1. According to electromagnetic theory, the line-integral ∫ H . ds of the magnetic force H taken round any closed curve is equal to 4πI, where I is the electric current threading the curve, H and I being measured in c.g.s. units. Such line-integrals have been calculated by Gauss and many later investigators for various curves on the earth’s surface, in order to determine whether any electric current flows upwards or downwards across the surface. Modern computations for large areas lead in general to values of ∫ H . ds differing from zero by amounts that correspond to current-densities of the order 3·10
-2
ampere/km.
2
. The magnetic field of such currents would account for 2 or 3 per cent, of the earth’s surface field. These results are inconsistent with the direct measurements of the atmospheric electric potential gradient and the ionisation of the air, which indicate a verticalcurrent-density of the order 3·10
-6
amp./km.
2
. If the magnetic estimates are reliable, the discrepancy indicates either that atmospheric electric currents exist which escape measurement, though they are 10,000 times as great as those which are measured, or that the relation ∫ H . ds = 4πI, which is one of the foundations of electromagnetic theory, is not strictly correct. These alternatives are so remarkable that the magnetic evidence must be above suspicion if it is to gain credence. Dr. L. A. Bauer holds that the results got from independent sets of data, for different epochs, and the mutual accordance of the results from neighbouring areas, justify the acceptance of the non-zero line-integrals, and that to explain them away it is necessary to assume quite unlikely systematic errors in the magnetic data. Other investigators show less conviction: for example, Sir Frank Dyson and H. Furner conclude that “though there is some evidence for Prof. Bauer’s results, the existence of vertical electric currents is not indicated with any great certainty.” But though the magnetic evidence may not be conclusive, it cannot be lightly dismissed, and in view of the importance of the question Sir Arthur Schuster has recently urged the desirability of a detailed magnetic survey of a small area as the best means of obtaining a definite conclusion.