow. The RANS simulation, which is typically used in industry, evaluates time-averaged components of the flow. The numerical results are accompanied by experimental data, which was used to validate the two methods. Profiles of the mean and root-mean-square (RMS) fluctuating components were compared at various points along the midplane of the elbow. Upstream of the elbow, the predicted mean and RMS velocities from the RANS and DNS simulations compared well with the experiment, differing slightly near the walls. However, downstream of the elbow, the RANS deviated from the experiment and DNS, showing a longer region of flow re-circulation. This caused the mean and RMS velocities to significantly differ. Examining the cross-section flow field, secondary motion was clearly present. Upstream secondary motion of the first kind was observed which is caused by anisotropy of the reynolds stresses in the turbulent flow. Downstream of the bend, the flow transitions to secondary motion of the second kind which is caused by streamline curvature. Qualitatively, the RANS and DNS showed similar results upstream of the bend, however downstream, the magnitude of the secondary motion differed significantly.

Measurements with a pulsed-wire and a hot-wire anemometer in the highly turbulent wake of a normal flat plate

1976 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. S. Bradbury
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Flat Plate ◽  
Flow Direction ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Turbulent Intensity ◽  
Hot Wire ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Better Than

This paper describes an investigation into the response of both the pulsed-wire anemometer and the hot-wire anemometer in a highly turbulent flow. The first part of the paper is concerned with a theoretical study of some aspects of the response of these instruments in a highly turbulent flow. It is shown that, under normal operating conditions, the pulsed-wire anemometer should give mean velocity and longitudinal turbulent intensity estimates to an accuracy of better than 10% without any restriction on turbulence level. However, to attain this accuracy in measurements of turbulent intensities normal to the mean flow direction, there is a lower limit on the turbulent intensity of about 50%. An analysis is then carried out of the behaviour of the hot-wire anemometer in a highly turbulent flow. It is found that the large errors that are known to develop are very sensitive to the precise structure of the turbulence, so that even qualitative use of hot-wire data in such flows is not feasible. Some brief comments on the possibility of improving the accuracy of the hot-wire anemometer are then given.The second half of the paper describes some comparative measurements in the highly turbulent flow immediately downstream of a normal flat plate. It is shown that, although it is not possible to interpret the hot-wire results on their own, it is possible to calculate the hot-wire response with a surprising degree of accuracy using the results from the pulsed-wire anemometer. This provides a rather indirect but none the less welcome check on the accuracy of the pulsed-wire results, which, in this very highly turbulent flow, have a certain interest in their own right.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document